Khodorkovsky Given Six More Years in Jail
Mikhail Khodorkovsky gets six more years in Russia jail Hague concerned but allows US agents London surveillance prison
The hypocrisy here of the West especially the US/UK is repugnant in the extreme. US State Dept spokesman Mark Toner's and UK Foreign Secretary William Hage's comments pointing a finger at Russia are pathetic given the fact that the US and UK do far worse than this. It's not just an abuse of due process, justice and the legal system that occurs in the US and UK, but it's the secret surveillance government that exists completely outside the democratic institutions and the democratic rule of law that is profoundly stunning.
To be imprisoned indefinitely by surveillance technology for over 12+ years as I have been in London by the US and UK with torture abuse, medical experimentation and execution continuously threatened makes Russian justice look benevolent. The US and UK have carried on from the worst of the KGB and the Gestapo with current technology that creates a secret government with these abuses hidden and most certainly never acknowledged.
Worst of all is that these western governments attack the innocent on a presumptionof guilt while those in power like William Hague, Hiliary Clinton, David Cameron and Barack Obama do absolutely nothing to stop it. When you know the reality of these western governments, Putin and Russia appear far more attractive: brutal but out in the open about it. The real repression and destruction in the West matches and exceeds that of repressive govenrments like China, Burma and other totalitarian states except for perhaps North Korea. Purges worse than those carried out by Stalin are being accomplished in the West in secret whle everyone watches.
The context in which these comments occurred can be seen here
Thursday, 30 December 2010
Wednesday, 29 December 2010
"Inside Rome's Embassy Bombing Wave of Terror"
Inside Rome's Embassy Bombing Wave of Terror by Barbie Latza Nadeau The Daily Beast
Excellent: I've wanted to read about the ongoing bits of information concerning these bombings on Christmas Eve Eve especially about who they are and other related bombing attempts such as in Athens last November as described. It's a well made point that terrorism is the plague continuing from the last century especially after WWII
Let us not forget the US terrorism from the Weathermen, Puerto Rican liberation, SLA (Patty Hearst) in the 1960s and onwards. People with a cause seek to terrorise with violence and the threat of violence instead of legitimate communication to attract attention. They only serve to destroy their cause in the process which is presumably bankrupt since they have to resort to terrorism.
Let's also not forget that splinter IRA groups are alive and well in Northern Ireland with their eyes on mainland UK as are emerging al Qaeda groups like AQAP (African Peninsula) whose eyes are on Europe and North America. Nine arrested terrorists of Bangladeshi origin were just charged with plotting to bomb the US embassy, tourist and government locations in London.
While Julian Assange was in Wandsworth Prison, a suspected al Qaeda terrorist bomber from Luton 35 miles north of London bombed Stockholm, Sweden. They caught nine but one got away and bombed for terror fear. There were the package bombs out of AQAP found in the UK (almost missed) and Middle East causing disruption to air freight into the US.
My major concern revolves around the efforts of democratic governments to deal with terrorism as a whole generated by various groups while there is an ever increasing threat from an escalation in WMD as well as the standard pipe bomb or small package bombs which are horrible to contemplate being on the receiving end hence they terrorise.
My greatest worry is that marginal people are being inducted into the fight against terrorism who then abuse the process because they are given investigative tools such as surveillance and powers that are outside the democratic rule of law so that they become terrorists themselves. I have witnessed and experienced this myself directly for over 12 years since mid-Augsut 1998.
The abuse of power has been so extensive that I can fully agree with "Dsrtsailor" above that "the ruling government is legal mafia." In my direct experience the government has become organised crime from the abuse of surveillance technology against me indefinitely so that the terrorists have won by destroying democracy and its rule of law. They do not have to do anything. It has already been done for them.
The abuse of surveifllance technology against me has produced a standard of antisocial and criminal behaviour which resulted night before last in 13 hours of antisocial and violent behaviour throughout the night where I had to call the police at half midnight because of violence where somone was apparently injured.
Using surveillance technology indefinitely like this creates a power base that is completely independent of government and corrupts all the departments of government including the NHS and police in the UK as I've directly experienced in North Kensington in London since 1998.
Fascism (power for power's sake) is growing out of terrorism and replacing democracy because those who are using the surveillance technology manufacture allegations to support their contnuing abuse of power by a smear and fear campaign in the community that even makes those in the departments of government afraid just like the Mafia or terrorists would. As a result more terrorism is created by inciting others who are close to the edge and distracting legitimate anti-terrorist efforts to miss those like the Stockholm bomber who lived near London for almost a decade.
The most worrying aspect of this is that no matter how much I accurately document and report what is going on to those in authority no one has stopped this terrorism in the local community from destroying it and the local government itself.
There are two serious problems: those from without and those from within. No one is dealing with or reporting those from within. Why not? Especially when considered in this instance where this internal terrorism and organised crime have existed as a standard for over 12 years. The same kind of destruction wielded by the Brown Shirts in Nazi Germany starting in 1933 is being carried out today and is similarly approved by those in government.
The context of the abuve comment can be found here
Wasn't if 1993 when the WTC was first bombed? John P O'Neill http://bit.ly/gfVmo3 dug into the roots of the WTC 1993 bombing to find al Qaeda and bin Laden and helped capture its bomber Ramzi Yousef. He investigated the USS Cole bombing but had tense relations with the US ambassador to Yemen over security and withdrew. He left the FBI under cloudy circumstances that might be considered smear tactics and was only 19 days at his new job of WTC head of security when killed on 9/11.
They could have gotten it right then but didn't. They drove out the best so that the bureaucrats could do as they pleased. It's still going on. When I'm subjected to indefinte surveillance by USMC no-hopers and child abusers for 12 years 24/7/365 that means they cannot get anything right even with totally invasive surveillance technology, and they destroy everything in the process.
Diligence applied to corruption does not get the job done, and I have no trust or confidence that anything will work since the grossly incompetent continue to dominate and control. There is no one with the intelligence and ability to stop the abuse I experience directly. That means the terrorists will succeed. Smear and fear are the standards for success in a bureacracy dedicated to image management but do not advance meaningful and sound organisaitonal objectives and instead put the public at risk from terrorism.
The context for the above comment can be found here
1. Not exactly: Archduke Franz Ferdinand was assassinated on 28th June 1914 by a Serbian nationalist in the Balkans whose countries like Bosnia are part of our recent conflicts still. He did not get back up on his horse, and Europe was decimated in the following four years with the UK destroyed. There were no winners out of WWI which led to WWII. Read Barbara Tuchman's "The Guns of August" which The Daily Beast just recommended this Christmas.
2. Never underestimate terrorists. They have outwitted the local police, security and intelligence services (including the FBI) as can be seen in the successful bombings. Look at Northern Ireland for several decades and the London bombings in the 1990s.
3. Today's surveillance technology which no one really wants to admit exists requires little in human resources so that numerous terroists at the cell level can be totally tracked by technology from a centre with a few people covering many. There is no problem with respect to resources as most think in terms of surveillance squads per person which has been superceded. The problem today is its abuse which I generally noted above.
4. Terrorists have succeeded in both strategy and tactics as we've seen the results which continue to grow as a threat, e.g., al Qaeda. The objective is to terrorise which has succeeded phenomenally. If the bomb doesn't go off, people are left to fear when one will. Somone opening and injured by a package with a bomb will create terror for the mail service everywhere.
5. WWII ended with an unconditional surrender by Germany and Japan. They were each destroyed or subject to destruction. Apply the technique of weighted averages to such victories considering the size of the war and its outcome, and you wlll find that war has resulted in unconditional surrender. The centrally planned totalitarian USSR collapsed and fell apart signalling the end of the Cold War. This was not an unconditional surrender but not a hot war in the generally accepted sense either.
Read Barabara Tuchman's last paragraph in the Afterword of "The Guns of August." Then read her "A Distant Mirror" about the 14th century another spectacular book. Today we have nuclear, chemical and biological weapons. One man acting alone can bring about catastrophe. Civilisation has changed irrevocably as a result of technology as has war, but the human animal has not. Will we catch up with the change in time, or will we regress? See Barbara Tuchman's "The March of Folly: from Troy to Vietnam." We go on making the same mistakes.
The context for the above comment can be found here
Reform does not occur when the best people are eliminated and replaced by the "loyal" incompetents who cannot do the job as cronyism was the benchmark of the Bush administration. If the objective, critical imput is not present, there will be no reform. Describing a situation of terrorism by anarchists in Rome as Dsrtsailor did is not advocating terrorism. Creating illusionary management for image purposes only results in a pretend organisation whether enterprise or government which eventually collapses as we've witnessed from Enron to the financial and economic collapse.
Terrorism flourishes today because we live with illusionary government pretending it is doing a proper job when the reverse is true. ". . . the fundamental cause[s] of government folly [are] the impotence of reason in the face of greed, selfish ambition, and moral cowardice" comes from the book jacket for Barbara Tuchman's "The March of Folly: from Troy to Vietnam." This book published in 1984 summed up nicely in advance what has happened in the past 26 years.
The question raised is how to change the government when terrorists start emerging while avoiding terrorism which is certainly not the way to go. At the same time the public must be protected against terrorism by a government that does not function properly. A massive amount of wealth has been thrown away by greed. Borrowing more and monetizing the government debt to sustain political power will only lead to a complete collapse. The problem is that honest criticism like this is subjected to intense, indefinite surveillance abuse as I write. How do we recover from this? How do we eliminate this terrorism using the democratic rule of law?
The context for the above comment can be found here
Excellent: I've wanted to read about the ongoing bits of information concerning these bombings on Christmas Eve Eve especially about who they are and other related bombing attempts such as in Athens last November as described. It's a well made point that terrorism is the plague continuing from the last century especially after WWII
Let us not forget the US terrorism from the Weathermen, Puerto Rican liberation, SLA (Patty Hearst) in the 1960s and onwards. People with a cause seek to terrorise with violence and the threat of violence instead of legitimate communication to attract attention. They only serve to destroy their cause in the process which is presumably bankrupt since they have to resort to terrorism.
Let's also not forget that splinter IRA groups are alive and well in Northern Ireland with their eyes on mainland UK as are emerging al Qaeda groups like AQAP (African Peninsula) whose eyes are on Europe and North America. Nine arrested terrorists of Bangladeshi origin were just charged with plotting to bomb the US embassy, tourist and government locations in London.
While Julian Assange was in Wandsworth Prison, a suspected al Qaeda terrorist bomber from Luton 35 miles north of London bombed Stockholm, Sweden. They caught nine but one got away and bombed for terror fear. There were the package bombs out of AQAP found in the UK (almost missed) and Middle East causing disruption to air freight into the US.
My major concern revolves around the efforts of democratic governments to deal with terrorism as a whole generated by various groups while there is an ever increasing threat from an escalation in WMD as well as the standard pipe bomb or small package bombs which are horrible to contemplate being on the receiving end hence they terrorise.
My greatest worry is that marginal people are being inducted into the fight against terrorism who then abuse the process because they are given investigative tools such as surveillance and powers that are outside the democratic rule of law so that they become terrorists themselves. I have witnessed and experienced this myself directly for over 12 years since mid-Augsut 1998.
The abuse of power has been so extensive that I can fully agree with "Dsrtsailor" above that "the ruling government is legal mafia." In my direct experience the government has become organised crime from the abuse of surveillance technology against me indefinitely so that the terrorists have won by destroying democracy and its rule of law. They do not have to do anything. It has already been done for them.
The abuse of surveifllance technology against me has produced a standard of antisocial and criminal behaviour which resulted night before last in 13 hours of antisocial and violent behaviour throughout the night where I had to call the police at half midnight because of violence where somone was apparently injured.
Using surveillance technology indefinitely like this creates a power base that is completely independent of government and corrupts all the departments of government including the NHS and police in the UK as I've directly experienced in North Kensington in London since 1998.
Fascism (power for power's sake) is growing out of terrorism and replacing democracy because those who are using the surveillance technology manufacture allegations to support their contnuing abuse of power by a smear and fear campaign in the community that even makes those in the departments of government afraid just like the Mafia or terrorists would. As a result more terrorism is created by inciting others who are close to the edge and distracting legitimate anti-terrorist efforts to miss those like the Stockholm bomber who lived near London for almost a decade.
The most worrying aspect of this is that no matter how much I accurately document and report what is going on to those in authority no one has stopped this terrorism in the local community from destroying it and the local government itself.
There are two serious problems: those from without and those from within. No one is dealing with or reporting those from within. Why not? Especially when considered in this instance where this internal terrorism and organised crime have existed as a standard for over 12 years. The same kind of destruction wielded by the Brown Shirts in Nazi Germany starting in 1933 is being carried out today and is similarly approved by those in government.
The context of the abuve comment can be found here
Wasn't if 1993 when the WTC was first bombed? John P O'Neill http://bit.ly/gfVmo3 dug into the roots of the WTC 1993 bombing to find al Qaeda and bin Laden and helped capture its bomber Ramzi Yousef. He investigated the USS Cole bombing but had tense relations with the US ambassador to Yemen over security and withdrew. He left the FBI under cloudy circumstances that might be considered smear tactics and was only 19 days at his new job of WTC head of security when killed on 9/11.
They could have gotten it right then but didn't. They drove out the best so that the bureaucrats could do as they pleased. It's still going on. When I'm subjected to indefinte surveillance by USMC no-hopers and child abusers for 12 years 24/7/365 that means they cannot get anything right even with totally invasive surveillance technology, and they destroy everything in the process.
Diligence applied to corruption does not get the job done, and I have no trust or confidence that anything will work since the grossly incompetent continue to dominate and control. There is no one with the intelligence and ability to stop the abuse I experience directly. That means the terrorists will succeed. Smear and fear are the standards for success in a bureacracy dedicated to image management but do not advance meaningful and sound organisaitonal objectives and instead put the public at risk from terrorism.
The context for the above comment can be found here
1. Not exactly: Archduke Franz Ferdinand was assassinated on 28th June 1914 by a Serbian nationalist in the Balkans whose countries like Bosnia are part of our recent conflicts still. He did not get back up on his horse, and Europe was decimated in the following four years with the UK destroyed. There were no winners out of WWI which led to WWII. Read Barbara Tuchman's "The Guns of August" which The Daily Beast just recommended this Christmas.
2. Never underestimate terrorists. They have outwitted the local police, security and intelligence services (including the FBI) as can be seen in the successful bombings. Look at Northern Ireland for several decades and the London bombings in the 1990s.
3. Today's surveillance technology which no one really wants to admit exists requires little in human resources so that numerous terroists at the cell level can be totally tracked by technology from a centre with a few people covering many. There is no problem with respect to resources as most think in terms of surveillance squads per person which has been superceded. The problem today is its abuse which I generally noted above.
4. Terrorists have succeeded in both strategy and tactics as we've seen the results which continue to grow as a threat, e.g., al Qaeda. The objective is to terrorise which has succeeded phenomenally. If the bomb doesn't go off, people are left to fear when one will. Somone opening and injured by a package with a bomb will create terror for the mail service everywhere.
5. WWII ended with an unconditional surrender by Germany and Japan. They were each destroyed or subject to destruction. Apply the technique of weighted averages to such victories considering the size of the war and its outcome, and you wlll find that war has resulted in unconditional surrender. The centrally planned totalitarian USSR collapsed and fell apart signalling the end of the Cold War. This was not an unconditional surrender but not a hot war in the generally accepted sense either.
Read Barabara Tuchman's last paragraph in the Afterword of "The Guns of August." Then read her "A Distant Mirror" about the 14th century another spectacular book. Today we have nuclear, chemical and biological weapons. One man acting alone can bring about catastrophe. Civilisation has changed irrevocably as a result of technology as has war, but the human animal has not. Will we catch up with the change in time, or will we regress? See Barbara Tuchman's "The March of Folly: from Troy to Vietnam." We go on making the same mistakes.
The context for the above comment can be found here
Reform does not occur when the best people are eliminated and replaced by the "loyal" incompetents who cannot do the job as cronyism was the benchmark of the Bush administration. If the objective, critical imput is not present, there will be no reform. Describing a situation of terrorism by anarchists in Rome as Dsrtsailor did is not advocating terrorism. Creating illusionary management for image purposes only results in a pretend organisation whether enterprise or government which eventually collapses as we've witnessed from Enron to the financial and economic collapse.
Terrorism flourishes today because we live with illusionary government pretending it is doing a proper job when the reverse is true. ". . . the fundamental cause[s] of government folly [are] the impotence of reason in the face of greed, selfish ambition, and moral cowardice" comes from the book jacket for Barbara Tuchman's "The March of Folly: from Troy to Vietnam." This book published in 1984 summed up nicely in advance what has happened in the past 26 years.
The question raised is how to change the government when terrorists start emerging while avoiding terrorism which is certainly not the way to go. At the same time the public must be protected against terrorism by a government that does not function properly. A massive amount of wealth has been thrown away by greed. Borrowing more and monetizing the government debt to sustain political power will only lead to a complete collapse. The problem is that honest criticism like this is subjected to intense, indefinite surveillance abuse as I write. How do we recover from this? How do we eliminate this terrorism using the democratic rule of law?
The context for the above comment can be found here
Sunday, 19 December 2010
UK Government Wants ISPs to Block Adult Content on the Internet
Broadband firms urged to block sex websites to protect children
by Caroline Davies The Guardian Sunday 19 December 2010 15.52 GMT
This is creeping censorship by the government attempting to add another layer to ISPs' role of Big Brother implementer. While everyone agreed that child sex abuse web sites should have been blocked which was done successfully, the UK government now wants ISPs to block sex web sites instead of parents in the home. What was universally acceptable is now being stretched to that which is not universally objectionable except for children where parents should be responsbile. The public will have to "opt-in" to watch sex websites. How? From a list? What's next?
Who will pay for this huge job of creating a list of these sites?
How will they be judged? Who's going to be doing it?
It's one thing to automatically ban child sex abuse web sites with which everyone agrees but quite another to ban adult sex content web sites.
Will the government then have a database of all those who "opt-in" to watch adult sex web sites on the Internet?
Will they be next to be selected for surveillance by the government to see what other "depravity" in which these people might engage?
This is wide open for abuse creating the very objectional behaviour the government seeks to limit. This is social control that can easily run amok as it has done in my situation.
I have a large group of people abusing surveillance technology against me 24/7/365 at the core of which are the mother of the children whom I reported for child abuse in May 1998 and Lt Harry "Ill Eagle" Bird USMC Ret. She started with surveillance technology abuse 24/7/365 in mid-august 1998, and he joined with his most sophisticated surveillance technology in February 2001. Together they have been doing this for 12 years and four months continuously and are always present.
They attack any adult content material that I might access on the Internet with brutal verbal abuse and direct interference using the surveillance technology to cut off my computer from the Internet forcing me to reboot since resetting the router does not work. They have that kind of control with the surveilalnce technology.
At the same time, however, they engage in sadistic sexual verbal abuse against me personally around-the-clock of the most violent character and get others including chihldren involved as well. They attack all forms of normal human biological activity manufacturing false allegations to which they cling relentlessly and in a most hysterical manner. They get others to join in, and those with a sadistic character disposition do so. They also involve children in this activity. They are thus engaged in serious child sexual abuse.
The UK government is behind this and has been for 12 years four months 24/7/365 since mid-August 1998 involving various departments of government at both the local and central levels as well as elected officials.
Under the ruse of pretending to attack my viewing adult content matter on the Internat, they carry out this violence gainst me for their own perverted sadistic pleasure. These people do this for power, and they do not care what they do. They just abuse indiscriminately faking allegations to maintain power so that they can abuse on a continuous basis which has lasted for over 12 years 24/7/365.
The government now proposes an activity which will result in the creation of a database of all people who want to "opt-in" to watch adult content on the Internet The government wants the ISPs to create this database so that adult content material can be accessed by these people on this list on the Internet. I believe this to be an invasion of privacy and a human rights violation.
As in my case, the government will have a database of people whom they can then subject to surveillance by child abusers and those with viciously violent personalities to create the illusion of social control that is really an excuse for these people to abuse adults and children. The government will be creating the very abuse it has sought to end because that is what is actually happening already in the world in my direct experience. This is not an hypothetical situation.
Consider this parallel situation. Adult content magazines are placed on the top shelf of stores to keep them out of reach of children so they cannot see, pick them up and read them in store. Suppose the government wants the store owner to remove all these top shelf adult content magazines from view, create a list of those adults who wish to purchase them and then sell them from under the counter only to those on the list?
Who will make up the list of magazines to be removed from public display? How will standards and criteria be developed and applied to do so? The store owner will then have to create an approved list of purchasers and will have to get information about them to determine borderline decisions with respect to age, etc. He will then have to specially segregate these listed magazines and privately sell them only to approved customers on his own list of purchasers. Who will do the work and who will pay for its cost? It will also be changing continuously.
The government cannot possibly get involved in asking the ISDPs to carry out this kind of censorship and distribution of adult content material on the Intenet. It might seek to create the equivalent of a "top shelf" at the ISPs, but that could be fraught with time-consuming effort and endless haggles over decisions about whom to segregate in this manner. Even that is not feasible.
What happens if the government wants to decide that certain people are not suitable to obtain adult content material?
If the government has allowed child abusers and viciously violent personalites to abuse surveillance technology against me and and other adults and children in the process for 12+ years 24/7/365, why doesn't it address this frontline directly abusive activity in the community and bring it to a stop instead of trying to implement censorship at the ISPs which should be done by the parents at home to protect children?
There is a terrible failure of government already present that is not being addressed while the government is proposing to create an environment that will encourage further abuse. This surveillance technology abuse is growing with recruits being sought and added. They need something to go after. Culling from a list of those who "opt-in" to watch adult material on the Internet for surveillance technology targets is just such an opportunity that will allow this "industry" of abuse to grow.
Imagine people getting hold of this list who are extremist power freaks seeking to "out" those miscreants who watch adult content material such as MPs, doctors, lawyers or just neighbours they want to hate? "S/he's on BT's porn view list," they will shout labeling the innocent a sex fiend and campaigning for his/her removal.
by Caroline Davies The Guardian Sunday 19 December 2010 15.52 GMT
This is creeping censorship by the government attempting to add another layer to ISPs' role of Big Brother implementer. While everyone agreed that child sex abuse web sites should have been blocked which was done successfully, the UK government now wants ISPs to block sex web sites instead of parents in the home. What was universally acceptable is now being stretched to that which is not universally objectionable except for children where parents should be responsbile. The public will have to "opt-in" to watch sex websites. How? From a list? What's next?
Who will pay for this huge job of creating a list of these sites?
How will they be judged? Who's going to be doing it?
It's one thing to automatically ban child sex abuse web sites with which everyone agrees but quite another to ban adult sex content web sites.
Will the government then have a database of all those who "opt-in" to watch adult sex web sites on the Internet?
Will they be next to be selected for surveillance by the government to see what other "depravity" in which these people might engage?
This is wide open for abuse creating the very objectional behaviour the government seeks to limit. This is social control that can easily run amok as it has done in my situation.
I have a large group of people abusing surveillance technology against me 24/7/365 at the core of which are the mother of the children whom I reported for child abuse in May 1998 and Lt Harry "Ill Eagle" Bird USMC Ret. She started with surveillance technology abuse 24/7/365 in mid-august 1998, and he joined with his most sophisticated surveillance technology in February 2001. Together they have been doing this for 12 years and four months continuously and are always present.
They attack any adult content material that I might access on the Internet with brutal verbal abuse and direct interference using the surveillance technology to cut off my computer from the Internet forcing me to reboot since resetting the router does not work. They have that kind of control with the surveilalnce technology.
At the same time, however, they engage in sadistic sexual verbal abuse against me personally around-the-clock of the most violent character and get others including chihldren involved as well. They attack all forms of normal human biological activity manufacturing false allegations to which they cling relentlessly and in a most hysterical manner. They get others to join in, and those with a sadistic character disposition do so. They also involve children in this activity. They are thus engaged in serious child sexual abuse.
The UK government is behind this and has been for 12 years four months 24/7/365 since mid-August 1998 involving various departments of government at both the local and central levels as well as elected officials.
Under the ruse of pretending to attack my viewing adult content matter on the Internat, they carry out this violence gainst me for their own perverted sadistic pleasure. These people do this for power, and they do not care what they do. They just abuse indiscriminately faking allegations to maintain power so that they can abuse on a continuous basis which has lasted for over 12 years 24/7/365.
The government now proposes an activity which will result in the creation of a database of all people who want to "opt-in" to watch adult content on the Internet The government wants the ISPs to create this database so that adult content material can be accessed by these people on this list on the Internet. I believe this to be an invasion of privacy and a human rights violation.
As in my case, the government will have a database of people whom they can then subject to surveillance by child abusers and those with viciously violent personalities to create the illusion of social control that is really an excuse for these people to abuse adults and children. The government will be creating the very abuse it has sought to end because that is what is actually happening already in the world in my direct experience. This is not an hypothetical situation.
Consider this parallel situation. Adult content magazines are placed on the top shelf of stores to keep them out of reach of children so they cannot see, pick them up and read them in store. Suppose the government wants the store owner to remove all these top shelf adult content magazines from view, create a list of those adults who wish to purchase them and then sell them from under the counter only to those on the list?
Who will make up the list of magazines to be removed from public display? How will standards and criteria be developed and applied to do so? The store owner will then have to create an approved list of purchasers and will have to get information about them to determine borderline decisions with respect to age, etc. He will then have to specially segregate these listed magazines and privately sell them only to approved customers on his own list of purchasers. Who will do the work and who will pay for its cost? It will also be changing continuously.
The government cannot possibly get involved in asking the ISDPs to carry out this kind of censorship and distribution of adult content material on the Intenet. It might seek to create the equivalent of a "top shelf" at the ISPs, but that could be fraught with time-consuming effort and endless haggles over decisions about whom to segregate in this manner. Even that is not feasible.
What happens if the government wants to decide that certain people are not suitable to obtain adult content material?
If the government has allowed child abusers and viciously violent personalites to abuse surveillance technology against me and and other adults and children in the process for 12+ years 24/7/365, why doesn't it address this frontline directly abusive activity in the community and bring it to a stop instead of trying to implement censorship at the ISPs which should be done by the parents at home to protect children?
There is a terrible failure of government already present that is not being addressed while the government is proposing to create an environment that will encourage further abuse. This surveillance technology abuse is growing with recruits being sought and added. They need something to go after. Culling from a list of those who "opt-in" to watch adult material on the Internet for surveillance technology targets is just such an opportunity that will allow this "industry" of abuse to grow.
Imagine people getting hold of this list who are extremist power freaks seeking to "out" those miscreants who watch adult content material such as MPs, doctors, lawyers or just neighbours they want to hate? "S/he's on BT's porn view list," they will shout labeling the innocent a sex fiend and campaigning for his/her removal.
Friday, 17 December 2010
America's New Mercenaries As Described By Tim Shorrock
As American commanders meet this week for the Afghanistan review, Obama is hiring military contractors at a rate that would make Bush blush. Tim Shorrock on the Blackwater heirsAmerica's New Mercenaries by Tim Shorrock
16/12/10 21:36:20 Local neighbourhood security rolls in on a Sunday morning in August 2010
16/12/10 21:38:13 You're absolutely right, but it's not nations who buy them. It's the friendlies with neighbourhoods where they want to "adjust" security problems, i.e., keep people "on message." When these wars wind down as they inevitably will, where do you think they will go? Right into your neighbourhood to keep themselves employed in the same intelligence capacity for local governments and wealthy private individuals who want "security." They sell a protection racket just like mobsters making up threats (terrorism, crime) against convenient scapegoats to "protect" people.
Colonel Vine & Lt Harry Bird both USMC Ret rolled into my North Kensington neighbourhood in London against me in February 2001 and are still here. They've been at it 24/7/365. Vine dabbled in a little rendition and travelled to Kabul after the successful invasion at the end of 2001. They also market their services to others. If you thought Toxic Debt was bad, wait for the destruction by Toxic Surveillance to emerge. Unless this plague is stopped democratically, Big Brother will be a reality beyond anything ever imagined from which there will be no escape. Local neighbourhood security rolling in on a Sunday morning in August 2010. Photographs taken from my kitchen window.
16/12/10 22:00:55 Oh, yeah? I've missed those rumours and would like to know what they are. I'm looking for solid evidence from the government about my experience during the last 12 years and four months 24/7/365. I've been waiting for Wikileaks to produce something. Maybe that's why the USAF is practising censorship on a large scale in-house before rolling it out-house.
16/12/10 23:22:50 "Pauline Neville-Jones, the U.K.'s minister of state for security and counterterrorism (and a former executive with QinetiQ PLC, a major intelligence contractor), told an audience at the Brookings Institution that "we have something of a crisis in Afghanistan" partly because of the "largely unregulated private sector security companies performing important roles" there."
"In response to a question from The Daily Beast, Neville-Jones said that American and British forces must work out "the operational rules and roles that they have when they are in the frontline." Unless that happens, "We are in danger of getting up against Geneva Convention problems and failure to observe fundamental rules of war." "
This is nothing compared with what is happeing inside the UK in London's North Kensington in my direct experience where US government agent/contractors have been operating Toxic Surveillance for almost a decade. This is not a war zone, yet it is under martial law devised by those former US military personnel using the Toxic Surveillance all of which is outside the UK's democratic rule of law and control. On top of which they play drty tricks to destroy and are not investigating anything legitimately. They are milking the system for all they can.
Baroness Pauline Neville-Jones is in the House of Lords and, as such, does not have a constituency and is not elected to any office. Most in government in the UK are elected officials unlike the US where the president appoints the cabinet and administrative postions. It's not unusual for a government minister to be from the House of Lords where they are appointed. The poblem for me is communicating with them as I have wanted to do in the past when she was a Conservative shadow minister (out of elected government but "shadowing" it in opposition) before taking over this role officially. She also has a significant background in government with respect to intelligence having headed the Joint Inteligence Committee in the past.
If there is a serious problem like the one here, I like to send along my thoughts and commetns by Email, but this cannot be done to someone in the House of Lords. For the House of Commons it's easy because elected officials are accessible. My MP is the Chairman of the Joint (Commons and Lords) Intelligence and Security Committee so I can sound off to him which I do frequently. But, this problem described here is way out of control with the US government agents/contractors taking over at the expense of everybody else and British sovereignty. If Dame Neville-Jones thinks the problem is a potential crisis in Afghanistan, it's a catastrophe in North Kensington.
17/12/10 00:07:53 Transparency is essential today. This is not WWII. Everything is different. You don't need secrecy with Drones and Cruise missiles. Everyone knows they are there. They just cannot do anything about them since we are picking on people who live basic lives on limited money and need to finance their war effort with drugs which we let them do, so we can keep fighting.
The French won the US Revolutionary War by sea and by land. They kept the British fleet occupied on both sides of the Atlantic so that the rag, tag 80% privateers as you call them could cope. Lafayette did a credible job on land. This was the French army and navy. They were military and not contractors.
Contractors cost a fortune and are part of the revolving door problem between the military and civilian defense workers. They get a huge amount of money much more than military or government employees. The revolving door problem rips off the US taxpayer. It's cushy collusion for top pay where those inside pay huge amounts waiting for the day when they can revolve to the outside world and cash in.
We, the West, are the ones who have done irreparable harm to our own war effort as I witness daily from the likes of Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret by his destructive behaviour that makes him about the ugliest American that ever was. He creates terrorism.
17/12/10 00:52:05 Marquis de Lafayette and his exceptional life including the US Revolutionary War
Grim Sleeper Serial Killer: More Victims of L.A. Monster
Grim Sleeper Serial Killer: More Victims of L.A. Monster
It's necessary these days to preserve these serial killers and deviants of all kinds to study them because the means to get valuable information from them to stop this in the future by others now exists. It's possible now to read and decode brainwaves surrounding the head to gain a wealth of information about a person so that we can begin to develop a knowledge database to answer many questions including those raised above in the discussion. This process should be part of the sentencing after conviction which the state controls just like imprisonment but openly stated and only non-consensually used after a conviction for such an horrendous series of crimes. Killing these people will just keep us ignorant and subjected to future repetition by others committing these crimes.
The police can use this as an interrogation tool in these very serious investigations as a totally non-invasive method to read brainwaves or the thoughts of these people while being verbally interrogated. I think you will learn at some point that this has been used extensively by the US military in such places as Guantanamo or Abu Ghraib but not openly acknowledged yet. Camp X-Ray was a perfect name until they changed it. Torturing people is a means to break them down so they don't inhibit their thoughts. But torture is completely unnecessary.
Aileen Wournos was a serial killer in Florida in 1989 and 1990 as everyone knows from the films "Overkill" (1992) and "Monster" (2003) where Charlize Theron won an Oscar for her portrayal of Wournos. Nick Broomfield made two documentaries "The Selling of a Serial Killer" (1994) and "The Death of a Serial Killer" (2003). Sue Reynolds wrote an excellent book "Damsel of Death" (UK) and "Lethal Intent" (US). There is a book by Michael Reynolds called "Dead Ends."
So, there's much material out there about this particular serial killer who was executed at Raiford, Florida in Oct 2002. At the end she wanted to be executed to end her own life. Given all that was written and filmed I believe that a most important aspect has been overlooked which comes up in Nick Broomfield's "The Death of a Serial Killer." She complained of or described three things:
1. Putting an electronic circuit board behind her cell's medicine cabinet or mirror above her sink at the Broward County jail;
2. Installation of a large satellite dish on top of the roof of this jail; and
3. Something she described as "noise pressure."
She claims all of these things happened at about the same time, and she thought they were in some way connected to her. I think she was right, and that she was the target of experiments which she picked up but could not articulate. She was driven to complaining in such an extreme manner that no one paid any attention to her and wrote her off as insane. I don't think she was. No one listened to her which drove her to act in the extreme. She had something to say.
I've read these books and seen these films to see if there was any more about this possible experimentation to which she appeared to be subjected. I couldn't find anything. After her death, her personal papers were destroyed on her instructions. She's now gone. There are no records except what was collected while she was alive. She should have never been killed by the state. There was much that could have been learned about a woman serial killer who killed seven men in 1989 and 1990.
Don't throw that opportunity away with this series of crimes that might be far greater than anyone could imagine. The police could show him the 180 photos, and see what he thought about them. He might not be able to identify them, but he might have thoughts about them that would be useful to the police. It can be used as part of interrogating him and monitoring him all the time to see what he might reveal.
How do I know this? I've been a target of this technology 24/7/365 since February 2001 just after Bush was inaugurated. He brother was Florida's governor during this time just before Wournos' execution in Oct 2002. I've learned all about it because those who are present using it all the time against me are criminals with disturbed personalities. They cannot help talking about it and teach me everything because they seek to abuse me non-stop. One of them is the mother of the children I reported for child abuse in May 1998, and the other is an import from the US a Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret along with a Colonel Vine USMC Ret who travels to such places as Kabul. I am completely innocent of anything, but they do not stop their abuse against me seeking to cover up what they have done in some manner.
Let's not kill off these people who have committed atrocious crimes because we can learn a great deal about them and about what they have done especially for the relatives and friends of their victims. The technology is available and being used in secret. It's time to get it out into the open to be used for the benefit of all instead of enriching the few who use it to fake everything. It's time to go forward not backward. I just wonder how many journalists might know about this technology and are not reporting it?
It's necessary these days to preserve these serial killers and deviants of all kinds to study them because the means to get valuable information from them to stop this in the future by others now exists. It's possible now to read and decode brainwaves surrounding the head to gain a wealth of information about a person so that we can begin to develop a knowledge database to answer many questions including those raised above in the discussion. This process should be part of the sentencing after conviction which the state controls just like imprisonment but openly stated and only non-consensually used after a conviction for such an horrendous series of crimes. Killing these people will just keep us ignorant and subjected to future repetition by others committing these crimes.
The police can use this as an interrogation tool in these very serious investigations as a totally non-invasive method to read brainwaves or the thoughts of these people while being verbally interrogated. I think you will learn at some point that this has been used extensively by the US military in such places as Guantanamo or Abu Ghraib but not openly acknowledged yet. Camp X-Ray was a perfect name until they changed it. Torturing people is a means to break them down so they don't inhibit their thoughts. But torture is completely unnecessary.
Aileen Wournos was a serial killer in Florida in 1989 and 1990 as everyone knows from the films "Overkill" (1992) and "Monster" (2003) where Charlize Theron won an Oscar for her portrayal of Wournos. Nick Broomfield made two documentaries "The Selling of a Serial Killer" (1994) and "The Death of a Serial Killer" (2003). Sue Reynolds wrote an excellent book "Damsel of Death" (UK) and "Lethal Intent" (US). There is a book by Michael Reynolds called "Dead Ends."
So, there's much material out there about this particular serial killer who was executed at Raiford, Florida in Oct 2002. At the end she wanted to be executed to end her own life. Given all that was written and filmed I believe that a most important aspect has been overlooked which comes up in Nick Broomfield's "The Death of a Serial Killer." She complained of or described three things:
1. Putting an electronic circuit board behind her cell's medicine cabinet or mirror above her sink at the Broward County jail;
2. Installation of a large satellite dish on top of the roof of this jail; and
3. Something she described as "noise pressure."
She claims all of these things happened at about the same time, and she thought they were in some way connected to her. I think she was right, and that she was the target of experiments which she picked up but could not articulate. She was driven to complaining in such an extreme manner that no one paid any attention to her and wrote her off as insane. I don't think she was. No one listened to her which drove her to act in the extreme. She had something to say.
I've read these books and seen these films to see if there was any more about this possible experimentation to which she appeared to be subjected. I couldn't find anything. After her death, her personal papers were destroyed on her instructions. She's now gone. There are no records except what was collected while she was alive. She should have never been killed by the state. There was much that could have been learned about a woman serial killer who killed seven men in 1989 and 1990.
Don't throw that opportunity away with this series of crimes that might be far greater than anyone could imagine. The police could show him the 180 photos, and see what he thought about them. He might not be able to identify them, but he might have thoughts about them that would be useful to the police. It can be used as part of interrogating him and monitoring him all the time to see what he might reveal.
How do I know this? I've been a target of this technology 24/7/365 since February 2001 just after Bush was inaugurated. He brother was Florida's governor during this time just before Wournos' execution in Oct 2002. I've learned all about it because those who are present using it all the time against me are criminals with disturbed personalities. They cannot help talking about it and teach me everything because they seek to abuse me non-stop. One of them is the mother of the children I reported for child abuse in May 1998, and the other is an import from the US a Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret along with a Colonel Vine USMC Ret who travels to such places as Kabul. I am completely innocent of anything, but they do not stop their abuse against me seeking to cover up what they have done in some manner.
Let's not kill off these people who have committed atrocious crimes because we can learn a great deal about them and about what they have done especially for the relatives and friends of their victims. The technology is available and being used in secret. It's time to get it out into the open to be used for the benefit of all instead of enriching the few who use it to fake everything. It's time to go forward not backward. I just wonder how many journalists might know about this technology and are not reporting it?
Thursday, 16 December 2010
Julian Assange: is the public interest being served?
Julian Assange granted bail at high court | Media | Guardian Britain's Crown Prosecution Service opposed bail. Sweden had nothing to do with it.
Is the public interest being served? Contrasting terrorism and those who seek to expose deficiencies.
Consider the fact of 12 years and four months 24/7/365 of Toxic Surveillance imprisonment, torture interrogation, medical experimentation and surveillance R&D accomplished completely outside the prison system, legal justice system and democratic rule of law.
This is driven by the US with agent/contractors Colonel Vine USMC Ret, Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret and others dominating and controlling this activity in this environment.
I believe that it is the US behind Britain's Crown Prosecution Service seeking to keep Julian Assange in prison. The US is here seeking the extradition of Abid Naseer although the UK has insufficient evidence to prosecute him.
Generally speaking the UK serves as a penal colony for the US which makes a significant contribution to the failures in the UK to properly track terrorists putting other countries including the US at risk.
1. In the same court, Westminster Magistrates' Court, a similar extradition hearing is under way. Abid Naseer was 1 of 12 arrested on 8th April 2009 in a premature raid for bombings to take place on 15 to 20 April 2009.
Bob Quick, Metropolitan Police Anti-Terrorist Unit head, inadvertently exposed documents to cameras when entering Number Ten. 11 were deported, but Naseer feared mistreatment and was allowed to stay.
US seeks extradition in Westminster Magistrates' Court at the same time Sweden seeks Julian Assange's extradition. See http://reut.rs/fT1pHJ
These were al Qaeda terrorist bombings to take place against the UK, Norway and US the US claims in its extradition arguments.
Many, if not all, of these 12 were arrested at universities during the day.
2. Sweden was bombed by a suicide terrorist on Saturday last who came from the UK having spent the past decade in Luton and its Bedfordshire University from 2001 to 2004.
There are indications that he was part of a larger al Qaeda driven terror campaign network where connections to other bombings or attempted bombings in the UK had included Luton as a crossroads contact point.
Luton and Bedfordshire University were radicalisation centres and crossroads for bombers such as 7/7/2005 and one of the fertilizer bombers.
Not only was this all missed with these bombers, but the Stockholm bomber went totally undetected. It's been a complete fiasco.
15/12/10 12:05:22 BBC News - Is Luton a breeding ground for terrorists? http://bbc.in/gJS19R Excellent article with a naive conclusion. There is much more.
3. I've been subjected to totally invasive surveillance technology abuse in North Kensington for 12 years and 4 months 24/7/365 since mid-August 1998.
Bob Quick headed the most expensive surveillance operation ever against a police officer in Kensington during the early years of the abuse against me which directly involved Metropolitan Police Special Branch officers (now Metropolitan Police Anti-Terrorist Unit) who engaged in continuous torture abuse.
16/12/10 13:35:15 Ali Dezaei Are Police Real Bullies? http://bit.ly/9H1iIj Revenge and retaliation provocation. Compare and contrast with Julian Assange.
They tried Ali Dezaei for espionage on behalf of Iran, but he was acquitted and subsequently elevated in the Met to an Assistant Commissioner until the pressure caused him to go off the rails against someone.
4. Summary
I can tell you first hand that the police and all those involved in this surveillance for all these years either participated in torture abuse faking allegations or supported it. Bob Quick went on to head the Metropolitan Police Anti-Terror Unit and botched the activity in April of last year which led to his resignation.
As far as I am concerned given my direct experience for all these years, these people are grossly incompetent and fake it to succeed. As a result terrorism flourishes
An article in The Daily Beast by Wendy Murphy called Julian Assange's prosecution “bogus.” Judging from my experience I believe that the prosecution against Ali Dezaei was bogus. He was acquitted. I know that all that has been done against me for 12 years and four months 24/7/365 has been bogus.
At the same time terrorists are bombing Sweden in 2010 and subject to a hearing in the Westminster Magistrates' Court for extradition for planning such an international campaign in 2009.
North Kensington like Luton has been an epicentre for terrorists. The 21/7/2005 would-be bombers who connected with the 7/7/2005 London bombers had residential and operational apartments in opposite directions of where I live and not that far away.
One of the 21/7/2005 dud bombers tried to set off his bomb at the nearby Shepherd's Bush Hammersmith & City Line Tube station just south of the BBC. Another of these dud bombers chickened out and dumped his rucksack with a bomb in it in Wormwood Scrubs just north of the BBC and not far from their operational apartment.
te
These 21/7/2005 dud bombers went undetected just as the 7/7/2005 went undetected who passed through Luton on their way to bomb London causing 52 deaths and 700+ injuries.
Nothing I kept reporting for years leading up to 2005 did any good nor has it since. There is a big hole in intelligence and security which I believe comes from those faking it who can't do a proper job using up resources that deprive legitimate activity so that everyone is at risk.
This includes the US as well as noted by the Xmas Day bomber and his UK background at university. Although Bob Quick's group were focused on the 12 arrested in April 2009, he made a mistake that forced the arrests prematurely.
There was not enough evidence to prosecute them, and they were let go but deported. All except one who is currently having his extradition hearing heard at the same time as Julian Assange is dealing with his extradition. There's a study in contrasts here that has to be investigated.
Since February 2001 the US has been behind this massive surveillance activity against me driven by those whom I reported for child abuse in May 1998 and joined by Colonel Vine USMC Ret and Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret in February 2001 who took over. This is still taking place as of this writing while the bombings go on undetected.
There is an incredible effort to cover up the revelations of truth coming from Wikileaks while I am subjected to intense abuse to stop me from reporting the truth as well.
The public interest is not being served by these bogus prosecutions and persecutions as public safety is being put at risk from the bombers.
We live in a global community which is being put at risk from terrorism while those in charge are spending their time engaged in criminal activity to protect themselves and not the public.
It is time to expose all of this to the light of day so that the public fully understands what is happening. That is the only way to change these abuses and bring them to a stop.
Is the public interest being served? Contrasting terrorism and those who seek to expose deficiencies.
Consider the fact of 12 years and four months 24/7/365 of Toxic Surveillance imprisonment, torture interrogation, medical experimentation and surveillance R&D accomplished completely outside the prison system, legal justice system and democratic rule of law.
This is driven by the US with agent/contractors Colonel Vine USMC Ret, Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret and others dominating and controlling this activity in this environment.
I believe that it is the US behind Britain's Crown Prosecution Service seeking to keep Julian Assange in prison. The US is here seeking the extradition of Abid Naseer although the UK has insufficient evidence to prosecute him.
Generally speaking the UK serves as a penal colony for the US which makes a significant contribution to the failures in the UK to properly track terrorists putting other countries including the US at risk.
1. In the same court, Westminster Magistrates' Court, a similar extradition hearing is under way. Abid Naseer was 1 of 12 arrested on 8th April 2009 in a premature raid for bombings to take place on 15 to 20 April 2009.
Bob Quick, Metropolitan Police Anti-Terrorist Unit head, inadvertently exposed documents to cameras when entering Number Ten. 11 were deported, but Naseer feared mistreatment and was allowed to stay.
US seeks extradition in Westminster Magistrates' Court at the same time Sweden seeks Julian Assange's extradition. See http://reut.rs/fT1pHJ
These were al Qaeda terrorist bombings to take place against the UK, Norway and US the US claims in its extradition arguments.
Many, if not all, of these 12 were arrested at universities during the day.
2. Sweden was bombed by a suicide terrorist on Saturday last who came from the UK having spent the past decade in Luton and its Bedfordshire University from 2001 to 2004.
There are indications that he was part of a larger al Qaeda driven terror campaign network where connections to other bombings or attempted bombings in the UK had included Luton as a crossroads contact point.
Luton and Bedfordshire University were radicalisation centres and crossroads for bombers such as 7/7/2005 and one of the fertilizer bombers.
Not only was this all missed with these bombers, but the Stockholm bomber went totally undetected. It's been a complete fiasco.
15/12/10 12:05:22 BBC News - Is Luton a breeding ground for terrorists? http://bbc.in/gJS19R Excellent article with a naive conclusion. There is much more.
3. I've been subjected to totally invasive surveillance technology abuse in North Kensington for 12 years and 4 months 24/7/365 since mid-August 1998.
Bob Quick headed the most expensive surveillance operation ever against a police officer in Kensington during the early years of the abuse against me which directly involved Metropolitan Police Special Branch officers (now Metropolitan Police Anti-Terrorist Unit) who engaged in continuous torture abuse.
16/12/10 13:35:15 Ali Dezaei Are Police Real Bullies? http://bit.ly/9H1iIj Revenge and retaliation provocation. Compare and contrast with Julian Assange.
They tried Ali Dezaei for espionage on behalf of Iran, but he was acquitted and subsequently elevated in the Met to an Assistant Commissioner until the pressure caused him to go off the rails against someone.
4. Summary
I can tell you first hand that the police and all those involved in this surveillance for all these years either participated in torture abuse faking allegations or supported it. Bob Quick went on to head the Metropolitan Police Anti-Terror Unit and botched the activity in April of last year which led to his resignation.
As far as I am concerned given my direct experience for all these years, these people are grossly incompetent and fake it to succeed. As a result terrorism flourishes
An article in The Daily Beast by Wendy Murphy called Julian Assange's prosecution “bogus.” Judging from my experience I believe that the prosecution against Ali Dezaei was bogus. He was acquitted. I know that all that has been done against me for 12 years and four months 24/7/365 has been bogus.
At the same time terrorists are bombing Sweden in 2010 and subject to a hearing in the Westminster Magistrates' Court for extradition for planning such an international campaign in 2009.
North Kensington like Luton has been an epicentre for terrorists. The 21/7/2005 would-be bombers who connected with the 7/7/2005 London bombers had residential and operational apartments in opposite directions of where I live and not that far away.
One of the 21/7/2005 dud bombers tried to set off his bomb at the nearby Shepherd's Bush Hammersmith & City Line Tube station just south of the BBC. Another of these dud bombers chickened out and dumped his rucksack with a bomb in it in Wormwood Scrubs just north of the BBC and not far from their operational apartment.
te
These 21/7/2005 dud bombers went undetected just as the 7/7/2005 went undetected who passed through Luton on their way to bomb London causing 52 deaths and 700+ injuries.
Nothing I kept reporting for years leading up to 2005 did any good nor has it since. There is a big hole in intelligence and security which I believe comes from those faking it who can't do a proper job using up resources that deprive legitimate activity so that everyone is at risk.
This includes the US as well as noted by the Xmas Day bomber and his UK background at university. Although Bob Quick's group were focused on the 12 arrested in April 2009, he made a mistake that forced the arrests prematurely.
There was not enough evidence to prosecute them, and they were let go but deported. All except one who is currently having his extradition hearing heard at the same time as Julian Assange is dealing with his extradition. There's a study in contrasts here that has to be investigated.
Since February 2001 the US has been behind this massive surveillance activity against me driven by those whom I reported for child abuse in May 1998 and joined by Colonel Vine USMC Ret and Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret in February 2001 who took over. This is still taking place as of this writing while the bombings go on undetected.
There is an incredible effort to cover up the revelations of truth coming from Wikileaks while I am subjected to intense abuse to stop me from reporting the truth as well.
The public interest is not being served by these bogus prosecutions and persecutions as public safety is being put at risk from the bombers.
We live in a global community which is being put at risk from terrorism while those in charge are spending their time engaged in criminal activity to protect themselves and not the public.
It is time to expose all of this to the light of day so that the public fully understands what is happening. That is the only way to change these abuses and bring them to a stop.
Tuesday, 14 December 2010
Wikileaks Exposes London Embassy's Hypocritical Contradiction Blaming UK
14/12/10 12:03:05 BBC News - Wikileaks cables: US worry over UK home-grown extremism Yet US contributes to it in UK #cheatsheet [Tweet]
14/12/10 12:11:57 US Embassy in London expressed concern over UK's ability to address extremism in the country while its very own Colonel Vine USMC Ret and Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret carried on with Toxic Surveillance in North Kensington, London, from February 2001 24/7/365 as terrorists. They set the example of controlling by fear from smear and dirty tricks while destroying the democratic rule of law inciting terrorism. Wikileaks exposes this hypocritical contradiction with US blaming UK. [Facebook]
The Bogus Assange Rape Case by Wendy Murphy a former child abuse and sex crimes prosecutor who teaches at New England Law/Boston. Wendy specializes in the representation of crime victims, women and children. Her expose of the American legal system, And Justice For Some, came out in 2007.
My comments
13/12/10 22:50:27 There's a whole parallel series of events here that drives home the problem of the rule of law and the protection of the public. That's the terrorist attack in Stockholm by a Swedish Iraqi Muslim residing in the UK near London where he went to university and lived with his family in Luton until a couple weeks ago. The irony is that Wikileaks is reporting just these problems to prevent such abuse that has ensnared Julian Assange himself.
Look at the massive waste of resources that have been expended against him to jail him in the UK for this apparent "politicisation" of the law to attack in one unfortunate way for a perceived espionage problem as described by Wendy Murphy above and for counterespionage purposes as elaborated in comments here.
Meanwhile this bomber completely escapes detection and almost creates extreme havoc in Stockholm but misses due to premature detonation of the petrol bomb in his vehicle. The New York Times tells us that there is an al Qaeda cell in Sweden with travel back and forth to and from that country. It also tells us that Sweden is engaged in NATO signals intelligence in Afghanistan.
While all the effort has taken place in London to arrest and detain Julian Assange as the Swedish intelligence is concentrated on Afghanistan, this bomber has been completely undetected by the Swedish and UK security and intelligence people so much so that he bombs. What good has it done to have Julian Assange in jail in London? Events have proven his point and justified what he's doing.
This morning I sent an Email to TDB as this related to my situation with respect to the waste of resources. Then I saw this excellent article which only drove home for me further the problem that government is not coordinated in dealing with the most important problems of our day. And, the US is apparently behind pushing Sweden to get Julian Assange as it is in pushing Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret in my situation not that the two are in anyway equivalent. It's a revelation of a pattern of behaviour
The US is putting nations and their people at further risk as well as itself since the Xmas Day bomber came out of Europe as did the recent packages all of which originated in Yemen. The issues being brought to light here in persecutions not legitimate prosecutions revolve around fabricated violent abuses that are used more like COINTELPRO (Counter Intelligence Programme) of the 1960s and 70s maliciously by the FBI. This today adds extreme risk from terrorist attacks which are actually occurring. And, no one listens to the warnings. The public is not protected only those in positions of authority are.
14/12/10 11:16:00 0800 789 321 UK Terrorist Hotline Call if you see anything suspicious. Let the police work it out to see if it's valid. [Tweet]
14/12/10 11:40:40 What I consider suspicious are the same people terrorising the community with Toxic Surveillance fear for 12 yrs 4 mos 24/7/365 & not stopped. [Tweet]
14/12/10 13:09:22 COINTELPRO: The Untold American Story http://bit.ly/gnLTKZ by Paul Wolf and others. [Tweet]
14/12/10 12:11:57 US Embassy in London expressed concern over UK's ability to address extremism in the country while its very own Colonel Vine USMC Ret and Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret carried on with Toxic Surveillance in North Kensington, London, from February 2001 24/7/365 as terrorists. They set the example of controlling by fear from smear and dirty tricks while destroying the democratic rule of law inciting terrorism. Wikileaks exposes this hypocritical contradiction with US blaming UK. [Facebook]
The Bogus Assange Rape Case by Wendy Murphy a former child abuse and sex crimes prosecutor who teaches at New England Law/Boston. Wendy specializes in the representation of crime victims, women and children. Her expose of the American legal system, And Justice For Some, came out in 2007.
My comments
13/12/10 22:50:27 There's a whole parallel series of events here that drives home the problem of the rule of law and the protection of the public. That's the terrorist attack in Stockholm by a Swedish Iraqi Muslim residing in the UK near London where he went to university and lived with his family in Luton until a couple weeks ago. The irony is that Wikileaks is reporting just these problems to prevent such abuse that has ensnared Julian Assange himself.
Look at the massive waste of resources that have been expended against him to jail him in the UK for this apparent "politicisation" of the law to attack in one unfortunate way for a perceived espionage problem as described by Wendy Murphy above and for counterespionage purposes as elaborated in comments here.
Meanwhile this bomber completely escapes detection and almost creates extreme havoc in Stockholm but misses due to premature detonation of the petrol bomb in his vehicle. The New York Times tells us that there is an al Qaeda cell in Sweden with travel back and forth to and from that country. It also tells us that Sweden is engaged in NATO signals intelligence in Afghanistan.
While all the effort has taken place in London to arrest and detain Julian Assange as the Swedish intelligence is concentrated on Afghanistan, this bomber has been completely undetected by the Swedish and UK security and intelligence people so much so that he bombs. What good has it done to have Julian Assange in jail in London? Events have proven his point and justified what he's doing.
This morning I sent an Email to TDB as this related to my situation with respect to the waste of resources. Then I saw this excellent article which only drove home for me further the problem that government is not coordinated in dealing with the most important problems of our day. And, the US is apparently behind pushing Sweden to get Julian Assange as it is in pushing Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret in my situation not that the two are in anyway equivalent. It's a revelation of a pattern of behaviour
The US is putting nations and their people at further risk as well as itself since the Xmas Day bomber came out of Europe as did the recent packages all of which originated in Yemen. The issues being brought to light here in persecutions not legitimate prosecutions revolve around fabricated violent abuses that are used more like COINTELPRO (Counter Intelligence Programme) of the 1960s and 70s maliciously by the FBI. This today adds extreme risk from terrorist attacks which are actually occurring. And, no one listens to the warnings. The public is not protected only those in positions of authority are.
14/12/10 11:16:00 0800 789 321 UK Terrorist Hotline Call if you see anything suspicious. Let the police work it out to see if it's valid. [Tweet]
14/12/10 11:40:40 What I consider suspicious are the same people terrorising the community with Toxic Surveillance fear for 12 yrs 4 mos 24/7/365 & not stopped. [Tweet]
14/12/10 13:09:22 COINTELPRO: The Untold American Story http://bit.ly/gnLTKZ by Paul Wolf and others. [Tweet]
Monday, 13 December 2010
UK Education & Training Centre for Terrorists
Sent by Email to: The Daily Beast 13/12/10 12:46:35
1. “Sweden suicide bomber: Taimur Abdulwahab al-Abdaly was living in Britain” - Telegraph British university association in Luton
2. “Ibrahim al Asiri: Mysterious Yemeni Bomb Maker Targeting America” - The Daily Beast Attrition by war of nerves
3. “Achilles Heel at US National Counterterrorism Centre?” Year later another UK educated resident attacks with Yemen connection
A year after the attempted bombing of the Delta/Northwest airliner approaching Detroit on Xmas Day another British educated terrorist residing near London in Luton up until two weeks ago carries out a bombing attack in Stockholm.
One cannot say that it was the US NCTC that got it jumbled this time. It's necessary to go back to the source once again in the UK where the very real possibility exists that this latest suicide bomber was either picked up and dropped by the security and intelligence services or was missed altogether.
Given the reports that are emerging about his presence on the Internet, e.g., Facebook, with comments and graphics indicating a clear terrorist orientation, I wonder why this Stockholm bomber was not picked up and tracked by the UK security services?
I can think of one good reason why UK security has failed once again given the 12 years and four months of 24/7/365 totally invasive surveillance technology carried out against me by BS, Lt Harry "Ill Eagle" Bird USMC Ret and others in North Kensington.
This constitutes not just a massive waste of resources of all kinds but reflects levels beyond gross incompetence that involve outright fraud deliberately and knowingly allowed to take place for the purposes of greed, glory and power.
This is Toxic Surveillance at work against a totally innocent person that is educating and training everyone to be terrorists themselves as the standard for behaviour in the UK. It is the government who is doing this, and it is the government who will not stop it.
If this cannot be gotten right after 12 years and four months of totally invasive surveillance 24/7/365, there is not much hope that the security services in the UK can get anything right.
Consequently, the UK has become a training and educational centre for terrorists where they reside either at some point before going off on terrorist training and missions or before going off on a terrorist mission to other countries as has just occurred.
No amount of correspondence from me or communicating this as widely as I can for all these 12 years and four months has been able to bring this abuse to an end. It is not baffling to me why these terrorist attacks continue to happen as they do.
I live with terrorism as a standard carried out against me on an institutionalised basis 24/7/365. It's no surprise that this is the standard which goes undetected and unchecked in the UK. No one is doing a proper job, and everyone is engaged in extensive criminal activity using surveillance technology to cover it up.
cc The Rt Hon Sir Malcolm Rifkind, KCMG QC MPO, Kensington; Chairman: Intelligence and Secureity Committee
The Rt Hon Kenneth Clarke, QC MP, Secretary of State for Justice
The Rt Hon Teresa May, MP, Secretary of State, The Home Office
Councillor Sir Merrick Cockell, Leader, Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea
Reg Kerr-Ball, Chairman, Kensington & Chelsea Tenant Management Organisation
Robert Black, Chief Executive, Kensington & Chelsea Tenant Management Organisation
Jean Daintith, Executive Director, Housing Health and Adult Social Service, Kensington & Chelsea
Laura Johnson, Head of Housing, Kensington & Chelsea
The Complaints Manager, CNWL NHS Foundation Trust
(Further to complaint about this matter in my Emails of Fri 8th & Wed 27th October 2010)
Jim O'Donnell, Service Manager, CNWL NHS Foundation Trust, K&C Adult MH Service
Notting Barns Ward Safer Neighbourhood Team
Top Secret America, Washington Post
BBC News Channel
13/12/10 15:54:44 "Factbox: Failed militant attacks in past decade" | Reuters Excellent timeline for EU origin terrorism; how about US & rest of the world?
13/12/10 17:02:33 "UK mosque denounced Stockholm bomber for militancy" | Reuters Ridiculed for radical preaching in Luton & driven out.
13/12/10 18:23:54 "One of the Sweden Bombs Exploded Prematurely" - Reports of al Qaeda cell in Sweden. Cartoonist cited. 5% of Sweden's 9.6 million Muslim.
1. “Sweden suicide bomber: Taimur Abdulwahab al-Abdaly was living in Britain” - Telegraph British university association in Luton
2. “Ibrahim al Asiri: Mysterious Yemeni Bomb Maker Targeting America” - The Daily Beast Attrition by war of nerves
3. “Achilles Heel at US National Counterterrorism Centre?” Year later another UK educated resident attacks with Yemen connection
A year after the attempted bombing of the Delta/Northwest airliner approaching Detroit on Xmas Day another British educated terrorist residing near London in Luton up until two weeks ago carries out a bombing attack in Stockholm.
One cannot say that it was the US NCTC that got it jumbled this time. It's necessary to go back to the source once again in the UK where the very real possibility exists that this latest suicide bomber was either picked up and dropped by the security and intelligence services or was missed altogether.
Given the reports that are emerging about his presence on the Internet, e.g., Facebook, with comments and graphics indicating a clear terrorist orientation, I wonder why this Stockholm bomber was not picked up and tracked by the UK security services?
I can think of one good reason why UK security has failed once again given the 12 years and four months of 24/7/365 totally invasive surveillance technology carried out against me by BS, Lt Harry "Ill Eagle" Bird USMC Ret and others in North Kensington.
This constitutes not just a massive waste of resources of all kinds but reflects levels beyond gross incompetence that involve outright fraud deliberately and knowingly allowed to take place for the purposes of greed, glory and power.
This is Toxic Surveillance at work against a totally innocent person that is educating and training everyone to be terrorists themselves as the standard for behaviour in the UK. It is the government who is doing this, and it is the government who will not stop it.
If this cannot be gotten right after 12 years and four months of totally invasive surveillance 24/7/365, there is not much hope that the security services in the UK can get anything right.
Consequently, the UK has become a training and educational centre for terrorists where they reside either at some point before going off on terrorist training and missions or before going off on a terrorist mission to other countries as has just occurred.
No amount of correspondence from me or communicating this as widely as I can for all these 12 years and four months has been able to bring this abuse to an end. It is not baffling to me why these terrorist attacks continue to happen as they do.
I live with terrorism as a standard carried out against me on an institutionalised basis 24/7/365. It's no surprise that this is the standard which goes undetected and unchecked in the UK. No one is doing a proper job, and everyone is engaged in extensive criminal activity using surveillance technology to cover it up.
cc The Rt Hon Sir Malcolm Rifkind, KCMG QC MPO, Kensington; Chairman: Intelligence and Secureity Committee
The Rt Hon Kenneth Clarke, QC MP, Secretary of State for Justice
The Rt Hon Teresa May, MP, Secretary of State, The Home Office
Councillor Sir Merrick Cockell, Leader, Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea
Reg Kerr-Ball, Chairman, Kensington & Chelsea Tenant Management Organisation
Robert Black, Chief Executive, Kensington & Chelsea Tenant Management Organisation
Jean Daintith, Executive Director, Housing Health and Adult Social Service, Kensington & Chelsea
Laura Johnson, Head of Housing, Kensington & Chelsea
The Complaints Manager, CNWL NHS Foundation Trust
(Further to complaint about this matter in my Emails of Fri 8th & Wed 27th October 2010)
Jim O'Donnell, Service Manager, CNWL NHS Foundation Trust, K&C Adult MH Service
Notting Barns Ward Safer Neighbourhood Team
Top Secret America, Washington Post
BBC News Channel
13/12/10 15:54:44 "Factbox: Failed militant attacks in past decade" | Reuters Excellent timeline for EU origin terrorism; how about US & rest of the world?
13/12/10 17:02:33 "UK mosque denounced Stockholm bomber for militancy" | Reuters Ridiculed for radical preaching in Luton & driven out.
13/12/10 18:23:54 "One of the Sweden Bombs Exploded Prematurely" - Reports of al Qaeda cell in Sweden. Cartoonist cited. 5% of Sweden's 9.6 million Muslim.
Wednesday, 1 December 2010
WikiLeaks Docs Continue Leslie Gelb Comments on TDB
WikiLeaks Helps America: How Julian Assange Proved U.S. Working Hard on Policy Problems - The Daily Beast - and . . .
On Sunday evening three days ago I read the WikiLeaks synopsis in "The Guardian" which included a line about information concerning rendition flights in the UK. I'm waiting to see more about this because it's currently a huge and explosive diplomatic and domestic issue in the UK who has settled out of court with 16 torture victims paying them millions so the intelligence services would not have to testify in open court.. So far there's been nothing more. I am dependent upon the media to read and report the content of these documents as journalists do for all information reporting.
I don't have the time to read the documents myself since I am subjected to 24/7/365 surveillance torture abuse by Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret and others. They never stop, and I never stop documenting what they do. He and Colonel Vine USMC Ret who is in charge travelling the world in this capacity introduced me to rendition in May 2001 three months after they started this surveillance imprisonment and torture. Their pleas to kidnap me from London were refused, but they have never stopped struggling to do so or use its threat as a torture mechanism.
Part of the WikiLeaks documents include instructions to gain information from foreign nationals that would be helpful to the State Department. These included credit card numbers and DNA. How? Profiling with DNA? Seeking items purchased and indebtedness? These requests are way out-of-bounds. Looking for thought processes and thinking are OK and need to be done if in a legitimate manner (not with surveillance technology of the kind to which I'm subjected), but there are indications that something far more sinister is going on. What about the recent reports from Sweden, Norway and Denmark concerning US embassy surveillance teams tracking their people?
Vine and Bird are linked to the London US embassy to some degree, but I do not know (yet) how much and what it is. I spent this afternoon writing an Email for a couple hours about what is happening here on a daily basis as a result of their surveillance technology abuses' impact and its antisocial behaviour consequences in this environment. I was about to finish it about 1700 GMT when my access to the Internet was interrupted by the surveillance abuse which delayed my sending this Email to its intended recipients for an hour. This meant that they would not receive it until tomorrow morning when they returned to their offices since it did not go out until 1800 GMT. They will do anything to slow me down and stop my activity if they can.
This is just a small dirty trick, but one that goes on daily. There are many, many more carried out continuously. They have been at it for almost a decade non-stop. The nature of their surveillance technology's capabilities far exceeds anything that George Orwell even began to imagine. There is a very dark underside to all of this activity by the US State Department worldwide, and I believe that there is much to be gleaned from these documents that is significantly important in that regard only one must be aware of what is present. If knowledge of what exists is absent, there will be no alertness to something else going on.
I am most concerned about a quote I read yesterday in TDB attributed to Robert Gates who said that Russia was a defunct democracy controlled by an intelligence driven oligarchy. There is a great deal of that in the US government these days, and I believe that a healthy bit of intelligence dominated government can be found in the State Department. This is what makes these WikiLeaks so important with respect to these documents which have to be digested in that context. All information is important and must be considered in the context of all that is happening some or a great deal of which might be hidden in secrecy.
On Sunday evening three days ago I read the WikiLeaks synopsis in "The Guardian" which included a line about information concerning rendition flights in the UK. I'm waiting to see more about this because it's currently a huge and explosive diplomatic and domestic issue in the UK who has settled out of court with 16 torture victims paying them millions so the intelligence services would not have to testify in open court.. So far there's been nothing more. I am dependent upon the media to read and report the content of these documents as journalists do for all information reporting.
I don't have the time to read the documents myself since I am subjected to 24/7/365 surveillance torture abuse by Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret and others. They never stop, and I never stop documenting what they do. He and Colonel Vine USMC Ret who is in charge travelling the world in this capacity introduced me to rendition in May 2001 three months after they started this surveillance imprisonment and torture. Their pleas to kidnap me from London were refused, but they have never stopped struggling to do so or use its threat as a torture mechanism.
Part of the WikiLeaks documents include instructions to gain information from foreign nationals that would be helpful to the State Department. These included credit card numbers and DNA. How? Profiling with DNA? Seeking items purchased and indebtedness? These requests are way out-of-bounds. Looking for thought processes and thinking are OK and need to be done if in a legitimate manner (not with surveillance technology of the kind to which I'm subjected), but there are indications that something far more sinister is going on. What about the recent reports from Sweden, Norway and Denmark concerning US embassy surveillance teams tracking their people?
Vine and Bird are linked to the London US embassy to some degree, but I do not know (yet) how much and what it is. I spent this afternoon writing an Email for a couple hours about what is happening here on a daily basis as a result of their surveillance technology abuses' impact and its antisocial behaviour consequences in this environment. I was about to finish it about 1700 GMT when my access to the Internet was interrupted by the surveillance abuse which delayed my sending this Email to its intended recipients for an hour. This meant that they would not receive it until tomorrow morning when they returned to their offices since it did not go out until 1800 GMT. They will do anything to slow me down and stop my activity if they can.
This is just a small dirty trick, but one that goes on daily. There are many, many more carried out continuously. They have been at it for almost a decade non-stop. The nature of their surveillance technology's capabilities far exceeds anything that George Orwell even began to imagine. There is a very dark underside to all of this activity by the US State Department worldwide, and I believe that there is much to be gleaned from these documents that is significantly important in that regard only one must be aware of what is present. If knowledge of what exists is absent, there will be no alertness to something else going on.
I am most concerned about a quote I read yesterday in TDB attributed to Robert Gates who said that Russia was a defunct democracy controlled by an intelligence driven oligarchy. There is a great deal of that in the US government these days, and I believe that a healthy bit of intelligence dominated government can be found in the State Department. This is what makes these WikiLeaks so important with respect to these documents which have to be digested in that context. All information is important and must be considered in the context of all that is happening some or a great deal of which might be hidden in secrecy.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)