Green River killer Ridgway pleads guilty to 49th murder
Gary L. Ridgway, the Green River killer, pleaded guilty Friday [18th February 2011]to the 2002 [1982?] slaying of Rebecca "Becky" Marrero.
By Jennifer Sullivan
Seattle Times staff reporter
Ann Rule put a link to your article on her web site which I've just read since I finished her book about Ridgway "Green River, Running Red" yesterday.
You noted important points which were questions I had about whether he would jeopardise his agreement and face the death penalty.
I wrote the following to Ann Rule about this situation and thought you might like to see these comments too.
******
When Dave Reichert met with Ridgway just before his sentencing in Dec 2003, he might have known conclusively that Ridgway was holding back info, and he might have known exactly what it was but could not reveal its source and needed Ridgway to divulge it. The whole set up of moving him into their operational room where he slept and was interrogated could have been done to facilitate the secrecy of brainwave monitoring which has been done to me since February 2001. I know it exists, what it can do and that it was operational during his interrogation.
They could read his thoughts by a process of intercepting his electromagnetic radiation halo surrounding his head 24/7 to note all his thoughts especially when he was being interrogated, thinking about his crimes and while asleep when memory could be probed. The signals could be sent by microwave to another location, or there could have been others in another office unknown to the officers carrying out the investigation except Dave Reichert. Presumably, no one but him would know since it is so secret.
He would want Ridgway to stay another six months to get him to admit to them what they knew he held in his mind. This interception is based upon a principle called Tempest which has been in development since at least the 1950s for monitoring electronic devices like telephone lines, crypto gear and later computers. During this development process, it is logical that the human brain, a computer also with its own electrical generating source, would be so monitored and decoded.
Although it took me about six months from Feb 2001 when this was introduced by Colonel Vine USMC Ret and Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret to the surveillance activity against me already in place since Aug 1998, I was able to learn that they could see through my eyes, hear with my ears, read my thoughts (words & images) and feed back sound to me electronically so that I could hear what they were saying. There is much more too. This was the manner of interrogating me 24/7 to read my thought reactions by bombarding me continuously with the electronic transmission of sound regardless of my location. They could also induce dreams and probe memory during the night as I slept.
The reason I learned all of this was due to the fact that those using this surveillance technology were psycho/sociopaths (ASPDs) who engaged in sadistic torture and did not hesitate to let me know what they were doing. Especially key to this was the mother of the abused children whom I had reported for child abuse in May 1998. I'll call her BS. She got the surveillance technology installed against me in Aug 1998 and proceeded to carry out the torture abuse as part of a large group of neighbours using initially radar imaging from the flat above mine along with more conventional surveillance including Tempest against computers. I knew everything that was happening and who was involved. There were no mysterious "they."
When Vine and Bird came along 2.5 years into this in Feb 2001 just after Bush was inaugurated in the US (I live in London's N Kensington), I just picked up what they were doing in the same way only improved by the most sophisticated surveillance technology ever. BS and Bird have been the two present all the time 24/7/365 and could not keep their mouths shut. That is why I know them well enough to be able to call them psycho/sociopaths (ASPDs) from Robert Hare’s PCL-R since I have a total of 13 years (actually 15+ years since it was two years before I reported the child abuse in the flat below mine) experience of them 24/7/365 with the surveillance technology and can accurately make that assessment.
I believe that by 2003 this neuroscience based surveillance technology (it could track me and do all its activities wherever I was located) was being used throughout law enforcement in the US for such interrogations. I believe that it was used at Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib in connection with more conventional torture methods to breakdown resistance so that thoughts floated to the surface. The difficulty would be language at these military facilities, but not so in US law enforcement with its prisoners.
It really looks like this was a perfect set up for that activity with its bizarre placement of the killer right with the investigating team. Dave Reichert wanted six more months but had to get it from Ridgway voluntarily in some manner. He did not succeed. I also see his "reward" as a US GOP Congressman following on after this success given the information they did get and the use for R&D they could obtain from this most heinous of serial killers. The GOP came and helped him out from the top. I suspect that the FBI was heavily involved but not known as such outwardly. Funny that Dave Reichert should threaten to bring in the FBI as if the investigative team were inadequate.
Nick Broomfield'’s second documentary about Aileen Wournos c 2004 started in 2002: "Aileen: Life & Death of a Serial Killer." I saw it on Channel4 here and went to the West End to see it in a cinema immediately afterwards I was so captured by what I had seen. She said three things:
1) they put a circuit board behind her mirror above her sink in her cell;
2) they put a microwave dish on top of the Broward County jail about the time she started getting;
3) what she called "noise pressure" in her head.
I wanted to see if there were more indications of what I knew was being done to me with the neuroscience based surveillance technology that existed from at least Feb 2001 in my direct experience. I did not think she was mentally ill and only needed someone to listen to her with understanding as difficult as this might have been. Since no one did, she displayed her verbal aggression which, I believe, they sought to produce in order to discredit what she might reveal. There was little doubt she was quite disturbed, but they appeared to be adding another layer.
The sad part is that she wanted to be executed since she was treated so badly which the State of Florda did in October 2002 at Raiford just like Ted Bundy almost 14 years earlier. The most important thing is to keep these people alive to get all the information from them as is possible to prevent these murders and its kind of behaviour in the future. The problem is that those using this neuroscience technology abuse it trying to create mental illness and destroying people as I've been experiencing for over a decade.
Florida was especially compliant to the demands of those with this neuroscience technology, I believe, since Jeb Bush was George Bush's brother and its governor. The general disposition of Florida law enforcement to kill as you noted in your book about Ted Bundy is also a factor although I must state that my father was not like that at all. I suspect that by 2003 this neuroscience technology would be ideal to use in conjunction with Ridgway's investigation, and its usage with him might even go back to when he was caught from 30th Nov 2001 onwards.
Although I believe that it is right and proper to use such neuroscience technology in this manner, I take great exception, as I would, against its abuse when used indefinitely against innocent people like me by those whom I reported for crimes starting with child abuse. When this neuroscience surveillance technology is in the hands of psycho/sociopaths (ASPDs) who are free to do whatever they want with it indefinitely until their target dies, it destroys the whole foundation of democratic society abrogating the protection of the innocent while ensuring the prosecution of the guilty. The reverse happens and in such a way that it cannot be stopped easily. The worst case scenario is that psycho/sociopathic (ASPDs) serial killers like Ridgway and Bundy will be able to do their crimes officially with surveillance technology of this kind.
In my case BS & Bird are "cleaners" just like Ridgway only they are attacking the aged inside their homes to kill them off so that the younger can take over their homes and possessions which is being done to me. Why I study this carefully and document it all is to be able to stop what I perceive to be the beginning of serial killers' activity which will accelerate and never stop until they are stopped. I don't want to see a whole string of deaths (Dr Shipman killed over 200 of his patients in the UK before he was finally stopped) occur before those in authority wise up to the problem.
The great problem here is that this is happening inside government itself with the police and NHS (National Health Service) participating along with many others in a position of authority. It's out of control, and no one knows what they are doing. That's why your educating the public about serial killers and their psychology is so critically important because the same thing is happening in the US as well as here that I directly experience.
All of this needs to be open in a democratic society, and the public protected. There is a whole new foundation for crime here as well as great help in protecting the public, but it is not being used for that in my direct experience. See how valuable your books are! Thanks again. Gary
******
Sincerely yours
Gary D Chance
http://garydchance.com/
http://garydchance.tripod.com/surveillance/
http://garydchance.bravejournal.com/
http://garydchance-gary.blogspot.com/
http://twitter.com/garydchance
Facebook, MySpace & YouTube as garydchance
Recommended reading:
"The Female Homicide Offender: Serial Murder and the Case of Aileen Wuornos," Stacey L Shipley & Brice A Arrigo, Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2004. Chapter 9 especially Robert Hare's Psychopath Check List (Revised) (PCL-R) pps 122-6.
"The Psychopath Test: a Journey Through the Madness Industry," Jon Ronson, Picador, London 2011. Chapter 4: The Psychopath Test
"The Sociopath Next Door," Martha Stout, Ph.D., Broadway Books, New York, 2005.
"Without Conscience: the Disturbing World of the Psychopaths Among Us," Robert D Hare, Ph.D., The Guilford Press, New York, 1999.
"Snakes in Suits: When Psychopaths Go to Work," Paul Babiak, Ph.D. & Robert D Hare, Ph.D., Harper, New York, 2006.
"The Stranger Beside Me," Ann Rule, Warner Books, London, 1994 (First published in the US by W W Norton and Company, inc., 1980)
"Green River, Running Red," Ann Rule, Pocket Star Books, 2005 (Free Press, New York, 2004)
Monday, 22 August 2011
Monday, 8 August 2011
"Former New York Police Chief Says He'd Lead Scotland Yard" The Daily Beast
Bill Bratton Interview: Former New York Police Chief Says He'd Lead Scotland Yard -The Daily Beast Ms May won't let him
I wrote this on Sunday, 7th August 2011. On Sunday night there was a second night of rioting and looting across London.
London riots spread south of Thames | UK news | guardian.co.uk to Brixton & east. 100 arrrested & 35 police injured
I think that this article is so important it deserves a more full consideration of the issues that are surfacing with regard to policing throughout the UK as well as in London since they reflect the failure of the Constitutional Monarchy form of Parliamentary government that currently exists with its unwritten constitution.
This problem is at the core of the foundation of a civilised and democratic UK that is being rent asunder by incompetence and corruption while terrorism, organised and serious crime threaten.
The criminals including those from within, quite literally, are taking over because no one is doing anything to stop general criminality.
This article is an outstanding summary of the problems and why they exist in the UK. Police corruption and incompetence has developed over decades as a result of the brain drain, and incompetent, corrupt officers feathering their nests driving out those who would do better. It's coming apart now as it inevitably will while the Home Secretary Teresa May knows how bad it is and needs to contain it by perpetuating the old system, old boy network: to get along police must go along and stay on message. Instead of a democratic response to incompetence and corruption there is a bureaucratic one which permeates the British government. Teresa May is not responsible to a nation wide democratically elected head of state. She is responsible to her constituency only. That is why Britain is failing so dramatically at present. This Parliamentary system no longer works.
The police corruption and incompetence problem in London today is far worse than that of the 1960s NYPD when all were on the "pad" as exposed by Frank Serpico and the Knapp Commission and was cleaned up by John Lindsay appointing a new commissioner because he was accountable politically to all the people of New York. It took a huge effort to get the corruption exposed then. Can Boris Johnson act like John Lindsay did 40 years ago? No.
The elements today that impact the corruption and incompetence in London are far more serious and embedded than anyone imagines or Mr Bratton describes as the basic policing issues or the complexity of terrorism and protection for the Monarch and others. The terrible corruption and incompetence that still exists unknown which I have experienced directly for 13 years 24/7/365 are and have been covered up by all in government despite its widespread knowledge and use involving hundreds of people from multiple departments of government.
I am talking about the ongoing and continuous Toxic Surveillance used against me in North Kensington to falsely imprison, torture interrogate continuously, carry out medical experimentation, further surveillance technology R&D and ultimately execute to cover up any "resistance" from speaking the truth and providing evidence about all that has happened. This has been covered up by all Home Secretaries (Straw, Blunkett, anon), Foreign Secretaries (Straw again), Chancellors, Prime Ministers (Blair, Brown and now Cameron) and other ministers of state such as those for the NHS and more recently Justice (Straw once more and Clarke). My current MP as of May 2010 is the Chair of the Joint Intelligence and Security Committee, yet this extreme abuse goes on involving the US and UK governments. The government in the UK is non-functional in modern day Britain.
Toxic Surveillance is growing by the use of the general public in the UK who are being trained to use this technology and engage in its violence for control. These are criminals being developed by the government as a standard for behaviour. How can the police hope to cope with this situation and develop competence in law enforcement and avoid corruption when they are being trained at the ground level to be criminal supporters and criminals themselves as standard of practise?
This is what Teresa May wants to protect from exposure, and she will get the cooperation of both David Cameron and Boris Johnson although they might present a different public image for political purposes. Teresa May won't suffer since she is doing what they tacitly want by hiding this abuse further in the system that has prevailed for at least the past 13 years in my direct experience where I have notified commissioner after commissioner along with government ministers of state about this problem with no results. This is a tyranny not a democracy as Mr Bratton describes for policing by the Met in London.
A man or woman like Mr Bratton must come into the Met from the outside to take charge, but it will never happen. Look at what the British have done to the American woman who got the 2012 Olympic bid underway. She was wipe out brutally. Look at what the British did to the guy they brought in to restore the operational capacity of the London Underground. They bounced him when he had gotten it done. The British do not want anyone from the outside to actually do a proper job completely and entirely to receive recognition for it. They exploit instead, use people up and throw them out while claiming credit for the ongoing success. Britain is still psychologically in the 19th century colonial exploitation mode only they are also doing it to themselves as well as can be seen in the police.
1) Eight police officers including three senior officers are on trial in Swansea (Wales) for framing three men for killing a 20-year-old prostitute in 1988. They were convicted but freed after two years when their conviction was squashed on appeal. Finally, a decade later DNA resulted in the apprehension and conviction of the real killer. Now the extraordinary corruption by these eight police officers is coming out at their trial which is expect to run six months it is so complex.
BBC News - Lynette White case: Witness changes mind Mark Grommek broke down and told them what they wanted to hear.
2) The Cleveland Chief Constable (Police Chief) and his deputy were just arrested and suspended on corruption charges because they were too close to the local police oversight organisation among other things.
BBC News - Cleveland Police Chief Constable Sean Price suspended misconduct, abuse of position fraud & corrupt practice
3) The Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO), a private organisation, ran its own secret police force unaccountable in any way to the government and, therefore, the people of the UK where the Home Office denied any knowledge of it just like the Home Office denies any knowledge of what is being done to me. This was just exposed after many years last 10th January 2011 going back perhaps to 1998 when a police officer seconded from the Met to the ACPO secret police went over to the other side agreeing to testify on behalf of those whom he had infiltrated for years.
Police body set to be stripped of operational powers - Telegraph ACPO's secret intel gathering force infiltrated orgs.
4) Last night Tottenham in North London blew up in riots, burning and looting because a 29-year-old with four children was shot and killed by the police on Thursday. The police should have seen this coming and headed it off, but they did not. All they can say is that no one could have seen this coming. Nonsense.
Tottenham riots: police let gangs run riot and loot - Telegraph
This police corruption is nationwide and infiltrates the top brass all over the UK as well as extending to the ground level as I've directly experienced for 13 years since mid-August 1998. This is why I get death threats continuously as I attempt to expose and/or comment upon the truth about what is happening as I am doing now. The UK desperately needs someone like Mr Bratton but will never let anyone from the outside into the top position at the Met.
I'll bet there are a huge number of officers just like Frank Serpico was who wanted to do a genuine job of policing and public service but cannot given the machine that operates in favour of incompetence and corruption. Even if Mr Bratton gets into the job most likely they will eat him alive and spit him out as the British do over and over again. I don't know why anyone would want the job of Met Commissioner. The UK is disintegrating from within because the police do not enforce the law and are part of the criminal enterprise activities against which they are supposed to protect the public. Can anyone clean this up?
In the "Gangs of New York" New York State had to send in a separate police force to replace the one then in New York City during the 19th century because they were so corrupt. The New York City police even then refused to leave and fought against those sent in by New York State. Read the book, and you'll also see a bit of this in Martin Scorcese's film. There is no New York State equivalent to send in a separate police force into London to take over the Met. How will reform ever work given the current form of UK government and a Home Secretary like all Home Secretaries who will protect themselves at the expense of the people who eventually turn to riot and mayhem as occurred in Tottenham last night?
I wrote this on Sunday, 7th August 2011. On Sunday night there was a second night of rioting and looting across London.
London riots spread south of Thames | UK news | guardian.co.uk to Brixton & east. 100 arrrested & 35 police injured
I think that this article is so important it deserves a more full consideration of the issues that are surfacing with regard to policing throughout the UK as well as in London since they reflect the failure of the Constitutional Monarchy form of Parliamentary government that currently exists with its unwritten constitution.
This problem is at the core of the foundation of a civilised and democratic UK that is being rent asunder by incompetence and corruption while terrorism, organised and serious crime threaten.
The criminals including those from within, quite literally, are taking over because no one is doing anything to stop general criminality.
This article is an outstanding summary of the problems and why they exist in the UK. Police corruption and incompetence has developed over decades as a result of the brain drain, and incompetent, corrupt officers feathering their nests driving out those who would do better. It's coming apart now as it inevitably will while the Home Secretary Teresa May knows how bad it is and needs to contain it by perpetuating the old system, old boy network: to get along police must go along and stay on message. Instead of a democratic response to incompetence and corruption there is a bureaucratic one which permeates the British government. Teresa May is not responsible to a nation wide democratically elected head of state. She is responsible to her constituency only. That is why Britain is failing so dramatically at present. This Parliamentary system no longer works.
The police corruption and incompetence problem in London today is far worse than that of the 1960s NYPD when all were on the "pad" as exposed by Frank Serpico and the Knapp Commission and was cleaned up by John Lindsay appointing a new commissioner because he was accountable politically to all the people of New York. It took a huge effort to get the corruption exposed then. Can Boris Johnson act like John Lindsay did 40 years ago? No.
The elements today that impact the corruption and incompetence in London are far more serious and embedded than anyone imagines or Mr Bratton describes as the basic policing issues or the complexity of terrorism and protection for the Monarch and others. The terrible corruption and incompetence that still exists unknown which I have experienced directly for 13 years 24/7/365 are and have been covered up by all in government despite its widespread knowledge and use involving hundreds of people from multiple departments of government.
I am talking about the ongoing and continuous Toxic Surveillance used against me in North Kensington to falsely imprison, torture interrogate continuously, carry out medical experimentation, further surveillance technology R&D and ultimately execute to cover up any "resistance" from speaking the truth and providing evidence about all that has happened. This has been covered up by all Home Secretaries (Straw, Blunkett, anon), Foreign Secretaries (Straw again), Chancellors, Prime Ministers (Blair, Brown and now Cameron) and other ministers of state such as those for the NHS and more recently Justice (Straw once more and Clarke). My current MP as of May 2010 is the Chair of the Joint Intelligence and Security Committee, yet this extreme abuse goes on involving the US and UK governments. The government in the UK is non-functional in modern day Britain.
Toxic Surveillance is growing by the use of the general public in the UK who are being trained to use this technology and engage in its violence for control. These are criminals being developed by the government as a standard for behaviour. How can the police hope to cope with this situation and develop competence in law enforcement and avoid corruption when they are being trained at the ground level to be criminal supporters and criminals themselves as standard of practise?
This is what Teresa May wants to protect from exposure, and she will get the cooperation of both David Cameron and Boris Johnson although they might present a different public image for political purposes. Teresa May won't suffer since she is doing what they tacitly want by hiding this abuse further in the system that has prevailed for at least the past 13 years in my direct experience where I have notified commissioner after commissioner along with government ministers of state about this problem with no results. This is a tyranny not a democracy as Mr Bratton describes for policing by the Met in London.
A man or woman like Mr Bratton must come into the Met from the outside to take charge, but it will never happen. Look at what the British have done to the American woman who got the 2012 Olympic bid underway. She was wipe out brutally. Look at what the British did to the guy they brought in to restore the operational capacity of the London Underground. They bounced him when he had gotten it done. The British do not want anyone from the outside to actually do a proper job completely and entirely to receive recognition for it. They exploit instead, use people up and throw them out while claiming credit for the ongoing success. Britain is still psychologically in the 19th century colonial exploitation mode only they are also doing it to themselves as well as can be seen in the police.
1) Eight police officers including three senior officers are on trial in Swansea (Wales) for framing three men for killing a 20-year-old prostitute in 1988. They were convicted but freed after two years when their conviction was squashed on appeal. Finally, a decade later DNA resulted in the apprehension and conviction of the real killer. Now the extraordinary corruption by these eight police officers is coming out at their trial which is expect to run six months it is so complex.
BBC News - Lynette White case: Witness changes mind Mark Grommek broke down and told them what they wanted to hear.
2) The Cleveland Chief Constable (Police Chief) and his deputy were just arrested and suspended on corruption charges because they were too close to the local police oversight organisation among other things.
BBC News - Cleveland Police Chief Constable Sean Price suspended misconduct, abuse of position fraud & corrupt practice
3) The Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO), a private organisation, ran its own secret police force unaccountable in any way to the government and, therefore, the people of the UK where the Home Office denied any knowledge of it just like the Home Office denies any knowledge of what is being done to me. This was just exposed after many years last 10th January 2011 going back perhaps to 1998 when a police officer seconded from the Met to the ACPO secret police went over to the other side agreeing to testify on behalf of those whom he had infiltrated for years.
Police body set to be stripped of operational powers - Telegraph ACPO's secret intel gathering force infiltrated orgs.
4) Last night Tottenham in North London blew up in riots, burning and looting because a 29-year-old with four children was shot and killed by the police on Thursday. The police should have seen this coming and headed it off, but they did not. All they can say is that no one could have seen this coming. Nonsense.
Tottenham riots: police let gangs run riot and loot - Telegraph
This police corruption is nationwide and infiltrates the top brass all over the UK as well as extending to the ground level as I've directly experienced for 13 years since mid-August 1998. This is why I get death threats continuously as I attempt to expose and/or comment upon the truth about what is happening as I am doing now. The UK desperately needs someone like Mr Bratton but will never let anyone from the outside into the top position at the Met.
I'll bet there are a huge number of officers just like Frank Serpico was who wanted to do a genuine job of policing and public service but cannot given the machine that operates in favour of incompetence and corruption. Even if Mr Bratton gets into the job most likely they will eat him alive and spit him out as the British do over and over again. I don't know why anyone would want the job of Met Commissioner. The UK is disintegrating from within because the police do not enforce the law and are part of the criminal enterprise activities against which they are supposed to protect the public. Can anyone clean this up?
In the "Gangs of New York" New York State had to send in a separate police force to replace the one then in New York City during the 19th century because they were so corrupt. The New York City police even then refused to leave and fought against those sent in by New York State. Read the book, and you'll also see a bit of this in Martin Scorcese's film. There is no New York State equivalent to send in a separate police force into London to take over the Met. How will reform ever work given the current form of UK government and a Home Secretary like all Home Secretaries who will protect themselves at the expense of the people who eventually turn to riot and mayhem as occurred in Tottenham last night?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)