Modern Medicine: Poison. How scientists went from finding antidotes to poisons to applying poisons as a cure Available until 11:29pm 29th October 2013 on the BBC iPlayer.
There is a stunning example of the proper functioning for approving drugs by the US when a woman at the FDA refused to grant approval for Thalidomide while it was being sold globally with tragic consequences that were eventually discovered. JFK gave her a medal for maintaining proper standards that protected women in the US from the horrible side effects of this morning sickness drug that destroyed their offspring the consequences with which the world is still grappling today.
Enclosed below is information from an Email from the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues with respect to its educational material which is linked there. I urge you to look at this educational material with respect to consent as presented by the Commission involving its investigative work and other aspects of research carried out in the community.
I have been subjected to such medical research by those who introduced neurological surveillance technology against me in February 2001 namely, Colonel Vine and Lt Harry Bird, both of the USMC (Res/Ret). This medical research as well as general surveillance technology R&D has been carried out in conjunction with the NHS and their own laboratories which I presume are located in the US.
I have brought this subject up continuously during the past 12+ years since February 2001 in connection with its being conducted outside a hospital environment without my consent let alone my having been informed except by its torture abuse and continuous side effects. Such medical experimentation formed a part of my recent Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) complaint on 1st April 2013.
In contrast to the woman from the US FDA who was awarded a medal by JFK for not allowing sub-standard drug development research to form the foundation for licensing Thalidomide in the US, Lt Harry Bird USMC (Res/Ret) was recently apparently given a medal for his activities in North Kensington, London, against me since February 2001 which have included medical research some of which involved incapacitants and/or debilitants. He was described as being in uniform on the day he was purportedly to receive this medal which has been often referenced since including during the past couple days.
The US Marine Corps is in charge of the Joint Non-Lethal Weapons Directorate (JNLWD) for all the US military at the Department of Defense. I believe that his connection with the US Marines which he flouts continuously, the US embassy and his activity including the purported receipt of a medal should be investigated throughly. There was a medical student present nightly a few years ago who refused to continue his participation on ethical grounds.
Every effort is currently being made to cover up this criminal activity as I continuously report.
Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues
Re-Introducing New Materials for Bioethics Education
You may have missed the original announcement as it went out just prior to the recent federal government shutdown. The Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues is back and we're pleased to share our new materials for bioethics education.
Don't forget to follow us on Twitter @bioethicsgov for news updates like this
Providing easily accessible and free materials based on the Bioethics Commission’s own analysis is an effort to help meet the repeated recommendations the advisors have made that bioethics education should be available to a wider variety of disciplines at the undergraduate, graduate, and professional levels. The new materials integrate content across the Bioethics Commission’s reports and are designed to support teaching of bioethics ideas, principles, and theories.
“Establishing the appropriate ethical foundation early in education and reinforcing it throughout a career allows professionals across disciplines to build rigorous ethics into their daily work and to anticipate problems, helping prevent ethical surprises and obstacles down the road,” explains Executive Director Lisa M. Lee, Ph.D., M.S., in a just-published Hastings Center Report essay about the new materials.
Read the Hastings Center Report essay
Download the education materials, including modules on informed consent and community engagement
Watch a video featuring commission representatives to learn more about the Bioethics Commission’s commitment to supporting bioethics education
Read more on our blog
Check out the Hastings Center Report call for papers for a special issue on teaching bioethics
View our webinar from September 19th where Bioethics Commission staff reviewed the materials and discussed their potential application in both traditional and nontraditional educational settings
The Bioethics Commission is committed to ensuring that future scientists, public health professionals, and health care providers are able to identify ethically challenging situations, to make morally sound decisions in response to these situations, and to seek and receive the support they need to do so.
Thursday, 24 October 2013
The Rabbit Never Escapes
US ambassador in Germany summoned in Merkel mobile row re NSA's monitoring her calls.
An untrustworthy ally? Chancellor Angela Merkel hails from East Germany that was the GDR until the Berlin Wall came down in 1989 just 24 years ago where the Stasi ran the state from its huge bureaucracy staffed by 15,000 on Normannenstrasse for overseas and domestic surveillance. Anna Funder goes on to describe in her book "Stasiland" how the public stormed the Stasi HQ. On page 57 she describes how the German media called the GDR "the most perfected surveillance state of all time."
She writes that the Stasi had 97,000 employees in a country of 17 million and goes on to describe that there was "one Gestapo agent for every 2,000 citizens" in Nazi Germany, and there was "one KGB agent for every 5,830 people" in the USSR. However, the Stasi had 173,000 informers in addition to its employees, and Anna Funder writes that when part time informers were added there were one for each 6.5 citizens in the GDR. Her book describes how this surveillance state controlled the lives and relationships of everyone. The West cannot allow anything like this to ever take a foothold, and Ms Merkel is doing exactly what needs to be done. Everyone else should follow her example. She knows what she is doing. [Facebook]
Frank Gardner commenting on the BBC News Channel said he would be surprised if allies were not spying on each other citing as an example the competition to sell arms thus making economic competition by nations subjected to spying for information in order to gain an advantage. His reporting is descriptive, as I took it, that does not reflect his or the BBC's point of view.
Such an attitude by nation states reflects the acceptance of spying that trickles down into a society where we have seen phone hacking in journalism taken on as acceptable if one could get away with it for competitive reasons. Of course, when the truth about the extent of this spying for gain became known, it turned into a national scandal with the Leveson Inquiry alongside an ongoing police investigation. Currently, there is a struggle taking place with respect to media guidelines as a result.
I hope everyone saw Ambassadors on BBC Two last night for it featured a satire about the diplomatic corps in a fictional country where the UK government was trying to compete against the French for a two billion pound sale of helicopters to this country while a British citizen was in prison facing faked murder charges and possible execution. I'll not say more that would ruin it for anyone who has not seen it yet that is available on the BBC iPlayer at:
Ambassadors: The Rabbit Never Escapes. Human rights cause trouble for a lucrative arms deal between the UK and Tazbekistan. Available until 8:59pm 13th November 2013
What I will say is that in North Kensington the same absurd false allegations have been made against me since 2001 as part of a totally invasive surveillance technology operation involving a vigilante mob surrounding my home who have distributed surveillance technology. These false allegations are intended to incite a violent mob hysterically for an emotional response to generate fear and hatred and keep the surveillance technology in place citing "He has to be monitored." As a result, there is a complete abrogation of human rights and the democratic rule of law reflecting the absence of any acceptable standards. If you can get away with it, then it's acceptable.
Naturally, Frank Gardner was describing the reality of international economic competition where nations have the power to carry out clandestine spying, but that standard exists now in the community as I've experienced directly 24/7/365 since 1998 which has contributed to terrorism, serious and organised crime and failures in government. This is called "reality" by these people here with their surveillance technology. Once the government itself starts down the slippery slope, where does it end?
A characteristic of psychopathy is competition where those engaged in this surveillance technology abuse against me are obsessed with winning or losing. They will do anything to win. The title of this Ambassadors' episode, The Rabbit Never Escapes, could very well apply to a surveillance target when psychopathic behaviour reflecting a competition for arms sales or surveillance technology power over others where those involved will do or say anything to win for their own personal gain which can be seen portrayed in this satire on BBC Two.
An untrustworthy ally? Chancellor Angela Merkel hails from East Germany that was the GDR until the Berlin Wall came down in 1989 just 24 years ago where the Stasi ran the state from its huge bureaucracy staffed by 15,000 on Normannenstrasse for overseas and domestic surveillance. Anna Funder goes on to describe in her book "Stasiland" how the public stormed the Stasi HQ. On page 57 she describes how the German media called the GDR "the most perfected surveillance state of all time."
She writes that the Stasi had 97,000 employees in a country of 17 million and goes on to describe that there was "one Gestapo agent for every 2,000 citizens" in Nazi Germany, and there was "one KGB agent for every 5,830 people" in the USSR. However, the Stasi had 173,000 informers in addition to its employees, and Anna Funder writes that when part time informers were added there were one for each 6.5 citizens in the GDR. Her book describes how this surveillance state controlled the lives and relationships of everyone. The West cannot allow anything like this to ever take a foothold, and Ms Merkel is doing exactly what needs to be done. Everyone else should follow her example. She knows what she is doing. [Facebook]
Frank Gardner commenting on the BBC News Channel said he would be surprised if allies were not spying on each other citing as an example the competition to sell arms thus making economic competition by nations subjected to spying for information in order to gain an advantage. His reporting is descriptive, as I took it, that does not reflect his or the BBC's point of view.
Such an attitude by nation states reflects the acceptance of spying that trickles down into a society where we have seen phone hacking in journalism taken on as acceptable if one could get away with it for competitive reasons. Of course, when the truth about the extent of this spying for gain became known, it turned into a national scandal with the Leveson Inquiry alongside an ongoing police investigation. Currently, there is a struggle taking place with respect to media guidelines as a result.
I hope everyone saw Ambassadors on BBC Two last night for it featured a satire about the diplomatic corps in a fictional country where the UK government was trying to compete against the French for a two billion pound sale of helicopters to this country while a British citizen was in prison facing faked murder charges and possible execution. I'll not say more that would ruin it for anyone who has not seen it yet that is available on the BBC iPlayer at:
Ambassadors: The Rabbit Never Escapes. Human rights cause trouble for a lucrative arms deal between the UK and Tazbekistan. Available until 8:59pm 13th November 2013
What I will say is that in North Kensington the same absurd false allegations have been made against me since 2001 as part of a totally invasive surveillance technology operation involving a vigilante mob surrounding my home who have distributed surveillance technology. These false allegations are intended to incite a violent mob hysterically for an emotional response to generate fear and hatred and keep the surveillance technology in place citing "He has to be monitored." As a result, there is a complete abrogation of human rights and the democratic rule of law reflecting the absence of any acceptable standards. If you can get away with it, then it's acceptable.
Naturally, Frank Gardner was describing the reality of international economic competition where nations have the power to carry out clandestine spying, but that standard exists now in the community as I've experienced directly 24/7/365 since 1998 which has contributed to terrorism, serious and organised crime and failures in government. This is called "reality" by these people here with their surveillance technology. Once the government itself starts down the slippery slope, where does it end?
A characteristic of psychopathy is competition where those engaged in this surveillance technology abuse against me are obsessed with winning or losing. They will do anything to win. The title of this Ambassadors' episode, The Rabbit Never Escapes, could very well apply to a surveillance target when psychopathic behaviour reflecting a competition for arms sales or surveillance technology power over others where those involved will do or say anything to win for their own personal gain which can be seen portrayed in this satire on BBC Two.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)