Amanda Knox Weapon to Be DNA Retested - The Daily Beast
23/01/11 01:40:38 BBC News - New tests for 'murder weapon' in Amanda Knox case
"The prosecution's case might have been defeated had the defense lawyers been more unified. After all, there was no solid confession, no real murder weapon [hence the forensic re-examination of the knife's DNA], no convincing motive and not much evidence." "Angel Face," Barbie Latza Nadeau, p.153. This case's investigation and trial are too much of a mess. Can justice ever be done here? Are there other factors and people?
The context for this comment can be found here.
There is a way to actually get the truth these days by reading the brain which has been in use for a decade at least but generally unacknowledged which most people do not want to believe exists preferring aliens instead, so it continues to be abused rather than used effectively.
However, if she suffered a drug induced blackout and frenzy of murder such as was fictionally portrayed in Donna Tartt's "The Secret History" set at a US liberal arts school, this would present a challenge. Nonetheless, there is the very real possibility that all is recorded in the brain under the level of consciousness provided the neurons are not destroyed sort of like memory chips. Almost all, if not all, of our memories are there, and whether they can be retrieved from the brain or not remains to be seen. This research currently using non-consenting human guinea pigs is kept secret at present.
The courts everywhere as a general rule are far behind technology although many years ago I read about legal proceedings in the US using related brain verification techniques in cases to prove innocence although I have not seen any of this lately. When the courts and the public catch up with today's science and the science that I have been experiencing for the past decade, we might move forward by being able to determine guilt or innocence on a more sound basis and put aside all this speculation and rhetoric.
But, legal justice systems have to move on the basis of reliability to ensure that the innocent are not punished while the guilty remain free. I've seen far too much where people carry out crimes and blame others for what has happened hoping to get away with it while generating a feeding frenzy that takes place against the innocent. There must always be due process, skill and expertise applied at every step of the way from investigation to judgement to ensure that the guilty are punished and the innocent are not. The public must always be properly protected. At present law enforcment and the judicial systems everywhere are wide open to abuse which takes place continuously from all sources.
"I am denying the defense request to have an independent analysis of all the DNA evidence." said Judge Massi during the trial going on to say "The decision is not an indicator of guilt." Barbie Latza Nadeau goes on to write "But in fact it was" (page 157 in her book "Angel Face"). So, now on appeal, there is an independent review by a "superperizia" [super analyst] which will take place and is why this article is all important.
The context of this comment can be found here.
Well said. Here are two examples from London which show just how these things can go wrong where there is no capital punishment so that justice eventually gets done even when it goes astray:
Rachel Nickell: murderd in Wimbledon Common 1992. There was no forensic evidence to connect Colin Stagg with her murder so the police used psychological profiling and a "honeytrap." The judge said at his trial that "the police had shown "excessive zeal" and had tried to incriminate a suspect by "deceptive conduct of the grossest kind". The entrapment evidence was excluded and the prosecution withdrew its case. Mr Stagg was acquitted in September 1994."
In 2006 the police charged Robert Napper with her murder. It was then revealed that because of police "bad decisions and errors" with respect to earlier crimes he had been left free to kill her and another women and her four-year-old daughter each of which could have been prevented. See http://bit.ly/iaRyZS
Jill Dando: murdered at her door step in 1999. Barry George was charged, tried and convicted. "[A]fter discredited forensics evidence was excluded from the prosecution's case, George's third appeal succeeded in November 2007. The original conviction was quashed and a second trial lasting eight weeks ended in George's acquittal on 1 August 2008." See http://bit.ly/ebdLUd Her murderer is still free.
The context of this comment can be found here.
Sunday, 23 January 2011
Tuesday, 18 January 2011
"Obama to Trim Regulations" - The Daily Beast
"Obama to Trim Regulations" - The Daily Beast
There is a cancer eating at the presidency, said John Dean c 1972/3 trying to warn Nixon who didn't need to be warned. Obama proposes the great bureaucracy regulation reshuffle when it's all political gloss. The one person in the world who can do something about the most serious problem threatening enterprise completely ignores what he knows is happening. Why?
Toxic surveillance used as a weapon is providing employment to violent abusive no-hopers who could not get a job in anything meaningful and constructive. They are employed by the government or Top Secret America's private investors to carry out extreme abuse and spying against those who are not liked. The real problem is the subversion of the state from within by those who have access to this surveillance technology.
Those who cannot do steal and destroy enterprise with this surveillance technology along with the people involved. This is the real threat to enterprise activity in the US and the rest of the world because the US government and/or contractors are exporting it worldwide. No one is going to engage in any kind of business if what they are doing can be stolen from them by a complete invasion of privacy about which they will know nothing except the fact that what they do does not work, and many problems will mysteriously appear.
Obama is the one person who can bring this under control, and I know that he is not doing it and has not for the past two years despite being fully informed by me about what is happening. Those who are carrying out this abuse against me and my company are continuing as if they can do whatever they please. Business will not succeed or exist in this environment in the future. They are making a mockery of David Cameron's enterprise Britain.
It just like terrorism. I predicted the risk associated with the Christmas Day bomber five months in advance notifying Obama and Brown by fax because I could easily see that those who claimed to know what they were doing did not have a clue about what was really happening on the ground.
I'm predicting the same thing with regard to the risks associated with enterprise activity. Confidence will not exist, and that $2 trillon will stay in cash doing nothng. People will be too afraid to do anything. Those who do will lose their money. What's the point when a non-functional illiterate abuser can and does operate this surveillance technology carrying out extreme destruction and is allowed to do so?
Instead of actually addressing the serious problems, Obama and Cameron too in the UK spin wheels creating the illusion that they are doing something while Toxic Surveillance grows digitised and localised with more and more people involved. Afterall, it's employment just like Toxic Debt. This malignancy is eating away at the private sector and will destroy it completely in due course unless it's brought under control.
That's the world we live in currently which I've experienced directly for the past 12.5 years as a target. It's just like Nazi Germany in the 1930s. No one wants to admit what is really happening and pretends that all is humky dory if we can just fish around with some regulations when Top Secret America is "beyond control" and getting worse. Obama can do it but will not. That cancer is eating away at the presidency.
Never ask why there's violence in the US and world as once again we've just seen in Arizona. There are the viciously violent trying to create more of it and getting paid to do so along with full government support. When a child abuser whom I reported for child abuse is given surveillance technology to abuse me for 12.5 years non-stop 24/7/365, the sysem is not functioning at all except destructively which has resulted in the collapse of local government last year that now has to merge just like any failing enterprise to keep from collapsing. Who or what's next?
The context of this comment can be found here.
There is a cancer eating at the presidency, said John Dean c 1972/3 trying to warn Nixon who didn't need to be warned. Obama proposes the great bureaucracy regulation reshuffle when it's all political gloss. The one person in the world who can do something about the most serious problem threatening enterprise completely ignores what he knows is happening. Why?
Toxic surveillance used as a weapon is providing employment to violent abusive no-hopers who could not get a job in anything meaningful and constructive. They are employed by the government or Top Secret America's private investors to carry out extreme abuse and spying against those who are not liked. The real problem is the subversion of the state from within by those who have access to this surveillance technology.
Those who cannot do steal and destroy enterprise with this surveillance technology along with the people involved. This is the real threat to enterprise activity in the US and the rest of the world because the US government and/or contractors are exporting it worldwide. No one is going to engage in any kind of business if what they are doing can be stolen from them by a complete invasion of privacy about which they will know nothing except the fact that what they do does not work, and many problems will mysteriously appear.
Obama is the one person who can bring this under control, and I know that he is not doing it and has not for the past two years despite being fully informed by me about what is happening. Those who are carrying out this abuse against me and my company are continuing as if they can do whatever they please. Business will not succeed or exist in this environment in the future. They are making a mockery of David Cameron's enterprise Britain.
It just like terrorism. I predicted the risk associated with the Christmas Day bomber five months in advance notifying Obama and Brown by fax because I could easily see that those who claimed to know what they were doing did not have a clue about what was really happening on the ground.
I'm predicting the same thing with regard to the risks associated with enterprise activity. Confidence will not exist, and that $2 trillon will stay in cash doing nothng. People will be too afraid to do anything. Those who do will lose their money. What's the point when a non-functional illiterate abuser can and does operate this surveillance technology carrying out extreme destruction and is allowed to do so?
Instead of actually addressing the serious problems, Obama and Cameron too in the UK spin wheels creating the illusion that they are doing something while Toxic Surveillance grows digitised and localised with more and more people involved. Afterall, it's employment just like Toxic Debt. This malignancy is eating away at the private sector and will destroy it completely in due course unless it's brought under control.
That's the world we live in currently which I've experienced directly for the past 12.5 years as a target. It's just like Nazi Germany in the 1930s. No one wants to admit what is really happening and pretends that all is humky dory if we can just fish around with some regulations when Top Secret America is "beyond control" and getting worse. Obama can do it but will not. That cancer is eating away at the presidency.
Never ask why there's violence in the US and world as once again we've just seen in Arizona. There are the viciously violent trying to create more of it and getting paid to do so along with full government support. When a child abuser whom I reported for child abuse is given surveillance technology to abuse me for 12.5 years non-stop 24/7/365, the sysem is not functioning at all except destructively which has resulted in the collapse of local government last year that now has to merge just like any failing enterprise to keep from collapsing. Who or what's next?
The context of this comment can be found here.
Sunday, 16 January 2011
"The Cult Web Film that Inspired Loughner"
The Cult Web Film that Inspired Loughner by Michelle Goldberg The Daily Beast
I found this to be extraordinarily interesting, fascinating and enlightening which, for me, reinforces the need to pay attention and listen to everything that is being said closely for the pellets of truth that emerge. Karl Marx, Adolph Hitler and Ayn Rand were among his favourite reads noted on Facebook.
I read four of Ayn Rand's books c 1960 and found that she was reacting against collectivism “we” and toward the individual “I.” I didn't take away the extremes of right wing capitalism from this but the need for the individual to be allowed to flourish and not subsumed under the collective whether it be government or whatever. In “The Fountainhead” the architect Howard Roark had a superior low cost housing project which was in conflict with the government's development. This was even made into a film with Gary Cooper and a grand speech at the end.
I haven't read Karl Marx I'm sorry to say, but I do recall Erich Fromm describing a time when he was speaking to a group of clergymen (and women?) providing them with quotes for them to identify their source. Most thought they came from the Bible. The quotes came from Karl Marx. I would never read anything by Adolph Hitler since, as a man given his actions, I do not believe that he could offer anything of value except for those engaged in forensic analysis of a demented and depraved personality.
The difficulty here, as always, is sorting out the complexities of thought, expression and actions when they come in contact with others who then add their own input/interpretation. Oftentimes, we don't konw very much and rely upon our sense of human behaviour that leads to conspiracy theories which is not an irrational thing to do nor is it paranoid because the tendency for human beings to have a disposition to do the same thing is a common experience. This tendency has led to many disasters in history and within human activities currently. It's right to question all aspects of what people are doing individually and collectively, and we have the freedom to do so. What happens when that freedom is taken away, or someone tries to take it away? Is this the foundation of a compounded conspiracy?
To think that there is an apparent collusion and conspiracy to control people with implanted chips is not as far fetched as it might seem. In fact, the neurological technology now exists to do a lot more without chips or implants of any kind that is generally being ignored, going unreported and not discussed so that there is an absence of a general awareness of what is happening.
This technology has been used against me for the past decade 24/7/365 involving scores if not hundreds who know all about it. These people come from the NHS (National Health Service), police, various government departments at the local and central levels and include elected officials and the general public. At its core are those whom I reported for child abuse in 1998 and two former US Marines now retired, Colonel Vine and Lt Harry Bird, who brought this totally invasive surveillance technology to be used against me in February 2001 joining an existing 2.5 years of 24/7/365 surveillance torture abuse in London's North Kensington.
The objective is to torture and abuse continuously around-the-clock so much so that by means of extreme provocation violence will be created as a response for which I can then be blamed and attacked. This has never happened as a response by me during the past 12.5 years. Instead, I do what I am doing now to document and communicate it to all and sundry as appropriate since what is happening is so extraordinary. There are no mysterious people here. What they are doing is made known to me by the surveillance technology's electronic sound transmission which is a key component of the torture process. There are other feedback mechanisms as well as monitoring.
Hitting someone who is young and vulnerable with this surveillance technology can have extreme reactions, and they are intended to make the target appear to be mentally ill if only by simply reporting what is happening as I do. Mental illness is a means to try to discredit the truth of what is being reported by the target/victim. A 21-year-old British student studying in France went to Germany lured by a false pretense to attend a conference. He was then subjected to some intense abuse which caused him great distress resulting in his calling home, running away down the highway in the middle of the night in Germany and attempting to throw himself in front of vehicles until he finally succeeded in killing himself. He appeared to be mentallly ill, but was he? Was he driven to this behaviour by neurological surveillance technology torture abuse from which he could not escape?
By the time this 22-year-old in Arizona shot and killed six people and wounded a congresswoman among numerous others, he was exhibiting signs of mental disorder and emotional distress until he finally he finally broke in a rage of violence at a source of what he thought was the problem he “perceived” existed. There are truths in what he was saying, but he was not approaching these issuess in a careful, analytical and well judged manner based upon evidence. Hitting a young person like this with the neurological surveillance technology could produce any kind of reaction, and, as my direct experience attests for the past decade, this is an experimentation process to see what will happen.
I am not suggesting that this Arizona shooter was subjected to this kind of neurological surveillance technology experimentation in mind control and abuse to see what it takes to break down a human being so that complete submission, obedience and conformity are achieved if they ever can be as has been done to me and completely failed so far. I am saying, however, that this must be part of the discussion about what is happening with respect to violent acts like this and the general discussion with respect to conspiracy theories. There is something there. I know and report what is happening, but every effort is being made to keep it secret while these experiments go on. This needs to be brought into the open.
There are violently abusive people in this world who have this most advanced neurological surveillance technology using it against others like myself indefinitely to create violence in order to falsely establish a mental health attack to blame the target/victim and protect themselves. In total there is a massive number of dirty tricks continuously carried out to create dirty data that is then accepted as valid which engages the scores if not hundreds of other people. Once they find out that they have been misled and “had,” they are trapped because they cannot admit what they have done. They then remain to ultimately destroy hoping to cover up the reality of what has happened. There are those who willingly go along knowing it's a massive hoax. There are the few who walk away refusing to participate. But, no one stops it. Why? Who is responsible and accountable?
The context in which this comment appeared can be found here.
I almost forgot that Hitler had an uncertain ancestry in that his grandfather might have been Jewish. His grandmother worked in a Jewsh household as a cook where she became pregnant. While this paternity was attributed to or claimed by several, payment was made by the Jewish family for 14 years as if the 19-year-old son was the father of Hitler's father. It is the uncertainty that is important. See Alice Miller's "For Your Own Good."
If so or even if uncertainly so, then Rand, Hitler and Marx were Jewish. This is a common thread of sorts interspersed with the antipathy each reflected. It turns out that Congresswoman Giffords is Jewish.
Alice Miller writes "human destructiveness is reactive" and not innate which she notes was asserted by Erich Fromm and others. If this is true, then Hitler's violence can be shown to be developmentally derived, and she goes on to investigate this thoroughly.
The violence of Jader Loughner then would also be reactive to the circumstances of his development and not innately found inside him and would derive from being treated violently. One wonders then how such conspiracy films would have fit into the process of a developing violent personality to the extent that he would shoot six people to death and wound a dozen or more others? The films would not be primarily influential but perhaps have a strong secondary influence in such a development context reacting against violence. For a normal person the conspiracy films would not have this effect.
The context in which this comment appeared can be found here.
A Jewsih British student studying in Paris thought he was going to an anti-war conference in Germany in 2003. It was a front for a Lyndon LaRouche organisation run by his wife. Six days later Jeremiah Duggan was found dead several hours after a 4:30 am phone call to his mother expressing terror.
The German police claimed it was suicide, but forensic reports differ postulating murder. The UK Parliament has had a meeting about this situation. The German courts have refused a judicial revfiew earlier this year for a murder investigation. Wikipedia has a long description of the complexity of this mysterious death: http://bit.ly/ihIWeR And, here's a bit from 2007 when two separate forensic reports emerged: http://bit.ly/h5qZor
The complexity of the interaction between these elements included Dick Cheney and the Tavistock Institute. Lyndon LaRouche claims that Cheney et al have a vendetta against him. He believes that the Tavistock Institute in London is subversive in a mass mind control sense. Jeremiah Duggan had attended the Tavistock Institute when younger while his parents were separating.
I couldn't possiblity sort out these complexities, but I see contradictions coming from the right amid right wingers themselves as well as being against socially progressive institutions about which they have an innate fear which could very well have some justification. Are they projecting themselves, or is there some truth to what they say?
I sense the same kind of contradictions from within the right with respect to Congresswoman Giffords' shooting including the fact that she is Jewish and that Loughner had an unbalanced mental state. I don't know anything about Lyndon LaRouche either, but he seems to be high on the list of conspiracy "theorists." What happens when the state refuses to investigate a murder?
I do know, however, that there is an extraordinary collusion and general conspiracy to manufacture massive allegations and negative characteristics against me using surveillance technology during the past 12.5 years by extreme right wing former US Marine kooks, a woman who is a violently malicious child abuser and involving large numbers of people along with a significant number of government departments. The Tavistock Institute is not that far away either. I cannot go beyond circumstance without solid factual evidence, but the situation is a fascinating one that keeps me open to all possbilities and events such as these given the extraordinary complexities that continue to emerge.
The context in which this comment appeared can be found here.
I found this to be extraordinarily interesting, fascinating and enlightening which, for me, reinforces the need to pay attention and listen to everything that is being said closely for the pellets of truth that emerge. Karl Marx, Adolph Hitler and Ayn Rand were among his favourite reads noted on Facebook.
I read four of Ayn Rand's books c 1960 and found that she was reacting against collectivism “we” and toward the individual “I.” I didn't take away the extremes of right wing capitalism from this but the need for the individual to be allowed to flourish and not subsumed under the collective whether it be government or whatever. In “The Fountainhead” the architect Howard Roark had a superior low cost housing project which was in conflict with the government's development. This was even made into a film with Gary Cooper and a grand speech at the end.
I haven't read Karl Marx I'm sorry to say, but I do recall Erich Fromm describing a time when he was speaking to a group of clergymen (and women?) providing them with quotes for them to identify their source. Most thought they came from the Bible. The quotes came from Karl Marx. I would never read anything by Adolph Hitler since, as a man given his actions, I do not believe that he could offer anything of value except for those engaged in forensic analysis of a demented and depraved personality.
The difficulty here, as always, is sorting out the complexities of thought, expression and actions when they come in contact with others who then add their own input/interpretation. Oftentimes, we don't konw very much and rely upon our sense of human behaviour that leads to conspiracy theories which is not an irrational thing to do nor is it paranoid because the tendency for human beings to have a disposition to do the same thing is a common experience. This tendency has led to many disasters in history and within human activities currently. It's right to question all aspects of what people are doing individually and collectively, and we have the freedom to do so. What happens when that freedom is taken away, or someone tries to take it away? Is this the foundation of a compounded conspiracy?
To think that there is an apparent collusion and conspiracy to control people with implanted chips is not as far fetched as it might seem. In fact, the neurological technology now exists to do a lot more without chips or implants of any kind that is generally being ignored, going unreported and not discussed so that there is an absence of a general awareness of what is happening.
This technology has been used against me for the past decade 24/7/365 involving scores if not hundreds who know all about it. These people come from the NHS (National Health Service), police, various government departments at the local and central levels and include elected officials and the general public. At its core are those whom I reported for child abuse in 1998 and two former US Marines now retired, Colonel Vine and Lt Harry Bird, who brought this totally invasive surveillance technology to be used against me in February 2001 joining an existing 2.5 years of 24/7/365 surveillance torture abuse in London's North Kensington.
The objective is to torture and abuse continuously around-the-clock so much so that by means of extreme provocation violence will be created as a response for which I can then be blamed and attacked. This has never happened as a response by me during the past 12.5 years. Instead, I do what I am doing now to document and communicate it to all and sundry as appropriate since what is happening is so extraordinary. There are no mysterious people here. What they are doing is made known to me by the surveillance technology's electronic sound transmission which is a key component of the torture process. There are other feedback mechanisms as well as monitoring.
Hitting someone who is young and vulnerable with this surveillance technology can have extreme reactions, and they are intended to make the target appear to be mentally ill if only by simply reporting what is happening as I do. Mental illness is a means to try to discredit the truth of what is being reported by the target/victim. A 21-year-old British student studying in France went to Germany lured by a false pretense to attend a conference. He was then subjected to some intense abuse which caused him great distress resulting in his calling home, running away down the highway in the middle of the night in Germany and attempting to throw himself in front of vehicles until he finally succeeded in killing himself. He appeared to be mentallly ill, but was he? Was he driven to this behaviour by neurological surveillance technology torture abuse from which he could not escape?
By the time this 22-year-old in Arizona shot and killed six people and wounded a congresswoman among numerous others, he was exhibiting signs of mental disorder and emotional distress until he finally he finally broke in a rage of violence at a source of what he thought was the problem he “perceived” existed. There are truths in what he was saying, but he was not approaching these issuess in a careful, analytical and well judged manner based upon evidence. Hitting a young person like this with the neurological surveillance technology could produce any kind of reaction, and, as my direct experience attests for the past decade, this is an experimentation process to see what will happen.
I am not suggesting that this Arizona shooter was subjected to this kind of neurological surveillance technology experimentation in mind control and abuse to see what it takes to break down a human being so that complete submission, obedience and conformity are achieved if they ever can be as has been done to me and completely failed so far. I am saying, however, that this must be part of the discussion about what is happening with respect to violent acts like this and the general discussion with respect to conspiracy theories. There is something there. I know and report what is happening, but every effort is being made to keep it secret while these experiments go on. This needs to be brought into the open.
There are violently abusive people in this world who have this most advanced neurological surveillance technology using it against others like myself indefinitely to create violence in order to falsely establish a mental health attack to blame the target/victim and protect themselves. In total there is a massive number of dirty tricks continuously carried out to create dirty data that is then accepted as valid which engages the scores if not hundreds of other people. Once they find out that they have been misled and “had,” they are trapped because they cannot admit what they have done. They then remain to ultimately destroy hoping to cover up the reality of what has happened. There are those who willingly go along knowing it's a massive hoax. There are the few who walk away refusing to participate. But, no one stops it. Why? Who is responsible and accountable?
The context in which this comment appeared can be found here.
I almost forgot that Hitler had an uncertain ancestry in that his grandfather might have been Jewish. His grandmother worked in a Jewsh household as a cook where she became pregnant. While this paternity was attributed to or claimed by several, payment was made by the Jewish family for 14 years as if the 19-year-old son was the father of Hitler's father. It is the uncertainty that is important. See Alice Miller's "For Your Own Good."
If so or even if uncertainly so, then Rand, Hitler and Marx were Jewish. This is a common thread of sorts interspersed with the antipathy each reflected. It turns out that Congresswoman Giffords is Jewish.
Alice Miller writes "human destructiveness is reactive" and not innate which she notes was asserted by Erich Fromm and others. If this is true, then Hitler's violence can be shown to be developmentally derived, and she goes on to investigate this thoroughly.
The violence of Jader Loughner then would also be reactive to the circumstances of his development and not innately found inside him and would derive from being treated violently. One wonders then how such conspiracy films would have fit into the process of a developing violent personality to the extent that he would shoot six people to death and wound a dozen or more others? The films would not be primarily influential but perhaps have a strong secondary influence in such a development context reacting against violence. For a normal person the conspiracy films would not have this effect.
The context in which this comment appeared can be found here.
A Jewsih British student studying in Paris thought he was going to an anti-war conference in Germany in 2003. It was a front for a Lyndon LaRouche organisation run by his wife. Six days later Jeremiah Duggan was found dead several hours after a 4:30 am phone call to his mother expressing terror.
The German police claimed it was suicide, but forensic reports differ postulating murder. The UK Parliament has had a meeting about this situation. The German courts have refused a judicial revfiew earlier this year for a murder investigation. Wikipedia has a long description of the complexity of this mysterious death: http://bit.ly/ihIWeR And, here's a bit from 2007 when two separate forensic reports emerged: http://bit.ly/h5qZor
The complexity of the interaction between these elements included Dick Cheney and the Tavistock Institute. Lyndon LaRouche claims that Cheney et al have a vendetta against him. He believes that the Tavistock Institute in London is subversive in a mass mind control sense. Jeremiah Duggan had attended the Tavistock Institute when younger while his parents were separating.
I couldn't possiblity sort out these complexities, but I see contradictions coming from the right amid right wingers themselves as well as being against socially progressive institutions about which they have an innate fear which could very well have some justification. Are they projecting themselves, or is there some truth to what they say?
I sense the same kind of contradictions from within the right with respect to Congresswoman Giffords' shooting including the fact that she is Jewish and that Loughner had an unbalanced mental state. I don't know anything about Lyndon LaRouche either, but he seems to be high on the list of conspiracy "theorists." What happens when the state refuses to investigate a murder?
I do know, however, that there is an extraordinary collusion and general conspiracy to manufacture massive allegations and negative characteristics against me using surveillance technology during the past 12.5 years by extreme right wing former US Marine kooks, a woman who is a violently malicious child abuser and involving large numbers of people along with a significant number of government departments. The Tavistock Institute is not that far away either. I cannot go beyond circumstance without solid factual evidence, but the situation is a fascinating one that keeps me open to all possbilities and events such as these given the extraordinary complexities that continue to emerge.
The context in which this comment appeared can be found here.
Wednesday, 12 January 2011
"Columbia, MIT Not Elite Enough?"
"Columbia, MIT Not Elite Enough?" The Daily Beast Cheat Sheet pointing to Want A Great Job? Don't Go To Second-Tier Schools Like Columbia And MIT from Business Insider
So much for education. If you want to become "cogs in wheel" go to Harvard, Yale, etc, and you might become President. If you want an education, go to Columbia, etc. I'm reminded of Malvina Reynolds' song "Little Boxes" which were "all made out of ticky tacky" . From those wonderful top elite schools who gave you Toxic Debt here's some more.
Avoid the "Layman's Copout" David Miller lectured his Operations Research students at Columbia's Business School by using the example of Stanley Milgram's experiment in learning at Yale in the early 1960s where "electrical shocks" were administered to "improve" learning. It was actually an experiment to study people's willlingness to engage in sadistic destructive behaviour in the interest of science. See a complete description of his "Behavioural Study in Obedience" in Erich Fromm's "Anatomy of Human Destructiveness."
David Miller received an ovation from the students at the end of this first lecture because he was so inspiring by urging students not to "copout" and not to defer to those who are the "experts" or to any concept such as science. Think and most importantly feel for yourself he was saying urging students not to be afraid to tackle and solve complicated problems themsevles based on what they could do as individuals.
The top employers might claim they want this kind of person, but they don't when it comes to reality. They want conformity and obedience which the likes of Harvard, Yale etc, are providing for them. You climbed a mountain, huh? But, what did you actually learn in the classroom about solving problems, thinking and getting it right for the right reason?
Read Frank Partnoy's "F.I.A.S.C.O." about what happened at Morgan Stanley during the 1990s. Or, read "Liar's Poker" by Michael Lewis about how it all got underway in the 1980s at Salomon Brothers.
MIT has made its course contents available online for the world to obtain an education if you can afford the price of the books. One math book I saw and liked cost a fortune. I don't think that so-called top firms will be recruiting from this group. They've missed the essence of education that it's for its own sake. Today you can sit on top of a mountain with a computer and get the best education available online.
PS another book I really like is Pierre Burton's "Klondike" about the 1898 gold rush to the Yukon. No one found the gold because all the areas had been claimed, but they did learn from the experience of getting there.
And, I must agree that the concentraton of power and wealth will lead to a debacle as it has already done with Toxic Debt. The tendency to become ingrown with a lack of diversification in the population at the top means risk. It's not so much of a revolution that will occur as a collapse much like the USSR that started in 1989 "not with a bang but with a whimper".
The context in which this comment appeared can be found here.
So much for education. If you want to become "cogs in wheel" go to Harvard, Yale, etc, and you might become President. If you want an education, go to Columbia, etc. I'm reminded of Malvina Reynolds' song "Little Boxes" which were "all made out of ticky tacky" . From those wonderful top elite schools who gave you Toxic Debt here's some more.
Avoid the "Layman's Copout" David Miller lectured his Operations Research students at Columbia's Business School by using the example of Stanley Milgram's experiment in learning at Yale in the early 1960s where "electrical shocks" were administered to "improve" learning. It was actually an experiment to study people's willlingness to engage in sadistic destructive behaviour in the interest of science. See a complete description of his "Behavioural Study in Obedience" in Erich Fromm's "Anatomy of Human Destructiveness."
David Miller received an ovation from the students at the end of this first lecture because he was so inspiring by urging students not to "copout" and not to defer to those who are the "experts" or to any concept such as science. Think and most importantly feel for yourself he was saying urging students not to be afraid to tackle and solve complicated problems themsevles based on what they could do as individuals.
The top employers might claim they want this kind of person, but they don't when it comes to reality. They want conformity and obedience which the likes of Harvard, Yale etc, are providing for them. You climbed a mountain, huh? But, what did you actually learn in the classroom about solving problems, thinking and getting it right for the right reason?
Read Frank Partnoy's "F.I.A.S.C.O." about what happened at Morgan Stanley during the 1990s. Or, read "Liar's Poker" by Michael Lewis about how it all got underway in the 1980s at Salomon Brothers.
MIT has made its course contents available online for the world to obtain an education if you can afford the price of the books. One math book I saw and liked cost a fortune. I don't think that so-called top firms will be recruiting from this group. They've missed the essence of education that it's for its own sake. Today you can sit on top of a mountain with a computer and get the best education available online.
PS another book I really like is Pierre Burton's "Klondike" about the 1898 gold rush to the Yukon. No one found the gold because all the areas had been claimed, but they did learn from the experience of getting there.
And, I must agree that the concentraton of power and wealth will lead to a debacle as it has already done with Toxic Debt. The tendency to become ingrown with a lack of diversification in the population at the top means risk. It's not so much of a revolution that will occur as a collapse much like the USSR that started in 1989 "not with a bang but with a whimper".
The context in which this comment appeared can be found here.
Sunday, 9 January 2011
Gabrielle Giffords' Gunman: Jared Lee Loughner
Gabrielle Giffords' Gunman: Jared Lee Loughner by Eve Conant The Daily Beast
Here are my comments about a copy of a Email I sent to The Daily Beast. The Email is not provided since it is too long and unnecessary. My comments here are most important.
I wrote this Email today after events of last night which occur continuously every night. After reading Eve Conant's comments about the attack in Tucson yesterday, I wanted to send you a copy of this since the issues raised in her reporting are criticallly important and deserve very close attention. There is a tendency to dismiss as crackpot what might very well have a significant foundation.
There is a concerted effort to create mental health problems through the indefinite abuse by what I call Toxic Surveillance which I have been experiencing as a target for 12+ years 24/7/365 as you know by now.
There is the very real possibility that "mind control" is being used which has been fictionalised in the 1950s and 1960s in "The Manchurian Candidate" and "The Ipcress file." I would also urge you to see the two other films in which Michael Caine played the lead: "The Whistle Blower" and "The Quiet American." Each contains a truth that is important to recognise.
Jared Lee Loughner might not be the target of such surveillance, but that cannot be discounted. Every situation is different because each reflects experimental elements and the abuse by people who are quite disturbed given surveillance technology power indefinitely which they then use in an extremly destructive manner.
In my experience they are viciously violent and quite disturbed in a sadistic manner dedicated to torture abuse. They are trying to create mental illness and have failed so far. But, they claim it exists hoping to be proven right at some point. Meanwhile, they isolate and alienate while trying to provoke violent behaviour.
It is most certainly within the realm of possibility that efforts are being made to create assassins who will strike out as intended by those who are trying to control by means of this surveillance technology. The "Manchurian Candidate" is a very real possibility today.
You will see in this Email below references to cranial fluid. This results from electromagnetic radiation sent into the brain while I sleep to probe memory and induce dreams using video often to do so. It also implants memories.
Such electromagnetic radiation is treated as an injury to the brain cells triggering the immune system which then breaches the blood brain barrier osmosis process in one direction only. That fluid in the brain has no where to go since there are no lymph nodes to drain it away from the brain.
This cranial fluid seeps out into areas like the ear canal eustachian tube and sinus cavities where it drains into the throat ultimately. Meanwhile, for me it can clog and usually does the downhill nasal passage which I call a side effect of this surveillance technology abuse that I described as occurring last night in the Email below.
There is a whole spectrum of objectives that can be present here involving social control which does not have to involve programming someone for violence although I must admit that the provocations that do exists are intended to create a violent response. You can get a sense of these provocations in the Email below.
Remember this goes on continuously around the clock and never stops. Most people will eventually succumb to it. I have not and have no intention of doing so as Harry Palmer in "The Ipcress File," and like him I am confronted with trying to figure out who is honest and who is the traitor.
If it has not had an ultimate impact on me during over 12 years of continuous, non-stop abuse, I do not think it will occur. Physical harm: yes; mental harm: no unless there is physical harm done to the brain.
These people go on with all this activity completely oblivious to what is happenign in the world thinking that they are invincible and can do whatever they want. Given the widespread support they are receving, this is true so far, and it does reflect governments with a very dark force operating contrary to all that is anticipated as a fundamental standard to be found in a democratic society.
It is time to explore what is happening here in society at large in the world to figure out the sources of violence. It's a terrible tragedy that when there are spectacular tools to accomplish this, they are used for malignant objectives instead. It's time to end this secrecy and bring all of this technology into the light of the democratic day.
Here are my comments about a copy of a Email I sent to The Daily Beast. The Email is not provided since it is too long and unnecessary. My comments here are most important.
I wrote this Email today after events of last night which occur continuously every night. After reading Eve Conant's comments about the attack in Tucson yesterday, I wanted to send you a copy of this since the issues raised in her reporting are criticallly important and deserve very close attention. There is a tendency to dismiss as crackpot what might very well have a significant foundation.
There is a concerted effort to create mental health problems through the indefinite abuse by what I call Toxic Surveillance which I have been experiencing as a target for 12+ years 24/7/365 as you know by now.
There is the very real possibility that "mind control" is being used which has been fictionalised in the 1950s and 1960s in "The Manchurian Candidate" and "The Ipcress file." I would also urge you to see the two other films in which Michael Caine played the lead: "The Whistle Blower" and "The Quiet American." Each contains a truth that is important to recognise.
Jared Lee Loughner might not be the target of such surveillance, but that cannot be discounted. Every situation is different because each reflects experimental elements and the abuse by people who are quite disturbed given surveillance technology power indefinitely which they then use in an extremly destructive manner.
In my experience they are viciously violent and quite disturbed in a sadistic manner dedicated to torture abuse. They are trying to create mental illness and have failed so far. But, they claim it exists hoping to be proven right at some point. Meanwhile, they isolate and alienate while trying to provoke violent behaviour.
It is most certainly within the realm of possibility that efforts are being made to create assassins who will strike out as intended by those who are trying to control by means of this surveillance technology. The "Manchurian Candidate" is a very real possibility today.
You will see in this Email below references to cranial fluid. This results from electromagnetic radiation sent into the brain while I sleep to probe memory and induce dreams using video often to do so. It also implants memories.
Such electromagnetic radiation is treated as an injury to the brain cells triggering the immune system which then breaches the blood brain barrier osmosis process in one direction only. That fluid in the brain has no where to go since there are no lymph nodes to drain it away from the brain.
This cranial fluid seeps out into areas like the ear canal eustachian tube and sinus cavities where it drains into the throat ultimately. Meanwhile, for me it can clog and usually does the downhill nasal passage which I call a side effect of this surveillance technology abuse that I described as occurring last night in the Email below.
There is a whole spectrum of objectives that can be present here involving social control which does not have to involve programming someone for violence although I must admit that the provocations that do exists are intended to create a violent response. You can get a sense of these provocations in the Email below.
Remember this goes on continuously around the clock and never stops. Most people will eventually succumb to it. I have not and have no intention of doing so as Harry Palmer in "The Ipcress File," and like him I am confronted with trying to figure out who is honest and who is the traitor.
If it has not had an ultimate impact on me during over 12 years of continuous, non-stop abuse, I do not think it will occur. Physical harm: yes; mental harm: no unless there is physical harm done to the brain.
These people go on with all this activity completely oblivious to what is happenign in the world thinking that they are invincible and can do whatever they want. Given the widespread support they are receving, this is true so far, and it does reflect governments with a very dark force operating contrary to all that is anticipated as a fundamental standard to be found in a democratic society.
It is time to explore what is happening here in society at large in the world to figure out the sources of violence. It's a terrible tragedy that when there are spectacular tools to accomplish this, they are used for malignant objectives instead. It's time to end this secrecy and bring all of this technology into the light of the democratic day.
Friday, 7 January 2011
Paul Volcker's Legacy
Volcker Rule Is a Sad End to a Brilliant Career by Charlie Gasparino The Daily Beast
I must agree that Paul Volcker's achievement from 1979 onwards as Fed Chairman until he left the Fed will stand as a beacon which will eclipse anything to do with the watered down Volcker Rule. I happened to be in a central pension fund management position during the period and had a front row seat as it were to what happened. I constructed the pension fund's asset allocation based upon what was happening. You can see some of the bits and pieces of this at http://www.garydchance.com.
I credit Paul Volcker with single handedly saving the western world by adopting at the right time a monetary policy where the money supply increase was set while the price of money was allowed to find its own level. The size of the US in the world made this all important for the western economies. Margaret Thatcher had been elected to power in May 1979 three months before his appointment and pursued the same monetary policy in the UK, but its size in terms of global impact was not as significant as the US. Also, she had enormous ffscal changes to make that are long forgotten now. She saved the UK.
I carefuilly tracked monetary policy through the St Louis Fed's reports commenting on what was happening through that double dip recession and extremely difficult effort to keep the money supply increase from leaking into assets rather than economic activity. It's possible to see what happened through the election of 1980 and its aftermath. Finally, in August 1982 Mexico presented the world with a sovereign debt crisis of some $60 billion that led to the Fed easing money to avoid a disaster, and the recovery was off and running. Paul Volcker was a pragmatist as well as a sound policy manager.
What always over hung his staying on as Fed Chairman was his wife's health. Everyone was afraid he would go because of her. Just after Reagan's inauguration in 1981, I attended a meeting in Washington where Beryl Sprinkle, the Treasury's Undersecretary for Monetary Affairs, spoke about their agreement with what the Fed was doing and how they were going to work in concert. Everyone knew that Paul Volcker was doing exactly right and didn't want to see the newly elected government going in a different direction.
Ronald Reagan had a difficult fiscal policy problem to solve as well just as Margaret Thatcher had, and his administration did an excellent job of getting that right too. The economic success of the following decades resulted from both fiscal and monetary policy of this period which included tax cuts based upon the notion of the Laffer Curve.
I don't know why Paul Volcker eventually left as Fed Chairman, but in the early years with the Reagan administration there was, I believe, rapport, and I always assumed that he left because of his wife's health and because it was time for him to get into the private sector after his long tenure in government which included President of the NY Federal Reserve Bank before becoming Fed Chairman.
In no way can what followed in Wall Street be attributed to him. Wall Street had its propensity already to create products that would sell rather than serve the client's interests. In early 1983 I said in an Institute of Chartered Financial Analysts Seminar speech held in New York and San Francisco:
"It is up to the investment community to lead the owner of funds to rewarding managing techniques -- and eschew trying to devise faulty products designed only to be sold, not managed effectively." I had just made negative statements about these products before this remark. The room was absolutely silent. I was the last speaker before fielding some questions. When the seminar was held next in San Francisco they asked me to be the first speaker on our panel so I would not be the last. They did not like what I said. Look at what has happened.
My whole activity was centred around risk management which is documented in the link provided above. Paul Volcker sought to make his contribution to risk management as well with the Volcker Rule. I also agree that he will not be remembered for what turned out as managing the risk in Wall Street by the Volcker Rule given all that is known about what has happened to that law.
I want to say thank you to Paul Volcker for what he has done for which he gets full credit by making possible what was good in the past three decades. He like everyone else tried to make a contribution at a time when catastrophe was threatening. The next debacle will not come from Wall Street risk or something similar to Toxic Debt there. It will come from Toxic Surveillance for which I've had a front row seat these past ten years as I did some 30 years ago for what was developing in Wall Street. The human failings will be the same, but the playing field will be different. This time it will be the government itself and come from what the Washington Post has called Top Secret America where there is no regulation.
The context for this comment can be found here
I must agree that Paul Volcker's achievement from 1979 onwards as Fed Chairman until he left the Fed will stand as a beacon which will eclipse anything to do with the watered down Volcker Rule. I happened to be in a central pension fund management position during the period and had a front row seat as it were to what happened. I constructed the pension fund's asset allocation based upon what was happening. You can see some of the bits and pieces of this at http://www.garydchance.com.
I credit Paul Volcker with single handedly saving the western world by adopting at the right time a monetary policy where the money supply increase was set while the price of money was allowed to find its own level. The size of the US in the world made this all important for the western economies. Margaret Thatcher had been elected to power in May 1979 three months before his appointment and pursued the same monetary policy in the UK, but its size in terms of global impact was not as significant as the US. Also, she had enormous ffscal changes to make that are long forgotten now. She saved the UK.
I carefuilly tracked monetary policy through the St Louis Fed's reports commenting on what was happening through that double dip recession and extremely difficult effort to keep the money supply increase from leaking into assets rather than economic activity. It's possible to see what happened through the election of 1980 and its aftermath. Finally, in August 1982 Mexico presented the world with a sovereign debt crisis of some $60 billion that led to the Fed easing money to avoid a disaster, and the recovery was off and running. Paul Volcker was a pragmatist as well as a sound policy manager.
What always over hung his staying on as Fed Chairman was his wife's health. Everyone was afraid he would go because of her. Just after Reagan's inauguration in 1981, I attended a meeting in Washington where Beryl Sprinkle, the Treasury's Undersecretary for Monetary Affairs, spoke about their agreement with what the Fed was doing and how they were going to work in concert. Everyone knew that Paul Volcker was doing exactly right and didn't want to see the newly elected government going in a different direction.
Ronald Reagan had a difficult fiscal policy problem to solve as well just as Margaret Thatcher had, and his administration did an excellent job of getting that right too. The economic success of the following decades resulted from both fiscal and monetary policy of this period which included tax cuts based upon the notion of the Laffer Curve.
I don't know why Paul Volcker eventually left as Fed Chairman, but in the early years with the Reagan administration there was, I believe, rapport, and I always assumed that he left because of his wife's health and because it was time for him to get into the private sector after his long tenure in government which included President of the NY Federal Reserve Bank before becoming Fed Chairman.
In no way can what followed in Wall Street be attributed to him. Wall Street had its propensity already to create products that would sell rather than serve the client's interests. In early 1983 I said in an Institute of Chartered Financial Analysts Seminar speech held in New York and San Francisco:
"It is up to the investment community to lead the owner of funds to rewarding managing techniques -- and eschew trying to devise faulty products designed only to be sold, not managed effectively." I had just made negative statements about these products before this remark. The room was absolutely silent. I was the last speaker before fielding some questions. When the seminar was held next in San Francisco they asked me to be the first speaker on our panel so I would not be the last. They did not like what I said. Look at what has happened.
My whole activity was centred around risk management which is documented in the link provided above. Paul Volcker sought to make his contribution to risk management as well with the Volcker Rule. I also agree that he will not be remembered for what turned out as managing the risk in Wall Street by the Volcker Rule given all that is known about what has happened to that law.
I want to say thank you to Paul Volcker for what he has done for which he gets full credit by making possible what was good in the past three decades. He like everyone else tried to make a contribution at a time when catastrophe was threatening. The next debacle will not come from Wall Street risk or something similar to Toxic Debt there. It will come from Toxic Surveillance for which I've had a front row seat these past ten years as I did some 30 years ago for what was developing in Wall Street. The human failings will be the same, but the playing field will be different. This time it will be the government itself and come from what the Washington Post has called Top Secret America where there is no regulation.
The context for this comment can be found here
Sunday, 2 January 2011
"The Gorgon Is Watching Everyone"
The Gorgon Is Watching Everyone The Daily Beast
With Air Force's new drone, 'we can see everything' Washington Post by Ellen Nakashima and Craig Whitlock
Gorgon Stare: what a perfect name for a camera surveillance array to be introduced into drones currently being used in Afghanistan. Somehow I think that the USAF Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance Agency was not aware of Peter Shaffer's play “The Gift of the Gorgon” or were they? Cast list and photo. December 1992
First performed by the Royal Shakespeare Company at the Barbican Pit in December 1992 directed by Peter Hall with Judi Dench it raised the conflict issues of revenge and retaliation versus reason, justice and forgiveness including an atrocious terrorist attack along the way as part of the dramatic argument. "The Gift of the Gorgon" review by Caroline Rees 30th December 1992
I saw the play after it transferred to the Wyndhams Theatre in March 1993 and was left stunned into silence by the performance. Somehow I think the play should be revived in light of this new piece of surveillance technology so that the philosophical arguments can be reignited.
“Maj. Gen. James O. Poss, the Air Force's assistant deputy chief of staff for intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance [USAF ISR Agency]: "Gorgon Stare will be looking at a whole city, so there will be no way for the adversary to know what we're looking at, and we can see everything." “
“Questions persist, however, about whether the military has the capability to sift through huge quantities of imagery quickly enough to convey useful data to troops in the field.”
Surely they must have technology processes for this output. I cannot believe that they do not.
“Officials also acknowledge that Gorgon Stare is of limited value unless they can match it with improved human intelligence - eyewitness reports of who is doing what on the ground.”
Coupled with Tempest this will be a formidable surveillance tool and one that will be most effective including the ability to know who is saying what and where.
In April 1961 the USAF Secrutiy Service (predecessor to the current USAF ISR Agency) was able to monitor the blacked out and encrypted space flight communications between the ground and Yuri Gargarin in space by means of a satellite intercepting the telephone lines on the ground at the USSR space centre because it could intercept the very small electromagnetic radiation surrounding them. See “Body of Secrets” by James Bamford, Arrow Books, London, 2002, pps 154-5.
During the Cuban Missile Crisis of October 1962 the NSA spy ship USS Oxford was able to monitor the electromagnetic radiation surrounding the Soviety cryptographic equipment located near Havana harbour from about four miles at sea. Bamford, ibid, p 110.
Fifty years ago a ship could do this for electronic equipment 20,000 feet away. Today a drone can monitor the electromagnetic radiation emission from the human brain from that distance or less. In fifty years the process of Tempest emissions interception and decoding has progressed to the human brain.
It has been used against me for the past decade and can do everything including reading thoughts. All the senses can be monitored and feedback can be carried out. I also believe that this can be done by satellite as occurred in 1961 against telephone lines on the ground during the Yuri Gagarin space flight. Only today I believe that the human electromagnetic radiation brainwaves can be so monitored by satellite.
Although the USAF ISR Agency will not divulge this, I believe that it is a component in these drones to be used in tandom with Gorgon Stare. I wonder what they call it?
“The Air Force is looking to mount wide-area surveillance cameras on airships that can stay aloft for up to two weeks.”
This is where the Tempest emission intercept really kicks in with the video surveillane when it can be deployed on a platform like this for total monitoring of an environment.
“ "This is all cutting-edge technology that is being fielded in a short period of time," said retired Lt. Gen. David A. Deptula, who served as deputy chief of staff for intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance.
“"If you look into the not-too-distant future, what these technologies will allow us to do is remove more and more ground forces and replace them with sensors where we normally would have to rely on people going somewhere to find something out," he said.”
He's telling it exactly as it is here while not giving away the full surveillance technology available. There are those who object because they see the need for “boots on the ground” still. What they are missing is that Humint has combined with Comint with this application of Tempest emission intercept largely removing the need for personnel on the ground.
This is why, I believe, President Obama believes that he can remove troops starting this year and still be effective. He might be much more effective than in the past.
“Gorgon Stare is being tested now, and officials hope it will be fielded within two months. Each $17.5 million pod weighs 1,100 pounds and, because of its configuration, will not be mounted with weapons on Reaper aircraft, officials said. They envision it will have civilian applications, including securing borders and aiding in natural disasters. The Department of Homeland Security is exploring the technology's potential, an industry official said.”
And, this is where the big problem arises which means that the full body of technology must be revealed so that the democratic institutions in the US and the world can begin debating what is happening when this “Gift of the Gorgon” is fully understood. With all its implications for surveillance in war and domestically in peace as has been happening to me for the past decade in a most abusvie and destructive manner.
With Air Force's new drone, 'we can see everything' Washington Post by Ellen Nakashima and Craig Whitlock
Gorgon Stare: what a perfect name for a camera surveillance array to be introduced into drones currently being used in Afghanistan. Somehow I think that the USAF Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance Agency was not aware of Peter Shaffer's play “The Gift of the Gorgon” or were they? Cast list and photo. December 1992
First performed by the Royal Shakespeare Company at the Barbican Pit in December 1992 directed by Peter Hall with Judi Dench it raised the conflict issues of revenge and retaliation versus reason, justice and forgiveness including an atrocious terrorist attack along the way as part of the dramatic argument. "The Gift of the Gorgon" review by Caroline Rees 30th December 1992
I saw the play after it transferred to the Wyndhams Theatre in March 1993 and was left stunned into silence by the performance. Somehow I think the play should be revived in light of this new piece of surveillance technology so that the philosophical arguments can be reignited.
“Maj. Gen. James O. Poss, the Air Force's assistant deputy chief of staff for intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance [USAF ISR Agency]: "Gorgon Stare will be looking at a whole city, so there will be no way for the adversary to know what we're looking at, and we can see everything." “
“Questions persist, however, about whether the military has the capability to sift through huge quantities of imagery quickly enough to convey useful data to troops in the field.”
Surely they must have technology processes for this output. I cannot believe that they do not.
“Officials also acknowledge that Gorgon Stare is of limited value unless they can match it with improved human intelligence - eyewitness reports of who is doing what on the ground.”
Coupled with Tempest this will be a formidable surveillance tool and one that will be most effective including the ability to know who is saying what and where.
In April 1961 the USAF Secrutiy Service (predecessor to the current USAF ISR Agency) was able to monitor the blacked out and encrypted space flight communications between the ground and Yuri Gargarin in space by means of a satellite intercepting the telephone lines on the ground at the USSR space centre because it could intercept the very small electromagnetic radiation surrounding them. See “Body of Secrets” by James Bamford, Arrow Books, London, 2002, pps 154-5.
During the Cuban Missile Crisis of October 1962 the NSA spy ship USS Oxford was able to monitor the electromagnetic radiation surrounding the Soviety cryptographic equipment located near Havana harbour from about four miles at sea. Bamford, ibid, p 110.
Fifty years ago a ship could do this for electronic equipment 20,000 feet away. Today a drone can monitor the electromagnetic radiation emission from the human brain from that distance or less. In fifty years the process of Tempest emissions interception and decoding has progressed to the human brain.
It has been used against me for the past decade and can do everything including reading thoughts. All the senses can be monitored and feedback can be carried out. I also believe that this can be done by satellite as occurred in 1961 against telephone lines on the ground during the Yuri Gagarin space flight. Only today I believe that the human electromagnetic radiation brainwaves can be so monitored by satellite.
Although the USAF ISR Agency will not divulge this, I believe that it is a component in these drones to be used in tandom with Gorgon Stare. I wonder what they call it?
“The Air Force is looking to mount wide-area surveillance cameras on airships that can stay aloft for up to two weeks.”
This is where the Tempest emission intercept really kicks in with the video surveillane when it can be deployed on a platform like this for total monitoring of an environment.
“ "This is all cutting-edge technology that is being fielded in a short period of time," said retired Lt. Gen. David A. Deptula, who served as deputy chief of staff for intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance.
“"If you look into the not-too-distant future, what these technologies will allow us to do is remove more and more ground forces and replace them with sensors where we normally would have to rely on people going somewhere to find something out," he said.”
He's telling it exactly as it is here while not giving away the full surveillance technology available. There are those who object because they see the need for “boots on the ground” still. What they are missing is that Humint has combined with Comint with this application of Tempest emission intercept largely removing the need for personnel on the ground.
This is why, I believe, President Obama believes that he can remove troops starting this year and still be effective. He might be much more effective than in the past.
“Gorgon Stare is being tested now, and officials hope it will be fielded within two months. Each $17.5 million pod weighs 1,100 pounds and, because of its configuration, will not be mounted with weapons on Reaper aircraft, officials said. They envision it will have civilian applications, including securing borders and aiding in natural disasters. The Department of Homeland Security is exploring the technology's potential, an industry official said.”
And, this is where the big problem arises which means that the full body of technology must be revealed so that the democratic institutions in the US and the world can begin debating what is happening when this “Gift of the Gorgon” is fully understood. With all its implications for surveillance in war and domestically in peace as has been happening to me for the past decade in a most abusvie and destructive manner.
Saturday, 1 January 2011
21 Coptic Christians Killed in Alexandria Suicide Bomb
New Year's Attack Kills 21 in Egypt The Daily Beast
Bomb hits Egypt church at New Year's Mass, 21 dead The Associated Press
"Ash-heap of four cultures,/Bounded by Mareotis, a salt lake,"* writes Lawrence Durrell as he begins his poem "Conon in Alexandria." He is Conan. Reading about this terrible tragedy I first thought about his "Alexandrian Quartet" which brought modern Alexandria to the world over 50 years ago and especially the Coptic Greek poet Constantine P Cavafy whom he called "the old man in the city."
Cavafy wrote in one of his poems "Expecting the Barbarians" that they had been a kind of solution but had disappeared. Not any longer as the barbarians are entering the gates and bombing the Coptic Christians with the government suspecting or at least pointing a finger at Iraqi al Qaeda. It seems as though two Coptic women wanting a divorce forbidden in the Coptic Christian Orthodox Church converted to Islam but are now being held by the Coptic Church in Alexandria. Al Qaeda never one to ignore an opportunity for terrorism has declared revenge against Coptics in Egypt where there are some 8 million of them or 10% of the 80 million population.
Terrorism is emerging everywhere under any excuse, and the Alexandria of myth created by Durrell with Justine, Melissa and Clea will become another battleground of innocent death and destruction where love has turned to hate. What can the poet do about this? Cavafy ends his poem "The God Forsakes Antony" with the line "bid her farewell, the Alexandria you are losing."**
I recall W Somerset Maugham writing about Alexandria in the context of a place where someone while travelling had gotten off his ship and was enchanted with Alexandria so much that he wanted to stay and refused to leave. His friends, Maugham writes, got together to take care of him so he could stay there which he did. I cannot recall where I read this in Maugham.
* “The Poetry of Lawrence Durrell,” E P Dutton & Co., Inc., New York, 1962.
** "The Complete Poems of Cavafy" translated and with notes by Rae Dalven, Introduction by W H Auden, Harvest Book, Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc., New York, 1948/61.
The context of this comment can be found here.
Don't forget the anarchists with their recent Rome and Athens letter bombs. Terrorists are a breed of criminal that arise from any group when a few seek to exploit hatred by acting out their own killing and maiming the innocent for extreme sadisitc pleasure. These psychological character types have to be identified and dealt with properly. It's not just Muslims. The Muslims in Alexandria did condemn the bombing, Rhett6, read the article.
The context of this comment can be found here.
In his “Anatomy of Human Destructiveness” Erich Fromm writes that sadism is devotional and the religion of the psychic cripple. The sadisitic personality seeks to completely dominate and control one living creature to assuage a feeling of powerlessness. The sadist seeks to be all powerful, i.e., ominipotent. Thus, the sadist seeks to be god-like. Fundamentally, the sadist is a no-hoper who cannot do anything except be devoted to sadistic behaviour.
Terrorism derives from this kind of personality seeking to dominate and control out of fear by constantly having the threat of violence and destruction at hand while actually carrying out violence against the vulnerable and innocent. Terrorism has to do with sadisitic individuals drawn to violent expression in varous ideological ways that exploits groups or causes. These individuals are the ones that need to be identifed not the groups for these indiividuals exist in every kind of group. The disposition to sadism exists in every human being and must be identifed when it emerges as destructive behaviour.
The context for this comment can be found here.
You sound like the very tyranny you are condemning and in great ignorance as well. All you are doing is replacing one hatred with another. These problems have been around for a very long time and are characteristic of many different types of groups epitomised by people like you about whom the Kingston Trio sang over 50 years ago:
"They're rioting in Africa, they're starving in Spain.
There's hurricanes in Florida, and Texas needs rain.
The whole world is festering with unhappy souls.
The French hate the Germans, the Germans hate the Poles.
Italians hate Yugoslavs, South Africans hate the Dutch.
And I don't like anybody very much!
"But we can be tranquil, and thankful, and proud,
For mans' been endowed with a mushroom-shaped cloud.
And we know for certain that some lovely day
Someone will set the spark off, and we will all be blown away.
"They're rioting in Africa, there's strife in Iran.
What nature doesn't do to us, will be done by our fellow man."
["The Merry Minuet" written by Sheldon Harnick and performed by the Kingston Trio http://bit.ly/fNVIUd recorded first on their "Live at the Hungry i" album in the late 1950s.]
They could have written this today and been absolutely correct. However, someone has . . .
Updated lyrics for "The Merry Minuet" http://bit.ly/eJadq2 for today with commentary to be sung at the New Year.
The context for this comment can be found here.
Bomb hits Egypt church at New Year's Mass, 21 dead The Associated Press
"Ash-heap of four cultures,/Bounded by Mareotis, a salt lake,"* writes Lawrence Durrell as he begins his poem "Conon in Alexandria." He is Conan. Reading about this terrible tragedy I first thought about his "Alexandrian Quartet" which brought modern Alexandria to the world over 50 years ago and especially the Coptic Greek poet Constantine P Cavafy whom he called "the old man in the city."
Cavafy wrote in one of his poems "Expecting the Barbarians" that they had been a kind of solution but had disappeared. Not any longer as the barbarians are entering the gates and bombing the Coptic Christians with the government suspecting or at least pointing a finger at Iraqi al Qaeda. It seems as though two Coptic women wanting a divorce forbidden in the Coptic Christian Orthodox Church converted to Islam but are now being held by the Coptic Church in Alexandria. Al Qaeda never one to ignore an opportunity for terrorism has declared revenge against Coptics in Egypt where there are some 8 million of them or 10% of the 80 million population.
Terrorism is emerging everywhere under any excuse, and the Alexandria of myth created by Durrell with Justine, Melissa and Clea will become another battleground of innocent death and destruction where love has turned to hate. What can the poet do about this? Cavafy ends his poem "The God Forsakes Antony" with the line "bid her farewell, the Alexandria you are losing."**
I recall W Somerset Maugham writing about Alexandria in the context of a place where someone while travelling had gotten off his ship and was enchanted with Alexandria so much that he wanted to stay and refused to leave. His friends, Maugham writes, got together to take care of him so he could stay there which he did. I cannot recall where I read this in Maugham.
* “The Poetry of Lawrence Durrell,” E P Dutton & Co., Inc., New York, 1962.
** "The Complete Poems of Cavafy" translated and with notes by Rae Dalven, Introduction by W H Auden, Harvest Book, Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc., New York, 1948/61.
The context of this comment can be found here.
Don't forget the anarchists with their recent Rome and Athens letter bombs. Terrorists are a breed of criminal that arise from any group when a few seek to exploit hatred by acting out their own killing and maiming the innocent for extreme sadisitc pleasure. These psychological character types have to be identified and dealt with properly. It's not just Muslims. The Muslims in Alexandria did condemn the bombing, Rhett6, read the article.
The context of this comment can be found here.
In his “Anatomy of Human Destructiveness” Erich Fromm writes that sadism is devotional and the religion of the psychic cripple. The sadisitic personality seeks to completely dominate and control one living creature to assuage a feeling of powerlessness. The sadist seeks to be all powerful, i.e., ominipotent. Thus, the sadist seeks to be god-like. Fundamentally, the sadist is a no-hoper who cannot do anything except be devoted to sadistic behaviour.
Terrorism derives from this kind of personality seeking to dominate and control out of fear by constantly having the threat of violence and destruction at hand while actually carrying out violence against the vulnerable and innocent. Terrorism has to do with sadisitic individuals drawn to violent expression in varous ideological ways that exploits groups or causes. These individuals are the ones that need to be identifed not the groups for these indiividuals exist in every kind of group. The disposition to sadism exists in every human being and must be identifed when it emerges as destructive behaviour.
The context for this comment can be found here.
You sound like the very tyranny you are condemning and in great ignorance as well. All you are doing is replacing one hatred with another. These problems have been around for a very long time and are characteristic of many different types of groups epitomised by people like you about whom the Kingston Trio sang over 50 years ago:
"They're rioting in Africa, they're starving in Spain.
There's hurricanes in Florida, and Texas needs rain.
The whole world is festering with unhappy souls.
The French hate the Germans, the Germans hate the Poles.
Italians hate Yugoslavs, South Africans hate the Dutch.
And I don't like anybody very much!
"But we can be tranquil, and thankful, and proud,
For mans' been endowed with a mushroom-shaped cloud.
And we know for certain that some lovely day
Someone will set the spark off, and we will all be blown away.
"They're rioting in Africa, there's strife in Iran.
What nature doesn't do to us, will be done by our fellow man."
["The Merry Minuet" written by Sheldon Harnick and performed by the Kingston Trio http://bit.ly/fNVIUd recorded first on their "Live at the Hungry i" album in the late 1950s.]
They could have written this today and been absolutely correct. However, someone has . . .
Updated lyrics for "The Merry Minuet" http://bit.ly/eJadq2 for today with commentary to be sung at the New Year.
The context for this comment can be found here.
"Khost CIA Attack: Lessons One Year Later"
Khost CIA Attack: Lessons One Year Later by Bruce Reidel The Daily Beast
What I gleaned from Bruce Reidel's article is that it is incredibly difficult and almost impossible to protect against terrorists if the CIA drone operations hut can be attacked taking out a half a dozen CIA agents. This highlights the difficulties in addressing the problem of terrorism originating in this area of Afghanistan and Pakistan as well as AQAP and probably elsewhere like Luton in the UK near London. Locals in Europe and the US seek to go to these areas for training to come back and bomb as occurred recently in Stockholm. This article is extremely important in that context, and, indeed, what lessons have been learned?
The lesson that we are learning is that we are not learning anything at least as far as what can't or won't be expressed publicly. The reality is that there is an entire secret government and secret war being carried out against a very real threat from terrorism. We appear as if we are not learning because it is secret. Given what is happening it is time to share openly with the population of the world just what is happening to prevent its abuse which will only cause more terrorism and distract from identifying the real terrorists.
How can we find out who are the terrorists and deal with them properly? The answer exists and is reflected in my experience of the past decade as an innocent surveillance target and articles such as those from the BBC, The Washington Post including its Top Secret America (TSA) series and right here with The Daily Beast.
The drone activity from Afghanistan into Pakistan is incredibly important and contains the elements of technology which can solve the terrorist problem but also includes a menace and danger for everyone including democracy and civilisation as we know it. According to the BBC and TSA these drones are controlled locally for take off and landing and from Nevada for their surveillance and missile strikes. They fix on mobile phones and use data warehousing technology in Nevada to identify and attack targets.
What is not being described is the ability to identify, track and monitor individual human beings by the brainwave electromagnetic radiation that surrounds the head. All of the human senses can by monitored as well as the thoughts of the target. This exists and has been used against me for ten years by Colonel Vine USMC Ret, Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret and others since February 2001. They joined an already existing surveillance abuse programme against me which had been operating for 2.5 years since mid-August 1998. I know or am familiar with all those involved.
As a result of a feedback component of this surveillance called Voice/Sound-to-Skull (V/S2K) by the US Army, I have been informed of all that has been happening since they have engaged in intense sadistic torture abuse to cause a breakdown and have failed so far. This totally invasive surveillance abuse has been taking place in a residential neighbourhood in North Kensington, London, for 12+ years 24/7/365.
It is just a question of time before this surveillance technology will be used against terrorists by drones instead of targeting mobile phone signals which could very well be a diversion at present while the real targeting takes place against brainwave electromagnetic radiation activity by human beings. I can be tracked and abused verbally wherever I go which has been done for all these years 24/7/365. The question arises as to the extent, if any, of its domestic use in the US.
The future will be, I predict, the use of drones and satellites as surveillance instruments for identifying and tracking primary targets who then become surveillance instruments themselves due to the monitoring so that all others can be detected. By reading thoughts triple agents such as this bomber will be known in advance. All of this will be done at a central location just as the drones are controlled from Nevada. The same data warehousing technology will be used to identify brainwaves instead of mobile phone signals. I believe that this is most likely well under way but is a huge operation when you stop to think about it. It will take time and language skills to develop.
The reason why this has to be opened now is to prevent the kinds of abuses to which I've been subjected during the past decade. This is a useful tool in the fight against terrorism, but it must be removed from the secret government and placed in the public domain so that it can be democratically controlled to effectively prevent its abuse which is surely to come on a mass scale. There are also extraordinary medical benefits to be derived from this technology as it exists currently in my direct experience, but it is being used in a most malignant way at present while the medical profession as a whole remains in ignorance of its existance.
While Bruce Reidel might very well know all about this technology and its current usage, he could very well be constrained by its secrecy from writing anything about it. I have no constraints placed upon me, and all this information has been freely divulged to me by any number of people intent upon abuse. In fact, there are scores if not hundreds of people from differing backgrounds and professions who know all about this surveillance technology because they have all participated in its abuse aganst me during the past decade. It is no secret here, and I am not bound by any secrecy constraints to report what is being done to me as I try to protect and defend myself against its abuse to ensure that this is stopped so that no one else will be an innocent target of this secret government.
An added comment concerning Bruce Reidel's assertion that boots on the ground are needed to direct the drones effectively to meaningful targets. I don't agree. This surveillance technology I describe above combines both Humint and Comint so that the former is no longer needed as a separate entity. In reacting to the risk from penetration as occurred in this bombing of CIA agents in the drone operations hut I believe that this surveillance technology will be used to replace boots on the ground to eliminate this penetration risk so that all can remain safe. This, I believe, is the real lesson that has been learned. This has grave implications for perpetuating the secret government and its secret war.
Why are the Department of Homeland Security's offices throughout the US called Fusion Centres? Is this because they reflect the fusion between Humint and Comint by today's brainwave electromagnetic radiation surveillance technology?
"We can't train anymore," said a surveillance male. Is that why I've been subjected to 12+ years 24/7/365 indefinite surveillance technology torture abuse as an expendable, non-consenting human guinea pig?
The context in which these comments occur can be found here.
What I gleaned from Bruce Reidel's article is that it is incredibly difficult and almost impossible to protect against terrorists if the CIA drone operations hut can be attacked taking out a half a dozen CIA agents. This highlights the difficulties in addressing the problem of terrorism originating in this area of Afghanistan and Pakistan as well as AQAP and probably elsewhere like Luton in the UK near London. Locals in Europe and the US seek to go to these areas for training to come back and bomb as occurred recently in Stockholm. This article is extremely important in that context, and, indeed, what lessons have been learned?
The lesson that we are learning is that we are not learning anything at least as far as what can't or won't be expressed publicly. The reality is that there is an entire secret government and secret war being carried out against a very real threat from terrorism. We appear as if we are not learning because it is secret. Given what is happening it is time to share openly with the population of the world just what is happening to prevent its abuse which will only cause more terrorism and distract from identifying the real terrorists.
How can we find out who are the terrorists and deal with them properly? The answer exists and is reflected in my experience of the past decade as an innocent surveillance target and articles such as those from the BBC, The Washington Post including its Top Secret America (TSA) series and right here with The Daily Beast.
The drone activity from Afghanistan into Pakistan is incredibly important and contains the elements of technology which can solve the terrorist problem but also includes a menace and danger for everyone including democracy and civilisation as we know it. According to the BBC and TSA these drones are controlled locally for take off and landing and from Nevada for their surveillance and missile strikes. They fix on mobile phones and use data warehousing technology in Nevada to identify and attack targets.
What is not being described is the ability to identify, track and monitor individual human beings by the brainwave electromagnetic radiation that surrounds the head. All of the human senses can by monitored as well as the thoughts of the target. This exists and has been used against me for ten years by Colonel Vine USMC Ret, Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret and others since February 2001. They joined an already existing surveillance abuse programme against me which had been operating for 2.5 years since mid-August 1998. I know or am familiar with all those involved.
As a result of a feedback component of this surveillance called Voice/Sound-to-Skull (V/S2K) by the US Army, I have been informed of all that has been happening since they have engaged in intense sadistic torture abuse to cause a breakdown and have failed so far. This totally invasive surveillance abuse has been taking place in a residential neighbourhood in North Kensington, London, for 12+ years 24/7/365.
It is just a question of time before this surveillance technology will be used against terrorists by drones instead of targeting mobile phone signals which could very well be a diversion at present while the real targeting takes place against brainwave electromagnetic radiation activity by human beings. I can be tracked and abused verbally wherever I go which has been done for all these years 24/7/365. The question arises as to the extent, if any, of its domestic use in the US.
The future will be, I predict, the use of drones and satellites as surveillance instruments for identifying and tracking primary targets who then become surveillance instruments themselves due to the monitoring so that all others can be detected. By reading thoughts triple agents such as this bomber will be known in advance. All of this will be done at a central location just as the drones are controlled from Nevada. The same data warehousing technology will be used to identify brainwaves instead of mobile phone signals. I believe that this is most likely well under way but is a huge operation when you stop to think about it. It will take time and language skills to develop.
The reason why this has to be opened now is to prevent the kinds of abuses to which I've been subjected during the past decade. This is a useful tool in the fight against terrorism, but it must be removed from the secret government and placed in the public domain so that it can be democratically controlled to effectively prevent its abuse which is surely to come on a mass scale. There are also extraordinary medical benefits to be derived from this technology as it exists currently in my direct experience, but it is being used in a most malignant way at present while the medical profession as a whole remains in ignorance of its existance.
While Bruce Reidel might very well know all about this technology and its current usage, he could very well be constrained by its secrecy from writing anything about it. I have no constraints placed upon me, and all this information has been freely divulged to me by any number of people intent upon abuse. In fact, there are scores if not hundreds of people from differing backgrounds and professions who know all about this surveillance technology because they have all participated in its abuse aganst me during the past decade. It is no secret here, and I am not bound by any secrecy constraints to report what is being done to me as I try to protect and defend myself against its abuse to ensure that this is stopped so that no one else will be an innocent target of this secret government.
An added comment concerning Bruce Reidel's assertion that boots on the ground are needed to direct the drones effectively to meaningful targets. I don't agree. This surveillance technology I describe above combines both Humint and Comint so that the former is no longer needed as a separate entity. In reacting to the risk from penetration as occurred in this bombing of CIA agents in the drone operations hut I believe that this surveillance technology will be used to replace boots on the ground to eliminate this penetration risk so that all can remain safe. This, I believe, is the real lesson that has been learned. This has grave implications for perpetuating the secret government and its secret war.
Why are the Department of Homeland Security's offices throughout the US called Fusion Centres? Is this because they reflect the fusion between Humint and Comint by today's brainwave electromagnetic radiation surveillance technology?
"We can't train anymore," said a surveillance male. Is that why I've been subjected to 12+ years 24/7/365 indefinite surveillance technology torture abuse as an expendable, non-consenting human guinea pig?
The context in which these comments occur can be found here.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)