1. It is my legal responsibility to mitigate damages and report crimes.
2. It is my moral and legal responsibility to report corruption and abuse of power.
Therefore
The Rt Hon David Cameron, MP
Prime Minister
10 Downing Street
London SW1A 2AA
BY FAX 0207 925 0918
Dear Mr Prime Minister
I see by the reply from the Home Office in response to my Email to the current Home Secretary that it has shown once again an ongoing “dysfunctional” and “not fit for purpose” character.
Enclosed is my reply to this response. The security of this nation is at stake which the Home Secretary is ignoring, or there is a dark subterfuge taking place. The facts supporting this contention are stated in the enclosed response.
The Home Secretary might very well be dealing with a group of people intent upon covering up its own misconduct during the 13 years of the former Labour government where the Home Office was afflicted with multiple Home Secretaries.
The ACPO secret police force paid by the taxpayer but not accountable to government is a case in point. Simon Watkin trying to cover up the surveillance technology abuse against me by attacking me personally while David Blunkett was Home Secretary as well as when one of his successors occupied that position is another.
They might have taken advantage of a blind David Blunkett, but Teresa May is not blind. Getting all the skeletons out of the closet sooner rather than later will keep this government from being tarred by the extreme abuses in which the former Labour government engaged.
There is a whole issue of the tail wagging the dog here that has to be explored including who is actually in charge of government in a democratic society. At present there is an alternate government which functions as a tyranny that eclipses the overall democratic government, and it is highly likely that its cover up goes to the top of the civil service bureaucracy.
It’s time for this government to show that this will not be tolerated, or it will be implicated in a manner like the former Labour government. Your notion about local government is destroyed by the abuse from Toxic Surveillance in this environment at the local level.
Sincerely yours
Gary D Chance
enclosure
Subject RE: Reply garbled for Toxic Surveillance Abuse of Power Continues to Clandestinely Grown on Its Own in North Kensington Outside the Democratic Rule of Law
Sender garydchance
Recipient The Rt Hon Teresa May, MP
The Rt Hon Sir Malcolm Rifkind, KCMG QC MP
Date Friday, 15th April 2011, 1543
Formerly enclosed garbled text received once again from the Home Office to which I referred below has apparently been detected as a virus by the Home Office and House of Commons IT security procedures and been blocked. I am resending this Email by way of forwarding it to these two recipients having deleted that garbled text. Virus was described as "CorruptedCompressedUuencodeFile"
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: Reply garbled for Toxic Surveillance Abuse of Power Continues to Clandestinely Grown on Its Own in North Kensington Outside the Democratic Rule of Law
Date: Fri, 15 April 2011, 1522
To: The Rt Hon Teresa May, MP
The Rt Hon Sir Malcolm Rifkind, KCMG QC MP
The Rt Hon Kenneth Clarke, QC MP
BBC News Channel
Top Secret America
The Daily Beast
The Rt Hon Teresa May, MP
Home Secretary
Dear Ms May
I find the following reply to my Email about the abuse of power and growth of Toxic Surveillance torture carried out indefinitely against me 24/7/365 since mid-August 1998 for 12 years and 8 months so far now to be fundamentally abusive in character and criminal in its dismissal of extreme criminal activity including torture, attempted murder and perverting the course of justice.
This reply indicates that the Home Office is an accessory to these and other crimes and indicates that it continues to be.
I will send you Emails as I deem appropriate about this extensive criminal activity carried out by the UK government which will then serve as evidence in my proceedings against you as evidence of your failures in this matter.
Incidentally, this Email reply originally garbled was the first reply I have had to my correspondence from this government, and your enclosure was also garbled here as you can see below. This does not inspire confidence in the ability of the Home Office to function even at the most rudimentary level of information processing.
The Home Office was characterised as "dysfunctional" and "unfit for purpose" by the former Home Secretary Charles Clarke before the House of Commons which led to its separation into two separate departments.
I see that this is still the case and the ongoing crime and failures to protect the public from the most serious of threats including terrorism continues unabated as a result of this extreme abuse of surveillance technology under the operational control of those whom I reported for child abuse in May 1998. This has resulted in institutionalised abuse in the community.
During this period London was bombed in the summer of 2005 when 52 were killed and 700+ injured on 7th July 2005 which was followed two weeks later by the "dud-bombers" in a similar pattern of activity on 21st July 2005.
These two groups of bombers crossed paths and were tracked but not followed up by the security and intelligence services due to a lack of resources which were being consumed by the massive abuse of surveillance against me while faking it in order to create the false image that something significant was being done.
First, the second group of "dud bombers" operated in an area whose epicentre was this location. They lived in flats in the Colville Road area to the east and had a bomb factory in a flat to the northwest.
Second, one bomber tried to detonate his bomb at the Shepherd's Bush Tube Station on the Hammersmith & City Line which is one stop away from this building (Lattimer Road Tube Station) at that time before the Wood Lane Tube stop was constructed.
Third, one of the bombers dumped his unexploded rucksack bomb in Wormwood Scrubs to the west of here just north of the BBC Television Centre.
All of these bombers went totally undetected by the security and intelligence services while huge amounts of false allegations where made against me to sustained the faked surveillance abuse.
Luton was also a centre point of crossing for these bombers and contact with others which was not tracked. As a result, a bomber who had lived and attended school in Luton for some nine years detonated a bomb in Sweden last December who was totally unknown and undetected by the security and intelligence services.
The December before that a would-be bomber had tried to ignite a bomb on an aircraft as it came into land in Detroit on Christmas Day 2009. He had been through the UK and was educated in London where he too was picked up and dropped by the security and intelligence services although his connections have turned out to be extremely important.
I predicted the risk for this bombing accurately based upon my direct experience of being falsely subjected to surveillance technology abuse and was precisely correct in identifying exactly who and what organisation in the US was responsible for failing to detect this bomber in 2009.
I wrote about this risk which was published before the attempted bombing occurred. I sent copies of my Email to the Editor of Columbia Magazine to Prime Minister Brown and President Obama at the end of July 2009 five months before the attempted bombing occurred.
They did not pay any attention to what I described as the precise risk in anti-terrorist activity which turned out to be precisely the reason this Christmas Day bombing occurred. I have published this in my blog just after that bombing attempt. Go read it if you're interested.
The Home Office is responsible for MI5 and the police including Special Branch that has morphed into the Anti-Terrorism unit at the Met. They have flubbed completely all these years including recently with the Luton bomber who went to Sweden. The Home Office is totally responsible for these failures.
I have sent you the most important information you will ever receive in your life, and you continue to disregard it and abuse me further in the process. This country is at serious risk because of those faking it with surveillance technology who take down the system for their own personal greed, glory and power. As a result, this country puts the world at risk.
You are no different from them by allowing this to go on and putting the UK and the world at risk because of your gross incompetence and deliberate disregard of the very factors which contribute to crime and terrorism by allowing the serious criminals and terrorists to exist without detection to carry out their dastardly deeds.
These are facts, and you are ignoring them all for your own image of the moment which will have devastating consequences for the UK as has already occurred in the past decade.
The Home Office is completely and totally clueless and willfully so remaining "dysfunctional" and "unfit for purpose".
You have the right and responsibility to intervene in all the issues I raise to ensure that the public is protected which you are not doing in the most horrendous manner possible.
How can it be that the Home Office completely missed the unaccountable and beyond control ACPO secret police espionage state for all those years after ACPO formed a private company in 1997/8 until it was exposed in court on 10th January 2011 by the collapse of a prosecution when the police officer involved stated he was going to testify for the defense?
Not only did those six people walk free as rightly they should have done, but some 20 convictions in the past are now under review as a result of the government creating the problem it was privately policing with a secret police apparatus outside government.
You can't tell me that the Home Office is functioning properly when I receive an Email like the one below in light of what has been happening in this country with respect to serious crime and serious threat to internal security outside government control, namely, that of the Home Office.
Why didn't the Home Office know about this private use of Metropolitan police officers for private and personal gain as is happening in this situation as I now write about it and has been happening since mid-August 1998 about which I've been writing all along? Do you think that there might be a connection?
You will be happy to note, I'm sure, that those carrying out the Toxic Surveillance are quite pleased with your reply which indicates that they can continue with their extra government activity without having to worry about proper government oversight by the Home Office.
Sincerely yours
Gary D Chance
http://garydchance.com/
http://garydchance.tripod.com/surveillance/
http://garydchance.bravejournal.com/
http://garydchance-gary.blogspot.com/
http://twitter.com/garydchance
http://www.facebook.com/garydchance
http://www.myspace.com/garydchance
http://www.youtube.com/garydchance
cc The Rt Hon Sir Malcolm Rifkind, KCMG QC MP, Kensington; Chair: ISC
The Rt Hon Kenneth Clarke, QC MP, Justice Secretary
BBC News Channel
Top Secret America
The Daily Beast
enclosures
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: Reply garbled for Toxic Surveillance Abuse of Power Continues to Clandestinely Grown on Its Own in North Kensington Outside the Democratic Rule of Law
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011, 11:50:39 +0100
From: Public Enquiries (CD)
To: garydchance
Cc: Public Enquiries (CD)
Please see response below
DIRECT COMMUNICATIONS UNIT
2 Marsham Street, London SW1P 4DF
Switchboard: 020 7035 4848
Fax: 020 7035 4745
Textphone: 020 7035 4742
E-mail: public.enquiries@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk
Website: www.homeoffice.gov.uk
Mr Gary Chance
Reference: T5935/11 6 April 2011
Dear Mr Chance,
Thank you for your e-mail of 30 March about your concerns. As I am sure you will appreciate, the Home Secretary receives a large number of e-mails and is unable to respond to each one individually. Therefore, your e-mail has been passed to the Direct Communications Unit and I have been asked to reply.
It is always interesting to hear the views of members of the public. I appreciate the time it has taken for you to write, and would like to thank you for sharing this information which has been noted.
However, the Home Office is unable to intervene in the issues you raise in your e-mails and we will no longer be able to answer your e-mails in detail unless you are able to give us substantive new information that we should be following up. It is simply not practical for us to continue to review the same details in any one case. Resources do not permit us to continue with correspondence that makes no progress or which merely leads to the re-stating of our position.
I am very sorry but I cannot undertake that any further communication from you that simply revisits subjects covered in previous correspondence will be acknowledged or receive a formal response. The contents of any written correspondence received from you will continue to be noted on file here.
Yours sincerely,
-----Original Message-----
From: garydchance
Sent: 07 April 2011 3:24 PM
To: Public Enquiries (CD)
Subject: Reply garbled for Toxic Surveillance Abuse of Power Continues to Clandestinely Grown on Its Own in North Kensington Outside the Democratic Rule of Law
Thank you for your reply to my recent Email. Unfortunately, it came through garbled as you can see below.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Toxic Surveillance Abuse of Power Continues to Clandestinely Grown on Its Own in North Kensington Outside the Democratic Rule of Law
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 17:13:08 +0100
From:
To:
Reference : T5935/11
Thank you for your e-mail enquiry of 30/03/2011 1:21:45 AM
A reply is attached.
**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are private and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please return it to the address it came from telling them it is not for you and then delete it from our system.
This email message has been swept for computer viruses.
**********************************************************************
[Garbled text snipped since it triggered a virus response by the Home Office and House of Commons IT security software.]
