Tuesday, 24 September 2013

Navy Yard Gunman Complained About Linen Closet Noises

ABC News 20th September2013 Navy Yard Gunman Kicked Out of Quarters for Noise Complaint

Saturday, 21st September 2013

For almost 20 years I had a knowledge that was generally unknown to the world, but even that knowledge was limited until I read The Puzzle Palace and had something to direct others to read. For the past 15 years and especially since February 2001 I've acquired another special knowledge as a surveillance target that was and is generally unknown. No one wants to accept the reality of the surveillance technology based upon Tempest used against computer technology and humans that is beyond anything ever known. We all have a weakness about what is known to us personally and our inability to accept what is not generally known. Every effort is made to censor and stop my collection of evidence, its processing and reporting inluding my comments about current events especially related to the abuse I witness continuously.

Saturday afternoon, a male using this surveillance technology said outside under my front window "I'm going to section you for what you wrote on Facebook." In the UK section means to detain involuntarily for 28 days in hospital under the Mental Health Act because someone is either threat to him/herself or others or both. This was an attempt to suppress by intimidation using mental illness as a weapon. This was the threat used at the end of The Whistle Blower against Michael Caine's character to keep him silent. What I have written is not a threat to anyone but quite the opposite. However, every effort is made to provoke something that can be used against me, i.e., the familiar dirty tricks campaign.

All during this Saturday afternoon, I could not access the Internet with the tablet I'm using because those with the surveillance technology were deliberately blocking me as they do frequently in their efforts to censor and stop what I am doing. They were blocking/stalling quite important evidence from the previous night's continuous abuse. I use Facebook to document on a broad basis with general comments sometimes specifically related to this activity as it coincides with world activity.

In the past I've blocked comments to avoid abuse since those locally using the surveillance technology would comment under pseudonyms to be abusive. They want to control and dominate everything and make distorted complaints to Facebook about what I write and note which has lead to restrictions on my Facebook account in the past. There is nothing I can do about this since Facebook is too huge, and no redress of grievance contact point was available as far as I could find. Since they know all my logon details, they can access my Facebook account to make minor changes which has happened.

I made the following Disqus comment after an ABC News article concerning Aaron Alexis and some more mental illness problems: "He could have been harassed by surveillance technology that included the electronic transmission of sound, Voice-to-Skull (V2N), and ultrasound to make the noises in the linen closet. These could have been done to drive him out and/or create a mental health problem. Doing this to someone who is unstable could result in a psychotic break with tragic results as occurred." Someone asked the following question: "And this nobody would be targeted in such a way why?" with two others repeating "Why?"

It's a very good question. That's how these people operate among many reasons by going after the vulnerable maliciously and sadistically. It's the same kind of question that has been raised about targeting people with nothing to fear. It's arbitrary and capricious or for revenge and retaliation by those with this surveillance technology. The worst case scenario is that it's done intentionally to create a violent incident to sustain fear, funding and power. The problem is that neither ABC News or any other large news agency will explore this as a legitimate investigation because the implications are too problematic. To me that's apathy. It's better for them to ignore it which means that this surveillance technology activity gets sanctioned and continues to grow whether or not it exists in this instance.

What are we left with? The social media including Facebook. This is certainly far better than it was before even with all the cake baking and similar interaction. I'm against the direct interference that I receive which actually pushes the likes of Facebook into cooking and pets as the lowest common denominator that is innoffensive and irrelevant on a higher social level of human interaction in the world. Apathy is getting more and more pervasive in human life and has led to extreme failures. All one has to do is read the news, but then what I have to say never gets into any news media despite years of media correspondence or into the political process despite the same.