OBL Surveillance Most Likely Toxic Surveillance That Needs to Be Made Public for Democratic Survival
from Gary D Chance
to topsecretamerica (The Washington Post); editorial (The Daily Beast)
date 7 May 2011 14:37
subject OBL Surveillance Most Likely Toxic Surveillance That Needs to Be Made Public for Democratic Survival
Tina Brown
Dana Priest
William Arkin
Julie Tate
Mesdames et Monsieur
It’s extremely important at this point to get the reporting of the surveillance technology right since I belief that what was used against OBL since last August 2010 was what I call Toxic Surveillance so named because its usage is harmful to the point of being lethal. However, it can be used without most of the lethal and explicitly torturous activity for complete information gathering.
It’s interesting to note that OBL was found in August 2010 just after The Washington Post came out with Top Secret America in July 2010. The Washington Post deserves all the credit for a massive job effort that revealed this huge monolith of an “alternate” geography that is “beyond control” which I prefer to call an alternate government which is out of democratic control given my experience as a Toxic Surveillance target since February 2001 seven months before 9/11.
I’ve been writing extensively about this ever since in as rational and reasonable a manner as possible and continue to do so, but the fact of what it is precludes many from allowing my posts to appear which also includes the BBC and many UK publications. However, to the everlasting credit of The Washington Post and The Daily Beast this has not been the case, and what I’ve had to say has been allowed to remain in the public domain as far as I know.
As we hit the stunning fact of the surveillance carried out against OBL for some eight months, Toxic Surveillance jumps up into reality for me because I know what it is and also know its abuses. This means that there is no justification for what was done to OBL, and that every means was available to capture him without incident. I suspect that, as with me and others, Toxic Surveillance is used as a sadistic weapon rather than a democratic tool. This is why it needs to be publicised.
Brainwave monitoring and decoding along with computer technology and any electronic technology device that emits low level electromagnetic radiation is subject to Tempest interception. I described this a bit in my comment to The Washington Post article that I blogged whose link is below.
This means they knew everything about all these people and mapped their brainwave electromagnetic radiation signature surrounding each person’s head enabling them to be tracked and monitored always. This, I believe, is why it took tens of millions of dollars to do the job. They knew who the “Pacer” was.
It means that the children as well as the women, couriers and whoever else was present were equally monitored along with OBL. It means that they continue to be monitored while in the custody of the Pakistanis and always will be wherever they are located unless underground or in one of the special rooms described in Top Secret America.
You might think that they would have the decency not to monitor children, but this is not true. Those who use Toxic Surveillance have extremely abusive personalities and are abusers of all sorts. In my direct experience child abusers have been incorporated into the surveillance process since its beginning in August 1998 against me and have been running it along with Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret who joined their operation with Toxic Surveillance in February 2001.
1. I want to point to the Bioethical Issues Commission where a woman from the public pleaded for herself and daughter who was being subjected to this abuse. You can see her and 21 others making their statements (such as they are in two minutes) here:
Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues Session 10: Public Comments 1st March 2011 St Regis Hotel Washington D.C.
We are not just talking about using Toxic Surveillance for going after the OBL’s of this world. It is being used against innocent people for perverse and sadistic reasons on an indefinite basis that leads to either their being committed (sectioned in the UK) to a mental institution (again see the video above) or killed as occurred to OBL.
There can never be any justification for such an execution as occurred to OBL. The implications for this justifying many others to do the same are incalculable. It goes on already. If it is seen to be justified in the case of OBL, all the sadistic and perverted people involved in Toxic Surveillance will use that to carry out their own abuse as I’ve experienced for 12.75 years 24/7/365 in total so far.
2. I’ve read and commented upon your report about the surveillance carried out against OBL: Here are my comments blogged since they are buried away among some 600 comments so far:
"CIA spied on bin Laden from safe house" Washington Post My Toxic Surveillance comments. #topsecretamerica #cheatsheet
3. I next read something in the Arab News online which lead me to the NY Times article. I made my comments here first:
"CIA watched Bin Laden from nearby house" - Arab News
“This story never stops changing. Now, he was shot at so that he was moving away when the Washington Post explained that moving away constituted "resisting."
“One thing that has never come out yet in detail is the kind of surveillance used. The description above from the NY Times goes further than the Washington Post, but neither begins to touch what I believe has actually been used. I haven't read the NY Times yet.
“Please see my comments about Toxic Surveillance blogged here for convenience in respect to what was published in the Washington Post. This has been used against me since Feb 2001 24/7/365 in London by retired US Marine contractors developing it and still goes on.”
4. Here are my comments which I tried to post on the NY Times comments that I’ve not seen appear yet and again reference my blogged comments about the Washington Post’s reporting:
“The information being released about the surveillance against OBL is a cover for what has really taken place. There's a bit here and there that draws upon what is known, but the operation used totally different technology for completely invasive surveillance. I make this supposition having been a target of what I call Toxic Surveillance in London for over ten years 24/7/365 since Feb 2001 carried out by former US Marines who are still at it while I write.
“Please see my blog at for my Toxic Surveillance comments after I read the Washington Post’s description. While the NY Times’ description is more detailed, neither ventures into the reality of the surveillance technology that has been in use for over a decade which has astounding attributes and results. It explains how they were able to get away with it for eight months. They got all the information that was there and then eliminated OBL.”
5. Finally, here is something I wrote for a Baltimore Sun comment that I have not seen appear yet either. It dealt with someone who thought the action against OBL was justified.
“1) OBL was under a 1998 SDNY Federal Court indictment and subject to arrest for prosecution in the US judicial system. He was summarily executed unarmed in the middle of the night in his bedroom in front of women and children. He did not deserve this. No one does. This was not justice of any kind. It was an act of cowardly murder.
“2) My father was stationed at Pearl Harbour on 7th December 1941 and survived. I was born there a year later. At no time did I ever hear him talk disparagingly of the Japanese. There was never a hint of any revenge attacks. He spent 31 days at Iwo Jima as captain of the USS Zuni where nearly 50,000 were killed. The Japanese strafed US sailors in the water after sinkings, but the US PBYs did not do this to Japanese surviving seamen. (See Gordon Prange's "Miracle at Midway").
“3) For ten years and three months 24/7/365 since February 2001 (seven months before 9/11) I've been subjected to the most extreme surveillance torture abuse non-stop by Col Vine USMC Ret, Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret and others in a residential neighbourhood in North Kensington, London, UK. I've been imprisoned, tortured and experimented upon by it without a second's relief. "He deserves it," says Bird repeatedly along with other familiar abusive justifications of sadistic violence. I am subjected to menace, threats of violence and death threats continuously as an innocent person. I’ve been kept out of the justice system by this abuse directly and indirectly.
“These are the terrorists in this world as far as I'm concerned, and they create more of them on both sides who feel justified in killing innocent people too because of what they see the US military and their contractors do in the world without any restraint. There can never be justification for what happened to OBL. He should have been arrested and returned to the criminal justice system of the US. The US stooped to the level of criminal terrorist by murdering him in the manner that it was done.
“He was summarily executed by those who rationalise this murderous act so that all others around the world feel free to do the same. Anyone like me can become a designated target outside the legal justice system and protection of the law. Anyone can be summarily executed on this basis as Bird keeps trying to do in a way in which he can get away with just for the sake of doing it as a murderer. He gets points for the harm and injury done to me which become promotion and pay. Is this the world you want? It’s the world that has been created now supported and sustained by Barack Obama as symbolised by the execution of OBL.
“Barack Obama is coming to the UK soon, and he just met with Prince Charles in Washington discussing the environment. You should see the environment in North Kensington. This is a journalist free zone although the BBC's Television Centre is not far away. I wonder what Barack Obama and David Cameron will be discussing?”
I believe that it’s imperative for Toxic Surveillance to be brought to light to stop all its abuses that are far more widespread than its use against OBL. It needs to see the democratic light of day if we are to have democracy in the West. It appears at present as if there is a takeover of the US government by Top Secret America which is determining law in accordance with the desires of those who are in control rather than by the judicial system.
Sincerely yours
Gary D Chance
http://garydchance.com/
http://garydchance.tripod.com/surveillance/
http://garydchance.bravejournal.com/
http://garydchance-gary.blogspot.com/
http://twitter.com/garydchance
http://www.facebook.com/garydchance
http://www.myspace.com/garydchance
http://www.youtube.com/garydchance
