"Grim Sleeper Indicted" The Daily Beast

Grim Sleeper Indicted by Christine Pelisek The Daily Beast

My comments about this article in response to a comment made are as follows:

You've raised a critically important point that is not sinking in with respect to innocents abused by surveillance while criminals are ignored. A key element of this has to do with economics on a personal and national scale. Those who cannot do a proper job as individuals concentrate on the innocent easy targets just like terrorists in order to fake it to make it. On the grand scale oil is at the heart of Libya not human rights. That oil is critically important to Europe and the overall world oil price. The stability sought in dictators for oil supply has been lost in Libya's Colonel Gaddafi who has gone berserk. He would destroy his own country and who knows what he would do with the oil now.

There is also an alternate government at work in the US and elsewhere hidden under the guise of intelligence, protection against terrorism, state security and law enforcement. The Washington Post exposed this last summer as Top Secret America with a revolving door between the military and civilian security activity. These people have to earn a living when they get out of the military at all levels, and they have no skills. They can carry out surveillance in conjunction with law enforcement however. What do they do? They fake it against innocents to make it and ignore the real criminals. They are fraudsters seeking to milk the system.

In a very strange and quite complex way this all fits together under greed, glory and power where those without skills can make a living and wealth by faking it. It is quite independent of the elected government and out of control by either Democrats or Republicans. I've been one of these surveillance targets in London by former US Marines who fake it to make it since February 2001. I thought Obama's election would change this. Nope. He is caught in it and cannot establish standards just as he cannot close Guatanamo since it is such a mess now. He has to go along with the alternate government created by the US military and the intelligence community.

I have the very same complaint you voiced: why aren't these efforts and sophisticated surveillance tools being used against real criminals instead of being used against the innocent by people who are criminals themselves? Going to Libya under the guise of ensuring some form of democracy results is just an option for keeping the oil supply open in the future because Gaddafi has gone off the deep end. Against his people, yes, but also against the economic interest of the West and world.

The common denominator in all of this is the abuse of power for self serving reasons which is at the heart of misuse of surveillance and even the ultimate objective for the action in Libya. Humans still operate on the basis of self interest. The question is: are we moving away from this toward altruistic motivations and objectives in a meaningful way? I don't know yet. I'll let you know if the indefinite surveillance torture abuse against me stops. There’s no reason for this to be done at all.

The context for these comments can be found here.

"Behind Pedophile Jeffrey Epstein's Sweetheart Deal" The Daily Beast

Behind Pedophile Jeffrey Epstein's Sweetheart Deal by Conchita Sarnoff and Lee Aitken The Daily Beast

My comments about this article are as follows:

There is no justice for the little person. If you don't have the wealth, justice is not there nor will it be anytime soon with resources wiped out by toxic debt, and the military spending more and more on these wars as the little people try to throw off the dictators' shackles. But, the problem goes much deeper.

There is a fundamental disposition to avoid dealing properly with abuse as occurred in Michael Jackson's and a multitude of other cases. Try reporting child abuse sometime and see what happens. It's necessary to be very careful and have evidence since abusers will direct their destructive attention against those who would dare report it.

The victims are blamed, and no one helps them. It happens over and over as can be seen in court cases coming to trial and judgment decades after abuse started that was blatantly obvious as just occurred in Germany:

BBC News - German incest father-of-eight Detlef S jailed for 23 yrs of horrible child abuse. Victims waited 13 yrs for this.

Or, there's the horror of the Texas 11-year-old who was blamed by some for her gang rape by 18. Why aren't these incidents reported when they happen?

Gang Rape of Schoolgirl, and Arrests, Shake Texas Town - NYTimes.com 18 males in their teens & 20s raped an 11-yr-old.

I reported child abuse in May 1998. In August 1998 the child abusing family group was given access to surveillance technology which they have used against me 24/7/365 and are still at it. They are abusing everyone who is not "on message" and continue to be supported by all those in positions of authority.

This situation is a study in what is fundamentally wrong with respect to abusers everywhere, but its facts and analysis may never get out if the abusers can succeed in destruction. No, there is no justice any longer for the little people. It's been replaced by abusers with surveillance technology.

The context of these comments can be found here.

Presidential Bioethics Commission: Mon & Tue 28 Feb & 1 Mar 2011 Overview

Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues proceedings on Monday and Tuesday, 28th February and 1st March 2011: 1) State of the Science: Neuroscience, Neuroimaging and Genetics; and 2) Human Subjects Protection webcasts of the presentations.

You should pay very close attention to the penultimate video where 22 members of the public and non-consenting subjects/victims of many years of research abuse share their personal experiences pleading for the Commission to help them. It is a stunning revelation about what is happening reflected by a diverse group of people from different locations throughout the US.

Here are three Emails I sent relating to the actual proceedings because I was astounded by the juxtaposition of this Washington DC conference while London based surveillance technology watched me watch it and by the concluding remarks from 22 members of the public who were experiencing the same abuse as I which they publicly reported again watched by those watching me as they continued with their abuse against me. I wrote about this in Emails 1 and 3 below.

Email 2 below shows neuroscience over a decade ago in 1999 reflecting the ability to look through another creature's eyes by experiments carried out on a cat, and rats able to move a lever with their brain.

1. 28.02.2011 Bioethics: your morning session today was absolutely fascinating especially given the reality of those watching and listening along with me using neuroscience based surveillance technology

Valerie H Bonham
Executive Director
The Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues
Suite C-100
1425 New York Ave. NW
Washington, DC 20005.

Dear Ms Bonham

I have to make a comment at this point after watching the webcast of the proceedings so far this morning before lunch your time from London while under neuroscience based surveillance technology that

1) sees what I am watching through my eyes,

2) hears with my ears and

3) reads my thoughts while

4) from time to time comments are made which I can hear by the electronic transmission of sound. Someone said that this was interesting or fascinating.

I'm not sure irony is the right word for it, but the juxtaposition of the two events across the Atlantic ocean is phenomenal and needs to be comprehended by your proceedings at some point. You need to find the key that unlocks your entry into this aspect of neuroscience.

Being here in my home in London watching and hearing your proceedings is almost better than being there. I am making both audio comments on a tape recorder and filming portions of what I am doing for my own record to document what is happening.

I listen to the computer sound through infra-red headsets so that no sounds escape which means that the camcorder to DVD recording is only visual without any of your audio. This enables me to keep a very silent environment so that I can pick up any other external acoustically generated noises.

When I hear through the sound of the headsets the voiced comments by those using the neuroscience based surveillance technology, that is not recorded on the camcorder, yet I can hear it even through the headsets with its sound of your conference.

There are other means for those using the surveillance technology to watch and hear what I am doing by directly intercepting the computer's electromagnetic radiation emissions and/or the wireless transmission from the Internet.

But, as always, there is a distinction when I get up and walk away. Their neuroscience based surveillance technology monitoring and feedback follows me.

Martha Farah's comments about reading the mind pertain to imaging only, and I agree. It will not happen that way. It's already happening and has been for a decade in my direct experience by intercepting the electromagnetic radiation emissions from the brain without implants of any kind. It is mind reading of the most precise kind for thoughts and images and can induce thoughts and images as well.

I was really struck, however, by Bruce Rosen's presentation especially regarding the letter “M” imaged on the cortex at the back of the brain where sight imagining occurs. That is phenomenal. But, I don't think that it will progress to being able to read images in great detail.

The process of seeing through the eyes was done with cats in an experiment published on the BBC web site in 1999 using implanted electrodes where reasonably clear images can be seen. I don't have the URL to hand, but if you search “through a cat's eyes,” I think you can find this.

I am absolutely fascinated with being able to watch these presentations since they are outstanding. I have this innate curiosity about everything, and I think they are extraordinary.

I've been laughing quite a bit at the irony of the situation given what is being said against the background of what is actually happening. Somehow you are going to have to find that key which unlocks entry into neuroscience's ability with respect to intercepting the electromagnetic radiation from the brain which provides the ability to read the mind so that you can bring all of this into your discussions.

You have to appreciate that all you discuss about ethics with respect to neuroscience is completely ignored by these people using this neuroscience based surveillance technology who do so in whatever way they please so that the importance of what you are doing is emphasised in a most profound way by the actual need to do something at the ground level where this abuse is currently taking place.

You have my permission as always to share this Email with anyone, and I urge you do so.

Sincerely yours

Gary D Chance

http://garydchance.com/
http://garydchance.tripod.com/surveillance/
http://garydchance.bravejournal.com/
http://garydchance-gary.blogspot.com/
http://twitter.com/garydchance
http://www.facebook.com/garydchance
http://www.myspace.com/garydchance
http://www.youtube.com/garydchance

2. October 1999: decoding brain cells electromagnetic radiation to see through a cat's eyes & June 1999: brain controlled external object movement by rats

Neuroscience research in 1999:

1. Rat's brain controlling external object movement

03/01/11 12:01:15 PM BBC News | Sci/Tech | Mind over matter http://bbc.in/i4JU2y 21.06.1999 "brain cell activity can be used to control a robotic device" [Twitter]

2. Seeing through a cat's eyes

03/01/11 12:06:51 PM BBC News|Sci/Tech |Computer uses cat's brain to see http://bbc.in/fPPJQ2 Computer wired cat's brain created videos of sight. 08.10.1999 [Twitter]

03/01/11 12:10:57 PM BBC News|Sci/Tech| Looking through cats' eyes http://bbc.in/gQyBtJ "what it is like to look through the eyes of another creature" 11.10.1999 [Twitter]

03/01/11 12:15:34 PM "By recording the electrical activity of nerve cells in the thalamus, a region of the brain that receives signals from the eyes, researchers from the University of California at Berkeley were able to view these shapes. ... The team used what they describe as a "linear decoding technique" to convert the signals from the stimulated cells into visual images." http://bbc.in/gQyBtJ [Facebook]

What are these guys doing now?

"Dr Yang Dan, Assistant Professor of Neurobiology at UC Berkeley, Fei Li and Garrett Stanley, now Assistant Professor of Biomedical Engineering at Harvard University conducted 11 experiments." http://bbc.in/gQyBtJ

Sincerely yours

Gary D Chance

http://garydchance.com/
http://garydchance.tripod.com/surveillance/
http://garydchance.bravejournal.com/
http://garydchance-gary.blogspot.com/
http://twitter.com/garydchance
http://www.facebook.com/garydchance
http://www.myspace.com/garydchance
http://www.youtube.com/garydchance

3. If not us, who? If not now, when? Tuesday's appearance of the public speakers 1st March 2011

Valerie H Bonham
Executive Director
The Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues
Suite C-100
1425 New York Ave. NW
Washington, DC 20005.

Dear Ms Bonham

“A civilisation is measured by how it treats its most vulnerable,” said Amy Gutmann referring to prisoners and patients as examples at the start of the day, and, truly, what happened in Guatemala is atrocious. By the end of the morning session, I believe that the Commission learned something worse is happening on a much broader scale right under everyone's collective noses about which no one has been paying official attention let alone doing anything.

It appeared as if no one was prepared for what the public speakers said as Amy Gutmann's attitude changed from one of silence after each of the public speakers to “thank you” and then “thank you very much.” I'll have to listen again to what she said at the very end, but it did sound to me as if she said that the charge by President Obama was to make certain abuse did not happen again which is the way I read his letter.

As the public speakers pointed out, it is happening all over again and has been for many years without anyone paying attention or doing anything about it. They echoed the points I made in writing before their appearance and one could see and feel the very different people from all over reporting essentially the same experience in words as best they could given what was happening to them which I know only to well from my own 12.5 years experience 24/7/365.

Very hardcore, abusive personalities are loose with this technology R&D that goes beyond what the Nazis did in WWII concentration camps. As I said and as could be seen today, it's distributive.

I was pleased to hear your overview, but serious questions now arise about spending all those resources on a thorough investigation into people who are by now probably all dead when something more atrocious is currently taking place. A staff of 12 going through 477 boxes of information from a multitude of government departments about something that happened over 60 years ago does not seem right when people are suffering as they described in what was accurately characterised as an assassination programme.

The Commission was charged today by 22 people pleading for their lives reflecting thousands of others both alive and dead who need help which the Commission can now provide. President Obama represents all the people of the US, and in that capacity the treatment of the worst kind which makes people vulnerable reflects the character of this civilisation as it exists today.

I was quite struck by the few things that Amy Gutmann said which were precisely correct, but I see a big gap in trying to get others to concentrate and focus on the key elements of the issues. What is happening today reflects today's technology, and the world has not grasped that. Those who are not subjected to this abuse find it difficult to accept its existence. That's why the people with whom you really need to be talking are those from the public just as the staff engages with the speakers. It's an investigation, I believe, that you will have to undertake.

I've looked at the webcasts that are now available but have not had time to look at them further, but I want to go over them all. I was getting discouraged today about what the Commission was doing until the public people started speaking. I was stunned by what was said over and over by each of them.

“What's this?"asked a surveillance male watching the proceedings with Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret and the mother of the abused children. He was amazed by what he was hearing because he was participating in the very activity he heard described by people of all kinds from all over the US. It has not sunk in about what is happening except to those who have been targeted. Now, after this presentation those carrying it out can see themselves as their victims do for the heinous monsters that they really are.

I think Amy Gutmann should go back to President Obama and have a long chat with him about the direction in which the Commission needs to go and the resources to undertake what needs to be done for this abuse we heard about today is being carried out on a global basis. I do not believe that you fully grasp the implications of harm that this will do. It is a harm far beyond the financial and economic crisis of recent years for it will be a social collapse and loss of confidence in all human activity.

Amy Gutmann made one of her excellent remarks today referring to the damage that was done to the community by the kinds of abuses which have occurred in medical research indicating how destructive it was. You have no idea just how destructive this is overall to the community until you probe that thoroughly with an investigation.

These hardcore abusive personalities will never stop and will have to be stopped by others. They are the child and adult abusers which you see in the news relating to horrendous situations. This technology gives them a perfect outlet for their perversions and violence which they carry out on a serial basis unobstructed. They are straight out of the drama series “Criminal Minds,” and the FBI needs to apply its BAU (Behavioural Analysis Unit) to this problem, but the problem might be coming from the FBI itself.

This was noted by a couple speakers who said COINTELPRO is alive and well once again with Cynthia McKinney restarting an investigation into this activity. It was the FBI who disgraced itself with COINTELPRO which was not exposed and addressed until the Church Committee c 1975. It took a long time for those abuses to come to light. Now the technology is available to do it all over again and not get caught.

You've opened a door today. I hope that you will start to let fresh air and light into all of this and not restrict those who have something to say to two minutes as one speaker correctly protested. It is important to listen to each and every one no matter what they say very carefully. They have much to say and taking away the time pressure is all important because that is a key part of the torture to which all of us are subjected. Confronting a two minute limit to explain the horror of the torture experience is just further torture from an already indifferent society that supports the abuse.

When asked if there were dissenting voices in 1946-8 Guatemala, you replied “Yes” but could not say any more at present. My question is if there was dissent and controversy, how could this have gone undetected generally for over 60 years? People have been speaking up about this current torture problem for decades, but no one in an official capacity has taken up the problem to deal effectively with it.

Erich Fromm begins “Man for Himself: an Inquiry into the Psychology of Ethics” by noting “For Aristotle, ethics is built upon the science of man. Psychology investigates the nature of man and ethics therefore is applied psychology.” (p 34 Fawcett Premier Book, New York, 1947, 1969) An issue in today's session was the application of what the Commission reviews and reports. I would like to think that the Commission will develop facts from abuses existing today that can be developed into effective solutions to stop these abuses for which the public speakers pleaded.

The Commission has a full plate, however, which can be seen in all that it is addressing if one is to read John le Carre's “The Constant Gardner” or see the film as any indication of the problems that abound. There are many kinds of abuses that need to be addressed. I believe that the Commission needs the resources to do it all effectively, or it will fail by neglecting what it cannot do by such a lack which will result in pain, suffering and death continuing in those being tortured as described today.

"He'll be sectioned," said a surveillance male just before I sent this Email. In UK speak that means committed. This was what one woman said today about those who were declared mentally ill and taken away to hospital. It's just like the Soviet Union or Nazi Germany, and it's happening all over again for those who speak the truth. It's suppressive social control based on fear.

Sincerely yours

Gary D Chance

http://garydchance.com/
http://garydchance.tripod.com/surveillance/
http://garydchance.bravejournal.com/
http://garydchance-gary.blogspot.com/
http://twitter.com/garydchance
http://www.facebook.com/garydchance
http://www.myspace.com/garydchance
http://www.youtube.com/garydchance

Presidential Bioethics Commission: Human Subjects Protection Tue 1st Mar 2011

Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues proceedings on Tuesday, 1st March 2011: Human Subjects Protection webcasts of the presentations.

You should pay very close attention to the penultimate video where 22 members of the public and non-consenting subjects/victims of many years of research abuse share their personal experiences pleading for the Commission to help them. It is a stunning revelation about what is happening reflected by a diverse group of people from different locations throughout the US.

Prior to this second day's sessions of the Commission, I submitted the following comments on Sunday, 27th February 2011:

Valerie H Bonham
Executive Director
The Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues
Suite C-100
1425 New York Ave. NW
Washington, DC 20005.

Dear Ms Bonham

Re: Public Commentary Day 2 1st March 2011 Human Subjects Protection Needs to be Distributive & Global Moving from Collective Model Due to Technology

My final public comments with respect to protection are as noted below and attached in *.PDF. They reflect my 12.5 years of experience as a non-consenting subject of medical experimentation and the distributive character that the neuroscience based surveillance technology creates.

I believe that this is the critically important point of departure for today's state of the science and medicine as they relate to protection for what is actually happening in the world today. The technology makes it both global and individual which requires a similar response for protection.

This needs to be contrasted against the collective reflected by the Tuskegee and Guatemala experiments as a result of today's technology and ability to carry out abusive research on a distributive basis globally.

This is why I send this along to you during what must be a hectic time for you to pass along as you see fit so that it can receive the attention deemed appropriate and joined with my previous comments.

I do not believe that this is something which will originate from the organisations and speakers since it is clandestine but is certainly something about which they need to be aware in terms of their governmental and academic administration and educational activity.

Sincerely yours

Gary D Chance

http://garydchance.com/
http://garydchance.tripod.com/surveillance/
http://garydchance.bravejournal.com/
http://garydchance-gary.blogspot.com/
http://twitter.com/garydchance
http://www.facebook.com/garydchance
http://www.myspace.com/garydchance
http://www.youtube.com/garydchance

enclosure

Public Commentary
The Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues
Suite C-100
1425 New York Ave. NW
Washington, DC 20005.

Day 2: Human Subjects Protection
1st March 2011

I want to address the problem of protection of people with regard to the ethics of neuroscience, medical and general scientific research in the context of my previous comments relating to my direct experience for 12.5 years 24/7/365 as a non-consenting experimental subject for R&D relating to neuroscience based surveillance technology.

There are three basic areas which are simple but profoundly and devastatingly ignored by all of us at one time or another upon which we must focus clearly since the world has changed dramatically impacting all aspects of human life and endeavour given the development and abuse of neuroscience that I have experienced in the past decade as already described. The collective abuse has been replaced by distributive abuse which reorients the focus of attention for the process of protection.

The three principles which are generally abrogated are: 1) listening; 2) detection; and 3) enforcement:

1) We don't listen to other people especially at the two extremes of the education spectrum where those at the bottom do not want to show their ignorance and pretend to know while those at the top have both learned so much and don't want to show their ignorance that they are certain they know as well.

We need more people like Socrates who was ignorant and knew that he was ignorant. For this the Oracle at Delphi told him he was the most wise of men which he did not accept. He went in search of wisdom seeking to be taught by others, but each time he saw that others thought they were knowledgeable when they were not. The difference was he knew he did not know; hence, he was the wisest. A sound medical and scientific education also communicates how much we do not know. It's not as if this does not exist but gets forgotten.

When something comes along that is new and abusive as is this neuroscience based surveillance technology for social control to torture people into obedience and submission, no one listens no matter how carefully it is described. They don't want to believe that this new science and ability to read the human brain's thoughts, etc actually exists. It's more comfortable for most to live in the old world, so they dismiss it and anyone who talks about it. They thus become vulnerable themselves and help make and keep others vulnerable to its abuse by those who exploit.

Since I wanted to protect myself against the adverse effects of this surveillance technology's electromagnetic radiation abuse given the fact that I have a history of skin cancer with malignant melanoma surgery as already described in August 1979, I sought at least an annual dermatology examination to catch any recurrence even after 20 years since there was a disposition to skin cancer. In fact, in June 1998, Bowen's disease was diagnosed from a small lesion in the centre of my chest.

On one of my later visits to the dermatology clinic in the early 2000s at a local teaching hospital for an annual examination, I tried to explain why I sought the examination in order that the physician would be better informed about what to do. The dermatologist and several medical students sitting in as part of the examination took my explanation in stride about the surveillance technology abuse without saying anything. Later I saw the letter that the dermatologist had sent back to my GP which is routinely done following such examinations.

In it the dermatologist asked if there was any history of mental illness in my case specifically asking if I was a paranoid schizophrenic. I was trying to both protect myself and reduce the costs of treatment by early diagnosis for one of the easiest cancers to detect, but I met with a negative attitude about what I was explaining that also took place in a training environment which had evidently concluded that I was off my rocker. Students were being trained to disregard the patient and not probe further if there were any questions. I was ignored and disregarded, and what the patient was saying was treated as if it couldn't possibly be right. The result was my being blamed for having a further illness which was heading off in the wrong direction.

Before this occurred I had a similar and far more devastating encounter with two psychiatrists who did not bother to listen to me at all because their minds were obviously already made up. They were participating in the surveillance technology abuse themselves, knew that what I described was accurate and sought to blame me for perverse reasons of their own. This occurred in early 2000 before the neuroscience based surveillance technology arrived a year later in early 2001.

This encounter with these two psychiatrists followed on after I had written a lengthy letter to Prime Minister Tony Blair in September 1999 about the whole situation. I was subsequently subjected to an intense escalation of the then surveillance technology abuse, and the psychiatrists eventually sought an interview with me. I saw each one once and was subjected to more abuse including my letter to the Prime Minister which was displayed to me as part of my hospital folder.

The second psychiatrist who spent a great deal of time in the vicinity of my home participating in the surveillance technology tried to get me to take a powerful anti-psychotic drug as a calmative when it was not needed since there was no psychosis, and no diagnosis had been made. He did not even know my medical history. And, he was not listening to anything I was describing.

I refused to take any medication, made a formal complaint and refused to talk with either of these psychiatrists again. They then rolled out into the community in full surveillance participation which included the following year and on after the neuroscience based surveillance technology arrived for further development.

They were participating in extensive surreptitious medication by various means administering this to me inside my home without my consent. They would bring along other medical professionals to participate. These were not mysterious people. I had met with and talked with each which was one of the key reasons I voluntarily visited them. I wanted to find out who was prowling around my home.

As this neuroscience based surveillance technology R&D progressed from February 2001 onwards, I was dealing with two physical problems that needed medical attention: 1) cataracts in each eye; and 2) the risk presented by the use of this electromagnetic radiation surveillance technology as it related to skin cancer. I was being treated at hospitals which were all part of one complex of National Health Service hospitals.

These were the eye hospital, the hospital with the dermatology clinic and the hospital with the mental health clinic. The first two problems had solid physical evidence for practising medicine. The third had none whatsoever, but those involved were able to make up what was needed to carry out extensive “treatment” in the community against a non-consenting adult outside a hospital environment. No matter how much correspondence I sent out to doctors and hospital administrators nothing was done to stop the abuse.

I was generally ignored and considered mentally ill which reinforced what the psychiatric hospital was doing in the community with surveillance technology. I was even told by one specialist at the eye hospital that the cataracts were not caused as I had described despite what a continuous body of medical evidence had to show about exactly what had happened. They were all “on message” and wanted me to admit to what was not true so I could be “on message” too. Where was the delusion here?

How could the National Health Service expect to function properly if one hand was causing injury which the other hand had to fix it? This was a great waste of resources on all sides to say nothing about dirty data, and no one listened to the patient thinking all knew better. If the patient was mentally ill, then the National Health Service was all right and doing a proper job on all sides. It was better for all to blame the individual than accept collective responsibility objectively determined.

If you look at the National Health Service today, it is in a state of financial and managerial crisis. Where do you suppose this came from, and will it be fixed by the proposed changes? Will flattening the National Health Service help GPs and others listen to their patients? The real danger that is emerging in today's world with this neuroscience based surveillance technology is Münchhausen’s By Proxy Syndrome where people are being treated for conditions that do not exist because those using the neuroscience based surveillance technology make it all up. That's why I call it Toxic Surveillance. It is much like Toxic Debt with its fraudulent foundation and transaction abuse [for gain].

2) Detection is the means to place the neuroscience based surveillance technology on an objective foundation. As I described earlier, the interception of the human brainwaves' electromagnetic radiation while extremely important is irrelevant because it does no damage and is totally unknown to the target. Eventually learning about the loss of privacy and confidentiality can be devastating. The feedback process is entirely different. This is where the harm originates and must take on a top priority with regards to protection.

There needs to be developed and made available to the public an inexpensive means to detect these electromagnetic radiation transmissions which bring about the electronic transmission of sound, the inducement of thoughts and images in the brain, the pain and muscle movement in the body and the surreptitious medication for starters. Just as I can see what wireless access points are available for my computer usage, the same kind of detection should be made for these transmissions as well.

I can look at all those wireless access point transmissions in my vicinity with my computer software for their wireless transmitters/receivers to detect and see described who is available with its corresponding signal strength. I should be able to see if any of these brainwave electromagnetic radiation transmissions to me are present and even be able to read them such as the voice which is being communicated. The difficulty is that they are microwave transmissions that are pulsed at the very low frequency of the brainwaves to match the brain's frequency/wave length. If these can be made to impact the brain as they do, then they can be detected electronically and even read such as the sound.

This will provide proof about exactly what is being done. As it is now, I can try to gather all the evidence I can about what is happening other than the actually electronic transmissions. I've dabbled in this, but I've not been able to do much because of time and expense. Frequencies that are pulsed can be detected. What would be most useful would be to actually be able to listen to the sound being transmitted. This is well within the prospect of doable and is something the scientific, medical and engineering communities need to consider which is reflected by the composition of the Commission. .

There are other considerations for detection which can be very important such as the Mass Spectrograph for identifying the chemical content of hair to determine the presence of surreptitious medication. There surely must be other areas of the body which contain the residue of all that happens to a human being chemically. This whole area needs to be explored in terms of what is viable and necessary for the objective determination of the abuse by the neuroscience based surveillance technology.

3) Enforcement needs to be available by means of statute law so that the evidence from detection can be used to properly address these abuses which one would hope could provide a deterrence to those who venture into the unethical so that such behaviour will become unlawful and criminal at a point defined by law.

The state of Michigan passed a law which became effective at the beginning of 2004 which recognised that electronic weapons exist and are used maliciously:

http://garydchance.tripod.com/surveillance/id32.html

I really like this law and believe that it covers the problem very well, but to use it effectively there must be proof for which detection is essential. I believe that this is the kind of law that is needed at the Federal level to cover the entire US and apply to all personnel outside the US who are connected with the US government either as employees, agents or contractors. If they or their organisations are paid by the US taxpayer, they should be subjected to US laws.

Any US government funding to any company or organisation should make it liable under Federal law for any transgressions. I believe that civil rights was moved forward on this basis which raised people's hackles with respect to government interference, but then it was justified on the basis of human rights. In a like manner this situation where electronic weapons are being developed on the foundation of neuroscience based surveillance technology, the activity should carry with it the provisions of law to protect people who might be on the receiving end of such electronic weapons development/use by virtue of US government financing.

I want to point out at this point that in my reading of several years ago I noted that the US Marine Corps was given the responsibility for heading the development of non-lethal weapons. At the same time the two key people associated with this neuroscience based surveillance technology R&D carried out against me from February 2001 onwards up to and including the present have been Colonel Vine USMC Ret and Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret who probably as a reservist has been promoted to captain while here. How this has been justified is incomprehensible to me if it is true.

Conclusion

From the point of view of the practise of medicine no one is looking at the whole person except the patient him/herself. This allows specialists to go off on their own by ignoring what is happening elsewhere and in other ways to a patient s/he might be treating. Prime Minister David Cameron is trying to change this in the UK by flattening the managerial structure of the National Health Service to bring the point of decision making down to the level of the GP and patient him/herself. Whether this will provide for total patient care at the point of entry to medicine remains to be seen. I believe that the prospect of abuses like those that I have experienced could be reduced. That does not, however, eliminate the potential for abuse by the GP. Accountability is a key element here.

At the same time the point of enforcement must come to the individual being subjected to this abuse so that s/he can develop the means to individually detect and verify objectively what is happening and be able to pursue a legal remedy in the judicial system that will protect. This will need to be done in conjunction with the medical profession and scientific community based upon objectively determined evidence that is also derived from the human body reflecting what has or has not occurred along with the objective determination of external sources of electronic weapons such as those from this neuroscience based surveillance technology being used maliciously.

Since this is a distributive process and not a collective one of abuse, these kinds of protection methods need to be developed for the individual on an inexpensive and easy to use basis. For this reason I believe that these elements involving listening, detection and enforcement need to be integrated on the basis of the individual so that objective determinations can be made for one person. This is how the overall system has changed from the collective (Tuskegee, Guatemala) to the individual with this neuroscience based surveillance technology where the response to it needs to match this distributive orientation.

Gary D Chance
London, UK
27th February 2011

Presidential Bioethics Commission: State of Neuroscience Mon 28 Feb 2011

Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues proceedings on Monday, 28th February 2011: State of Neuroscience, Neuroimaging and Genetics webcasts of the presentations.

Prior to this first day's sessions of the Commission, I submitted the following comments on Tuesday, 22nd February 2011:

Valerie H Bonham
Executive Director
Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues
Suite C-100
1425 New York Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20005

Dear Ms Bonham

Re: 28th February 2011 State of the Science: Neuroscience and Neuroimaging: Current Issues in Neuroscience and Neuroimaging

With this first submission considering its unusual nature I wanted to run this by you given my earlier correspondence and your letter.

This actually opens a new dimension of your topic for Monday's meeting that is not precisely present in your draft agenda. Where you have indicated only neuroimaging, I have considered electromagnetic radiation monitoring and feedback.

This is nothing new since it's been done with electrodes for a long time with some similar results which I describe only they have used electrodes implanted in a cat's brain to see through its eyes as the BBC published in 1999. There is also more research that I have recently read about tracking the neural paths in this manner that is equally fascinating but uses electrodes.

My experience as a non-consenting research subject goes beyond electrodes involving only the interception of the electromagnetic radiation halo that surrounds the brain for monitoring its activity and for feedback. It's this feedback activity, e.g., sound, that is most abusive and dangerous which needs full consideration for protection.

You need to have another subject in addition to neuroimaging, but I don't know what you want to call it.

This lays the foundation of my experience as a subject and raises the issues which you cover later in the day and the next day with respect to protection. There is more to be considered, and I will send along my comments about those shortly.

I wanted to provide you with this foundation since it is quite different for the reasons I describe in its content. I believe that this involves the real issues of today that have created this current response to the experiments in Guatemala and behind that Tuskegee which I note in my conclusion.

What you do with this is, of course, your own decision. Personally, I wish that I could be present to make a presentation and answer questions, but I cannot. I would like to see it published on its own merits since these issues need to be raised and discussed.

Please feel to do anything you like with my submission. I have no privacy and confidentiality as I have described, so it does not matter to me what you do. All those using surveillance against me have watched me write this and have created a stir about its contents as is usual trying to intimidate and stop me from reporting as I do.

Of course, for me this validates what I am doing, but you don't know that, so it remains subjective from your point of view. That is one of the keys to protection which I want to make later in this context. There needs to be developed means to detect and monitor the feedback process of this surveillance technology to verify its existence and collect evidence.

I have included a copy of my submitted comments for next Monday morning's session enclosed below and as a *.PDF file attached. Sometimes attachments are automatically stripped, so I'm providing an enclosure too just in case.

After this I will submit my comments to info@bioethics.gov generally unless you want me to send these comments to the attention of anyone in particular.

Sincerely yours

Gary D Chance

http://garydchance.com/
http://garydchance.tripod.com/surveillance/
http://garydchance.bravejournal.com/
http://garydchance-gary.blogspot.com/
http://twitter.com/garydchance
http://www.facebook.com/garydchance
http://www.myspace.com/garydchance
http://www.youtube.com/garydchance

enclosure

Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues
28th February 2011
State of the Science
Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
Current Issues in Neuroscience and Neuroimaging

If you want to measure mass, do imaging. If you want to know about the content of the brain's activity, decode the electromagnetic radiation brainwaves surrounding the head.

The area which contains the greatest advance in neuroscience where the most abuse has occurred and currently exists with respect to R&D and its applications derive from neurological research involving decoding brainwaves and using this knowledge malevolently without any apparent public recognition of its existence or the benefits which are available.

Background Information

I speak from the position of a non-consenting human subject in this experiment carried out against me during the past ten years 24/7/365 since February 2001 with surveillance technology introduced by Colonel Vine USMC Ret, Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret and others with them to an already existing surveillance operation that had commenced in August 1998.

I have lived in a social housing environment in North Kensington, London, UK, since May 1996. Those carrying out this surveillance against me had been the local tenants/residents in a tenant managed environment whom I had reported for crimes and antisocial behaviour that included apparent rape, attempted murder, child abuse and road rage violence along with domestic violence.

By the time February 2001 arrived those involved with this activity included medical professionals from the National Health Service some of whom I had met and police whom I believed were from the then Metropolitan Police's Special Branch. There were numerous others involved as well.

I have just learned since 10th January 2011 that the Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) in the UK had several units operating outside the control of government and on a private basis since it was a private company. They used secret intelligence agents provocateurs for many years to infiltrate groups which were deemed to be a domestic threat to the UK.

There is the possibility that this activity might have had its foundation from the ACPO which formed as a private company in 1997 and began its secret police state activity. These units have now been taken over by the Metropolitan Police recently following the collapse of prosecution cases after a public admission from one of the police officers involved.

In any case Colonel Vine, Lt Bird and others joined with these people which also included the mother of the abused children in a key role as events developed from February 2001. Lt Harry Bird characterised his surveillance technology at that time as experimental. I learned what they were doing by its ability to transmit sound electronically which started the day of their arrival. I could also hear those with them. The intention was to “spook” me and cause an extreme abusive behaviour reaction by using this neurologically based surveillance technology right from the start.

Since I had already been subjected to surveillance technology abuse for 2.5 years 24/7/365, I knew the participants well by then and had met some NHS medical professionals so that I could easily recognise voices. There were no mysterious “they” in all of this. Anyone who came along I was able to determine for the most part who they were if they stayed long enough because of their talking, their relations with others I knew and the revelations they made about themselves.

Neurological Technology Development By Trial and Error Experiments

Implants are not necessary. The interception of electromagnetic radiation brainwaves is accomplished on the principle of Tempest which has been used against any electronic device for longer than the past five decades. The fundamental key to its use is the ability to intercept very low power electromagnetic radiation emissions.

Once this is understood as possible, the rest involves the arduous tasks of decoding the electromagnetic radiation emissions. Most familiar about this activity in recent years has been the ability to intercept and read computer monitor screen emissions. In fact, any component of a computer can be so monitored, decoded and read. This surveillance technology has advanced to the point where feedback and control of the computer technology is possible as well about which I began learning in 2001 too.

The same can be done to the human brain which has its own source of electricity from chemical reactions that leave an electromagnetic radiation halo around the head unique to every human being. First, every human being can be so identified and tracked wherever they are located.

I believe that this can be and is done by satellite in much the same way as Yuri Gagarin's April 1961 space flight was monitored from a satellite by listening to the very low power emissions that existed around the telephone cables in the Soviet space station on the ground. See James Bamford's “Body of Secrets” for a description of this activity which can be easily located through its index.

It is much less expensive to carry out this monitoring by other means I suspect. Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret has referenced the word “satellite” on numerous occasions, and another has described reading the communications although I have no verification of this. Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret has also referred to Vodafone on occasion as well. All possible methods are most likely being employed as part of this experiment for cost/benefit determinations.

Brainwave Decoding Capabilities

The decoding of the brainwaves that I have experienced so far which was present initially in 2001 consists of being able to accurately read the human senses: sight, hearing, feeling and smell. The most important are sight and hearing. Feelings while significant are not quite as important. And, smell has only been noted by comment. There has been no comment relating to taste.

Thoughts and images are also subject to accurate monitoring. I have tested these over and over and gotten verbal reactions from those using the surveillance technology accurately describing my thoughts and images many times throughout the past decade.

Very small printed type can be seen in this manner while I am reading which has been read out aloud by Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret in special circumstances to verify this facility. There is always the possibility that my thoughts about what I am reading can be read creating the impression that he can see through my eyes.

However, examples like the one where the mother of the abused children said “Look at his eyes” as the diplopia (double vision) was returning in September 2001 while I was walking across the football pitch in Holland Park “seeing” the trees in the distance separate into double vision confirmed this neurological surveillance technology facility.

What can be intercepted and decoded in this manner can also be fed back to the person as with a computer so that human activity such as hearing can be electronically transmitted. This is how I hear what those using the surveillance technology are saying anywhere I am located. They use this as a torture mechanism and interrogation tool to try to provoke the thought process which can be read as well as any other response reaction throughout the day and night 24/7/365. It's a means of continuous torture abuse.

Images can be implanted in the brain which in my experience is usually done at night to induce dreams and probe memory. On several occasions I have even seen a video being played as an image when woken by such dream inducement activity. I described exactly what had happened at that time as I do with everything verbally on an audio recorder which I use to keep continuous notes.

Pain can be induced by feedback as well and has been used as a torture method in the early years but has not been used that much lately about which I am directly aware. In February 2002 Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret simulated a cracked rib for an hour or two between midnight and about 0200 one night. Someone monitoring his activity outside and my response to its abuse caused him to drive down the road to tell Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret to stop since it was torture. He did, and the pain went away.

Initially, Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret had said to the mother of the abused children “Do you want to have some fun?” Then he initiated the pain which he himself called a “cracked rib” that described the pain precisely. I was writing notes on a notebook computer about all that was happening which was read from using Tempest by those outside in vehicles which caused the reaction as described.

Medication can also be carried out surreptitiously by emulating the brain's activity when subject to medication. This has been and is still used against me extensively to incapacitate and debilitate as a calmative not that it is needed. It is used on a false pretext in order to reduce function to create and look for errors that can then be pointed out and blamed on me the target.

It's purpose is simply sadistic abuse as was the pain inducement characterised by “Do you want to have some fun.” All of this activity which includes chronic sleep deprivation is intended to reduce and stop human activity. It's intention is to break down the human being. Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret frequently stated “Shut him down” to “Break him down” while carrying out this destructive behaviour against computer technology and myself to debilitate and incapacitate.

This was not successful over the years, and much conversation was devoted to it in terms of the efficacy of the surreptitious medication administered electronically. This was referenced by Colonel Vine USMC Ret working with Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret to send “it” back to the laboratory to get an improved surreptitious medication process. These particular medical procedures were being carried out by those who were not medical professionals and who also had a malicious objective to do as much harm as is possible.

There were also references to administering pain killers as calmatives with specific reference to morphine. This will have to be investigated further since I have no such addiction cravings and cannot determine precisely what has been administered although the fact of the surreptitious medication is well known to me subjectively and verified by what is being said.

I have allowed my hair to grow uncut throughout these years in order to be able to obtain a sample of any drugs administered surreptitiously by using a Mass Spectrograph for analysis since I have been drug free throughout this period and during my life taking prescription drugs only rarely when absolutely necessary. It is unlawful to administer drugs to a non-consenting adult outside a hospital environment in the UK. It is also unlawful for non-qualified medical professionals to do so at any time or any place.

As with all aspects of this neurologically based surveillance technology, it can be carried out anywhere the subject target is located by the accuracy of identification made possible by the unique signature of the human electromagnetic radiation halo surrounding the head.

I have thus been tracked and surreptitiously medicated while shopping, crossing the street, visiting an eye clinic or while at home. Often I will hear the phrase “He's drugged” just after I feel that I am hit by the surreptitious medication. They can monitor its impact. I was even hit with a loud verbal abuse comment while undergoing cataract surgery under local anaesthesia in the summer of 2003.

All human activity can be monitored wherever the subject target is located unless deep underground or protected by specially built rooms as now exist in many facilities as revealed by the Washington Post in its Top Secret America research last July 2010. It has occurred to me everywhere with all aspects of it used by targeting me accurately.

It creates an extraordinary surveillance technology, but the monitoring process has to be separated from the feedback activity. It's one thing to monitor against which there is no protection and which does not damage physically or psychologically except for the complete loss of privacy and confidentiality about which the subject target is totally unaware.

When the feedback occurs, however, as it does in my situation where it is being used for R&D, I am subjected to continuous verbal abuse which lets me know what is being done while abusing me at the same time. My location and activity are completely monitored by being able to see through my eyes and read my thoughts as well as being able to hear what I say if and when I speak.

At the same time all of this can be subjected to continuous comment which occurs in my situation for its experimental development as a torture tool. It is intended to cause physical and mental stress, distress and harm. The objective is to do as much damage as is possible for which this surveillance technology is being used against me in order to “teach him a lesson,” obtain “obedience” and ultimately be able to dominate and control human life and activity.

This sounds like a real life version of Stanley Milgram's 1960s Yale University experiment all over again or a similar one carried out at Stanford University a decade later that had to be shut down because it went out of control. See Erich Fromm's “Anatomy of Human Destructiveness” for a full description of these.

This surveillance technology is also a lethal weapon, and this experimental basis for its abuse against me is used to see how much can be done before harm is caused or death finally results. Killing the subject target in this manner is an objective of this R&D to hide what is happening by eliminating the target. This has been referenced frequently by the mother of the abused children who says “He should be dead by now.” Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret has said “You will die first” before he stops. I am subject to continuous death threats and threats of violence.

Side Effects

The side effects from the usage of the feedback portion of this neurological surveillance technology are quite noticeable and can be lethal. I can compare the past decade with the first 2.5 years of such surveillance activity carried out against me to see the similarities and differences.

Initially, the first 2.5 years consisted of radar imagining surveillance technology used in the flat above mine to watch my movements throughout my home. This started in mid-August 1998, and I was able to detect that something was happening immediately by the lymph oedema that occurred in my right forearm and hand. Subsequent verbal and other activity quickly confirmed what was being done.

The radar's electromagnetic radiation impacted the cells of the body triggering an immune system response as if the cells had been injured. This was not drained away in my right arm since I had had cancer surgery for a malignant melanoma on my right shoulder in August 1979 when all my lymph nodes under my right arm were removed. I was vulnerable to lymph oedema which I had experienced. Had it not been for the resulting lymph oedema, I would have never known about this side effect or its cause.

At the same time the radar imagining surveillance technology caused the cataracts to develop from mid-August 1998 to their diagnosis in December 2000. My eyes which had been stable for years although myopic began to deteriorate. I was already under hospital care for diplopia (double vision) which had started in February 1998 and was getting my eyes checked regularly by an optometrist as well.

The diplopia stablised by the end of 1998, but the damage to the lenses of the eyes took place as a result of the radar imaging devices located in the flat above. The deterioration was most pronounced in my otherwise stronger right eye because I slept on my left side more than my right which meant that my right eye was more exposed to the radar above.

After February 2001 when the neurological surveillance technology began to be used and especially after July 2002 when the brain probing began in some earnest, the same impact on the brain occurred as with that which had caused the lymph oedema in my right forearm and hand. There was an immune system response which resulted in the blood brain barrier being breached with what I call cranial fluid seeping into my sinus cavities.

There are no lymph nodes in the brain as you well know. That fluid then flows out with gravity. In my case I usually sleep on one side or another. The cranial fluid then blocks whatever nasal passage is on the downhill side. At the same time it seeps down my throat so I know what it is since I can taste it. If I turn over the nasal passage blockage disappears and reappears on the downhill side. If I sit or stand up, the blockage disappears altogether.

At the same time tinnitus occurs which is another side effect of this brain penetration by electromagnetic radiation activity during the night. If this is not done, there are no side effects. And, there is a diuretic impact from this neurological surveillance technology as well.

These side effects are signals to me about what is being done along with the actual process of dream inducements and periodic wake ups throughout each night. These abate from time to time which occur in conjunction with some restriction on what is being done as I continuously write about it and complain when I can. As is usual with all abuse, the victim is blamed, and this is no exception. I am blamed for what is happening while efforts are being made to deny what is being done as it goes on night and day.

I cannot tell any longer if there is any impact on my right arm from this activity since it remains permanently swollen. Whether this comes from the neurologically based surveillance technology or any ongoing abuse from the radar surveillance technology, I cannot tell.

In an issue of the Lancet at the end of October 1999 there was an excellent article about research into sleep deprivation. While well known as a torture method, this research article provided sound medical evidence of its adverse impact on the human body and its physiological systems. I happened to come across this article while reading in the library and was most interested because of the sleep deprivation to which I was being subjected at that time and had been since August 1998.

Chronic sleep deprivation will cause the collapse of one or more of the peripheral organ systems of the body most especially the cardiovascular system. It can destroy the cognitive ability of the brain and bring on weight gain and age onset diseases such as diabetes. Nutritional uptake is inhibited.

The chronic sleep deprivation to which I've been subjected for 12.5 years 24/7/365 has had as its intention to destroy life itself. This has been knowingly done since I have copied and communicated the contents of this Lancet article to numerous people since October 1999.

At one point early on when I was writing about the destruction of the cognitive capacity of the brain due to sleep deprivation, an NHS psychiatrist from a nearby hospital where I had met him at his request noted “At least he understands that” which I heard while working at an Internet shop as he was participating in the surveillance technology abuse. Years later a male said “I'm going to destroy your cognitive ability” again making violent threats as a consequence of the surveillance technology abuse.

Obviously, those with the surveillance technology who are creating this abuse know all about its impact and for this reason continue to carry out it. No one has ever stopped the intentional chronic sleep deprivation despite my continuous and complete reporting of it to a wide spectrum of people in positions of authority. What is being done is exactly the same as was done to suspected witches in the UK 400 years ago. The activity has not changed only the method by using today's technology.

Conclusion

I perceive here as a direct result of my 12.5 years of experience so far an ongoing pattern of medical and scientific research abuse made from US government sources based upon current technology development in much the same way that the infamous abuses from Tuskegee and Guatemala developed in their day based upon current medical science at that time. It also reflects the perverse elements of the Nazi experiments during WWII which were of a most extreme and abusive kind.

Given the indefinite usage of this neurologically based surveillance technology its objective is to obtain research on torture methods including interrogation and the ability to retrieve information from the human brain while making every effort to ultimately destroy the human being's activity and life itself. It is also focussing on developing incapacitating surreptitious medication electronically administered as well as social control.

It is the same process that was carried out at Tuskegee from 1932 to 1972 where the impact of syphilis was studied while watching the disease progress through its horrible stages to death at the same time penicillin was available but withheld while those suffering were not told that a cure existed. In this situation the deliberate destruction of life is being carried out for research purposes much like those experiments conducted by the Nazis during WWII while observing hoped for deterioration in human beings as they relate to mental and physical health until death occurs.

There are similarities to the Guatemala experiments of 1946-8 in that 700 vulnerable people who were mentally ill or prisoners were deliberately infected with SDTs in order to test the efficacy of penicillin as a cure. In my situation this surveillance makes people vulnerable. There is no defence against it by anyone. It also imprisons. I have been frequently called a “prisoner” or “He's my prisoner” by Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret and under “house arrest” which has been allowed to go on indefinitely with his presence for the past decade. This whole process replaces the democratic rule of law and its institutions.

In this situation every effort is being made to induce mental illness and physical disability as well as ultimately causing death to cover up what has been done by preventing me from accurately reporting all that has happened from my complete 24/7/365 database record which I have kept during all these years. There have also been similar references by Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret to the need to obtain my body at the time of death for “autopsy” purposes which I take to mean a cover up.

At the same time everything that is done is made to look like natural developments, and every effort is made to blame the victim as is the trademark of the abusive personality in order to discredit what I document and report. That is why Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret and the mother of the abused children are present 24/7/365 to perpetuate this fraud by “cooking the books.”

The key difference with this R&D is that it is distributive and not collective. The collection occurs at the central point of the use of this surveillance technology while the targets/subjects/victims are distributed. They are not collected together in one group as in the Tuskegee and Guatemala experiments. That is why I call this surveillance technology the portable concentration camp.

It is this characteristic that makes it far more difficult to detect and investigate. It looks like one person when, I believe, there are many involved who are distributed throughout the US and worldwide. This makes it all the more easy for those carrying out this abuse to hide and deny which is facilitated by blaming the target/subject/victim. That's why an investigation needs to be carried out to trace this back to its source to find its extent, all those who are participants and the other targets/subjects/victims. It's almost like a cell network of terrorists.

This neuroscience has been developed and is being applied to these destructive objectives while ongoing R&D proceeds unrestricted and unabated against non-consenting human subjects such as myself. I don't think I have to describe what positive and constructive benefits can be available from its proper use. These are self evident to all medical and scientific professionals.

This neuroscience is truly revolutionary, but it has fallen into the hands of those who are sadistically disposed in a secret research society with malicious intent to exploit it for material gain at the direct expense of the lives of those who are targeted by this surveillance technology. I believe that this can have a most beneficial legitimate use too, but it must be carefully controlled democratically to avoid these abuses which reflect the nature of the human character everywhere in the world.

Gary D Chance
London, UK
22nd February 2011

White House - Review of Human Subjects Protection

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary
For Immediate Release
November 24, 2010
Presidential Memorandum--Review of Human Subjects Protection

MEMORANDUM FOR DR. AMY GUTMANN Chair, Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues

SUBJECT: Review of Human Subjects Protection

Recently, we discovered that the U.S. Public Health Service conducted research on sexually transmitted diseases in Guatemala from 1946 to 1948 involving the intentional infection of vulnerable human populations. The research was clearly unethical. In light of this revelation, I want to be assured that current rules for research participants protect people from harm or unethical treatment, domestically as well as internationally.

I ask you, as the Chair of the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues, to convene a panel to conduct, beginning in January 2011, a thorough review of human subjects protection to determine if Federal regulations and international standards adequately guard the health and well-being of participants in scientific studies supported by the Federal Government. I also request that the Commission oversee a thorough fact-finding investigation into the specifics of the U.S. Public Health Service Sexually Transmitted Diseases Inoculation Study.

In fulfilling this charge, the Commission should seek the insights and perspective of international experts, including from Guatemala; consult with its counterparts in the global community; and convene at least one meeting outside the United States. I expect the Commission to complete its work within 9 months and provide me with a report of its findings and recommendations.

While I believe the research community has made tremendous progress in the area of human subjects protection, what took place in Guatemala is a sobering reminder of past abuses. It is especially important for the Commission to use its vast expertise spanning the fields of science, policy, ethics, and religious values to carry out this mission. We owe it to the people of Guatemala and future generations of volunteers who participate in medical research.

BARACK OBAMA

Information on the 1946-1948 United States Public Health Service STD Inoculation Study

My Email to the Commission on 10th February 2011:

Subject: Current neurological medical and science experiments carried out in London since February 2001 by US government agents/contractors on a non-consenting human guinea pig research subject 24/7/365

From: Gary D Chance 10 February 2011 15:24
To: info@bioethics.gov

Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues
1425 New York Avenue, NW
Suite C-100
Washington, DC 20005

Mesdames et Messrs

Less than a week ago on Friday last, 4th February 2011, I became aware of your work through the current issue of Emory Magazine from an Email I had just received.

Over the weekend I read the four major articles online devoted to ethics including the one concerning your work since Emory's President, James Wagner, is the Commission's Vice Chair.

I finished this Email on Monday, 7th February 2011, sending it along as noted below and then sent a copy of it to the Commission's Chair, Amy Gutmann, at the University of Pennsylvania the following day, Tuesday, 8th February 2011.

It was not until Tuesday last, 8th February 2011, that I began exploring your web site and have been doing so slowly and thoroughly.

My sense of my experience and its relevance to your work was solidified by President Obama's letter to Dr Gutmann dated 24th November 2010 charging the Commission with taking up the issue of protecting human research subjects in light of the Guatemala experiments in 1946-48. He took the words right out of my mouth when I read that letter a few moments ago.

Presidential Memorandum--Review of Human Subjects Protection | The White House 24.11.2010 to Dr Amy Gutmann, Chair. [Tweet]

I quote this paragraph since it is so very important to what is happening currently:

"I ask you, as the Chair of the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues, to convene a panel to conduct, beginning in January 2011, a thorough review of human subjects protection to determine if Federal regulations and international standards adequately guard the health and well-being of participants in scientific studies supported by the Federal Government. I also request that the Commission oversee a thorough fact-finding investigation into the specifics of the U.S. Public Health Service Sexually Transmitted Diseases Inoculation Study."

For the last decade I have been the non-consenting human guinea pig subject of neurological research relating to surveillance technology 24/7/365 carried out by agents and/or contractors of the US government who are named and described below.

I enclose a copy of the Email below for your preliminary evaluation with respect to this remit by President Obama. My comments based upon my experience reflect an international relevance and current day activity for the evaluation of US Federal regulations and international standards. This activity goes on while I write.

Further, since President Obama urges the Commission to hold at least one meeting at an international location, I would recommend that you consider London for that meeting which would give me an opportunity to present my experience and respond to any and all questions that members of the Commission might have.

This would also provide an opportunity for the Commission to engage in a fact finding activity on as broad a scale as is possible similar to the one which President Obama has requested of the Commission for the research carried out in Guatemala in 1946-8. The key advantage being that this is currently under way and in need of such a fact finding effort by the Commission for this situation will burst forth publicly at some point calling into question all the aspects of the ethical issues which the Commission is currently considering.

The abuses are still going on and need to be addressed especially in light of the five points for consideration that the Commission has provided which I note below. .

I have enclosed a copy of my Email below as well as attached a *.PDF file of it. I was trying my best to get the URL links operating to which I referred that appeared in the blogged version of this Email.

Those links most likely will appear as clickable in the Email you receive but not resolved into an HTML document format.Here is a copy of my Email of Monday, 7th February 2011, for your consideration

I have provided the additional *.PDF attachment for ease of distributing this 11-page document for your convenience, but it too will have the unresolved codes of an HTML document that will give the links but will have to be highlighted for automatic reference.

This is the best I can do at the present. The document is otherwise free of codes except for the links and italicised words.

Here is a copy of my Email of Monday, 7th February 2011, for your consideration:

Ethics at Emory University, Presidential Commission, Colonel Ted Westhusing

Paige Parvin, Editor, Emory Magazine
Mary Loftus, Associate Editor, Emory Magazine

Re Emory Magazine Winter 2011 Ethics: military corruption; President's commission; social media & Internet; ethics education.

You have both edited and written key articles for this superb issue of Emory Magazine, so I address this to both of you.

Friday night I sent along a "background" Email after I had begun reading your ethics edition of Emory Magazine about which I had just received Email notification enclosing a similar Email that I had sent the previous day to Dean Bowen at Oxford College [of Emory University].

At that time I had read the first article Ethics Ed. Since then I've read the other three: Lab to Life, An American Warrior and The Devil You Know the article on social media's dark side. I have not yet read the discussions about each having wanted to note my reaction and thoughts first.

I find what has been discussed here in these four articles quite profound and most relevant to my own experience and activity which includes all our experience in this world today. I just wanted to add a "few" more comments to the "background" from yesterday.

These comments hinge on the fact of my having been (and still am as of this writing) a surveillance target and non-consenting experimental human guinea pig for 12.5 years 24/7/365 since August 1998. This rather bizarre abuse of surveillance technology in a truly "Big Brother" manner given its most extreme sophistication has negatively impacted every aspect of life from the personal through the environment, community and nation to the international relating to antisocial and criminal behaviour, organised crime and terrorism. This is why what you are presenting here in these articles is so profound.

1. Emory Magazine: Winter 2011: From Lab to Life by Mary J Loftus Ethical considerations for biological research. Penn & Emory presidents.

"While forming its recommendations, the commission kept in mind five ethical principles relevant to considering the social implications of emerging technologies:

public beneficence,

responsible stewardship,

intellectual freedom and responsibility,

democratic deliberation, and

justice and fairness."

I've opened these up for my own benefit, focus and concentration because I believe that they form the foundation of what must be considered when approaching the ethical standards for any human activity most especially the indefinite surveillance abuse being carried out against me.

The commission was side tracked initially by the creation of life that needed addressing because it caught the public's attention and usefully provided a focus as well as a starting point from extreme public interest and need. I then noted the last paragraph which I found most important:

"As for the work of Gutmann, Wagner, and the rest of the bioethics panel? They will begin two new projects—one involving the ethics of genetic and neurological testing, the other reviewing human subject trials to ensure that all participants are protected from harm and unethical treatment."

I have yet to see anywhere any mention of the ability to intercept and decode human brainwaves surrounding the head in order to completely monitor and feedback to the human brain including reading thoughts and images as well as monitoring all human sensory perceptions.

This has been done to me for a decade since February 2001 introduced by Colonel Vine USMC Ret, Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret and others into the already ongoing surveillance abuse carried out against me started in August 1998.

Since the publication last July of Top Secret America by The Washington Post and its expose of the vast contracting activity being carried out, I have assumed that these people are from Top Secret America as either agents or contractors. Colonel Vine is a world traveller in this regard having gone to Kabul after the 2001 invasion, Sri Lanka after the Boxing Day Tsunami and might very well be or have been in Tibet recently.

Further, the revelation on 10th January 2011 just a few weeks ago of the UK's Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) operating a secret police force on a private basis since at least 1997 has filled a gap of how this could have taken place and not be accountable to the UK's Home Office/Secretary and the Surveillance Commissioner. ACPO itself became a private company in 1997 coincident with the incoming UK Labour government at that time.

In the past I have sent several Emails over the years to James Wagner [Emory University's President] about my experience and the need to address this extreme abuse of neurological science so that when these abuses come to light which they surely will, the scientific and medical communities are not attacked as responsible that would have the effect of discrediting research.

I have also just learned that James Wagner is an electrical engineer who has developed through medical applications of his knowledge. He should be well positioned to technically understand the Tempest intercept facility that leads to the decoding of human brainwave electromagnetic radiation.

Please see James Bamford's book Body of Secrets concerning Yuri Gagarin's April 1961 space flight and the USS Oxford off Havana Harbour during the October 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis for examples of this 50 years ago. His index will take you right to them. The very beginning of his The Shadow Factory will reveal this protection necessary in the office of the Director of the NSA (DIRNSA) at the beginning of this decade.

I will be waiting to see what develops from this commission in the future to see if it can really get at the single most important issue that confronts the worldwide public that has originated from the US with respect to neurological research and its abuses which have long been in existence. This abuse of neurological science and medicine threatens the foundation of democracy. Reporting it as I do would be similar to one of those in the Tuskegee experiment trying to get the truth out while that experiment was taking place.

2. Emory Magazine: Winter 2011: An American Warrior by Mary J Loftus Ethics meets Iraq contractor corruption. Guess who loses?

"On June 5, 2005, Ted Westhusing was found dead in a trailer at Camp Dublin in Baghdad, his service pistol on his bed along with a letter indicating that he had taken his own life. “I cannot support a msn [mission] that leads to corruption, human rights abuse, and liars. I am sullied—no more,” it read in part. “I didn’t volunteer to support corrupt, money grubbing contractors, nor work for commanders only interested in themselves. I came to serve honorably and feel dishonored. . . . Death before being dishonored anymore.” "

I have to sympathise with Colonel Ted Westhusing's wife and do not believe that he committed suicide given my experience of the past 12.5 years 24/7/365 and especially during the past decade as a result of Vine, Bird and others. Every effort is made to destroy especially escalating these when I attempted to report what was happening. They seek every means to kill including trying to drive someone to suicide. Faking suicide is a very real possibility despite the fact that his letter was in his handwriting. I'm still of the mind that Dr David Kelly's death could very well have been a faked suicide:

The abrogation of all ethical standards in the abuse of this surveillance technology is the least of it for it is extreme criminal activity operating outside the democratic rule of law destroying government and any governing body in favour of vigilante abuse driven by this surveillance technology. It destroys the lives of all who come in contact with its abuse.

A key element in this surveillance technology is the ability to transmit sound electronically which the US Army calls Voice-to-Skull (V2K). They can look through my eyes to see all that I am doing; hear with my ears and read my thoughts to anticipate behaviour in which they can then interfere. All of this and more can be done wherever I am located. They validate this activity for me by the verbal abuse from those I know: the mother of the abused children since 1998 and earlier, Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret since 2001 and others.

I can easily see where this kind of abuse would drive someone to suicide. They keep trying to do this to me while predicting it, but it has not and will not happen. They also make every effort to cause as much physical injury as they can. The capability of this surveillance technology doing this is far greater than they have used since they are trying to create death which will be seen as natural causes or suicide.

I found this article to be quite extraordinary about what happens to those who run into the corruption that exists on a mass scale as it does in Iraq, Afghanistan and other similar places where contractors are only interested in milking the system for as much as they can get. It's not just the war zones but also areas where I live in London's North Kensington. I have been experiencing this massive corruption for a very long time here driven by former US military types in a situation where the disposition to surveillance abuse already existed and understand fully what he ran into in Iraq. His wife was right when she said that she wished the generals had stayed away from his funeral.

3. Emory Magazine: Winter 2011: The Devil You Know by Paige P Parvin Social media & Internet harbours a dark side impacting human behaviour.

All of my efforts for over three years to properly address this abuse from August 1998 to August 2001 (before 9/11) led me to start making my experience public with the creation of a web site in November 2001 (just after 9/11). I later started using a Bravenet Journal (Blog) and YouTube.

I wanted to communicate the creation of antisocial behaviour in this environment by filming it and making it generally available so that something could be done about it and its source which derived from the surveillance technology abuse. You will note that I was subjected to intense abuse by the comments which were left on YouTube and a bit on MySpace. I stopped using it after some 50 or so videos were posted.

Those using the surveillance technology were instrumental in inducing antisocial behaviour then abusing me further for reporting it by this means. They also attempted to discredit my addressing the problem by inciting abuse from those engaging in the antisocial behaviour which I then filmed. A few of the video clips were removed from YouTube as a result of complaints from those abusing surveillance technology who sought to stop me altogether and still do by declaring this documentation as "illegal."

The YouTube videos show that not only was this antisocial behaviour extremely dangerous to those so engaged, but it also put at direct risk those passing by using the narrow entrance/exit where it was taking place.

On two occasions I filmed the police walking right through it and on at least one occasion driving right passed it. There was a general failure in addressing serious safety problems which were seen by those in authority. Steps were taken finally after a few years to make the fences higher and renovate the area out front where the benches had been damaged, but the problems and surveillance technology abuse persist.

There have been over 50K views of these videos on YouTube. You will see here as with all my Internet activity that I use my full name. This is not true for others which reflects what you are describing with respect to anonymity fostering abusive behaviour. Nothing went viral!

This raises not only an issue of ethics but of law enforcement and the protection of public safety which those abusing surveillance technology sought to abrogate by maintaining standards of antisocial and criminal behaviour.

More recently I've taken on MySpace, Twitter, Facebook and Blogger in addition to the Bravenet Journal after my computer systems were attacked by those using surveillance technology and disabled. I've continued to access these to communicate as best I can the essence of what is occurring against the news events that occur as all of this activity can be compared and contrasted with what is happening publicly with respect to government at all its levels and across the UK and world.

I started Twitter in mid-2009 as a result of the US health care plan being touted then and its criticism. I wanted to point out the extreme dangers that exist in government run health systems such as the NHS (National Health Service) in the UK. They have participated directly in the surveillance technology abuse against me since the end of 1999 just after I sent an Email to Prime Minister Tony Blair a copy of which was subsequently displayed to me in a visit I had at the local St Charles Hospital with a psychiatrist.

Last summer I learned that St Charles Hospital had been leasing one of its wards to a porn film company c 1998 to help finance itself although it was an NHS hospital fully funded by the taxpayer:

St Charles Hospital Porn Financed Surveillance S&M Torture

At the end of this Blog are links to the letter I sent to the Prime Minister, its five appendices, the various publicised newspaper reports about this porn financing and three links to correspondence from early 2000 that I sent regarding the abuse I received from these psychiatrists and a later Email of these to my Member of Parliament under the title "Repression By Psychiatry." This still goes on today.

This porn financing occurred at the onset of its abuse against me including these NHS health professionals rolling out into the community to join in the surveillance technology abuse and medical experimentation being carried out against me. Since I had met and talked with a couple of them, I could recognise their voices as they continued for years. This was a significant additional expenditure which could be financed by methods like these about which the public taxpayer was kept in the dark for over a decade. There is no accountability here and most certainly no responsibility.

You will find in Blogger (published at the end of December 2009) that I accurately forecast the risk of the Christmas Day bomber five months in advance:

Achilles Heel at US National Counterterrorism Centre?

I sent copies to President Obama and Prime Minister Brown of an Email that I had sent to the editor of Columbia Magazine (I finished my undergraduate work and went to graduate school at Columbia) at the end of July 2009 following an article they had done on the Director of the National Counterterrorism Centre (NCTC). Based upon my experience I knew he did not fully know what he was doing which constituted a risk that turned out to be precisely correct.

In July of 2010 The Washington Post revealed its two years of research connected with Top Secret America which started me adding Facebook to what I had been Tweeting for a year. The Tweets, by the way, automatically feed to MySpace and Buzz. Since my YouTube experience, I've kept the information flow on social media on the Internet in one direction largely because I do not have any time. I am beset by those abusing surveillance technology around-the-clock without any let up at all including sleep deprivation.

I make every effort to document all that I can by writing and recording with audio and video recordings so that I have a complete record of all that is happening. I've been doing this since 1998 to facilitate my reporting of what has been happening to all those in positions of authority where I seek to bring this to an end. This has enabled me to also make some of this information public on the Internet's social media, but I cannot interactively engage anyone there yet although I do this when I am posting on news commentary such as The Washington Post or The Daily Beast.

I'm not concerned about not being believed because I know that at some point all of this will become public knowledge which is slowly happening. Every conceivable effort is made to isolate and alienate me from everyone by those abusing the surveillance technology, but I am able to counter this by at least describing what is happening on the Internet. For this reason I think that it is a positive force for the overall betterment of the world and its people despite the abuses and its shortcomings.

You expressed concern about the media itself where journalists feel compelled to stay out front of news events in the 24/7 publishing world and are sometimes lax with respect to fact checking. That's not a new problem at all and goes way back including such venerable publications as The New York Times. Consider the reporting that surrounded the 1960s murder of Kitty Genovese:

Kitty Genovese: Truth About Witnessing & Reporting Crime

The whole truth about this murder did not come out until decades later when this blog poster did an excellent job of research and described it on the Internet. It turns out that the original New York Times reporting was somewhat suspect to put it mildly, but then they, too, like all journalists are under pressure to produce copy.

The same thing is happening here with significant forces and powers that be trying to maintain their positions of power by abusing surveillance technology and, for some like the child abusers, gain positions of power. Because of the Internet I am able to make this situation known as I have done for almost a decade while continuing to document and report to those in authority what is happening. I am subject to a great deal of abuse and attempts to discredit which I can counter to a degree by audio and video records of what is happening some of which I have made available on the Internet to publicly present what is happening.

It's a constant struggle but one that has to be done which the Internet and social media are making possible through the media itself, e.g., The Washington Post and The Daily Beast, as well as individuals of all sorts everywhere around the world. The need is to bring out the facts and disabuse any who would want to distort and misrepresent want is happening. That is exactly what you are doing here including pointing out the dark side of the Internet which needs to be recognised and properly addressed as you report is happening. After all it's called ethics, n'est-ce pas?

4. Emory Magazine: Winter 2011: Ethics Ed by Jim Auchmutey Challenge assumptions, embrace ambiguity, and step outside comfort zones

This was an excellent article and these comments about the essence of an ethics education set against practical experience are, as I've said, quite profound. But, I want to take them a step further in light of what I have discussed above in terms of "assumptions," "ambiguity" and "comfort zone."

I see the death of Colonel Ted Westhusing as a failure in either the educational system or in a system where eithics does not exist as a consideration. Whether or not Colonel Westhusing committed suicide, was driven to commit suicide or was actually murdered to make it appear as suicide is not important although investigation into and speculation about his death are extremely important. The fact is he's dead. Why? Where is the failure?

1. Is there a failure in the educational system at Emory that allowed a mechanistic approach to earning a Doctor of Philosophy degree in ethics (of all things) to override full consideration and probing of the ethical issues with which he was dealing?

2. Is it really meaningful to crank out a dissertation in half a year or so when two years would have enabled a more probing and thought provoking process?

3. Would Colonel Westhusing have gained more insight into the issues and himself if he had spent more time working through them rather than dashing them off to get back out into the system from which he came that ultimately led to his death?

4. Would he have questioned issues far more that might have led him to actually resign his commission before going to Iraq if he had understood that the problems were far more extensive and complex than he realised?

5. Did Emory's graduate programme fail him to the extent that he lost his life?

6. Or, is the system that currently exists especially with respect to the military and its current wars including terrorism along with the huge contractor revolving door between the military and civilian worlds so gargantuan now as The Washington Post has presented in its Top Secret America as to be "beyond control?"

7. Is it impossible for anyone to cope with this system that has self selected brutality and death as a means of perpetuating its own unethical and criminal character?

8. Did he ultimately learn the hard way after his education process at Emory that the world as it is today is far beyond anyone's comprehension even his own?

I give Colonel Ted Westhusing credit for having the ability to understand exactly what was happening around him in Iraq. Personally, I find it difficult to believe that he committed suicide although his letter appears to be genuinely his. There are facts that we cannot know about this situation except the fact of this death and the fact of the extensive corruption he described which was condoned and supported by those to whom he reported. He walked into a snake pit of vipers feeding off each other and the situation for their own gain which he deplored because they lied, cheated and stole all they could doing the least amount of work possible as he wrote.

The failure exists in that he could not address this situation properly when he found it, and he could not anticipate its existence beforehand since either that knowledge was unavailable or being hidden and denied including perhaps by himself as well.

Did he not question "assumption"; consider "ambiguities" and step outside his own "comfort zone" before entering the snake pit so that he could cope with it in some way that would have not resulted in his death by whatever means and for whatever reasons it took place?

The military itself is founded upon the principle of destroying any questioning whatsoever so that people are conditioned into accepting orders in the face of death and carrying them out regardless of any consideration for their own lives. This is the military training and what the chain of command is all about. It is wide open to abuse. Fundamentally, the military does not consider ethics and leaves that to the civilian authorities while it develops as a fighting machine or as in this case "An American Warrior." We also have to recognise that there are just wars and the military is an essential part of the state and its government.

9. The question then becomes how do we deal with its problems when it goes astray as inevitably occurs in times of war but is occurring now on an institutionalised basis in terms of civilian contractors who have formed a monolith that cannot be held responsible and is unaccountable to anyone because it is largely unknown even to those in ultimate civilian power in the government?

In the UK this has also been reflected by the Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) who, since 1997, has been a private company employing a secret police force outside government control that has acted for years as infiltrators and agents provocateurs inside organisations considered as threats to domestic safety.

10. What happens when, as is probably the case in the UK, these two unaccountable, unknown and beyond control entities get together as I've experienced in London's North Kensington for 12.5 years 24/7/365?

First and foremost, they will kill anyone who threatens their exposure. They have the weapon in surveillance technology to do so as I've directly experienced all these years since August 1998.

They lie to make up a threat to justify their surveillance which turns out to be indefinite and outside the democratic rule of law including the UK's Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (RIPA), the Surveillance Commissioner and Home Secretary. The foundation of this activity rests upon the most sophisticated surveillance technology ever known that itself is founded upon neurological science and a principle of electronics that has been known and used by the intelligence community in the US for over fifty years.

This technology has been introduced by the military/contractor revolving door element from the US into a civilian UK neighbourhood in London indefinitely from February 2001 and continues as of this writing. We are not talking about war zones only here but an extended abuse of this surveillance technology carried out indefinitely for at least a decade by former US military personnel who also travel the world presumably doing the same elsewhere which might very well include Tibet of late as well as other locations in the UK.

These are the same people who have given the world rendition with which I was threatened in May 2001, Guantanamo Bay, Abu Ghraib and secret prisons in Afghanistan and elsewhere in the world. I call this Toxic Surveillance and refer to it as the Portable Concentration Camp. You have got to ask and answer the question for yourselves why the National Health Service, police and other parts of government have been active participants in this while no one has stopped this despite my continuous documentation and reporting about what is happening.

If I'm having this problem, think of the problem Colonel Ted Westhusing would have inside the military with its chain of command for tyranny and cover up. In my situation there are scores if not hundreds of people involved. There are those who refuse based upon "ethics" such as the medical student who stopped participating for that reason.or the male who said this past week while I was reading your articles and writing this "I can't do this any more." Still, they do not do anything to stop it since it goes on and on.

I believe that you will find the same activity taking place inside the US, and you will find it in areas where there exists social housing so that ignorance can be exploited and people without any means to respond can be abused as non-consenting human guinea pigs. They may not even know about it. When you went to a social housing area for Somalia refugees and others to clean up, you needed to look at ways to further involve yourselves in the community. Cleaning up is a first step, but you need to connect with the people to find out about their "ethical" problems and how you can help them.

Without creating privacy invasion problems there needs to be a way to connect between the remote, elite university and the socially deprived areas so that all these people can see positive reinforcement for honest ethical standards as opposed to dishonest antisocial and criminal standards that seek to abuse and exploit them. The university by its very nature can be the key source for such help from all its disciplines including medicine, law, business as well as social work and the liberal arts and sciences. In the meantime the ethical studies centre should grow into an institute and a full academic discipline where case studies can be developed for education.

That academic discipline needs to draw upon and involve everyone else throughout the university. If my experience is any indication every aspect of the education system is being abused in the extreme in the community and perverted to such a degree as to destroy the very foundation of civilisation as we know it. So, the people need all aspects of community support and assistance which they cannot afford such as law, medicine, business and so on. This needs to be done in areas where potential disaffection can develop especially with refugees from places like Somalia. If Colonel Ted Westhusing cannot cope from within the system given all that he had, these people are doomed unless others come along to help them.

They are doomed because there are too many of the kind that I see like Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret and the family of child abusers who participate in the surveillance technology abuse against me leading and driving it for all to participate which is happening instead of its being stopped. The mother of the abused children went on to further child abuse expanding to adult abuse with surveillance technology against me and then generally inverting the standards of this environment and community. When the abused young boy grew to 18, he could not function as an adult. His mother using the surveillance technology sought to get him accepted as an official participant in its abuse. This is what is happening, and no one is stopping it.

I applaud you for what your doing and what you've done. I just want to see a lot more of it because my personal experience tells me there is a most profound abrogation of ethics that is taking over society. Much like the fraud that ended the likes of Enron and the Toxic Debt that almost financially wrecked the world, Toxic Surveillance will ultimate destroy society if it is not stopped. There will be no recovery from it if allowed to go on to the kinds of debacles we've witnessed in these other areas.

I took a look at James Wagner's background which had this statement:

"Dr. Wagner has worked closely with faculty, students, alumni, and staff to enhance the undergraduate educational experience, grow research, and foster more effective partnership between the academy and local institutions, including government and industry. Out of a firm devotion to the ancient university mission of liberal education-which he defines as mastering a discipline and developing a thirst for new knowledge-Dr. Wagner has been able to forge collaborations among a diverse array of schools and programs, ranging from the arts and sciences to the professional schools."

This has to be the future development, and it needs to be carried out on a huge scale if the "dark forces" are to be counter balanced before they are ultimately and finally destructive. The dark forces that emerge on the Internet need to be incorporated and addressed by the interactive educational process. What we really need to do is learn to start thinking about the process of thinking and open up those comfort zones, consider the ambiguities and challenge assumptions so that the experience of life can be meaningful for all and not destructive which now enables the abusive few to dominate and control the many.

I was at Oxford College [of Emory University] from 1958 to 1961 in what was called the Four-Year-Programme that only lasted three years by that time. I spent too much of my time thinking about what I was doing and exploring the phenomenal world that this education opened for me. I was quite taken by Dean Bowen's Email that I received the day before the Emory Magazine Email. He was discussing the new science facility to be constructed at Oxford [College of Emory University], but here's what he said in his last paragraph:

"We speak often about the transformation an Oxford education makes in our students' lives. Many Oxford graduates have taken the foundation in science and math that they gained here and gone on to scientific and technical roles with world-wide influence. Others, though not science or math majors, have encountered science and math through the Oxford liberal-arts curriculum and broadened their intellectual horizons. Both experiences can be life-changing."

Carl Jung's Psychology and Religion was one of the profound books we read in a history course's "B" section exploring the literature and thought of the period in this case the modern era. These were Jung's 1938 Terry Lectures at Yale University which are still in print. He brings to light here the dark side of the human character, or more properly called the shadow personality, the anima/animus, against the background of the conflict generated between the religious nature of man and modern rationality of scientific based knowledge. The conflict here led to the individual experiencing difficulties in functioning until he could resolve the two sides reflected by a religious character and rational scientific knowledge.

Erich Neumann wrote a book which came out in 1949 in Tel Aviv called Depth Psychology and a New Ethic. In it he carried on with Jung's work noting that the dark side of the human character had to be recognised for what it was as an integral part of human nature and integrated into the whole personality not denied [and repressed] as it had been in the past. Such denial [and repression] led to the dichotomy between good and evil which he called the old ethic [that he] sought to re-align thinking to approach these by fully integrating them into the whole personality so that a new and more satisfactory ethic could emerge. A key aspect of this is that lying damages the liar internally. Jung wrote a foreward as did others.

This same integration needs to take place across all disciplines in the educational community and reach out into the community where it exists. Dean Bowen described the facilities for the new science structure at Oxford [Collage of Emory University] as integrating the various science disciplines. He should go further to integrate all disciplines at Oxford [College of Emory University] under an ethical umbrella so that each understands better what is being done and how it can best suit the community at large. This does not mean that practical applications should be dominant, but that they should create an awareness in science and all disciplines about the issues and consequences of learning and knowledge. This can be readily seen in the neurological and electronic sciences where it is now possible to read the human brain as I've experienced directly as a surveillance target for a decade.

"Have to kill him," said Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret after I finished this Email. This is what they do as has occurred to Colonel Ted Westhusing. They seek to create an enclave in disadvantaged areas from which to operate. That's why it is key for the university to get out into the community to prevent this kind of development by providing an education for students in the real problems of the world which they need to solve. Otherwise, this lying, cheating and stealing by surveillance technology will undercut and destroy the fabric and integrity of the entire community and also the university as it has already done to the community here. These people steal everything with surveillance technology then rewrite it to suit themselves much like the Ministry of Truth in George Orwell's 1984. Society cannot be constructed on such dirty data. It will eventually collapse or run at a demented, low level.

Is Teaching Ethics a Waste of Time? by James Wagner, President, Emory University

"For [H Richard] Niebuhr, response-ability is the capacity to size up what is going on, determine what the appropriate response should be, and then hold oneself accountable for the outcomes of one’s actions."

Judgement "is the capacity to size up what is going on" to repeat given what Dr Wagner goes on to say about the purpose of Emory as an educational institution.

In the autumn of 1958 we read Plato's Republic in our Greek seminar class at Oxford College [of Emory University] as my class of 14 students started its Four-Year-Programme. It was an exploration of "What is virtue?" His answer was knowledge but in the special sense of what Plato called knowledge as it related to his "forms" and the ability to understand them. In my Greek humanities class that quarter (quarter system in those days) I wrote a paper called Plato's Theory of the Just Man. It wasn't that good but reflected a start in that direction. I'm still working on it. Yes, ethics can and needs to be taught. Judgement can be taught. We have no alternative any more given the advances in science and its abuse as described above.

One of my favourite books from Oxford College [of Emory University] is Gilbert Murray's Five Stages of Greek Religion which was the first book we encountered in our Greek humanities course. It was first published a hundred years ago in 1912 as Four Stages of Greek Religion.

This book is probably best known for its The Failure of Nerve thesis noting "a loss of self-confidence, of hope in this life and of faith in normal human effort; a despair of patient inquiry . . . an indifference to the welfare of the state" that occurred in "tone" between the classical writers of ancient Greece and those of the Christian era where this failure occurred. The suicide bombers and cults of today exhibit this same failure of nerve to engage in the world as part of it and reject it for death and a hoped for paradise.

I don't believe that Colonel Ted Westhusing suffered from a "Failure of Nerve" and took his own life. I believe that the problem today centres around losing one's nerve when confronted by Toxic Surveillance and its associated abuses so that one gives up as has occurred whenever totalitarian governments begin to emerge.

Sincerely yours

Gary D Chance

http://garydchance.com/
http://garydchance.tripod.com/surveillance/
http://garydchance.bravejournal.com/
http://garydchance-gary.blogspot.com/
http://twitter.com/garydchance
http://www.facebook.com/garydchance
http://www.myspace.com/garydchance
http://www.youtube.com/garydchance

cc James Wagner, President, Emory University
Stephen Bowen, Dean, Oxford College of Emory University
The Washington Post Top Secret America
The Daily Beast
BBC News Channel