-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Mon 07.11.2011: BBC Newsnight: "On the brink of a mental health revolution" but which way? Democracy or "Stasiland?"
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 07:32:47 -0800
From: Gary D Chance
Thomas R. Insel, M.D., Director
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Neuroscience Center (NSC) Building
6001 Executive Boulevard
Rockville, MD 20852
Professor Shitij Kapur, Dean
Institute of Psychiatry
King's College London
De Crespigny Park, London
United Kingdom, SE5 8AF
C Lee Bollinger, President
Columbia University
R Glenn Hubbard, Dean
Graduate School of Business
Columbia University
Peter J Awn, Dean
School of General Studies
Columbia University
James W Wagner, President
Emory University
Stephen H Bowen, Dean
Oxford College of Emory University
The Rt Hon Sir Malcolm Rifkind, KCMG QC MP, Kensington
Chair: Joint Intelligence and Security Committee
House of Commons
London
Susan Watts, BBC Newsnight
Madame et Messrs
Re BBC News - Newsnight - On the brink of a mental health revolution Susan Watts tonight 07.11.2011 at 2230 GMT BBC Two [and can be seen afterward on the BBC iPlayer]
Thomas Insel: "We have never had a full wiring diagram of the human brain. We are getting that now."
There's a parallel research project occurring that is malevolent and malignant using neuroscience and the principle of Tempest surveillance technology to effect social control in the community. I have been a non-consenting guinea pig for this research since mid-August 1998, but the real neuroscience based surveillance technology was not introduced into this process until February 2001 by Colonel Vine USMC Ret, Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret and others.
My points are two:
1) This surveillance Tempest based neuroscience research is eons ahead of what exists in the public domain and has extraordinary advantages for all of medicine; and
2) The risks today are that this malevolent, malicious and malignantly growing surveillance Tempest based neuroscience research will taint legitimate, beneficial neuroscience research bringing it into discredit and disrepute in the public's perception impacting science and its people negatively.
This article completely omits reference to the interception of electromagnetic radiation originating in the brain. The actual BBC Newsnight programme may touch on it. Dr Insel's statement indicates to me that such brain wiring mapping can only take place by such means and involves highly complex electrodes and minute sensors placed on the surface and inside the brain. Such activity and all that is being done as described in this article is to be applauded. It's moving in the right direction.
What I am experiencing has been moving in the most terribly tragic negative direction imaginable during the past 13+ years and most especially the past 10+ years which needs to be recognised and addressed by everyone including those in science and all disciplines along with law makers, managers, etc. so that this neuroscience technology can be democratically controlled and beneficially used for humans and all animals.
In contrast to the statements which emerged this year from the hearings held by the US Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues, I want to assert once again that thoughts can be read and the brain's inner activity understood for what it is as we experience it consciously for ourselves. In other words, we can know the minds of other people perhaps better than we know our own. The Commission limited its understanding and public comments to brain imaging which is only mass measurement and did not explore what might be available in decoding the brain's electronic signals which can be done without electrodes by merely intercepting the electromagnetic radiation surrounding the head.
This is well beyond brain wire mapping which will follow on from this process of decoding electromagnetic radiation from the brain by the techniques currently used that are only Tempest based interception without implants and/or electrodes. Those using this neuroscience Tempest based surveillance technology can see through my eyes. There is nothing new or startling about that. Before they began in February 2001 with this surveillance technology against me, there were articles in the BBC News during October 1999 about looking through a cat's eyes with photographs available to see what a cat was seeing.
BBC News | Sci/Tech | Computer uses cat's brain to see
BBC News | Sci/Tech | Looking through cats' eyes
BBC News | Sci/Tech | Vision of the future
The electronic transmission of sound to the human brain was my first experience with this neuroscience Tempest based surveillance technology. Since I had been under surveillance for 2.5 years up to February 2001 and knew the people involved, I was prepared for this change and quickly understood what was happening. I could also hear other people with whom they were speaking. This sound transmission was used abusively and enabled me to learn about everything else although it took me some six months to fully confirm the ability to see through my eyes. I did not know about these BBC News articles concerning cats for some time after this.
There is no doubt that my thoughts and images can be read by others. Like sound, these can be induced as well especially at night for memory probing and dream inducement. All aspects of neurological activity can be so monitored with feedback including surreptitious medication and pain inducement as well as muscle movement. I have documented my experience as completely as I could around-the-clock for all these years.
The great issue is that this is being used to try to create mental illness and physical harm which is the complete reverse of what neuroscience and medicine should be doing and against all the principles of ethical research and its application as well as legal and criminal standards enacted into law. The public is being assaulted by this neuroscience used as a weapon. This is what will taint its legitimate development and usage. This can be seen by the number of people reporting what is happening internationally.
I am most fortunate in that this all began by people well known to me who have carried on throughout all these 13+ years including those who joined in February 2001 and have stayed until now. Since this is indefinite until death, I believe that these same people will be so engaged unless it is stopped.
This is actually a massive Munchhausen By Proxy Syndrome effort that has extensively involved the NHS and the police among other UK government departments directly since at least the autumn of 1999 following my letter to the then Prime Minister, Tony Blair, that was faxed on 23rd September 1999. The actions taken against me to silence me have all been a massive fraud. I'm still here, and I do not suffer from any mental illness although I have sustained physical harm from the electromagnetic radiation.
This programme extols the efforts to address the mental health problems of people by the advance of neuroscience. I want to point out that this same neuroscience but much further advanced because it has been developed in secret and by using human guinea pigs like myself is being used to attempt to create mental illness in much the same way that totalitarian governments have abused the mentally ill or those who speak the truth to falsely claim that they are mentally ill.
This is the big problem right now that has to be addressed so that this neuroscience research can move forward and genuinely address mental and physical health and well being of people so that those who do otherwise are not allowed to create problems that the legitimate research is trying to cure. Science and medicine cannot advance on "dirty data."
The malevolent abuse of this neuroscience is commencing to grow malignantly by distributing it in neighbour flats in my case and training people in abusive behaviour to use it and generally become part of a vigilante mob. I now call this a Toxic Surveillance cult that is growing rapidly with people who have little scruples being trained to abuse it as desired.
Worst of all, perhaps, is that the cult leaders are psychopathic personalities which I've been able to determine on my own as a result of my direct association with them as a surveillance target for over a decade. Psychopathy is a mental illness of a completely different kind where there is not a malfunction but an absence of human brain factors that create the human being as we know especially with respect to conscience and all its attributes which lead almost all of us to learn and behave properly in a social context interacting with other human beings appropriately.
It is hoped that the neuroscience research can detect the psychopath to prevent such behaviour especially the extreme kind of serial criminal who becomes well known by his/her atrocities. There are tests which at the present can detect the absence of fright to alarming sounds but much more needs to be done to identify and understand this very special and most socially devastating of mental health problems. Robert Hare has surveyed prisons in North America determining that up to 25% of prison populations consist of psychopathic personalities who are responsible for 50% of the crime.
The ultimate objective is to prevent the marriage of psychopathic personalities with neuroscience based surveillance technology that reflects the ultimate power in the hands of a human being that can be exerted over another as I've been experiencing for 13+ years by such personalities with this mental health disorder among others.
I only wish that the media and scientific and academic communities would begin to recognise the existence of such neuroscience surveillance technology to make the public aware of its existence so that it can be re-directed from malevolent to benevolent usage and so controlled democratically. This BBC Newsnight programme needs to go much further in order to do that and lead the way out of the abyss that is forming into a well structured and meaningfully neurologically based science and medicine.
The art of listening has still to be learned everywhere, and I don't mean in the sense of eaves dropping. We have to protect against the disposition to create a new "Stasiland" as depicted brilliantly by Anna Funder in her book of this name where she talked with the people who had been involved on both sides of the Stasi in the former GDR (German Democratic Republic).
Sincerely yours
Gary D Chance
Thomas R. Insel, M.D.,
Dr. Insel was Professor of Psychiatry at Emory University. There, he was founding director of the Center for Behavioral Neuroscience, one of the largest science and technology centers funded by the National Science Foundation and, concurrently, director of an NIH-funded Center for Autism Research. From 1994 to 1999, he was Director of the Yerkes Regional Primate Research Center in Atlanta. While at Emory, Dr. Insel continued the line of research he had initiated at NIMH studying the neurobiology of complex social behaviors.
Professor Shitij Kapur
Professor Kapur brings a distinguished and international academic background, having served as Canada Research Chair for Schizophrenia and Therapeutic Neuroscience, Chief of Research at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, and a Professor of Psychiatry at the University of Toronto.
He graduated from the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, did his psychiatric training at the University of Pittsburgh and subsequently completed a PhD and Fellowship at the University of Toronto. He is a Distinguished Fellow of the American Psychiatric Association and has recently been elected as a Fellow of the Academy of Medical Sciences, UK.
