From: "Gary D Chance"
To: "BBC News Channel"; "BBC Panorama"; "BBC London"; "Alan Johnson"; "CEOP"; "Sir Paul Stephenson"
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 3:26 PM
Subject: Peter Chapman's (33) murder of Ashleigh Hall (17) was horrible & preventable, but all engaged in this discussion are keeping the British public in the dark and feeding them with what makes the grass grow greener.
The ultimate horror of a young woman of 17 experiencing that kind of death is unthinkable. It is even worse that the comments by those in the media and government are even more unthinkable because of everyone's obvious knowledge of a solution that is not even discussed let alone implemented.
The British public is not being served and, worse, is being abused by those who control power and information.
An earlier interviewee on the BBC News Channel talking with Matthew A said that there are 50,000 convicted sex offenders who need to be tracked in some way or another.
He said that at best only six of these can be put under surveillance for the protection of the public due to lack of resources since it takes a massive number of police officers to carry out surveillance against one person.
The question also came up about going after those who do not report to the police as required. He said that in such an instance all the police forces in the nation would have to be notified which would be an undertaking of considerable magnitude as well.
I also recall a Panorama programme on this very problem of tracking sex offenders to ensure that they do not re-offend. The result of the Panorama programme was that these sex offenders were not tracked and went on to attempt to groom as was shown. The system just does not work as was shown too, and representations to the contrary are just so much verbiage.
I have never done anything in my life to warrant indefinite surveillance carried out against me 24/7/365. Quite the contrary. I've reported problems for decades that have put my life at risk because they involved organised crime in the past. Bruce Bailey was killed in June 1989 in NYC by mistaken identity thinking that he was I. He looked exactly like me and lived on my street at that time.
Despite this sterling reputation of mine and my more than clean history, I have been tracked by surveillance technology for 11.5 years 24/7/365 by those whom I reported for child abuse who continue as of this writing in an effort to cover up that abuse and their other continuous criminal activity.
This reflects a terrible waste of resources against the innocent by the guilty allowing the real sex offenders and abusive personalities to go free and unfettered to commit further crimes. It has had the same impact on terrorism in the UK as well.
The surveillance technology exists to track serious sex offenders economically with minimal resources and people, but it is not even being publicly discussed let alone recognised as existing despite its abuse against me for nine years 24/7/365 since February 2001.
It's pathetic to see people like the Home Secretary Alan Johnson talking about laws in place for everything while side stepping the issue of monitoring and referring to the Child Exploitation and Online Protection (CEOP) Centre when he could address meaningful solutions for this problem but refuses to do so.
All Alan Johnson has to say is that "lessons need to be learned." Elect another lot to government and see what they can do is the lesson that has been learned from this government.
Jim Gamble from CEOP is in a quandary trying to get more and better cooperation from the Internet organisations and others to put child safety first which they are not doing in reality.
The question came up about powers not properly enforced? He said that we have collective power and referred to a mixed economy workforce: needed to work with industry.
He went on to describe a need for a greater and more ethical approach to social networking by these Internet social networking organisations adding that they should do it with a child safety first approach.
He ended his comments by saying that he felt like he would be back again soon saying the same things all over like a "broken record."
This will not happen if this country wakes up to the surveillance technology that exists and is being abused in the worst imaginable way against people like me by the abusers themselves who should be monitored not doing the surveillance monitoring.
It's time to start discussing the surveillance technology that can effectively track serious sex offenders and other criminals who are a direct threat to the public so that the public can be adequately protected which does not exist at present.
David Blunkett was right when he referred to a "prison without walls," only he wants to deny the reality of this surveillance technology.
How many more innocent children are you going to be allowed to be murdered by these depraved people when they can be adequately monitored and tracked so that they cannot disappear and/or offend?
Of course, coincident with this has been the sexual sadistic torture abuse carried out against me 24/7/365 for 11.5 years by those whom I reported for child abuse in 1998 and many others who have engaged in this "joint enterprise" with surveillance technology as a weapon.
Not only are children not protected, but abusers are allowed to carry out surveillance torture abuse of the most heinous kind against me 24/7/365 and the community indefinitely.
The problem goes far deeper than just failing to protect the public, and all activity is so far illusionary because it does not openly embrace the ability to get the job done properly and effectively.
Generally speaking all those involved in this discussion constitute a useless lot spinning wheels to create the illusion of doing something while innocent children continue to be murdered unnecessarily.
Forget about me, but listen to what I have to say.
Gary
cc The Rt Hon Alan Johnson, MP, Secretary of State, The Home Office
Sir Paul Stephenson, Commissioner, Metropolitan Police
Jim Gamble, CEOP
BBC Panorama
BBC London
