Cameras installed near Julian Assange's Norfolk bail home
There are the court assigned bail restrictions, and there are the intelligence and security services own surveillance activity. These need to be separated. But, what is not even noted is the fact that Julian Assange is with little doubt subjected to complete and total monitoring by what I call Toxic Surveillance that covers him as a human being and all his technology equipment as well based upon the principle of Tempest regardless of location.
Here they are talking about a couple roadside cameras set up in addition to his tagging and need to report to the police daily. It's all irrelevant when compared to what is actually happening carried out by a joint effort of US and UK agents which has been used against me for over a decade in North Kensington. It's all denied, of course, but it goes on brutally all the time. This won't happen to Julian Assange because they will do legitimate surveillance not the brutal terror, torture that is being carried out against me. At least not yet, anyway.
1. "Sarah Harrison from WikiLeaks says in the video: "I'm British and I've always been proud of our justice system, but this is just wrong. . . . This is a man that hasn't even been charged and he's being treated like a caged animal."
For the most part the judicial system hasn't a clue about what really happens, and they don't want to know. I haven't been charged with anything ever until recently as a result of the failure to file financial statements that was deliberately created by those abusing Toxic Surveillance against me. This doesn't mean a thing. They will use this surveillance technology to totally invade the privacy of a person, imprison him/her by its tracking ability and carry out torture abuse if so desired. Forget out the British judicial and prison systems. They are irrelevant.
2. "His former lawyer Mark Stephens, who did not know about the video release, said: "The restrictions on him are unduly burdensome. . . . I have felt for some time that they were unduly restrictive. Were someone other than Julian Assange who was in the same position, they would not be subject to the same restrictions."
Another clueless wonder in the legal profession who has no idea about what is really happening and sees these externals as too much. I wonder what he would say if he knew the truth? I wonder what Gareth Peirce is saying? I have informed her years ago about Toxic Surveillance. Mark Stephens has to wake up to the fact that this has been used against me for almost 13 years 24/7/365 in North Kensington in the most brutal manner imaginable by large groups of people many known to me. What he says about Julian Assange is rubbish. They go after everyone in a most extreme manner from which there is no protection. The presumption of guilt is the driving force for imprisoning indefinitely without charge as I've experienced for almost 13 years.
