A witch hunt at Big Brother House appears to be an appropriate tribute to the cultural heritage of the UK
With Halloween approaching on 31st October enterprising commercial interests produced mental patients' costumes flogged by the likes of Asda, Tesco, eBay and Amazon until complaints and a national outcry brought this to an end. These costumes presented the mental health patient fear factor with meat cleavers, machetes, face masks like that used on Hannibal Lecteur who consumed human flesh directly and bloody designer clothing or a psycho ward labeled orange jump suit. This fit right in with the other commercial aspects of witches, goblins, ghosts and terrifying mystical creatues that are brought forth on Halloween as objects to inspire fear.
This environment has been right in step with this cultural foundation in the UK by carrying out a witch hunt against me for over 15 years 24/7/365 using surveillance technology as a weapon to do so. Creating fear by using mental health characterisations from the beginning in 1998 has also been the foundation of this effort to subvert the government's legitimate efforts to deal with problems by creating a massive hoax aka Munchausen By Proxy Syndrome. They have brought this to the extreme in a Big Brother cultural society by distributing surveillance technology among neighbouring flats and attempting to sell surveillance widely on the basis of an apparent pilot project ordained and sustained by a government preferring hoax rather than reality.
Nobody objects sufficiently enough to this commercialisation of the destruction of human life to stop it. These are definitely the Killing Fields I've called them in the past, and they are making a snuff film and recordings out of it. What I hear sounds like the endlessly repeated performance that has gone on day and night alll these years to give these people who have nothing to do the appearance of doing something. A five-year management review study has resulted in keeping this effort in place while trying to engineer another election that is nothing more that what was done in 2009 that failed as can be see here.
What is most amazing at the same time is reflected by the commercialisation of mental health patients' Halloween costumes that was quickly scuppered nationally by a huge outcry covered extensively in the media. Quite the contrary here, however, is the fact that what actually exists in real terms is the abuse of the fear generated from false allegations about mental health illness that has been exploited throughout all these years without anybody stopping it. What kind of five-year investigation was actually conducted, and why is this environment so out of step with the rest of the nation when it comes to scare mongering by using a mental health illness hoax?
These people are ferociously continuing this during the so-called election process by faking everything without a murmur from anyone about this reality. The extreme abuse against me continues unabated 24/7/365 driven by those whom I reported for child abuse in 1998 and joined in February 2001 by Colonel Vine USMC Res/Res and Lt Harry Bird USMC Res/Ret with surveillance technology that is now being commercialised under under what has more recently been apparently called a pilot project scheme (someone said 15 units and 15 cases recently) which the government is funding that has been distributed to create a vigilante mob of Big Brother House surveillance technology abusers.
1. Mental Health Patients' Halloween Costumes
Asda and Tesco withdraw Halloween mental patients' costumes featuring violence fear factor from cleaver and machete.
"The £20 Asda outfit included ragged clothing, fake blood, a mask and a fake meat cleaver while Tesco's [Psycho Ward] orange boiler suit came with a plastic jaw restraint and offered to "complete the look" with a machete.
"Online retailer Amazon had also advertised the "psycho ward" outfit, but later said the costume was "not available"."
What actually happens in the community reflects this costume design. There are those who use mental illness like this as a weapon against the healthy because they do not like someone and seek to create hatred and fear based upon false allegations. Those whom I reported for child abuse are doing this to me and have been for over 15 years 24/7/365 by using surveillance technology indefinitely in order to discredit what I report. They are thus abusing the community in this manner, and if their target in this instance me were actually mentally ill, they could spark a psychotic break. As it is, they are making every effort to be as provocative as possible. The new abuse word is to call someone "potty" which actually reflects a necrophilic personality by this use of language.
The great problem in all of this is that the UK government is behind this activity by supporting this abuse without stopping it which involves the police, NHS, justice (legal profession and magistrates) along with the local and central governments. The result has been a destroyed government, yet the more they do the less inclined they are to admit their error and seek to cover up everything by accelerating the abuse against me. The greatest tragedy in all of this is that the NHS mental health professionals cannot deduce that those carrying out the abuse have a mental health problem acted out right in front of their faces which is the essence of Munchausen By Proxy Syndrome. Those using surveillance technology to fake allegations to get the police and NHS mental health professionals to intervene are the one's who are actually mentally ill which they are trying to hide. Munchausen By Proxy Syndrome is a mental illness symptom.
This is like terrorism. They are using false mental health allegations to carry out violence themselves, and all involved ignore what is actually happening while allowing it to grow. No wonder these costumes appear at Halloween. It's part of the actual culture in the UK that is not going away but getting worse.
2. Big Brother House on Display
The National Trust is conducting public tours on Friday and Saturday (27th & 28th September) of the Big Brother House as a cultural heritage ignoring its reality. I find this quite fitting that the National Trust should now associate the Big Brother House with the hundreds of years of British cultural heritage considering its influence on the UK culture as I've experienced directly.
I've been subjected to totally invasive surveillance technology abuse 24/7/365 for over 15 years since mid-August 1998 which goes on as of this writing. This is like the nation watching me in everything that I do regardless of what it is while behaving provocatively to entertain itself with bullying sadistic violent abuse that seeks to watch the impact and results.
Hundreds if not thousands of people have actually been directly involved in this surveillance technology abuse including the police, NHS, justice system and local and central government who support and sustain this activity indefinitely. Phrases used to sustain it include "He has to be monitored," "He is a study'' and "He might harm himself" which is something those using the surveillance technology seek to do. In fact, they are actually Angels of Death. It's like a narcotic for these people. They refuse to give it up. "I want to see," said one of them recently.
Let's congratulate the National Trust on keeping abreast with the cultural times by providing the public with an inside look at a house totally connected to surveillance. Perhaps it would like to investigate my home, adjacent flats and others in the environment where what they call "television" is installed so that whole families including children can watch all that I do inside my home 24/7/365, make up false allegations and gain sadistic pleasure from continuous torture abuse. Is this progressive or regressive? Whatever you might think it's the very essence of the UK as portrayed by George Orwell in 1984 that has gone far beyond even his imagination. Clever bunch that National Trust lot. Hail Britannia! Britannia rules the air waves
Friday, 27 September 2013
Tuesday, 24 September 2013
Navy Yard Gunman Complained About Linen Closet Noises
ABC News 20th September2013 Navy Yard Gunman Kicked Out of Quarters for Noise Complaint
Saturday, 21st September 2013
For almost 20 years I had a knowledge that was generally unknown to the world, but even that knowledge was limited until I read The Puzzle Palace and had something to direct others to read. For the past 15 years and especially since February 2001 I've acquired another special knowledge as a surveillance target that was and is generally unknown. No one wants to accept the reality of the surveillance technology based upon Tempest used against computer technology and humans that is beyond anything ever known. We all have a weakness about what is known to us personally and our inability to accept what is not generally known. Every effort is made to censor and stop my collection of evidence, its processing and reporting inluding my comments about current events especially related to the abuse I witness continuously.
Saturday afternoon, a male using this surveillance technology said outside under my front window "I'm going to section you for what you wrote on Facebook." In the UK section means to detain involuntarily for 28 days in hospital under the Mental Health Act because someone is either threat to him/herself or others or both. This was an attempt to suppress by intimidation using mental illness as a weapon. This was the threat used at the end of The Whistle Blower against Michael Caine's character to keep him silent. What I have written is not a threat to anyone but quite the opposite. However, every effort is made to provoke something that can be used against me, i.e., the familiar dirty tricks campaign.
All during this Saturday afternoon, I could not access the Internet with the tablet I'm using because those with the surveillance technology were deliberately blocking me as they do frequently in their efforts to censor and stop what I am doing. They were blocking/stalling quite important evidence from the previous night's continuous abuse. I use Facebook to document on a broad basis with general comments sometimes specifically related to this activity as it coincides with world activity.
In the past I've blocked comments to avoid abuse since those locally using the surveillance technology would comment under pseudonyms to be abusive. They want to control and dominate everything and make distorted complaints to Facebook about what I write and note which has lead to restrictions on my Facebook account in the past. There is nothing I can do about this since Facebook is too huge, and no redress of grievance contact point was available as far as I could find. Since they know all my logon details, they can access my Facebook account to make minor changes which has happened.
I made the following Disqus comment after an ABC News article concerning Aaron Alexis and some more mental illness problems: "He could have been harassed by surveillance technology that included the electronic transmission of sound, Voice-to-Skull (V2N), and ultrasound to make the noises in the linen closet. These could have been done to drive him out and/or create a mental health problem. Doing this to someone who is unstable could result in a psychotic break with tragic results as occurred." Someone asked the following question: "And this nobody would be targeted in such a way why?" with two others repeating "Why?"
It's a very good question. That's how these people operate among many reasons by going after the vulnerable maliciously and sadistically. It's the same kind of question that has been raised about targeting people with nothing to fear. It's arbitrary and capricious or for revenge and retaliation by those with this surveillance technology. The worst case scenario is that it's done intentionally to create a violent incident to sustain fear, funding and power. The problem is that neither ABC News or any other large news agency will explore this as a legitimate investigation because the implications are too problematic. To me that's apathy. It's better for them to ignore it which means that this surveillance technology activity gets sanctioned and continues to grow whether or not it exists in this instance.
What are we left with? The social media including Facebook. This is certainly far better than it was before even with all the cake baking and similar interaction. I'm against the direct interference that I receive which actually pushes the likes of Facebook into cooking and pets as the lowest common denominator that is innoffensive and irrelevant on a higher social level of human interaction in the world. Apathy is getting more and more pervasive in human life and has led to extreme failures. All one has to do is read the news, but then what I have to say never gets into any news media despite years of media correspondence or into the political process despite the same.
Saturday, 21st September 2013
For almost 20 years I had a knowledge that was generally unknown to the world, but even that knowledge was limited until I read The Puzzle Palace and had something to direct others to read. For the past 15 years and especially since February 2001 I've acquired another special knowledge as a surveillance target that was and is generally unknown. No one wants to accept the reality of the surveillance technology based upon Tempest used against computer technology and humans that is beyond anything ever known. We all have a weakness about what is known to us personally and our inability to accept what is not generally known. Every effort is made to censor and stop my collection of evidence, its processing and reporting inluding my comments about current events especially related to the abuse I witness continuously.
Saturday afternoon, a male using this surveillance technology said outside under my front window "I'm going to section you for what you wrote on Facebook." In the UK section means to detain involuntarily for 28 days in hospital under the Mental Health Act because someone is either threat to him/herself or others or both. This was an attempt to suppress by intimidation using mental illness as a weapon. This was the threat used at the end of The Whistle Blower against Michael Caine's character to keep him silent. What I have written is not a threat to anyone but quite the opposite. However, every effort is made to provoke something that can be used against me, i.e., the familiar dirty tricks campaign.
All during this Saturday afternoon, I could not access the Internet with the tablet I'm using because those with the surveillance technology were deliberately blocking me as they do frequently in their efforts to censor and stop what I am doing. They were blocking/stalling quite important evidence from the previous night's continuous abuse. I use Facebook to document on a broad basis with general comments sometimes specifically related to this activity as it coincides with world activity.
In the past I've blocked comments to avoid abuse since those locally using the surveillance technology would comment under pseudonyms to be abusive. They want to control and dominate everything and make distorted complaints to Facebook about what I write and note which has lead to restrictions on my Facebook account in the past. There is nothing I can do about this since Facebook is too huge, and no redress of grievance contact point was available as far as I could find. Since they know all my logon details, they can access my Facebook account to make minor changes which has happened.
I made the following Disqus comment after an ABC News article concerning Aaron Alexis and some more mental illness problems: "He could have been harassed by surveillance technology that included the electronic transmission of sound, Voice-to-Skull (V2N), and ultrasound to make the noises in the linen closet. These could have been done to drive him out and/or create a mental health problem. Doing this to someone who is unstable could result in a psychotic break with tragic results as occurred." Someone asked the following question: "And this nobody would be targeted in such a way why?" with two others repeating "Why?"
It's a very good question. That's how these people operate among many reasons by going after the vulnerable maliciously and sadistically. It's the same kind of question that has been raised about targeting people with nothing to fear. It's arbitrary and capricious or for revenge and retaliation by those with this surveillance technology. The worst case scenario is that it's done intentionally to create a violent incident to sustain fear, funding and power. The problem is that neither ABC News or any other large news agency will explore this as a legitimate investigation because the implications are too problematic. To me that's apathy. It's better for them to ignore it which means that this surveillance technology activity gets sanctioned and continues to grow whether or not it exists in this instance.
What are we left with? The social media including Facebook. This is certainly far better than it was before even with all the cake baking and similar interaction. I'm against the direct interference that I receive which actually pushes the likes of Facebook into cooking and pets as the lowest common denominator that is innoffensive and irrelevant on a higher social level of human interaction in the world. Apathy is getting more and more pervasive in human life and has led to extreme failures. All one has to do is read the news, but then what I have to say never gets into any news media despite years of media correspondence or into the political process despite the same.
How did Jeremiah Duggan die?
19:47
Jeremiah Duggan dies in Weisbaden in March 2003 while at Lyndon LaRouche's Schiller Institute for anti war conference
BBC2 Newsnight report: Jeremiah Duggan, Wiesbaden's Schiller Institute and Lyndon Larouche. Why did this British student in Paris die in Weisbaden? After being recruited from Paris to Weisbaden with anti war inclinations in the background to attend a conference, he ran out out at 0515 for four or five kilometres before being struck and killed on the autobahn about 0600. He was in a state of terror the British inquest stated refusing to recognise Weisbaden's conclusion that he committed suicide. Weisbaden would not investigate and closed the case. This video report reveals what was happening around this incident including comments by a former member of the Schiller Institute. It appears that he might have been subjected to mind control experimentation from an unknown source that he called computer experiments.
20:15
Erica Duggan talks about her son eight years after his death in Wiesbaden
Erica Duggan ignored by the prosecutor in Wiesbaden in March 2011 says "They [LaRouche organisation's Schiller Institute] saw him as the enemy and hounded him to death." She has evidence the Wiesbaden prosecutor will not consider that her son, Jeremiah Duggan, was not where he was described but at the LaRouche building near where he died hit by an auto in the busy autobahn about 0600 in March 2003. Did he run the four to five kilometres to this point from the house where he was claimed to have been?
Jeremiah Duggan dies in Weisbaden in March 2003 while at Lyndon LaRouche's Schiller Institute for anti war conference
BBC2 Newsnight report: Jeremiah Duggan, Wiesbaden's Schiller Institute and Lyndon Larouche. Why did this British student in Paris die in Weisbaden? After being recruited from Paris to Weisbaden with anti war inclinations in the background to attend a conference, he ran out out at 0515 for four or five kilometres before being struck and killed on the autobahn about 0600. He was in a state of terror the British inquest stated refusing to recognise Weisbaden's conclusion that he committed suicide. Weisbaden would not investigate and closed the case. This video report reveals what was happening around this incident including comments by a former member of the Schiller Institute. It appears that he might have been subjected to mind control experimentation from an unknown source that he called computer experiments.
20:15
Erica Duggan talks about her son eight years after his death in Wiesbaden
Erica Duggan ignored by the prosecutor in Wiesbaden in March 2011 says "They [LaRouche organisation's Schiller Institute] saw him as the enemy and hounded him to death." She has evidence the Wiesbaden prosecutor will not consider that her son, Jeremiah Duggan, was not where he was described but at the LaRouche building near where he died hit by an auto in the busy autobahn about 0600 in March 2003. Did he run the four to five kilometres to this point from the house where he was claimed to have been?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)