The Cult Web Film that Inspired Loughner by Michelle Goldberg The Daily Beast
I found this to be extraordinarily interesting, fascinating and enlightening which, for me, reinforces the need to pay attention and listen to everything that is being said closely for the pellets of truth that emerge. Karl Marx, Adolph Hitler and Ayn Rand were among his favourite reads noted on Facebook.
I read four of Ayn Rand's books c 1960 and found that she was reacting against collectivism “we” and toward the individual “I.” I didn't take away the extremes of right wing capitalism from this but the need for the individual to be allowed to flourish and not subsumed under the collective whether it be government or whatever. In “The Fountainhead” the architect Howard Roark had a superior low cost housing project which was in conflict with the government's development. This was even made into a film with Gary Cooper and a grand speech at the end.
I haven't read Karl Marx I'm sorry to say, but I do recall Erich Fromm describing a time when he was speaking to a group of clergymen (and women?) providing them with quotes for them to identify their source. Most thought they came from the Bible. The quotes came from Karl Marx. I would never read anything by Adolph Hitler since, as a man given his actions, I do not believe that he could offer anything of value except for those engaged in forensic analysis of a demented and depraved personality.
The difficulty here, as always, is sorting out the complexities of thought, expression and actions when they come in contact with others who then add their own input/interpretation. Oftentimes, we don't konw very much and rely upon our sense of human behaviour that leads to conspiracy theories which is not an irrational thing to do nor is it paranoid because the tendency for human beings to have a disposition to do the same thing is a common experience. This tendency has led to many disasters in history and within human activities currently. It's right to question all aspects of what people are doing individually and collectively, and we have the freedom to do so. What happens when that freedom is taken away, or someone tries to take it away? Is this the foundation of a compounded conspiracy?
To think that there is an apparent collusion and conspiracy to control people with implanted chips is not as far fetched as it might seem. In fact, the neurological technology now exists to do a lot more without chips or implants of any kind that is generally being ignored, going unreported and not discussed so that there is an absence of a general awareness of what is happening.
This technology has been used against me for the past decade 24/7/365 involving scores if not hundreds who know all about it. These people come from the NHS (National Health Service), police, various government departments at the local and central levels and include elected officials and the general public. At its core are those whom I reported for child abuse in 1998 and two former US Marines now retired, Colonel Vine and Lt Harry Bird, who brought this totally invasive surveillance technology to be used against me in February 2001 joining an existing 2.5 years of 24/7/365 surveillance torture abuse in London's North Kensington.
The objective is to torture and abuse continuously around-the-clock so much so that by means of extreme provocation violence will be created as a response for which I can then be blamed and attacked. This has never happened as a response by me during the past 12.5 years. Instead, I do what I am doing now to document and communicate it to all and sundry as appropriate since what is happening is so extraordinary. There are no mysterious people here. What they are doing is made known to me by the surveillance technology's electronic sound transmission which is a key component of the torture process. There are other feedback mechanisms as well as monitoring.
Hitting someone who is young and vulnerable with this surveillance technology can have extreme reactions, and they are intended to make the target appear to be mentally ill if only by simply reporting what is happening as I do. Mental illness is a means to try to discredit the truth of what is being reported by the target/victim. A 21-year-old British student studying in France went to Germany lured by a false pretense to attend a conference. He was then subjected to some intense abuse which caused him great distress resulting in his calling home, running away down the highway in the middle of the night in Germany and attempting to throw himself in front of vehicles until he finally succeeded in killing himself. He appeared to be mentallly ill, but was he? Was he driven to this behaviour by neurological surveillance technology torture abuse from which he could not escape?
By the time this 22-year-old in Arizona shot and killed six people and wounded a congresswoman among numerous others, he was exhibiting signs of mental disorder and emotional distress until he finally he finally broke in a rage of violence at a source of what he thought was the problem he “perceived” existed. There are truths in what he was saying, but he was not approaching these issuess in a careful, analytical and well judged manner based upon evidence. Hitting a young person like this with the neurological surveillance technology could produce any kind of reaction, and, as my direct experience attests for the past decade, this is an experimentation process to see what will happen.
I am not suggesting that this Arizona shooter was subjected to this kind of neurological surveillance technology experimentation in mind control and abuse to see what it takes to break down a human being so that complete submission, obedience and conformity are achieved if they ever can be as has been done to me and completely failed so far. I am saying, however, that this must be part of the discussion about what is happening with respect to violent acts like this and the general discussion with respect to conspiracy theories. There is something there. I know and report what is happening, but every effort is being made to keep it secret while these experiments go on. This needs to be brought into the open.
There are violently abusive people in this world who have this most advanced neurological surveillance technology using it against others like myself indefinitely to create violence in order to falsely establish a mental health attack to blame the target/victim and protect themselves. In total there is a massive number of dirty tricks continuously carried out to create dirty data that is then accepted as valid which engages the scores if not hundreds of other people. Once they find out that they have been misled and “had,” they are trapped because they cannot admit what they have done. They then remain to ultimately destroy hoping to cover up the reality of what has happened. There are those who willingly go along knowing it's a massive hoax. There are the few who walk away refusing to participate. But, no one stops it. Why? Who is responsible and accountable?
The context in which this comment appeared can be found here.
I almost forgot that Hitler had an uncertain ancestry in that his grandfather might have been Jewish. His grandmother worked in a Jewsh household as a cook where she became pregnant. While this paternity was attributed to or claimed by several, payment was made by the Jewish family for 14 years as if the 19-year-old son was the father of Hitler's father. It is the uncertainty that is important. See Alice Miller's "For Your Own Good."
If so or even if uncertainly so, then Rand, Hitler and Marx were Jewish. This is a common thread of sorts interspersed with the antipathy each reflected. It turns out that Congresswoman Giffords is Jewish.
Alice Miller writes "human destructiveness is reactive" and not innate which she notes was asserted by Erich Fromm and others. If this is true, then Hitler's violence can be shown to be developmentally derived, and she goes on to investigate this thoroughly.
The violence of Jader Loughner then would also be reactive to the circumstances of his development and not innately found inside him and would derive from being treated violently. One wonders then how such conspiracy films would have fit into the process of a developing violent personality to the extent that he would shoot six people to death and wound a dozen or more others? The films would not be primarily influential but perhaps have a strong secondary influence in such a development context reacting against violence. For a normal person the conspiracy films would not have this effect.
The context in which this comment appeared can be found here.
A Jewsih British student studying in Paris thought he was going to an anti-war conference in Germany in 2003. It was a front for a Lyndon LaRouche organisation run by his wife. Six days later Jeremiah Duggan was found dead several hours after a 4:30 am phone call to his mother expressing terror.
The German police claimed it was suicide, but forensic reports differ postulating murder. The UK Parliament has had a meeting about this situation. The German courts have refused a judicial revfiew earlier this year for a murder investigation. Wikipedia has a long description of the complexity of this mysterious death: http://bit.ly/ihIWeR And, here's a bit from 2007 when two separate forensic reports emerged: http://bit.ly/h5qZor
The complexity of the interaction between these elements included Dick Cheney and the Tavistock Institute. Lyndon LaRouche claims that Cheney et al have a vendetta against him. He believes that the Tavistock Institute in London is subversive in a mass mind control sense. Jeremiah Duggan had attended the Tavistock Institute when younger while his parents were separating.
I couldn't possiblity sort out these complexities, but I see contradictions coming from the right amid right wingers themselves as well as being against socially progressive institutions about which they have an innate fear which could very well have some justification. Are they projecting themselves, or is there some truth to what they say?
I sense the same kind of contradictions from within the right with respect to Congresswoman Giffords' shooting including the fact that she is Jewish and that Loughner had an unbalanced mental state. I don't know anything about Lyndon LaRouche either, but he seems to be high on the list of conspiracy "theorists." What happens when the state refuses to investigate a murder?
I do know, however, that there is an extraordinary collusion and general conspiracy to manufacture massive allegations and negative characteristics against me using surveillance technology during the past 12.5 years by extreme right wing former US Marine kooks, a woman who is a violently malicious child abuser and involving large numbers of people along with a significant number of government departments. The Tavistock Institute is not that far away either. I cannot go beyond circumstance without solid factual evidence, but the situation is a fascinating one that keeps me open to all possbilities and events such as these given the extraordinary complexities that continue to emerge.
The context in which this comment appeared can be found here.
