BBC News - UK infrastructure faces cyber threat, says GCHQ chief Director Iain Lobban
GCHQ Director Iain Lobban speaks out about risk and threat which also includes fundamental functioning of the UK as it does for any other country and the world. While he doesn't explicitly note Toxic Surveillance, he edges close it: It is most unusual to hear from him, and he addresses a critically important problem.
"While 80% of the threat to government systems could be dealt with through good information assurance practice - such as keeping security "patches" up to date - the remaining 20% was more complex and could not simply be solved by building "higher and higher" security walls." Read this as Tempest aka Toxic Surveillance.
" "There's a clear defensive angle. In order to flourish, a knowledge economy needs to protect from exploitation the intellectual property at the heart of the creative and high-tech industry sectors. It needs to maintain the integrity of its financial and commercial services." "
I am a victim of this and have been for almost a decade since February 2001 as I keep describing, but this overall threat and the destruction against me are from the government itself. He needs to address the threat from within as well as outside, otherwise there will be insurmountable moral and debilitating cynicism problems which will have the impact of terrorism without a bomb going off.
He will have to listen to the complaints of people like me. Reports that I generated at USAF Security Service HQ from March 1962 to October 1963 were copied to GCHQ. GCHQ relied upon that reporting from the office where I worked then. It will have to rely on that same reporting today by focusing on the content's validity. How does one send anything to GCHQ anyway these days?
Tuesday, 12 October 2010
Monday, 11 October 2010
MI5 & Police Responsible For 7/7 London Bombers Tracking Failure
July 7 inquiry: timeline of the 7/7 terror attacks - since the 7/7 London bombings. Telegraph Monday, 11th October 2010
21st May 2010: "Coroner Lady Justice Hallett rules that the inquests into the deaths of those killed in the [7/7] attacks should scrutinise alleged failings by police and the security services."
7th July 2005: "Suicide bombers Mohammed Sidique Khan, 30, Shehzad Tanweer, 22, Hasib Hussain, 18, and Jermaine Lindsay, 19, meet at Luton station."
11th May 2006: "A report by the Parliamentary Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) reveals that Khan and Tanweer were known to MI5 before the bombings but were not fully investigated because the Security Service had more pressing priorities."
19th May 2009: "A second ISC report discloses greater detail about what MI5 and the police knew about the bombers ahead of the attacks."
"Khan was photographed attending a suspected terrorist training camp in 2001 and was followed on several occasions in 2003 and 2004 by officers investigating Omar Khyam, the mastermind behind a foiled fertiliser bomb plot."
"But the report concludes that MI5 cannot be criticised for failing to follow up these leads because it was swamped with terror suspects at the time."
Starting in February 2001 Colonel Vine USMC Ret and Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret arrived in the UK heading for North Kensington, London, where they set up surveillance shop against me joining an already existing programme that had been under way 24/7/365 for 2.5 years.
They brought the most sophisticated surveillance ever known to human civilisation to use against me 24/7/365 faking an extensive number of allegations against me to perpetuate their false imprisonment, medical experimentation, surveillance R&D, torture and execution against me. The latter has so far not occurred.
This massive fraud was knowingly supported and sustained by Metropolitan Police officers "Paul Winston" and "Mike" who actively participated in the torture abuse. At that time surveillance in Kensington & Chelsea was headed by Bob Quick who was also driving the most expensive surveillance operation ever here against Ali Dizaei that eventually flopped in court. Bob Quick went on to head the Met's Anti-Terror Unit which was Special Branch with a name change.
I concluded from my experience that they faked it because they could not do a proper job and had the power to do as they pleased in the community carrying out abuse at will making up whatever they wanted to torture the innocent such as myself in order to move up the chain of command to higher rewards. Thus, they wasted a huge amount of resources in terms of money. time and personnel in my direct experience, and I concluded that they made a major contribution to the 7/7 terrorist attack.
To the best of my recollection I wrote a letter to MI5's Director-General in the first half of 2005 informing Lady Mannheim-Buller of this travesty of democratic justice and waste of resources which was not stopped then or at any time since.
This Toxic Surveillance has gone on without a second's respite for 12 years and two months 24/7/365 since mid-August 1998 to the present writing. I will be willing to testify about this experience if Lady Justice Hallett would like to hear what I have to say since she is emphasising the inability of MI5 and police to cope from 2001 to 2005 and track these terrorist when they became known.
21st May 2010: "Coroner Lady Justice Hallett rules that the inquests into the deaths of those killed in the [7/7] attacks should scrutinise alleged failings by police and the security services."
7th July 2005: "Suicide bombers Mohammed Sidique Khan, 30, Shehzad Tanweer, 22, Hasib Hussain, 18, and Jermaine Lindsay, 19, meet at Luton station."
11th May 2006: "A report by the Parliamentary Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) reveals that Khan and Tanweer were known to MI5 before the bombings but were not fully investigated because the Security Service had more pressing priorities."
19th May 2009: "A second ISC report discloses greater detail about what MI5 and the police knew about the bombers ahead of the attacks."
"Khan was photographed attending a suspected terrorist training camp in 2001 and was followed on several occasions in 2003 and 2004 by officers investigating Omar Khyam, the mastermind behind a foiled fertiliser bomb plot."
"But the report concludes that MI5 cannot be criticised for failing to follow up these leads because it was swamped with terror suspects at the time."
Starting in February 2001 Colonel Vine USMC Ret and Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret arrived in the UK heading for North Kensington, London, where they set up surveillance shop against me joining an already existing programme that had been under way 24/7/365 for 2.5 years.
They brought the most sophisticated surveillance ever known to human civilisation to use against me 24/7/365 faking an extensive number of allegations against me to perpetuate their false imprisonment, medical experimentation, surveillance R&D, torture and execution against me. The latter has so far not occurred.
This massive fraud was knowingly supported and sustained by Metropolitan Police officers "Paul Winston" and "Mike" who actively participated in the torture abuse. At that time surveillance in Kensington & Chelsea was headed by Bob Quick who was also driving the most expensive surveillance operation ever here against Ali Dizaei that eventually flopped in court. Bob Quick went on to head the Met's Anti-Terror Unit which was Special Branch with a name change.
I concluded from my experience that they faked it because they could not do a proper job and had the power to do as they pleased in the community carrying out abuse at will making up whatever they wanted to torture the innocent such as myself in order to move up the chain of command to higher rewards. Thus, they wasted a huge amount of resources in terms of money. time and personnel in my direct experience, and I concluded that they made a major contribution to the 7/7 terrorist attack.
To the best of my recollection I wrote a letter to MI5's Director-General in the first half of 2005 informing Lady Mannheim-Buller of this travesty of democratic justice and waste of resources which was not stopped then or at any time since.
This Toxic Surveillance has gone on without a second's respite for 12 years and two months 24/7/365 since mid-August 1998 to the present writing. I will be willing to testify about this experience if Lady Justice Hallett would like to hear what I have to say since she is emphasising the inability of MI5 and police to cope from 2001 to 2005 and track these terrorist when they became known.
Sunday, 10 October 2010
Kitty Genovese: Truth About Witnessing & Reporting Crime
"FBI, DHS, New Orleans police ignore citizen bomb warning" by Jeff Stein, Washington Post, Tuesday, 5th October 2010
The above possible terrorist threat reporting effort described by Jeff Stein in his Washington Post column has been growing on me for a couple days against the background of what I remembered concerning the apathy surrounding the Kitty Genovese murder reported in the 1960s and my own experience since 1996 after witnessing an apparent rape and attempted murder which I reported as it occurred without results.
Phil Ochs song "Outside of a Small Circle of Friends" about apathy starts off with a take on the 1964 murder of Kitty Genovese. He goes on with other verses as well.
Here's a long account of the Kitty Genovese incident, its impact and the truth which emerged much, much later:
"The Kitty Genovese Case: A Fascinating Intersection of True Crime, Psychology, and Media Misinformation The Confluence"
On the last Monday evening of August 1996, the day of the Notting Hill Carnival that year, I witnessed the apparent rape and attempted murder of a young women from my kitchen window. When I saw her standing in the middle of a crowd that looked ugly, I called the police immediately then watched what happened as the police failed to arrive at the scene.
Many people passed by avoiding the scene. There was a stream of them coming along this route because a Tube Station had been closed, and they were seeking the open one nearby. Vehicles were driving by, but no one stopped. One paused apparently to see if she was all right after the attempted murder.
The police arrived down the road but did not come here. I could see their flashing lights. There were Carnival related traffic problems that should not have been. If the police had arrived, they could have prevented the apparent rape and attempted murder that occurred.
I did call the police again but was given a run around by the emergency operator. Since they were departing by this time, it was too late. I told the emergency operator that and hung up. I sent a long fax to the Metropolitan Police Commissioner and local police station commander describing everything.
During the next couple of years, I reported another violent incident where the police did respond. I also figured out who was involved in the apparent rape and attempted murder. Then I reported child abuse in an adjacent flat in May 1998.
By mid-August 1998 I was the target of surveillance technology where those whom I reported for child abuse and those involved with the earlier incidents participated in an ongoing abuse activity against me using the surveillance technology as a weapon.
In February 2001 Colonel Vine USMC Ret, Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret and others arrived with their most sophisticated surveillance technology joining the child abusers and others involved in earlier crimes who had already been carrying out 2.5 years surveillance technology abuse which had been occurring 24/7/365 by that time. It goes on as of this writing over 12 years later.
It's not just apathy that we have as the problem, but the active involvement of the community in the crimes themselves by trying to cover them up and attack the person who reported them. This has turned into institutionalised abuse driven by surveillance technology under the operational control of the child abusing and viciously violent personalities.
Instead of solving the problem it has been allowed to persist and grow so that everyone is involved except the few who walk away perhaps too afraid to challenge and report it. The standards in society have inverted themselves starting at apathy and moving on to participation as accessories in the crimes and the abuse used to try to silence anyone who would report them. Society is sliding backwards, downhill and gaining momentum.
Two years ago in 2008 the nearby BBC Radio 4 broadcast the following programme:
BBC Radio4 Kitty Genovese was brutally killed in New York in 1964. Not 1 of 38 witnesses called for help until too late
They were discussing "Bystander Effect" and totally ignored the fact that the society in the UK as reflected by the nearby borough of Kensington & Chelsea had gone to a more extreme degree of criminality instead of countering crime. The BBC has studiously ignored what I have been bringing to their attention since 2000 now for ten years. They too have gone beyond apathy to aiding and abetting silence about crimes that persist coming from violent criminals who seek to silence those who would report the crimes.
Today the vigilante mob organised by tenant management around the police, NHS and other government organisations including elected officials and those in various positions of authority continues to make every effort to silence me. These organisations and people support and sustain the violent child and adult abusers in their attempt to discredit what I report by infantile name calling such as "potty," "psychotic" and "He's very sick."
All of this is based on a foundation of false allegations which they have developed during the past 12+ years in an effort to silence me in any brutal way they can get away with. Society has moved beyond Kitty Genovese to the extent that those watching from their windows would go out and help the murderer. Or, in the song the tow truck operator would stop and try to push the vehicles over the cliff. That is what has happened because no one is reporting the truth about what is really occurring in society today.
Phil Ochs - "Outside of a Small Circle of Friends" via @youtube Apathy kills: Kitty Genovese inspired portrayal being blind.
Phil Ochs: "What are you fighting for?" http://t.co/wjHbNmm Photo montage: Katrina to Guantanamo & Abu Ghraib @youtube @topsecreteamerica
The above possible terrorist threat reporting effort described by Jeff Stein in his Washington Post column has been growing on me for a couple days against the background of what I remembered concerning the apathy surrounding the Kitty Genovese murder reported in the 1960s and my own experience since 1996 after witnessing an apparent rape and attempted murder which I reported as it occurred without results.
Phil Ochs song "Outside of a Small Circle of Friends" about apathy starts off with a take on the 1964 murder of Kitty Genovese. He goes on with other verses as well.
Here's a long account of the Kitty Genovese incident, its impact and the truth which emerged much, much later:
"The Kitty Genovese Case: A Fascinating Intersection of True Crime, Psychology, and Media Misinformation The Confluence"
On the last Monday evening of August 1996, the day of the Notting Hill Carnival that year, I witnessed the apparent rape and attempted murder of a young women from my kitchen window. When I saw her standing in the middle of a crowd that looked ugly, I called the police immediately then watched what happened as the police failed to arrive at the scene.
Many people passed by avoiding the scene. There was a stream of them coming along this route because a Tube Station had been closed, and they were seeking the open one nearby. Vehicles were driving by, but no one stopped. One paused apparently to see if she was all right after the attempted murder.
The police arrived down the road but did not come here. I could see their flashing lights. There were Carnival related traffic problems that should not have been. If the police had arrived, they could have prevented the apparent rape and attempted murder that occurred.
I did call the police again but was given a run around by the emergency operator. Since they were departing by this time, it was too late. I told the emergency operator that and hung up. I sent a long fax to the Metropolitan Police Commissioner and local police station commander describing everything.
During the next couple of years, I reported another violent incident where the police did respond. I also figured out who was involved in the apparent rape and attempted murder. Then I reported child abuse in an adjacent flat in May 1998.
By mid-August 1998 I was the target of surveillance technology where those whom I reported for child abuse and those involved with the earlier incidents participated in an ongoing abuse activity against me using the surveillance technology as a weapon.
In February 2001 Colonel Vine USMC Ret, Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret and others arrived with their most sophisticated surveillance technology joining the child abusers and others involved in earlier crimes who had already been carrying out 2.5 years surveillance technology abuse which had been occurring 24/7/365 by that time. It goes on as of this writing over 12 years later.
It's not just apathy that we have as the problem, but the active involvement of the community in the crimes themselves by trying to cover them up and attack the person who reported them. This has turned into institutionalised abuse driven by surveillance technology under the operational control of the child abusing and viciously violent personalities.
Instead of solving the problem it has been allowed to persist and grow so that everyone is involved except the few who walk away perhaps too afraid to challenge and report it. The standards in society have inverted themselves starting at apathy and moving on to participation as accessories in the crimes and the abuse used to try to silence anyone who would report them. Society is sliding backwards, downhill and gaining momentum.
Two years ago in 2008 the nearby BBC Radio 4 broadcast the following programme:
BBC Radio4 Kitty Genovese was brutally killed in New York in 1964. Not 1 of 38 witnesses called for help until too late
They were discussing "Bystander Effect" and totally ignored the fact that the society in the UK as reflected by the nearby borough of Kensington & Chelsea had gone to a more extreme degree of criminality instead of countering crime. The BBC has studiously ignored what I have been bringing to their attention since 2000 now for ten years. They too have gone beyond apathy to aiding and abetting silence about crimes that persist coming from violent criminals who seek to silence those who would report the crimes.
Today the vigilante mob organised by tenant management around the police, NHS and other government organisations including elected officials and those in various positions of authority continues to make every effort to silence me. These organisations and people support and sustain the violent child and adult abusers in their attempt to discredit what I report by infantile name calling such as "potty," "psychotic" and "He's very sick."
All of this is based on a foundation of false allegations which they have developed during the past 12+ years in an effort to silence me in any brutal way they can get away with. Society has moved beyond Kitty Genovese to the extent that those watching from their windows would go out and help the murderer. Or, in the song the tow truck operator would stop and try to push the vehicles over the cliff. That is what has happened because no one is reporting the truth about what is really occurring in society today.
Phil Ochs - "Outside of a Small Circle of Friends" via @youtube Apathy kills: Kitty Genovese inspired portrayal being blind.
Phil Ochs: "What are you fighting for?" http://t.co/wjHbNmm Photo montage: Katrina to Guantanamo & Abu Ghraib @youtube @topsecreteamerica
Sunday, 3 October 2010
US Moves on All Fronts to Counter World Security Threat
"Blackwater firm parters with State Dept., CIA insiders" by Jeff Stein, Washington Post, Friday, 1st October 2010
BBC News - "US will issue travel warning for Americans in Europe" Be vigilant while travelling in Europe due to an al-Qa'eda threat of a Mumbai-style attack.
Telegraph - "SAS officers warn that Britain is unprepared for a Mumbai-style attack" Resources have been wasted by Colonel Vine USMC Ret, Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret and many others' massive hoax from mid-August 1998 which they joined in February 2001.
US spends $10 billion on State Department security forces including those of dubious character such as Blackwater hidden away while it announces a travel advisory today for US citizens in Europe and former SAS senior officers explain that London is unprepared for a Mumbai-style attack.
What does this all mean after nearly a decade of US surveillance operations in London's North Kensington against me 24/7/365 since February 2001 as part of what I now believe to be what the Washington Post as recently dubbed Top Secret America? Here's a brief synopsis:
Events are emerging all at the same time, and it is a $10b mercenary army to be deployed around the world as US Embassy centred but protecting US citizens and their enterprise in light of a terrorist threat/attack. Now I see this top to bottom with a stunning coherence and similarity.
Blackwater(Xe) et al will be a core protective force that cannot be or is not mounted locally which includes London. The US is moving worldwide with a contractor military force in civilian areas. Two high ranking SAS officers stated that London is unprepared for a Mumbai-style attack:
They went further describing a prime target as the Docklands and Canary Wharf with its high rise office building that could turn into a slow motion 9/11 because London is not currently prepared to defend against such an attack launched from the Thames estuary. There sits the likes of Morgan Stanley and other US organisations as prime targets for such an invasion and attack.
The US appears to be moving swiftly with a known force to provide such security protection by the likes of Blackwater and others everywhere. The connection with the "CIA insiders" is also profound with the presence of Michael Hayden on the Kaseman board along with the others as described by Jeff Stein.
This enterprise reflected as "part of International Development Solutions (IDS)," won the contract "in a joint venture with Kaseman” is absolutely incredible if you know what is really happening on the ground already.
Top Secret America is truly beyond control and reflects a government within a government slowly taking over worldwide based on the terrorist threat.
Since February 2001 what I believe to now be TSA contractors in the form of Colonel Vine USMC Ret and Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret joined a UK 2.5-year 24/7/365 surveillance operation against me bringing the most sophisticated surveillance technology ever known. It can monitor and feedback to the human being completely in much the same way as it can monitor any electronic device including computer technology. It's based upon Tempest intercept of electromagnetic radiation emissions.
This came out of NSA after decades of use and, for me, explains why Michael Hayden moved from DIRNSA to DCI: SIGINT and HUMINT are now combined in practice, and the management of these two agencies reflected that by his move. If you examine TSA carefully, all the building methods and security reflect this fact of intelligence gathering.
For almost a decade Colonel Vine USMC Ret (who travels) and Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret (who stays here 24/7/365) have literally taken over. I believe that this is exactly what will happen as the US State Department deploys its own security forces with the likes of Blackwater throughout its embassies.
What those at the top might say to placate the fears of those in the occupied countries at the top does not mean anything when the actions of those on the ground are completely different reflecting extreme brutality, menace and literally a "take over" as Blackwater has proven to be.
Rather than ignore the top nations of the world, they will be primary places of emphasis because a significant number of US citizens and large US organisations will be under threat. Expect to see these forces take over from local ones as has happened to me in London since February 2001.
There is a new government in place. It is totalitarian and consists of a secret police torture force. And, it is now being expanded worldwide based on threat alone.
BBC News - "US will issue travel warning for Americans in Europe" Be vigilant while travelling in Europe due to an al-Qa'eda threat of a Mumbai-style attack.
Telegraph - "SAS officers warn that Britain is unprepared for a Mumbai-style attack" Resources have been wasted by Colonel Vine USMC Ret, Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret and many others' massive hoax from mid-August 1998 which they joined in February 2001.
US spends $10 billion on State Department security forces including those of dubious character such as Blackwater hidden away while it announces a travel advisory today for US citizens in Europe and former SAS senior officers explain that London is unprepared for a Mumbai-style attack.
What does this all mean after nearly a decade of US surveillance operations in London's North Kensington against me 24/7/365 since February 2001 as part of what I now believe to be what the Washington Post as recently dubbed Top Secret America? Here's a brief synopsis:
Events are emerging all at the same time, and it is a $10b mercenary army to be deployed around the world as US Embassy centred but protecting US citizens and their enterprise in light of a terrorist threat/attack. Now I see this top to bottom with a stunning coherence and similarity.
Blackwater(Xe) et al will be a core protective force that cannot be or is not mounted locally which includes London. The US is moving worldwide with a contractor military force in civilian areas. Two high ranking SAS officers stated that London is unprepared for a Mumbai-style attack:
They went further describing a prime target as the Docklands and Canary Wharf with its high rise office building that could turn into a slow motion 9/11 because London is not currently prepared to defend against such an attack launched from the Thames estuary. There sits the likes of Morgan Stanley and other US organisations as prime targets for such an invasion and attack.
The US appears to be moving swiftly with a known force to provide such security protection by the likes of Blackwater and others everywhere. The connection with the "CIA insiders" is also profound with the presence of Michael Hayden on the Kaseman board along with the others as described by Jeff Stein.
This enterprise reflected as "part of International Development Solutions (IDS)," won the contract "in a joint venture with Kaseman” is absolutely incredible if you know what is really happening on the ground already.
Top Secret America is truly beyond control and reflects a government within a government slowly taking over worldwide based on the terrorist threat.
Since February 2001 what I believe to now be TSA contractors in the form of Colonel Vine USMC Ret and Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret joined a UK 2.5-year 24/7/365 surveillance operation against me bringing the most sophisticated surveillance technology ever known. It can monitor and feedback to the human being completely in much the same way as it can monitor any electronic device including computer technology. It's based upon Tempest intercept of electromagnetic radiation emissions.
This came out of NSA after decades of use and, for me, explains why Michael Hayden moved from DIRNSA to DCI: SIGINT and HUMINT are now combined in practice, and the management of these two agencies reflected that by his move. If you examine TSA carefully, all the building methods and security reflect this fact of intelligence gathering.
For almost a decade Colonel Vine USMC Ret (who travels) and Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret (who stays here 24/7/365) have literally taken over. I believe that this is exactly what will happen as the US State Department deploys its own security forces with the likes of Blackwater throughout its embassies.
What those at the top might say to placate the fears of those in the occupied countries at the top does not mean anything when the actions of those on the ground are completely different reflecting extreme brutality, menace and literally a "take over" as Blackwater has proven to be.
Rather than ignore the top nations of the world, they will be primary places of emphasis because a significant number of US citizens and large US organisations will be under threat. Expect to see these forces take over from local ones as has happened to me in London since February 2001.
There is a new government in place. It is totalitarian and consists of a secret police torture force. And, it is now being expanded worldwide based on threat alone.
Tuesday, 28 September 2010
Congressional Posturing Means Top Secret America Gets Further Beyond Control
Senate approves intelligence authorization bill
It's all electioneering show with the CIA used to deflect attention from the real issues some of which are mentioned by Jeff Stein like "no meaningful oversight of the spy agencies without control of their budgets through a fully empowered intelligence appropriations committee."
The whole issue emphasis is pushed in the wrong direction by the Senate Intelligence Committee completely ignoring the real threat and danger to the American people and everyone around the world. Consider this article by Nat Hentoff from 2002 concerning the FBI (you know, those people who cheated on the domestic investigation guidelines test http://bbc.in/9H80Qs):
"our contemplation cannot be only of what has been, but of what may be" Nat Nentoff quotes Justice Brandeis VV 28.05.02 http://bit.ly/duYH3Q This article about the FBI's Magic Lantern in the context of the Patriot Act, Congress and the judiciary is well worth reading. Even at that time the ability to remain outside one's home, office or whatever location and collect full information by intercept against computer technology and the human being as well existed and was being used as I had been experiencing directly at that time.
Congress is way behind reality, threat and danger absolutely refusing to listen to those in the US and elsewhere in the world who have something meaningful to say. Instead, Congress focusses on what will bring about image for electioneering. "Our Kind of Traitor" by John le Carre sums it up quite nicely for the UK's Security Service (MI5) what amounts to the FBI in the UK for domestic security. Read this book for a very enjoyable and informative experience. It is absolutely brilliant, relevant and captures the political element perfectly.
******The Same Happened to this Top Secret America Facebook Posting*****
"Some content in this message has been reported as abusive by Facebook users" said the message as I clicked on the comment button before it was even posted. Is someone monitoring this while I write at the Washington Post? I know those using surveillance were monitoring it and commenting as I did so. You can see what I wrote at: http://bit.ly/ad1plX
Every effort is being made by those who abuse surveillance technology against me to stop all my activity because I am accurately reporting what they are doing. Last night my Internet connection was stopped several times forcing me to reboot the computer and reset the router each time to get reconnected. A verbal comment was made "Do you want to do it again?" when it was stopped the final time.
This is censorship of the worst kind and keeps valuable information and comment that is descriptive and related to news articles including the FBI cheating on tests from being expressed. No wonder Congress and the media are in the dark. This is the TSA mushroom culture: keep 'em in the dark and covered with manure. That's probably abusive.
*****Then It Goes On As Follows******
28/09/10 13:23:05 A long argument goes on amongst those using the surveillance technology: BS. Lt Harry “Ill Eagle” Bird USMC Ret and others about censoring my Facebook comments on the Washington Post's Top Secrete America Facebook page that occurred this morning. At one moment I had entered “Ditto that” about previous comments which was accepted without any problems and decided to add the information shown above which got the rejection message and blockage as noted above.
BS/Bird are arguing that they have the “right” to stop me from posting this information against a couple other people (maybe more) who are arguing against it. All “Ill Eagle” can say is “It's wrong,” and BS says “It goes international.” Their abuse of surveillance technology enables me to hear what is being said for the most part which is intentional since they are able to verbally abuse me further in the course of the “good guy/bad guy” argument.
28/09/10 13:30:55 “Interesting,” says a surveillance male. This is the real Big Brother in action in all of its abusive power to crush the individual with surveillance technology under the control of those with extremely abusive antisocial personality disorder. He doesn't appear to be precisely in touch with reality as he says this while witnessing criminal activity.
28/09/10 13:32:52 “We can't bring him out now,” says another surveillance male following on from earlier surveillance technology abuse which takes place every day by manufacturing allegations while seeking to incite others to carry out this objective which would be the ultimate shut down and destruction of human activity, and, they hope, of human life itself.
28/09/10 13:37:58 “Psychotic,” says a male in some uncertain context amid comments by others “He's up there” and “Pull him out.” All of this is intended to continue the verbal abuse and fear of violence.
28/09/10 13:42:01 “Never had it so good,” said a female voice sounding like BS but uncertain about what she actually means whether this is herself or someone else.
28/09/10 13:43:40 “Republican,” said Lt Harry “Ill Eagle” Bird USMC Ret trying to associate me with the IRA, but I always reply “Who would have anything to do with George Bush's political party? Then he says quietly in a conspiratorial tone of voice “It's my job” meaning “dirty tricks” is his business, and “dirty data” is his currency.
28/09/10 13:46:58 “I'm usin' it,” said Lt Harry “Ill Eagle” Bird USMC Ret evidently indicating the surveillance technology while BS adds “Right there.”
28/09/10 13:50:22 “You think he'll kill himself,” asks a surveillance male about BS/Bird's continuous claim which they hope to create as an outcome so that they can get away with their extensive crimes carried out during the past 12+ years 24/7/365. No such luck, I say, but they go on projecting this onto me when they've each indicated that they would commit suicide if they did not get their way which is highly emotional and manipulative.
28/09/10 13:55:45 “What's going to happen to him?” asks a surveillance male meaning after they “Pull him out.” Then he goes on to say something about “Potty.” BS starts moan groaning in protest.
28/09/10 13:57:28 A surveillance male laughs and says “He knows he's . . . up there.”
28/09/10 13:59:42 A surveillance female then says something about “Paranoid.” Whatever its context, this is real persecution and certainly not a “persecution complex.” In addition those with the surveillance technology have the extreme need to dominate and control as they have done for 12+ years 24/7/365 while exhibiting repeated signs of delusion of grandeur.
28/09/10 14:05:10 “We;re goin' to pull him out. You'll see,” said a surveillance male. This has been going on like this for 12+ years 24/7/365 with nothing ever done. It's sadistic torture abuse and criminal harassment for starters. They have mounted raid after raid for years including a month-long police siege with nothing done. New people here are repeating the same old gambit like one-trick ponies.
28/09/10 14:44:18 “No electricity,” says BS. I've just spent 49 days without hot water that was cut off from another source and just as mysteriously cut on again. My natural gas has been turned off since on or before 2nd July 2009. Now, they want to cut off the electricity? Dirty tricks galore.
28/09/10 14:46:01 It's all over,” says Lt Harry “Ill Eagle” Bird USMC Ret. After a while, he demands “Pull him out” than added “It's getting harder each time.”
28/09/10 14:48:38 “He raped his mom,” says BS. Naturally, she has the evidence to take this to the police and create proceedings in the legal justice system, but instead she uses it on a presumption of guilt basis to emotionally charge hatred and rage in others to incite a vigilante mob to action which is fully supported by the police, NHS and other government departments as well as scores of people. This is more effective and cheaper government at the local level which David Cameron seeks to implement nationwide. After arriving in February 2001 Lt Harry “Ill Eagle” Bird USMC Ret first made this false allegation nine years ago at the end of August 2001 after BS had been abusing surveillance technology against me 24/7/365 for three years since mid-August 1998 without saying a word about this false allegation.
28/09/10 15:02:16 “Is he still up there?” asked a woman loudly outside under my front window. This the the general incitement that has resulted from the surveillance abuse by BS, Lt Harry “Ill Eagle” Bird USMC Ret and others. False rumours are spread continuously all around with the expectation that forces will act destructively. All of this constitutes criminal harassment and torture for starters satisfying the sadist pleasure needs of those so inclined to this perversion.
28/09/10 15:05:51 “Why did you pick London,” asked a surveillance male. Lt Harry “Ill Eagle” Bird USMC Ret has milked the British system for almost a decade finding out that the British are gullible and exploiting their incompetence to his advantage. The class system prevails, so he bosses everyone around using smear and fear tactics, and he can do as he pleases by playing on the fact that bigotry is a central part of the British character in underclass environments. He is totally unqualified to do anything except destructive violence and managed to hang on here since February 2001 by means of surveillance technology abuse That's some achievement. Tenant management has used him to create a glossy image by having someone continuously attack me to discredit what I report, and he's full of dirty tricks. He's been their imported thug. This is the function of TSA “security” contractors in the world. He didn't “choose” London. He was invited to come here.
It's all electioneering show with the CIA used to deflect attention from the real issues some of which are mentioned by Jeff Stein like "no meaningful oversight of the spy agencies without control of their budgets through a fully empowered intelligence appropriations committee."
The whole issue emphasis is pushed in the wrong direction by the Senate Intelligence Committee completely ignoring the real threat and danger to the American people and everyone around the world. Consider this article by Nat Hentoff from 2002 concerning the FBI (you know, those people who cheated on the domestic investigation guidelines test http://bbc.in/9H80Qs):
"our contemplation cannot be only of what has been, but of what may be" Nat Nentoff quotes Justice Brandeis VV 28.05.02 http://bit.ly/duYH3Q This article about the FBI's Magic Lantern in the context of the Patriot Act, Congress and the judiciary is well worth reading. Even at that time the ability to remain outside one's home, office or whatever location and collect full information by intercept against computer technology and the human being as well existed and was being used as I had been experiencing directly at that time.
Congress is way behind reality, threat and danger absolutely refusing to listen to those in the US and elsewhere in the world who have something meaningful to say. Instead, Congress focusses on what will bring about image for electioneering. "Our Kind of Traitor" by John le Carre sums it up quite nicely for the UK's Security Service (MI5) what amounts to the FBI in the UK for domestic security. Read this book for a very enjoyable and informative experience. It is absolutely brilliant, relevant and captures the political element perfectly.
******The Same Happened to this Top Secret America Facebook Posting*****
"Some content in this message has been reported as abusive by Facebook users" said the message as I clicked on the comment button before it was even posted. Is someone monitoring this while I write at the Washington Post? I know those using surveillance were monitoring it and commenting as I did so. You can see what I wrote at: http://bit.ly/ad1plX
Every effort is being made by those who abuse surveillance technology against me to stop all my activity because I am accurately reporting what they are doing. Last night my Internet connection was stopped several times forcing me to reboot the computer and reset the router each time to get reconnected. A verbal comment was made "Do you want to do it again?" when it was stopped the final time.
This is censorship of the worst kind and keeps valuable information and comment that is descriptive and related to news articles including the FBI cheating on tests from being expressed. No wonder Congress and the media are in the dark. This is the TSA mushroom culture: keep 'em in the dark and covered with manure. That's probably abusive.
*****Then It Goes On As Follows******
28/09/10 13:23:05 A long argument goes on amongst those using the surveillance technology: BS. Lt Harry “Ill Eagle” Bird USMC Ret and others about censoring my Facebook comments on the Washington Post's Top Secrete America Facebook page that occurred this morning. At one moment I had entered “Ditto that” about previous comments which was accepted without any problems and decided to add the information shown above which got the rejection message and blockage as noted above.
BS/Bird are arguing that they have the “right” to stop me from posting this information against a couple other people (maybe more) who are arguing against it. All “Ill Eagle” can say is “It's wrong,” and BS says “It goes international.” Their abuse of surveillance technology enables me to hear what is being said for the most part which is intentional since they are able to verbally abuse me further in the course of the “good guy/bad guy” argument.
28/09/10 13:30:55 “Interesting,” says a surveillance male. This is the real Big Brother in action in all of its abusive power to crush the individual with surveillance technology under the control of those with extremely abusive antisocial personality disorder. He doesn't appear to be precisely in touch with reality as he says this while witnessing criminal activity.
28/09/10 13:32:52 “We can't bring him out now,” says another surveillance male following on from earlier surveillance technology abuse which takes place every day by manufacturing allegations while seeking to incite others to carry out this objective which would be the ultimate shut down and destruction of human activity, and, they hope, of human life itself.
28/09/10 13:37:58 “Psychotic,” says a male in some uncertain context amid comments by others “He's up there” and “Pull him out.” All of this is intended to continue the verbal abuse and fear of violence.
28/09/10 13:42:01 “Never had it so good,” said a female voice sounding like BS but uncertain about what she actually means whether this is herself or someone else.
28/09/10 13:43:40 “Republican,” said Lt Harry “Ill Eagle” Bird USMC Ret trying to associate me with the IRA, but I always reply “Who would have anything to do with George Bush's political party? Then he says quietly in a conspiratorial tone of voice “It's my job” meaning “dirty tricks” is his business, and “dirty data” is his currency.
28/09/10 13:46:58 “I'm usin' it,” said Lt Harry “Ill Eagle” Bird USMC Ret evidently indicating the surveillance technology while BS adds “Right there.”
28/09/10 13:50:22 “You think he'll kill himself,” asks a surveillance male about BS/Bird's continuous claim which they hope to create as an outcome so that they can get away with their extensive crimes carried out during the past 12+ years 24/7/365. No such luck, I say, but they go on projecting this onto me when they've each indicated that they would commit suicide if they did not get their way which is highly emotional and manipulative.
28/09/10 13:55:45 “What's going to happen to him?” asks a surveillance male meaning after they “Pull him out.” Then he goes on to say something about “Potty.” BS starts moan groaning in protest.
28/09/10 13:57:28 A surveillance male laughs and says “He knows he's . . . up there.”
28/09/10 13:59:42 A surveillance female then says something about “Paranoid.” Whatever its context, this is real persecution and certainly not a “persecution complex.” In addition those with the surveillance technology have the extreme need to dominate and control as they have done for 12+ years 24/7/365 while exhibiting repeated signs of delusion of grandeur.
28/09/10 14:05:10 “We;re goin' to pull him out. You'll see,” said a surveillance male. This has been going on like this for 12+ years 24/7/365 with nothing ever done. It's sadistic torture abuse and criminal harassment for starters. They have mounted raid after raid for years including a month-long police siege with nothing done. New people here are repeating the same old gambit like one-trick ponies.
28/09/10 14:44:18 “No electricity,” says BS. I've just spent 49 days without hot water that was cut off from another source and just as mysteriously cut on again. My natural gas has been turned off since on or before 2nd July 2009. Now, they want to cut off the electricity? Dirty tricks galore.
28/09/10 14:46:01 It's all over,” says Lt Harry “Ill Eagle” Bird USMC Ret. After a while, he demands “Pull him out” than added “It's getting harder each time.”
28/09/10 14:48:38 “He raped his mom,” says BS. Naturally, she has the evidence to take this to the police and create proceedings in the legal justice system, but instead she uses it on a presumption of guilt basis to emotionally charge hatred and rage in others to incite a vigilante mob to action which is fully supported by the police, NHS and other government departments as well as scores of people. This is more effective and cheaper government at the local level which David Cameron seeks to implement nationwide. After arriving in February 2001 Lt Harry “Ill Eagle” Bird USMC Ret first made this false allegation nine years ago at the end of August 2001 after BS had been abusing surveillance technology against me 24/7/365 for three years since mid-August 1998 without saying a word about this false allegation.
28/09/10 15:02:16 “Is he still up there?” asked a woman loudly outside under my front window. This the the general incitement that has resulted from the surveillance abuse by BS, Lt Harry “Ill Eagle” Bird USMC Ret and others. False rumours are spread continuously all around with the expectation that forces will act destructively. All of this constitutes criminal harassment and torture for starters satisfying the sadist pleasure needs of those so inclined to this perversion.
28/09/10 15:05:51 “Why did you pick London,” asked a surveillance male. Lt Harry “Ill Eagle” Bird USMC Ret has milked the British system for almost a decade finding out that the British are gullible and exploiting their incompetence to his advantage. The class system prevails, so he bosses everyone around using smear and fear tactics, and he can do as he pleases by playing on the fact that bigotry is a central part of the British character in underclass environments. He is totally unqualified to do anything except destructive violence and managed to hang on here since February 2001 by means of surveillance technology abuse That's some achievement. Tenant management has used him to create a glossy image by having someone continuously attack me to discredit what I report, and he's full of dirty tricks. He's been their imported thug. This is the function of TSA “security” contractors in the world. He didn't “choose” London. He was invited to come here.
Monday, 27 September 2010
John le Carre's "Our Kind of Traitor"
John le Carre's new book "Our Kind of Traitor" (Penguin/Viking, 2010) is superb reflecting the essence of the Washington Post's Top Secret America but set entirely against the background of the UK's Secret Service (MI5). It's well worth reading.
"The terror thing, and the threat of civil unrest, were doing wonders for the private-security sector. Some of her very best ex-officers were earning twice as much as they'd earned in the Service and loving it." (p 123)
". . . We are suffering, as an ex-great nation, from top-down corporate rot. . . ." (p 119)
"What about the outsourcing of our Intelligence requirements to friendly companies, banks by no means excluded? We're not a crusade, Hector. We're not hired to rock the boat. We're here to help steer it. We're a Service." (p 175)
"The terror thing, and the threat of civil unrest, were doing wonders for the private-security sector. Some of her very best ex-officers were earning twice as much as they'd earned in the Service and loving it." (p 123)
". . . We are suffering, as an ex-great nation, from top-down corporate rot. . . ." (p 119)
"What about the outsourcing of our Intelligence requirements to friendly companies, banks by no means excluded? We're not a crusade, Hector. We're not hired to rock the boat. We're here to help steer it. We're a Service." (p 175)
Tuesday, 27 July 2010
TSA Terrorism: "Can we assess every threat?"
"Can we assess every threat?"
"Assess every threat" means gaining information about terrorism in advance for prevention/deterrence that is the role of the intelligence community you are evaluating. So far that has been a rather dismal and unsuccessful process in which you have played a key role to expose abuses.
To get at the mind of the terrorist torture has been mainly used as featured in Guantanamo, Abu Ghraib and your exposure of rendition as means to get that information. Now, you have shown us this whole intelligence community so huge and diversified as to be beyond control telling us once again that hidden away are methods and activities which need to be kept in the utmost secrecy.
Given all the facts of the past decade it is clear to me that we are headed toward a secret police torture state unless we can control the means to get the information necessary to ensure security by successfully doing so without brute force torture. I believe that this is what is being developed in this massive US intelligence community based upon Tempest.
However, due to IC's fundamental secrecy and being beyond control, the serious problem of sadistic torture abuse continues to grow "out of control" toward a secret police torture state. This can be changed by using the very Tempest technology based methods being developed if we first assess ourselves completely and thoroughly.
I want to back up to start with the definition of terrorism: any effort to cause fear in others. It has a common denominator, but there are many expressions of terror intended to create fear. I also believe that there is a common set of psychological characteristics which lead to behaviour we would consider terrorism. I think it's important to look at the criminal terrorist as well as the international terrorist. They overlap and merge at the foundation but diverge in acts which draw upon different law enforcement and prevention strategies.
I like the television drama series "Criminal Minds" featuring the FBI's Behavioural Analysis Unit (BAU). They seek to create a psychological profile of someone or people who is/are already on a terror spree as a serial violent criminal in order to stop further crimes usually torture and murder. So far this has not been applied to the population at large to stop such criminal terrorism that victimises the innocent on a random and arbitrary basis because of the limitations of profiling.
I think that this process is analogous to issues involving international terrorism and the approach to stop attacks by what appears to be a "one size fits all" approach. Can we assess its threat? Can we asses the threat of a serial killer, rapist, torturer and murderer before the fact? Yes, in limited circumstances but on the whole no. The same is true for international terrorism, but its real threat is from WMD against mass populations and geography which means that some means must be undertaken to assess this threat and stop it. How can this be done?
We have to properly analyse and evaluate all those concerned with the problem on the basis of an accurate and productive psychological profile to assess their disposition toward being a threat. As described in TSA, the Fort Hood shooter was not assessed despite obvious signs while a US Army unit declared its intention to go after Al Qaeda instead of looking inward at its own people. A threat was missed because this US Army unit jumped on the Al Qaeda bandwagon for whatever reason.
One size cannot fit all, so there must be a divergence of activities and objectives relevant to an organisation's existence and relations to its own environment, i.e., the US Army unit's need to look at its own organisation and not something done by many others. Like the FBI's BAU, we are learning these approaches by trial and error where the errors have horrendous consequences.
I've been at the centre of US Intel abuse for almost a decade from February 2001 and have developed an expertise from the point of view of the surveillance target who is abused for R&D purposes across a spectrum of applications from technology and torture Those carrying out this abuse are terrorists by definition as seen in their acts and psychological characteristics which fit a Criminal Minds' profile, yet they are acting out behaviour on behalf of the state in a position of trust which they abuse in the extreme.
The problem is that the psychological characteristics and disposition to create general fear by terrorising an environment is widespread and turns up from time to time in dramatic revelations from places and operations such as Guantanamo, Abu Graib and rendition. This is the US Intel community at work as terrorist torturers whom all the world has seen in photographs taken by those who carried out the torture terrorism at Abu Ghraib. This reflects an institutional disposition to what is called in the civilian world criminal "Happy Slappy."
Just yesterday in the UK two teens were sentenced to prison after pleading guilty to manslaughter in the death of a 67-year-old man who was attacked in front of his 3-year-old granddaughter by these youths running by, hitting him and knocking him to the ground where he sustain a head injury from which he later died. This was caught on CCTV. They did not film this on their mobile phones as usual. When police searched their homes, they found six such "Happy Slappy" videos on mobile phones just like the Abu Ghraib photographs.
Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret, one of those from the US Intel community's dedicated to surveillance and torture techniques R&D in London against me, took pictures of me on the last Friday of March 2001 using a large group of people under my front windows yelling and shouting about what they were doing. Taking photographs like this for entertainment and fun connected with gratuitous torture violence is an ongoing process by these surveillance abusers. Just this morning BS, the mother of the abused children whom I reported for child abuse in May 1998, said "It's boring." They seek external stimulus by using surveillance technology as a torture weapon for entertainment and fun. It's also part of a never ending torture interrogation process.
I believe that we can assess threats of international terrorism much, much better than we are doing at present because we are bogged down in terrorism ourselves. The surveillance technology which has been used against me 24/7/365 since February 2001 is so sophisticated that it can track and completely monitor human beings as it does with computer technology. This enables those who are picking up relationships between terrorists to keep monitoring them and establishing cell structures while knowing all that they are doing at minimal costs and usage of resources.
This surveillance technology is currently being developed by the US Intel community with R&D carried out in my experience in London on an extremely abusive basis so much so that it constitutes a secret police torture state that has destroyed this environment during the past decade. The reason for this abuse derives from the psychological aberration of those using this surveillance technology who have not been faxed in the least by the revelations about Guantanamo, Abu Ghraib or rendition. If fact, I anticipated these in advance as a result of the treatment I received from February 2001 onward.
The TSA project is magnificent with respect to all the work that has been accomplished. It reinforces what I am experiencing and shows the foundation for what is truly beyond control in terms of the usage of intelligence product emerging from this huge, dispersed and unaccountable US Intel community. However, missing from this as yet since I'm sure that this project has to proceed from a firm foundation forward are the activities which are being being carried out in all of these buildings.
In this situation all that has been done has been made generally known to hundreds of people who have come along to participate as well as myself by the very nature of the surveillance technology's torture capacity. This has declassified the technology completely which means that there are no constraints on reporting it as I do openly and freely but under the constant scrutiny of those using the surveillance technology who seek to stop me in any way that they can. So far I am still stumbling along getting the message out.
I believe that we can just about asses every threat democratically and freely without destroying people and democracy, but that is not being done to state the obvious. I think that the first step has to recognise the terrorist within who tries to rule by fear using terrorist's methods and those of the criminal mind. We are a long way from doing that which the massively diversified (1300?) US Intel community units are helping to sustain by being unknown, unaccountable and beyond control. As a result, we are moving toward a secret police torture state which needs to be halted by the recognition of what is happening. So far no one wants to do that. Afraid?
We have to assess ourselves first before we can properly and fully assess the threat from elsewhere that can carry with it weapons of mass destruction. Unless we properly, accurately, honestly and truthfully assess ourselves first, the enemy from within will defeat any opportunity to assess and prevent the terrorist threat from without. What I've been observing for a decade has been efforts to manufacture threats to milk the system while the real threats succeeded.
"Assess every threat" means gaining information about terrorism in advance for prevention/deterrence that is the role of the intelligence community you are evaluating. So far that has been a rather dismal and unsuccessful process in which you have played a key role to expose abuses.
To get at the mind of the terrorist torture has been mainly used as featured in Guantanamo, Abu Ghraib and your exposure of rendition as means to get that information. Now, you have shown us this whole intelligence community so huge and diversified as to be beyond control telling us once again that hidden away are methods and activities which need to be kept in the utmost secrecy.
Given all the facts of the past decade it is clear to me that we are headed toward a secret police torture state unless we can control the means to get the information necessary to ensure security by successfully doing so without brute force torture. I believe that this is what is being developed in this massive US intelligence community based upon Tempest.
However, due to IC's fundamental secrecy and being beyond control, the serious problem of sadistic torture abuse continues to grow "out of control" toward a secret police torture state. This can be changed by using the very Tempest technology based methods being developed if we first assess ourselves completely and thoroughly.
I want to back up to start with the definition of terrorism: any effort to cause fear in others. It has a common denominator, but there are many expressions of terror intended to create fear. I also believe that there is a common set of psychological characteristics which lead to behaviour we would consider terrorism. I think it's important to look at the criminal terrorist as well as the international terrorist. They overlap and merge at the foundation but diverge in acts which draw upon different law enforcement and prevention strategies.
I like the television drama series "Criminal Minds" featuring the FBI's Behavioural Analysis Unit (BAU). They seek to create a psychological profile of someone or people who is/are already on a terror spree as a serial violent criminal in order to stop further crimes usually torture and murder. So far this has not been applied to the population at large to stop such criminal terrorism that victimises the innocent on a random and arbitrary basis because of the limitations of profiling.
I think that this process is analogous to issues involving international terrorism and the approach to stop attacks by what appears to be a "one size fits all" approach. Can we assess its threat? Can we asses the threat of a serial killer, rapist, torturer and murderer before the fact? Yes, in limited circumstances but on the whole no. The same is true for international terrorism, but its real threat is from WMD against mass populations and geography which means that some means must be undertaken to assess this threat and stop it. How can this be done?
We have to properly analyse and evaluate all those concerned with the problem on the basis of an accurate and productive psychological profile to assess their disposition toward being a threat. As described in TSA, the Fort Hood shooter was not assessed despite obvious signs while a US Army unit declared its intention to go after Al Qaeda instead of looking inward at its own people. A threat was missed because this US Army unit jumped on the Al Qaeda bandwagon for whatever reason.
One size cannot fit all, so there must be a divergence of activities and objectives relevant to an organisation's existence and relations to its own environment, i.e., the US Army unit's need to look at its own organisation and not something done by many others. Like the FBI's BAU, we are learning these approaches by trial and error where the errors have horrendous consequences.
I've been at the centre of US Intel abuse for almost a decade from February 2001 and have developed an expertise from the point of view of the surveillance target who is abused for R&D purposes across a spectrum of applications from technology and torture Those carrying out this abuse are terrorists by definition as seen in their acts and psychological characteristics which fit a Criminal Minds' profile, yet they are acting out behaviour on behalf of the state in a position of trust which they abuse in the extreme.
The problem is that the psychological characteristics and disposition to create general fear by terrorising an environment is widespread and turns up from time to time in dramatic revelations from places and operations such as Guantanamo, Abu Graib and rendition. This is the US Intel community at work as terrorist torturers whom all the world has seen in photographs taken by those who carried out the torture terrorism at Abu Ghraib. This reflects an institutional disposition to what is called in the civilian world criminal "Happy Slappy."
Just yesterday in the UK two teens were sentenced to prison after pleading guilty to manslaughter in the death of a 67-year-old man who was attacked in front of his 3-year-old granddaughter by these youths running by, hitting him and knocking him to the ground where he sustain a head injury from which he later died. This was caught on CCTV. They did not film this on their mobile phones as usual. When police searched their homes, they found six such "Happy Slappy" videos on mobile phones just like the Abu Ghraib photographs.
Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret, one of those from the US Intel community's dedicated to surveillance and torture techniques R&D in London against me, took pictures of me on the last Friday of March 2001 using a large group of people under my front windows yelling and shouting about what they were doing. Taking photographs like this for entertainment and fun connected with gratuitous torture violence is an ongoing process by these surveillance abusers. Just this morning BS, the mother of the abused children whom I reported for child abuse in May 1998, said "It's boring." They seek external stimulus by using surveillance technology as a torture weapon for entertainment and fun. It's also part of a never ending torture interrogation process.
I believe that we can assess threats of international terrorism much, much better than we are doing at present because we are bogged down in terrorism ourselves. The surveillance technology which has been used against me 24/7/365 since February 2001 is so sophisticated that it can track and completely monitor human beings as it does with computer technology. This enables those who are picking up relationships between terrorists to keep monitoring them and establishing cell structures while knowing all that they are doing at minimal costs and usage of resources.
This surveillance technology is currently being developed by the US Intel community with R&D carried out in my experience in London on an extremely abusive basis so much so that it constitutes a secret police torture state that has destroyed this environment during the past decade. The reason for this abuse derives from the psychological aberration of those using this surveillance technology who have not been faxed in the least by the revelations about Guantanamo, Abu Ghraib or rendition. If fact, I anticipated these in advance as a result of the treatment I received from February 2001 onward.
The TSA project is magnificent with respect to all the work that has been accomplished. It reinforces what I am experiencing and shows the foundation for what is truly beyond control in terms of the usage of intelligence product emerging from this huge, dispersed and unaccountable US Intel community. However, missing from this as yet since I'm sure that this project has to proceed from a firm foundation forward are the activities which are being being carried out in all of these buildings.
In this situation all that has been done has been made generally known to hundreds of people who have come along to participate as well as myself by the very nature of the surveillance technology's torture capacity. This has declassified the technology completely which means that there are no constraints on reporting it as I do openly and freely but under the constant scrutiny of those using the surveillance technology who seek to stop me in any way that they can. So far I am still stumbling along getting the message out.
I believe that we can just about asses every threat democratically and freely without destroying people and democracy, but that is not being done to state the obvious. I think that the first step has to recognise the terrorist within who tries to rule by fear using terrorist's methods and those of the criminal mind. We are a long way from doing that which the massively diversified (1300?) US Intel community units are helping to sustain by being unknown, unaccountable and beyond control. As a result, we are moving toward a secret police torture state which needs to be halted by the recognition of what is happening. So far no one wants to do that. Afraid?
We have to assess ourselves first before we can properly and fully assess the threat from elsewhere that can carry with it weapons of mass destruction. Unless we properly, accurately, honestly and truthfully assess ourselves first, the enemy from within will defeat any opportunity to assess and prevent the terrorist threat from without. What I've been observing for a decade has been efforts to manufacture threats to milk the system while the real threats succeeded.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)