Paige Parvin
Editor
Emory Magazine
Dear Paige
Re Spring 2011 Issue of Emory Magazine
A letter about a letter re Bonnie S. Mandell-Rice, Broomfield, Colorado, comment about animal testing and using her imagination to consider ourselves being the focus of experiments by "aliens."
What you need to tackle sometime, somehow are the experiments being carried out on humans by humans in a far more unrestricted manner than anyone conceives.
The essence of your ethic's issue, I thought, was the focal point of the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues where James Wagner occupies the Vice Chair. Nothing could be more relevant to Emory and its overall educational process.
Because Emory Magazine introduced me to its existence I followed the Commission's hearings on 28th February and 1st March 2011 with a great deal of interest from London thanks to the Internet. I also made some submissions as well including the letter I sent you
I was struck by those 22 members of the public who appeared in the last 45 minutes on 1st March. When you understand the truth of what they said, it is most painful to hear.
,
These people put themselves into public view, open to ridicule and sought help because they were human guinea pigs currently being used as nonconsenting subjects for neuroscience research with horrible stories to tell. They were given only two minutes each. This was just more abuse for them.
If you have time, give the video of what they had to say a view and see what your reaction is:
Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues Session 10: Public Comments 1st March 2011 St Regis Hotel Washington D.C.
When you realise that what was said by each and every person from this very diverse group is accurate (except for maybe the vapour trails from jet aircraft), you will begin to ask many questions.
The Commission faces an ethical dilemma: should it study the Guatemala experiments of 1947/8 in great detail as is occurring for dubious objectives or devote all resources necessary to address today's abuse of medical and scientific research as it applies to neuroscience?
The answer is, I believe, unfortunately, with the former and not the latter which will lead in due course to the Commission being considered useless and a waste of resources at a time when it could have done a meaningful job.
I am patiently waiting to see what course it takes after hearing these people plead for help that this Commission could provide.
Then I read James Wagner's comments "History and Wholeness" Wow! Will he have the courage to do as he describes others as having done not to remain blind or incapacitated when it comes to the horror of neuroscience experimentation being carried out today?
Slavery was an abomination and its aftermath a horror of social destruction. I've just been listening to Emmylou Harris' song "My Name is Emmett Till" on her just released new album "Hard Bargain." It's always wise to remind ourselves of what it was like in 1955 in Mississippi. But, have things changed?
All of the issues and problems that James Wagner associated with his excellent comments about slavery and confronting its issues as has occurred during the past 175 years of Emory's history all exist today. We are repeating history because we have not learned how to think properly.
We have not learned from history in a meaningful way nor have we advanced beyond slavery and abuse in the extreme which the technology of today has provided anew.
I've had almost 13 years of direct experience being subjected to 24/7/365 surveillance technology abuse which has sought and maintained a master/slave relationship by sadomasochistic means from the inescapable power of neuroscience based surveillance technology.
For the past decade this has involved neuroscience based surveillance technology since February 2001 carried out in a manner to imprison, torture, interrogate, experiment medically and engaged in surveillance R&D indefinitely until death occurs.
Those possessing this surveillance technology and using it in a most abusive manner are former US Marines who have permanently set up shop in North Kensington, London, at my home. This is part of a global activity.
After reading James Wagner's comments about slavery and Emory I call on him to allow each and every member of the public who wants to speak at the next session of the Commission's hearings at least ten minutes seated at the table to do so.
The horror of watching these people being treated like cattle at an auction for the slaughter by the Commission on 1st March 2011 was unbearable. I have not been able to look at the video of their treatment when they sought help since.
There was a whole afternoon available that could have been used. Surely, the Commission could have spent an afternoon of its time to hear from these people whose lives were destroyed and needed to tell their stories publicly so that everyone could benefit.
The Commission failed ethically at this point. There are new hearings coming up on the Wed & Thu, 18th & 19th of May 2011 in NYC with the same limited amount of time allowed for the public. There is a request for the public to apply to speak by 9th May 2011.
I urge the Commission through Dr Wagner to allow whoever wants to speak to be allowed to do so for ten minutes seated at a table, and that the Commission set aside the afternoon to hear them. After all, it's the public who is paying for this Commission.
Today we are on the brink of slavery that is unimaginable when compared with the past. The onus rests upon everyone to find out the truth and dig as deeply as possible to expose it all. This is what the Commission should be doing not investigating Guatemalan archives as important as they might be.
If Dr Wagner cannot get the Commission to pursue this vigorously, he should resign in protest and carry out this investigative work at Emory with the Board's approval. I am sure there are many grad students and faculty who would like to find out exactly what is happening for it is they who will be tarred by the neuroscience abuse brush when all of this becomes generally known.
Sincerely yours
Gary D Chance
Friday, 29 April 2011
Thursday, 28 April 2011
"Panetta's Thankless New Job" The Daily Beast
Panetta's Thankless New Job by John Barry The Daily Beast
Here are my comments about this article:
While an excellent, comprehensive article, there is a key factor totally missing that means the past and its experience are completely irrelevant to these positions. I call it Toxic Surveillance which is generally ignored and unreported to which I've been subjected 24/7/365 since February 2001. Without considering its existence on a global basis, the essence of what is happening in these government departments is being missed.
Tempest based Toxic Surveillance came out of decades of intelligence activity by the NSA. My belief is that Michael Hayden (an Air Force Lt General) moved from the NSA to CIA to introduce Toxic Surveillance which combines SIGINT with HUMINT. He spent a long time in these positions. That is significant. He is now in the private sector as a board director supplying personnel to the likes of the State Department for worldwide deployment of these contractors.
Moving Petraeus to CIA is moving more military into a key intelligence agency that was formerly civilian oriented because now its military intelligence and contractors are the ones most using and likely to use Toxic Surveillance. The NSA was originally formed to combine the intelligence activity of the military services. It's a simple command and control decision that has nothing to do with the past and everything to do with the future: military personnel are moving into key positions.
Panetta's move to the DoD has nothing to do with his past record and everything to do with his role as CIA Director moving into a Pentagon which will be oriented around intelligence and most especially Toxic Surveillance. He has the immediate experience for this. BTW the drones can fly with signal detection technology which makes them ideal for Toxic Surveillance. Instead of detecting mobile phone signals, brainwave electromagnetic radiation can be detected, identified, tracked and monitored with targeting if necessary in exactly the same way.
There is a whole ethical problem surrounding Toxic Surveillance which I've experienced for over a decade now. It is not just largely unknown but is also being kept secret while its research impact is popping up all over in the people who have been abused by it. I carry the sense of Petraeus as the person who lied effectively to attempt to cover up the torture from Iraq and elsewhere related to rendition and secret military prisons. Ethics is not in his character.
Col Ted Westhusing reportedly committed suicide in June 2005. He reported to Generals Fil and Petreaus and was unsuccessful in bringing corruption to their attention. He was rebuked in so many words by Fil. He had a PhD 2003 from Emory University and taught at West Point where he was buried. His purported suicide note condemned his "commanders only interested in themselves." You can read about him in Emory Magazine: Winter 2011: An American Warrior http://bit.ly/iipRXR
It just so happens that the President of Emory University is the Vice Chair of the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues which has had a run-in of sorts with those who appear, like myself, to be victims of this neuroscience research abuse. In their last public meeting on 1st March 2011 they allowed 22 members of the public to speak in 45 minutes which can be seen here: http://bit.ly/elE10s
They all spoke about today's abuse. All of what each of them said I can agree with except the vapour trails from jets in the sky. Even the helicopters can be significant. But, these men and women reflecting many different backgrounds, ages, race and professions all told the same story which is not getting out generally. They pleaded for help. Will they get it?
These are the issues which are behind these appointments, I belive, that need close scrutiny and are getting none. Petraeus and Panetta are cover up artists, but the problem goes on. It will break out at some point. When? The military and the intelligence community are taking over including in civilian neighbourhoods as I've experienced for over a decade. This whole story needs to come out if democracy is to be preserved. I am shocked at these appointments by Barack Obama and seriously wonder if he knows what he is doing.
I do not believe that Col Ted Westhusing committed suicide. At the very least he was driven to suicide, but all indications are that he was a fighter and not someone to cave into suicide although his suicide note appeared to be in his handwriting. I do know from my direct experience that those who are carrying out this abuse for their own greed, glory and power will try every dirty trick possible to destroy any exposure of what they are doing. I believe that they killed Colonel Ted Westhausing and faked his note. They are making every effort to kill me off after over ten years too because I report the truth as I am doing here.
Here are the context in which these comments occurred.
Here are my comments about this article:
While an excellent, comprehensive article, there is a key factor totally missing that means the past and its experience are completely irrelevant to these positions. I call it Toxic Surveillance which is generally ignored and unreported to which I've been subjected 24/7/365 since February 2001. Without considering its existence on a global basis, the essence of what is happening in these government departments is being missed.
Tempest based Toxic Surveillance came out of decades of intelligence activity by the NSA. My belief is that Michael Hayden (an Air Force Lt General) moved from the NSA to CIA to introduce Toxic Surveillance which combines SIGINT with HUMINT. He spent a long time in these positions. That is significant. He is now in the private sector as a board director supplying personnel to the likes of the State Department for worldwide deployment of these contractors.
Moving Petraeus to CIA is moving more military into a key intelligence agency that was formerly civilian oriented because now its military intelligence and contractors are the ones most using and likely to use Toxic Surveillance. The NSA was originally formed to combine the intelligence activity of the military services. It's a simple command and control decision that has nothing to do with the past and everything to do with the future: military personnel are moving into key positions.
Panetta's move to the DoD has nothing to do with his past record and everything to do with his role as CIA Director moving into a Pentagon which will be oriented around intelligence and most especially Toxic Surveillance. He has the immediate experience for this. BTW the drones can fly with signal detection technology which makes them ideal for Toxic Surveillance. Instead of detecting mobile phone signals, brainwave electromagnetic radiation can be detected, identified, tracked and monitored with targeting if necessary in exactly the same way.
There is a whole ethical problem surrounding Toxic Surveillance which I've experienced for over a decade now. It is not just largely unknown but is also being kept secret while its research impact is popping up all over in the people who have been abused by it. I carry the sense of Petraeus as the person who lied effectively to attempt to cover up the torture from Iraq and elsewhere related to rendition and secret military prisons. Ethics is not in his character.
Col Ted Westhusing reportedly committed suicide in June 2005. He reported to Generals Fil and Petreaus and was unsuccessful in bringing corruption to their attention. He was rebuked in so many words by Fil. He had a PhD 2003 from Emory University and taught at West Point where he was buried. His purported suicide note condemned his "commanders only interested in themselves." You can read about him in Emory Magazine: Winter 2011: An American Warrior http://bit.ly/iipRXR
It just so happens that the President of Emory University is the Vice Chair of the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues which has had a run-in of sorts with those who appear, like myself, to be victims of this neuroscience research abuse. In their last public meeting on 1st March 2011 they allowed 22 members of the public to speak in 45 minutes which can be seen here: http://bit.ly/elE10s
They all spoke about today's abuse. All of what each of them said I can agree with except the vapour trails from jets in the sky. Even the helicopters can be significant. But, these men and women reflecting many different backgrounds, ages, race and professions all told the same story which is not getting out generally. They pleaded for help. Will they get it?
These are the issues which are behind these appointments, I belive, that need close scrutiny and are getting none. Petraeus and Panetta are cover up artists, but the problem goes on. It will break out at some point. When? The military and the intelligence community are taking over including in civilian neighbourhoods as I've experienced for over a decade. This whole story needs to come out if democracy is to be preserved. I am shocked at these appointments by Barack Obama and seriously wonder if he knows what he is doing.
I do not believe that Col Ted Westhusing committed suicide. At the very least he was driven to suicide, but all indications are that he was a fighter and not someone to cave into suicide although his suicide note appeared to be in his handwriting. I do know from my direct experience that those who are carrying out this abuse for their own greed, glory and power will try every dirty trick possible to destroy any exposure of what they are doing. I believe that they killed Colonel Ted Westhausing and faked his note. They are making every effort to kill me off after over ten years too because I report the truth as I am doing here.
Here are the context in which these comments occurred.
Friday, 15 April 2011
Who is Actually Running the UK Government?
1. It is my legal responsibility to mitigate damages and report crimes.
2. It is my moral and legal responsibility to report corruption and abuse of power.
Therefore
The Rt Hon David Cameron, MP
Prime Minister
10 Downing Street
London SW1A 2AA
BY FAX 0207 925 0918
Dear Mr Prime Minister
I see by the reply from the Home Office in response to my Email to the current Home Secretary that it has shown once again an ongoing “dysfunctional” and “not fit for purpose” character.
Enclosed is my reply to this response. The security of this nation is at stake which the Home Secretary is ignoring, or there is a dark subterfuge taking place. The facts supporting this contention are stated in the enclosed response.
The Home Secretary might very well be dealing with a group of people intent upon covering up its own misconduct during the 13 years of the former Labour government where the Home Office was afflicted with multiple Home Secretaries.
The ACPO secret police force paid by the taxpayer but not accountable to government is a case in point. Simon Watkin trying to cover up the surveillance technology abuse against me by attacking me personally while David Blunkett was Home Secretary as well as when one of his successors occupied that position is another.
They might have taken advantage of a blind David Blunkett, but Teresa May is not blind. Getting all the skeletons out of the closet sooner rather than later will keep this government from being tarred by the extreme abuses in which the former Labour government engaged.
There is a whole issue of the tail wagging the dog here that has to be explored including who is actually in charge of government in a democratic society. At present there is an alternate government which functions as a tyranny that eclipses the overall democratic government, and it is highly likely that its cover up goes to the top of the civil service bureaucracy.
It’s time for this government to show that this will not be tolerated, or it will be implicated in a manner like the former Labour government. Your notion about local government is destroyed by the abuse from Toxic Surveillance in this environment at the local level.
Sincerely yours
Gary D Chance
enclosure
Subject RE: Reply garbled for Toxic Surveillance Abuse of Power Continues to Clandestinely Grown on Its Own in North Kensington Outside the Democratic Rule of Law
Sender garydchance
Recipient The Rt Hon Teresa May, MP
The Rt Hon Sir Malcolm Rifkind, KCMG QC MP
Date Friday, 15th April 2011, 1543
Formerly enclosed garbled text received once again from the Home Office to which I referred below has apparently been detected as a virus by the Home Office and House of Commons IT security procedures and been blocked. I am resending this Email by way of forwarding it to these two recipients having deleted that garbled text. Virus was described as "CorruptedCompressedUuencodeFile"
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: Reply garbled for Toxic Surveillance Abuse of Power Continues to Clandestinely Grown on Its Own in North Kensington Outside the Democratic Rule of Law
Date: Fri, 15 April 2011, 1522
To: The Rt Hon Teresa May, MP
The Rt Hon Sir Malcolm Rifkind, KCMG QC MP
The Rt Hon Kenneth Clarke, QC MP
BBC News Channel
Top Secret America
The Daily Beast
The Rt Hon Teresa May, MP
Home Secretary
Dear Ms May
I find the following reply to my Email about the abuse of power and growth of Toxic Surveillance torture carried out indefinitely against me 24/7/365 since mid-August 1998 for 12 years and 8 months so far now to be fundamentally abusive in character and criminal in its dismissal of extreme criminal activity including torture, attempted murder and perverting the course of justice.
This reply indicates that the Home Office is an accessory to these and other crimes and indicates that it continues to be.
I will send you Emails as I deem appropriate about this extensive criminal activity carried out by the UK government which will then serve as evidence in my proceedings against you as evidence of your failures in this matter.
Incidentally, this Email reply originally garbled was the first reply I have had to my correspondence from this government, and your enclosure was also garbled here as you can see below. This does not inspire confidence in the ability of the Home Office to function even at the most rudimentary level of information processing.
The Home Office was characterised as "dysfunctional" and "unfit for purpose" by the former Home Secretary Charles Clarke before the House of Commons which led to its separation into two separate departments.
I see that this is still the case and the ongoing crime and failures to protect the public from the most serious of threats including terrorism continues unabated as a result of this extreme abuse of surveillance technology under the operational control of those whom I reported for child abuse in May 1998. This has resulted in institutionalised abuse in the community.
During this period London was bombed in the summer of 2005 when 52 were killed and 700+ injured on 7th July 2005 which was followed two weeks later by the "dud-bombers" in a similar pattern of activity on 21st July 2005.
These two groups of bombers crossed paths and were tracked but not followed up by the security and intelligence services due to a lack of resources which were being consumed by the massive abuse of surveillance against me while faking it in order to create the false image that something significant was being done.
First, the second group of "dud bombers" operated in an area whose epicentre was this location. They lived in flats in the Colville Road area to the east and had a bomb factory in a flat to the northwest.
Second, one bomber tried to detonate his bomb at the Shepherd's Bush Tube Station on the Hammersmith & City Line which is one stop away from this building (Lattimer Road Tube Station) at that time before the Wood Lane Tube stop was constructed.
Third, one of the bombers dumped his unexploded rucksack bomb in Wormwood Scrubs to the west of here just north of the BBC Television Centre.
All of these bombers went totally undetected by the security and intelligence services while huge amounts of false allegations where made against me to sustained the faked surveillance abuse.
Luton was also a centre point of crossing for these bombers and contact with others which was not tracked. As a result, a bomber who had lived and attended school in Luton for some nine years detonated a bomb in Sweden last December who was totally unknown and undetected by the security and intelligence services.
The December before that a would-be bomber had tried to ignite a bomb on an aircraft as it came into land in Detroit on Christmas Day 2009. He had been through the UK and was educated in London where he too was picked up and dropped by the security and intelligence services although his connections have turned out to be extremely important.
I predicted the risk for this bombing accurately based upon my direct experience of being falsely subjected to surveillance technology abuse and was precisely correct in identifying exactly who and what organisation in the US was responsible for failing to detect this bomber in 2009.
I wrote about this risk which was published before the attempted bombing occurred. I sent copies of my Email to the Editor of Columbia Magazine to Prime Minister Brown and President Obama at the end of July 2009 five months before the attempted bombing occurred.
They did not pay any attention to what I described as the precise risk in anti-terrorist activity which turned out to be precisely the reason this Christmas Day bombing occurred. I have published this in my blog just after that bombing attempt. Go read it if you're interested.
The Home Office is responsible for MI5 and the police including Special Branch that has morphed into the Anti-Terrorism unit at the Met. They have flubbed completely all these years including recently with the Luton bomber who went to Sweden. The Home Office is totally responsible for these failures.
I have sent you the most important information you will ever receive in your life, and you continue to disregard it and abuse me further in the process. This country is at serious risk because of those faking it with surveillance technology who take down the system for their own personal greed, glory and power. As a result, this country puts the world at risk.
You are no different from them by allowing this to go on and putting the UK and the world at risk because of your gross incompetence and deliberate disregard of the very factors which contribute to crime and terrorism by allowing the serious criminals and terrorists to exist without detection to carry out their dastardly deeds.
These are facts, and you are ignoring them all for your own image of the moment which will have devastating consequences for the UK as has already occurred in the past decade.
The Home Office is completely and totally clueless and willfully so remaining "dysfunctional" and "unfit for purpose".
You have the right and responsibility to intervene in all the issues I raise to ensure that the public is protected which you are not doing in the most horrendous manner possible.
How can it be that the Home Office completely missed the unaccountable and beyond control ACPO secret police espionage state for all those years after ACPO formed a private company in 1997/8 until it was exposed in court on 10th January 2011 by the collapse of a prosecution when the police officer involved stated he was going to testify for the defense?
Not only did those six people walk free as rightly they should have done, but some 20 convictions in the past are now under review as a result of the government creating the problem it was privately policing with a secret police apparatus outside government.
You can't tell me that the Home Office is functioning properly when I receive an Email like the one below in light of what has been happening in this country with respect to serious crime and serious threat to internal security outside government control, namely, that of the Home Office.
Why didn't the Home Office know about this private use of Metropolitan police officers for private and personal gain as is happening in this situation as I now write about it and has been happening since mid-August 1998 about which I've been writing all along? Do you think that there might be a connection?
You will be happy to note, I'm sure, that those carrying out the Toxic Surveillance are quite pleased with your reply which indicates that they can continue with their extra government activity without having to worry about proper government oversight by the Home Office.
Sincerely yours
Gary D Chance
http://garydchance.com/
http://garydchance.tripod.com/surveillance/
http://garydchance.bravejournal.com/
http://garydchance-gary.blogspot.com/
http://twitter.com/garydchance
http://www.facebook.com/garydchance
http://www.myspace.com/garydchance
http://www.youtube.com/garydchance
cc The Rt Hon Sir Malcolm Rifkind, KCMG QC MP, Kensington; Chair: ISC
The Rt Hon Kenneth Clarke, QC MP, Justice Secretary
BBC News Channel
Top Secret America
The Daily Beast
enclosures
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: Reply garbled for Toxic Surveillance Abuse of Power Continues to Clandestinely Grown on Its Own in North Kensington Outside the Democratic Rule of Law
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011, 11:50:39 +0100
From: Public Enquiries (CD)
To: garydchance
Cc: Public Enquiries (CD)
Please see response below
DIRECT COMMUNICATIONS UNIT
2 Marsham Street, London SW1P 4DF
Switchboard: 020 7035 4848
Fax: 020 7035 4745
Textphone: 020 7035 4742
E-mail: public.enquiries@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk
Website: www.homeoffice.gov.uk
Mr Gary Chance
Reference: T5935/11 6 April 2011
Dear Mr Chance,
Thank you for your e-mail of 30 March about your concerns. As I am sure you will appreciate, the Home Secretary receives a large number of e-mails and is unable to respond to each one individually. Therefore, your e-mail has been passed to the Direct Communications Unit and I have been asked to reply.
It is always interesting to hear the views of members of the public. I appreciate the time it has taken for you to write, and would like to thank you for sharing this information which has been noted.
However, the Home Office is unable to intervene in the issues you raise in your e-mails and we will no longer be able to answer your e-mails in detail unless you are able to give us substantive new information that we should be following up. It is simply not practical for us to continue to review the same details in any one case. Resources do not permit us to continue with correspondence that makes no progress or which merely leads to the re-stating of our position.
I am very sorry but I cannot undertake that any further communication from you that simply revisits subjects covered in previous correspondence will be acknowledged or receive a formal response. The contents of any written correspondence received from you will continue to be noted on file here.
Yours sincerely,
-----Original Message-----
From: garydchance
Sent: 07 April 2011 3:24 PM
To: Public Enquiries (CD)
Subject: Reply garbled for Toxic Surveillance Abuse of Power Continues to Clandestinely Grown on Its Own in North Kensington Outside the Democratic Rule of Law
Thank you for your reply to my recent Email. Unfortunately, it came through garbled as you can see below.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Toxic Surveillance Abuse of Power Continues to Clandestinely Grown on Its Own in North Kensington Outside the Democratic Rule of Law
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 17:13:08 +0100
From:
To:
Reference : T5935/11
Thank you for your e-mail enquiry of 30/03/2011 1:21:45 AM
A reply is attached.
**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are private and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please return it to the address it came from telling them it is not for you and then delete it from our system.
This email message has been swept for computer viruses.
**********************************************************************
[Garbled text snipped since it triggered a virus response by the Home Office and House of Commons IT security software.]
2. It is my moral and legal responsibility to report corruption and abuse of power.
Therefore
The Rt Hon David Cameron, MP
Prime Minister
10 Downing Street
London SW1A 2AA
BY FAX 0207 925 0918
Dear Mr Prime Minister
I see by the reply from the Home Office in response to my Email to the current Home Secretary that it has shown once again an ongoing “dysfunctional” and “not fit for purpose” character.
Enclosed is my reply to this response. The security of this nation is at stake which the Home Secretary is ignoring, or there is a dark subterfuge taking place. The facts supporting this contention are stated in the enclosed response.
The Home Secretary might very well be dealing with a group of people intent upon covering up its own misconduct during the 13 years of the former Labour government where the Home Office was afflicted with multiple Home Secretaries.
The ACPO secret police force paid by the taxpayer but not accountable to government is a case in point. Simon Watkin trying to cover up the surveillance technology abuse against me by attacking me personally while David Blunkett was Home Secretary as well as when one of his successors occupied that position is another.
They might have taken advantage of a blind David Blunkett, but Teresa May is not blind. Getting all the skeletons out of the closet sooner rather than later will keep this government from being tarred by the extreme abuses in which the former Labour government engaged.
There is a whole issue of the tail wagging the dog here that has to be explored including who is actually in charge of government in a democratic society. At present there is an alternate government which functions as a tyranny that eclipses the overall democratic government, and it is highly likely that its cover up goes to the top of the civil service bureaucracy.
It’s time for this government to show that this will not be tolerated, or it will be implicated in a manner like the former Labour government. Your notion about local government is destroyed by the abuse from Toxic Surveillance in this environment at the local level.
Sincerely yours
Gary D Chance
enclosure
Subject RE: Reply garbled for Toxic Surveillance Abuse of Power Continues to Clandestinely Grown on Its Own in North Kensington Outside the Democratic Rule of Law
Sender garydchance
Recipient The Rt Hon Teresa May, MP
The Rt Hon Sir Malcolm Rifkind, KCMG QC MP
Date Friday, 15th April 2011, 1543
Formerly enclosed garbled text received once again from the Home Office to which I referred below has apparently been detected as a virus by the Home Office and House of Commons IT security procedures and been blocked. I am resending this Email by way of forwarding it to these two recipients having deleted that garbled text. Virus was described as "CorruptedCompressedUuencodeFile"
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: Reply garbled for Toxic Surveillance Abuse of Power Continues to Clandestinely Grown on Its Own in North Kensington Outside the Democratic Rule of Law
Date: Fri, 15 April 2011, 1522
To: The Rt Hon Teresa May, MP
The Rt Hon Sir Malcolm Rifkind, KCMG QC MP
The Rt Hon Kenneth Clarke, QC MP
BBC News Channel
Top Secret America
The Daily Beast
The Rt Hon Teresa May, MP
Home Secretary
Dear Ms May
I find the following reply to my Email about the abuse of power and growth of Toxic Surveillance torture carried out indefinitely against me 24/7/365 since mid-August 1998 for 12 years and 8 months so far now to be fundamentally abusive in character and criminal in its dismissal of extreme criminal activity including torture, attempted murder and perverting the course of justice.
This reply indicates that the Home Office is an accessory to these and other crimes and indicates that it continues to be.
I will send you Emails as I deem appropriate about this extensive criminal activity carried out by the UK government which will then serve as evidence in my proceedings against you as evidence of your failures in this matter.
Incidentally, this Email reply originally garbled was the first reply I have had to my correspondence from this government, and your enclosure was also garbled here as you can see below. This does not inspire confidence in the ability of the Home Office to function even at the most rudimentary level of information processing.
The Home Office was characterised as "dysfunctional" and "unfit for purpose" by the former Home Secretary Charles Clarke before the House of Commons which led to its separation into two separate departments.
I see that this is still the case and the ongoing crime and failures to protect the public from the most serious of threats including terrorism continues unabated as a result of this extreme abuse of surveillance technology under the operational control of those whom I reported for child abuse in May 1998. This has resulted in institutionalised abuse in the community.
During this period London was bombed in the summer of 2005 when 52 were killed and 700+ injured on 7th July 2005 which was followed two weeks later by the "dud-bombers" in a similar pattern of activity on 21st July 2005.
These two groups of bombers crossed paths and were tracked but not followed up by the security and intelligence services due to a lack of resources which were being consumed by the massive abuse of surveillance against me while faking it in order to create the false image that something significant was being done.
First, the second group of "dud bombers" operated in an area whose epicentre was this location. They lived in flats in the Colville Road area to the east and had a bomb factory in a flat to the northwest.
Second, one bomber tried to detonate his bomb at the Shepherd's Bush Tube Station on the Hammersmith & City Line which is one stop away from this building (Lattimer Road Tube Station) at that time before the Wood Lane Tube stop was constructed.
Third, one of the bombers dumped his unexploded rucksack bomb in Wormwood Scrubs to the west of here just north of the BBC Television Centre.
All of these bombers went totally undetected by the security and intelligence services while huge amounts of false allegations where made against me to sustained the faked surveillance abuse.
Luton was also a centre point of crossing for these bombers and contact with others which was not tracked. As a result, a bomber who had lived and attended school in Luton for some nine years detonated a bomb in Sweden last December who was totally unknown and undetected by the security and intelligence services.
The December before that a would-be bomber had tried to ignite a bomb on an aircraft as it came into land in Detroit on Christmas Day 2009. He had been through the UK and was educated in London where he too was picked up and dropped by the security and intelligence services although his connections have turned out to be extremely important.
I predicted the risk for this bombing accurately based upon my direct experience of being falsely subjected to surveillance technology abuse and was precisely correct in identifying exactly who and what organisation in the US was responsible for failing to detect this bomber in 2009.
I wrote about this risk which was published before the attempted bombing occurred. I sent copies of my Email to the Editor of Columbia Magazine to Prime Minister Brown and President Obama at the end of July 2009 five months before the attempted bombing occurred.
They did not pay any attention to what I described as the precise risk in anti-terrorist activity which turned out to be precisely the reason this Christmas Day bombing occurred. I have published this in my blog just after that bombing attempt. Go read it if you're interested.
The Home Office is responsible for MI5 and the police including Special Branch that has morphed into the Anti-Terrorism unit at the Met. They have flubbed completely all these years including recently with the Luton bomber who went to Sweden. The Home Office is totally responsible for these failures.
I have sent you the most important information you will ever receive in your life, and you continue to disregard it and abuse me further in the process. This country is at serious risk because of those faking it with surveillance technology who take down the system for their own personal greed, glory and power. As a result, this country puts the world at risk.
You are no different from them by allowing this to go on and putting the UK and the world at risk because of your gross incompetence and deliberate disregard of the very factors which contribute to crime and terrorism by allowing the serious criminals and terrorists to exist without detection to carry out their dastardly deeds.
These are facts, and you are ignoring them all for your own image of the moment which will have devastating consequences for the UK as has already occurred in the past decade.
The Home Office is completely and totally clueless and willfully so remaining "dysfunctional" and "unfit for purpose".
You have the right and responsibility to intervene in all the issues I raise to ensure that the public is protected which you are not doing in the most horrendous manner possible.
How can it be that the Home Office completely missed the unaccountable and beyond control ACPO secret police espionage state for all those years after ACPO formed a private company in 1997/8 until it was exposed in court on 10th January 2011 by the collapse of a prosecution when the police officer involved stated he was going to testify for the defense?
Not only did those six people walk free as rightly they should have done, but some 20 convictions in the past are now under review as a result of the government creating the problem it was privately policing with a secret police apparatus outside government.
You can't tell me that the Home Office is functioning properly when I receive an Email like the one below in light of what has been happening in this country with respect to serious crime and serious threat to internal security outside government control, namely, that of the Home Office.
Why didn't the Home Office know about this private use of Metropolitan police officers for private and personal gain as is happening in this situation as I now write about it and has been happening since mid-August 1998 about which I've been writing all along? Do you think that there might be a connection?
You will be happy to note, I'm sure, that those carrying out the Toxic Surveillance are quite pleased with your reply which indicates that they can continue with their extra government activity without having to worry about proper government oversight by the Home Office.
Sincerely yours
Gary D Chance
http://garydchance.com/
http://garydchance.tripod.com/surveillance/
http://garydchance.bravejournal.com/
http://garydchance-gary.blogspot.com/
http://twitter.com/garydchance
http://www.facebook.com/garydchance
http://www.myspace.com/garydchance
http://www.youtube.com/garydchance
cc The Rt Hon Sir Malcolm Rifkind, KCMG QC MP, Kensington; Chair: ISC
The Rt Hon Kenneth Clarke, QC MP, Justice Secretary
BBC News Channel
Top Secret America
The Daily Beast
enclosures
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: Reply garbled for Toxic Surveillance Abuse of Power Continues to Clandestinely Grown on Its Own in North Kensington Outside the Democratic Rule of Law
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011, 11:50:39 +0100
From: Public Enquiries (CD)
To: garydchance
Cc: Public Enquiries (CD)
Please see response below
DIRECT COMMUNICATIONS UNIT
2 Marsham Street, London SW1P 4DF
Switchboard: 020 7035 4848
Fax: 020 7035 4745
Textphone: 020 7035 4742
E-mail: public.enquiries@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk
Website: www.homeoffice.gov.uk
Mr Gary Chance
Reference: T5935/11 6 April 2011
Dear Mr Chance,
Thank you for your e-mail of 30 March about your concerns. As I am sure you will appreciate, the Home Secretary receives a large number of e-mails and is unable to respond to each one individually. Therefore, your e-mail has been passed to the Direct Communications Unit and I have been asked to reply.
It is always interesting to hear the views of members of the public. I appreciate the time it has taken for you to write, and would like to thank you for sharing this information which has been noted.
However, the Home Office is unable to intervene in the issues you raise in your e-mails and we will no longer be able to answer your e-mails in detail unless you are able to give us substantive new information that we should be following up. It is simply not practical for us to continue to review the same details in any one case. Resources do not permit us to continue with correspondence that makes no progress or which merely leads to the re-stating of our position.
I am very sorry but I cannot undertake that any further communication from you that simply revisits subjects covered in previous correspondence will be acknowledged or receive a formal response. The contents of any written correspondence received from you will continue to be noted on file here.
Yours sincerely,
-----Original Message-----
From: garydchance
Sent: 07 April 2011 3:24 PM
To: Public Enquiries (CD)
Subject: Reply garbled for Toxic Surveillance Abuse of Power Continues to Clandestinely Grown on Its Own in North Kensington Outside the Democratic Rule of Law
Thank you for your reply to my recent Email. Unfortunately, it came through garbled as you can see below.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Toxic Surveillance Abuse of Power Continues to Clandestinely Grown on Its Own in North Kensington Outside the Democratic Rule of Law
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 17:13:08 +0100
From:
To:
Reference : T5935/11
Thank you for your e-mail enquiry of 30/03/2011 1:21:45 AM
A reply is attached.
**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are private and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please return it to the address it came from telling them it is not for you and then delete it from our system.
This email message has been swept for computer viruses.
**********************************************************************
[Garbled text snipped since it triggered a virus response by the Home Office and House of Commons IT security software.]
Tuesday, 12 April 2011
Bullies Travel in Groups
Munchhausen By Proxy Syndrome: BS/SR seek to have others carry out their dirty work for them by making false claims against me. They’ve been doing this for 12.5+ years, and, obviously, I resist it. I trusted talking with two people once, but that was a terrible mistake. They were not listening at all.
These are abusers who seek to abuse others and myself by making these false claims. If they get someone to carry out their interference in my life, they gain for themselves while others carry the legal liability.
They also gain a psychological reward by having put one over on others who have more power then they. This power abuse is very important to the sadistic abuser and results in abuse of others as well as myself.
They seek to isolate me and alienate others from me by their horrendous verbal abuse including false allegations and false negative characterisations. No one has ever had any first hand, personal and direct experience with me. They all are dependent upon BS/SR for the information they receive and looking in the surveillance technology when allowed to do so.
Thus, BS/SR dominate and control everything and everybody. They make it appear as if there are a large number of people in support of them, but none of these has any direct experience with me, and the few at the core are engaged in a “set up” activity by creating disturbances which they then blame on me.
In this way they make it look like there are a large number of people who are saying things against me that are consistent with what BS/SR say, but this is only because BS/SR stir everything up trying to create a conflict situation and provoke violent responses by me which have never happened.
They have to make up false allegations of violence against me and get others to do the same if they can so that it appears as if there is something wrong when there isn’t. The truth of the matter are that BS/SR are violent themselves to others and threaten violence continuously.
All of this fits the same pattern of bully abuse in the schoolyard where a victim is picked on by a large group who all make false statements and bully as toads following the lead of the one or two bullies at the centre. The difference here is that this is in housing, and the bully is given surveillance technology to use indefinitely against those who report the problems as I do.
They are allowed to stay in place and carry out all of this activity with surveillance technology so that they can orchestrate this gigantic upheaval all around in everything and have been doing so for 12.5+ years 24/7/365 without any management control or continuity. In fact, management is the instigator and a participant.
People want power especially those who feel powerless, and bullying is a power trip. Tenant management deliberately creates an environment where the democratic rule of law is abrogated in favour of violent abuse to pretend to carry out management. This degenerates into what has happened here with the criminals and violent abusers taking over with surveillance technology.
They prolong the abuse for as long as they can to milk the system for all it is worth enriching themselves at the public’s expense and destroying anyone who communicates the truth. In fact, the latter is the means of perpetuating the abuse by saying that someone is “too potty” to section, arrest or whatever. Blaming the victim is a definite sign of the abusive personality.
This is social housing management by “fry up.” It will create extreme hostility in those victimised and undermine trust and confidence in those in authority especially the police, NHS and social services since they are seeking power over people rather than solving real problems.
In this case the child abusing dysfunctional family group was given surveillance technology to attack me and try to stop my reporting of the real problems. This only resulted in my having a great deal more to report and a great deal more evidence to collect and maintain. As a result, society has inverted itself so that the abusers are setting the standard of violence, crime and antisocial behaviour to which all develop in this environment. That must present a huge problem in the schools as these children grow.
Meanwhile, they use surveillance technology to monitor all that I do including writing this where a male just said “That’s not true” about the above paragraph. They seek to suppress the truth by attacking it in this manner hoping to stop its expression. They seek to interfere all the time in everything and get others to do so on a grand scale as described above.
People in groups behave badly. People alone don’t. Those in groups think that they can hide their bad behaviour and feel free to act out the bad side of their character, i.e., sadism. Those alone do not behave this way and act according to fundamental standards of acceptable behaviour.
These are abusers who seek to abuse others and myself by making these false claims. If they get someone to carry out their interference in my life, they gain for themselves while others carry the legal liability.
They also gain a psychological reward by having put one over on others who have more power then they. This power abuse is very important to the sadistic abuser and results in abuse of others as well as myself.
They seek to isolate me and alienate others from me by their horrendous verbal abuse including false allegations and false negative characterisations. No one has ever had any first hand, personal and direct experience with me. They all are dependent upon BS/SR for the information they receive and looking in the surveillance technology when allowed to do so.
Thus, BS/SR dominate and control everything and everybody. They make it appear as if there are a large number of people in support of them, but none of these has any direct experience with me, and the few at the core are engaged in a “set up” activity by creating disturbances which they then blame on me.
In this way they make it look like there are a large number of people who are saying things against me that are consistent with what BS/SR say, but this is only because BS/SR stir everything up trying to create a conflict situation and provoke violent responses by me which have never happened.
They have to make up false allegations of violence against me and get others to do the same if they can so that it appears as if there is something wrong when there isn’t. The truth of the matter are that BS/SR are violent themselves to others and threaten violence continuously.
All of this fits the same pattern of bully abuse in the schoolyard where a victim is picked on by a large group who all make false statements and bully as toads following the lead of the one or two bullies at the centre. The difference here is that this is in housing, and the bully is given surveillance technology to use indefinitely against those who report the problems as I do.
They are allowed to stay in place and carry out all of this activity with surveillance technology so that they can orchestrate this gigantic upheaval all around in everything and have been doing so for 12.5+ years 24/7/365 without any management control or continuity. In fact, management is the instigator and a participant.
People want power especially those who feel powerless, and bullying is a power trip. Tenant management deliberately creates an environment where the democratic rule of law is abrogated in favour of violent abuse to pretend to carry out management. This degenerates into what has happened here with the criminals and violent abusers taking over with surveillance technology.
They prolong the abuse for as long as they can to milk the system for all it is worth enriching themselves at the public’s expense and destroying anyone who communicates the truth. In fact, the latter is the means of perpetuating the abuse by saying that someone is “too potty” to section, arrest or whatever. Blaming the victim is a definite sign of the abusive personality.
This is social housing management by “fry up.” It will create extreme hostility in those victimised and undermine trust and confidence in those in authority especially the police, NHS and social services since they are seeking power over people rather than solving real problems.
In this case the child abusing dysfunctional family group was given surveillance technology to attack me and try to stop my reporting of the real problems. This only resulted in my having a great deal more to report and a great deal more evidence to collect and maintain. As a result, society has inverted itself so that the abusers are setting the standard of violence, crime and antisocial behaviour to which all develop in this environment. That must present a huge problem in the schools as these children grow.
Meanwhile, they use surveillance technology to monitor all that I do including writing this where a male just said “That’s not true” about the above paragraph. They seek to suppress the truth by attacking it in this manner hoping to stop its expression. They seek to interfere all the time in everything and get others to do so on a grand scale as described above.
People in groups behave badly. People alone don’t. Those in groups think that they can hide their bad behaviour and feel free to act out the bad side of their character, i.e., sadism. Those alone do not behave this way and act according to fundamental standards of acceptable behaviour.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)