Russian MP Adrei Lugovoi has a point in mocking UK police and justice (1) but perhaps not exactly in the way he intended. The police would not believe Alexander Litvinenko until days before his death when confirmation of his radiation poisoning could be made or so it was described in the media. The victim was ignored when he knew what was happening.
The Home Secretary commissioned a report (2) about the police handling of the various incidents concerning Jimmy Savile that came to their attention which was just released. The victims were not only ignored but one was told not to report the crime and another that he could be subjected to arrest for doing so.
Victims were ignored and felt they could not report the abuse successfully and did not. They were intimidated from the outset which enabled Jimmy Savile to flourish.
There were other very important factors, e.g., database linkage nationally, that were involved, but what stands out is the fact that victims were not respected and heard to the extent that they were disregarded, considered a nuisance with respect to the estimable Jimmy Savile and could be criminalised themselves for making such reports.
Sir Peter Fahy, chief constable of Greater Manchester Police, makes a valid point (3) when he notes the complexity of such cases and the need to address the underlying issues.
Jimmy Savile was a sexual predator, but the essence of what he did involved power in that he could have power over vulnerable young people for his exploitation. This is a violent abuse that is sexual in character. However, the same fundamental abuse can be violent in a sexually sadistic character and have the same foundation but not be the same precise predatory nature.
We can go a bit further and note that serial killers murder their victims for the power that this gives them over life and death of their victims at the instant of death as the “Green River” killer has described who confessed to killing some 49 women over three decades. (See Ann Rule’s book “Green River Running Red.”)
The underlying issue here involve the psychopathic character with ancillary elements of paranoia, sadism and necrophilia as I’ve been witnessing, describing and reporting for 14.5+ years since 1998. The abuse has been perpetuated against me by those whom I reported for child abuse in 1998 who use surveillance technology during all these years without anyone getting anything right.
Not only can a Jimmy Savile-like situation happen again it is and has been for the past 14.5+ year 24/7/365 in my direct experience. If the sadistic abuser can latch onto one victim by using surveillance technology indefinitely, s/he they will never stop.
If s/he they can also use the trappings of a charity management organisation, volunteer status and creating both vulnerability in the targeted victim as well as the problems that are then blamed on the victim, this will flourish indefinitely just as Jimmy Savile did and as I’ve experienced as a victim since 1998 after I reported child abuse in 1998.
It was the child abusers and generally abusive personalities who then perpetuated this abuse against me and have been to this very day continuously abusing others in the process as they have done so. The underlying issue which has not been grasped and understood properly is the essence and behaviour of the psychopathic personality that forms the core of the surveillance technology abuse in this instance.
Psychopathy is extraordinarily important because it effects some 1% of the population (600,000 is a huge number in the UK) and manifests itself in varying types and degrees of antisocial and criminal behaviour. As I’ve noted previously according to Robert Hare’s research, 25% of those in prison are psychopaths who have committed 50% of the crimes. This number keeps turning up in those who were involved in the 2011 UK riots and those who fail to perform community orders.
This is important for the police, health, justice and prison systems professionals to fully understand which has not even begun to start happening yet because:
1) the police overlook the psycopathic factor and its behaviour characteristics,
2) the health professionals cannot diagnose it due to its unique mental illness character,
3) the justice system is frustrated because judges cannot understand why a large number of offenders are recidivists, and
4) prison reform will just not work until the psychopaths are identified and handled separately and differently.
This is why when I send out correspondence, they go to these various ministers of state, the Chancellor and the Mayor since the underlying issue forming the foundation of my experience is psychopathy that has impacted all of them in terms of their responsibilities, yet the problems are still occurring, and there is no visible dealing accurately with the essence of the problem to stop it here and to bring about policy changes to create an interdisciplinary government to make it effective across the nation.
The health professionals have to come to grips with psychopathy in such a way that they can educate the police in its characteristics especially the younger officers who do not have experience. This then has to feed into the justice and prison systems and back out again into the worlds of the police and health professionals so that an emerging database of characteristics underpinning criminal behaviour with this common denominator emerges.
The serial criminal of whatever kind who repeats these offences over and over needs to be understood completely by all these professionals so that an effective database can be created, and those who repeat the same crime over and over against one or just a few victims as I am experiencing must be understood in the same way.
When you add surveillance technology to the methods used by psychopaths to carry out serial crimes as I have experienced directly by its indefinite usage against me since 1998 24/7/365, a huge problem emerges that is far more difficult to detect, solve and ultimately results in the protection of the public.
This serial psychopathic criminal can hide behind surveillance technology while using it for crimes that can be virtually undetectable, and no one is going to pay any attention to the victim which will allow theses criminals free reign to blame the victim.
These are the news reports that inspired my comments about the issues mentioned above:
(1) Wed, 13 Mar 2013 - 17:09:55: BBC News-Litvinenko suspect rules himself out of attending inquest. Russian MP Andrei Lugovoi mocks UK police/justice
(2) Wed, 13 Mar 2013 - 17:41:00: BBC News-Jimmy Savile: Police watchdog criticises 'failures': need "professionals of all kinds to report child abuse"
“[HM Inspector of Constabulary Drusilla Sharpling] told the BBC that it must become an obligation on professionals of all kinds to report child abuse, and the use of the police database had to be "slicker" and "more comprehensive".
“Home Secretary Theresa May, who commissioned the report, said it had brought into "sharp focus police failings that allowed Savile to act with impunity over five decades"
“ "The public rightly want answers to how victims' voices were ignored for so long. While we can never right this wrong, we must learn the lessons to prevent the same from ever happening again."
(3) Wed, 13 Mar 2013 - 17:44:15: BBC News - Savile failings 'could happen again'. They are right now and have been for 14.5+ years in my experience.
“The Home Office is to review its policies regarding child protection.
“Sir Peter said the many reports on Savile and other cases of serial sexual offenders were not addressing the underlying issues.
“"We can continue to criticise individual members of staff for individual failings but this ignores the complexity of these issues and the way our system of criminal justice affects the victims of sexual offences," he said.”
