Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues proceedings on Monday and Tuesday, 28th February and 1st March 2011: 1) State of the Science: Neuroscience, Neuroimaging and Genetics; and 2) Human Subjects Protection webcasts of the presentations.
You should pay very close attention to the penultimate video where 22 members of the public and non-consenting subjects/victims of many years of research abuse share their personal experiences pleading for the Commission to help them. It is a stunning revelation about what is happening reflected by a diverse group of people from different locations throughout the US.
Here are three Emails I sent relating to the actual proceedings because I was astounded by the juxtaposition of this Washington DC conference while London based surveillance technology watched me watch it and by the concluding remarks from 22 members of the public who were experiencing the same abuse as I which they publicly reported again watched by those watching me as they continued with their abuse against me. I wrote about this in Emails 1 and 3 below.
Email 2 below shows neuroscience over a decade ago in 1999 reflecting the ability to look through another creature's eyes by experiments carried out on a cat, and rats able to move a lever with their brain.
1. 28.02.2011 Bioethics: your morning session today was absolutely fascinating especially given the reality of those watching and listening along with me using neuroscience based surveillance technology
Valerie H Bonham
Executive Director
The Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues
Suite C-100
1425 New York Ave. NW
Washington, DC 20005.
Dear Ms Bonham
I have to make a comment at this point after watching the webcast of the proceedings so far this morning before lunch your time from London while under neuroscience based surveillance technology that
1) sees what I am watching through my eyes,
2) hears with my ears and
3) reads my thoughts while
4) from time to time comments are made which I can hear by the electronic transmission of sound. Someone said that this was interesting or fascinating.
I'm not sure irony is the right word for it, but the juxtaposition of the two events across the Atlantic ocean is phenomenal and needs to be comprehended by your proceedings at some point. You need to find the key that unlocks your entry into this aspect of neuroscience.
Being here in my home in London watching and hearing your proceedings is almost better than being there. I am making both audio comments on a tape recorder and filming portions of what I am doing for my own record to document what is happening.
I listen to the computer sound through infra-red headsets so that no sounds escape which means that the camcorder to DVD recording is only visual without any of your audio. This enables me to keep a very silent environment so that I can pick up any other external acoustically generated noises.
When I hear through the sound of the headsets the voiced comments by those using the neuroscience based surveillance technology, that is not recorded on the camcorder, yet I can hear it even through the headsets with its sound of your conference.
There are other means for those using the surveillance technology to watch and hear what I am doing by directly intercepting the computer's electromagnetic radiation emissions and/or the wireless transmission from the Internet.
But, as always, there is a distinction when I get up and walk away. Their neuroscience based surveillance technology monitoring and feedback follows me.
Martha Farah's comments about reading the mind pertain to imaging only, and I agree. It will not happen that way. It's already happening and has been for a decade in my direct experience by intercepting the electromagnetic radiation emissions from the brain without implants of any kind. It is mind reading of the most precise kind for thoughts and images and can induce thoughts and images as well.
I was really struck, however, by Bruce Rosen's presentation especially regarding the letter “M” imaged on the cortex at the back of the brain where sight imagining occurs. That is phenomenal. But, I don't think that it will progress to being able to read images in great detail.
The process of seeing through the eyes was done with cats in an experiment published on the BBC web site in 1999 using implanted electrodes where reasonably clear images can be seen. I don't have the URL to hand, but if you search “through a cat's eyes,” I think you can find this.
I am absolutely fascinated with being able to watch these presentations since they are outstanding. I have this innate curiosity about everything, and I think they are extraordinary.
I've been laughing quite a bit at the irony of the situation given what is being said against the background of what is actually happening. Somehow you are going to have to find that key which unlocks entry into neuroscience's ability with respect to intercepting the electromagnetic radiation from the brain which provides the ability to read the mind so that you can bring all of this into your discussions.
You have to appreciate that all you discuss about ethics with respect to neuroscience is completely ignored by these people using this neuroscience based surveillance technology who do so in whatever way they please so that the importance of what you are doing is emphasised in a most profound way by the actual need to do something at the ground level where this abuse is currently taking place.
You have my permission as always to share this Email with anyone, and I urge you do so.
Sincerely yours
Gary D Chance
http://garydchance.com/
http://garydchance.tripod.com/surveillance/
http://garydchance.bravejournal.com/
http://garydchance-gary.blogspot.com/
http://twitter.com/garydchance
http://www.facebook.com/garydchance
http://www.myspace.com/garydchance
http://www.youtube.com/garydchance
2. October 1999: decoding brain cells electromagnetic radiation to see through a cat's eyes & June 1999: brain controlled external object movement by rats
Neuroscience research in 1999:
1. Rat's brain controlling external object movement
03/01/11 12:01:15 PM BBC News | Sci/Tech | Mind over matter http://bbc.in/i4JU2y 21.06.1999 "brain cell activity can be used to control a robotic device" [Twitter]
2. Seeing through a cat's eyes
03/01/11 12:06:51 PM BBC News|Sci/Tech |Computer uses cat's brain to see http://bbc.in/fPPJQ2 Computer wired cat's brain created videos of sight. 08.10.1999 [Twitter]
03/01/11 12:10:57 PM BBC News|Sci/Tech| Looking through cats' eyes http://bbc.in/gQyBtJ "what it is like to look through the eyes of another creature" 11.10.1999 [Twitter]
03/01/11 12:15:34 PM "By recording the electrical activity of nerve cells in the thalamus, a region of the brain that receives signals from the eyes, researchers from the University of California at Berkeley were able to view these shapes. ... The team used what they describe as a "linear decoding technique" to convert the signals from the stimulated cells into visual images." http://bbc.in/gQyBtJ [Facebook]
What are these guys doing now?
"Dr Yang Dan, Assistant Professor of Neurobiology at UC Berkeley, Fei Li and Garrett Stanley, now Assistant Professor of Biomedical Engineering at Harvard University conducted 11 experiments." http://bbc.in/gQyBtJ
Sincerely yours
Gary D Chance
http://garydchance.com/
http://garydchance.tripod.com/surveillance/
http://garydchance.bravejournal.com/
http://garydchance-gary.blogspot.com/
http://twitter.com/garydchance
http://www.facebook.com/garydchance
http://www.myspace.com/garydchance
http://www.youtube.com/garydchance
3. If not us, who? If not now, when? Tuesday's appearance of the public speakers 1st March 2011
Valerie H Bonham
Executive Director
The Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues
Suite C-100
1425 New York Ave. NW
Washington, DC 20005.
Dear Ms Bonham
“A civilisation is measured by how it treats its most vulnerable,” said Amy Gutmann referring to prisoners and patients as examples at the start of the day, and, truly, what happened in Guatemala is atrocious. By the end of the morning session, I believe that the Commission learned something worse is happening on a much broader scale right under everyone's collective noses about which no one has been paying official attention let alone doing anything.
It appeared as if no one was prepared for what the public speakers said as Amy Gutmann's attitude changed from one of silence after each of the public speakers to “thank you” and then “thank you very much.” I'll have to listen again to what she said at the very end, but it did sound to me as if she said that the charge by President Obama was to make certain abuse did not happen again which is the way I read his letter.
As the public speakers pointed out, it is happening all over again and has been for many years without anyone paying attention or doing anything about it. They echoed the points I made in writing before their appearance and one could see and feel the very different people from all over reporting essentially the same experience in words as best they could given what was happening to them which I know only to well from my own 12.5 years experience 24/7/365.
Very hardcore, abusive personalities are loose with this technology R&D that goes beyond what the Nazis did in WWII concentration camps. As I said and as could be seen today, it's distributive.
I was pleased to hear your overview, but serious questions now arise about spending all those resources on a thorough investigation into people who are by now probably all dead when something more atrocious is currently taking place. A staff of 12 going through 477 boxes of information from a multitude of government departments about something that happened over 60 years ago does not seem right when people are suffering as they described in what was accurately characterised as an assassination programme.
The Commission was charged today by 22 people pleading for their lives reflecting thousands of others both alive and dead who need help which the Commission can now provide. President Obama represents all the people of the US, and in that capacity the treatment of the worst kind which makes people vulnerable reflects the character of this civilisation as it exists today.
I was quite struck by the few things that Amy Gutmann said which were precisely correct, but I see a big gap in trying to get others to concentrate and focus on the key elements of the issues. What is happening today reflects today's technology, and the world has not grasped that. Those who are not subjected to this abuse find it difficult to accept its existence. That's why the people with whom you really need to be talking are those from the public just as the staff engages with the speakers. It's an investigation, I believe, that you will have to undertake.
I've looked at the webcasts that are now available but have not had time to look at them further, but I want to go over them all. I was getting discouraged today about what the Commission was doing until the public people started speaking. I was stunned by what was said over and over by each of them.
“What's this?"asked a surveillance male watching the proceedings with Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret and the mother of the abused children. He was amazed by what he was hearing because he was participating in the very activity he heard described by people of all kinds from all over the US. It has not sunk in about what is happening except to those who have been targeted. Now, after this presentation those carrying it out can see themselves as their victims do for the heinous monsters that they really are.
I think Amy Gutmann should go back to President Obama and have a long chat with him about the direction in which the Commission needs to go and the resources to undertake what needs to be done for this abuse we heard about today is being carried out on a global basis. I do not believe that you fully grasp the implications of harm that this will do. It is a harm far beyond the financial and economic crisis of recent years for it will be a social collapse and loss of confidence in all human activity.
Amy Gutmann made one of her excellent remarks today referring to the damage that was done to the community by the kinds of abuses which have occurred in medical research indicating how destructive it was. You have no idea just how destructive this is overall to the community until you probe that thoroughly with an investigation.
These hardcore abusive personalities will never stop and will have to be stopped by others. They are the child and adult abusers which you see in the news relating to horrendous situations. This technology gives them a perfect outlet for their perversions and violence which they carry out on a serial basis unobstructed. They are straight out of the drama series “Criminal Minds,” and the FBI needs to apply its BAU (Behavioural Analysis Unit) to this problem, but the problem might be coming from the FBI itself.
This was noted by a couple speakers who said COINTELPRO is alive and well once again with Cynthia McKinney restarting an investigation into this activity. It was the FBI who disgraced itself with COINTELPRO which was not exposed and addressed until the Church Committee c 1975. It took a long time for those abuses to come to light. Now the technology is available to do it all over again and not get caught.
You've opened a door today. I hope that you will start to let fresh air and light into all of this and not restrict those who have something to say to two minutes as one speaker correctly protested. It is important to listen to each and every one no matter what they say very carefully. They have much to say and taking away the time pressure is all important because that is a key part of the torture to which all of us are subjected. Confronting a two minute limit to explain the horror of the torture experience is just further torture from an already indifferent society that supports the abuse.
When asked if there were dissenting voices in 1946-8 Guatemala, you replied “Yes” but could not say any more at present. My question is if there was dissent and controversy, how could this have gone undetected generally for over 60 years? People have been speaking up about this current torture problem for decades, but no one in an official capacity has taken up the problem to deal effectively with it.
Erich Fromm begins “Man for Himself: an Inquiry into the Psychology of Ethics” by noting “For Aristotle, ethics is built upon the science of man. Psychology investigates the nature of man and ethics therefore is applied psychology.” (p 34 Fawcett Premier Book, New York, 1947, 1969) An issue in today's session was the application of what the Commission reviews and reports. I would like to think that the Commission will develop facts from abuses existing today that can be developed into effective solutions to stop these abuses for which the public speakers pleaded.
The Commission has a full plate, however, which can be seen in all that it is addressing if one is to read John le Carre's “The Constant Gardner” or see the film as any indication of the problems that abound. There are many kinds of abuses that need to be addressed. I believe that the Commission needs the resources to do it all effectively, or it will fail by neglecting what it cannot do by such a lack which will result in pain, suffering and death continuing in those being tortured as described today.
"He'll be sectioned," said a surveillance male just before I sent this Email. In UK speak that means committed. This was what one woman said today about those who were declared mentally ill and taken away to hospital. It's just like the Soviet Union or Nazi Germany, and it's happening all over again for those who speak the truth. It's suppressive social control based on fear.
Sincerely yours
Gary D Chance
http://garydchance.com/
http://garydchance.tripod.com/surveillance/
http://garydchance.bravejournal.com/
http://garydchance-gary.blogspot.com/
http://twitter.com/garydchance
http://www.facebook.com/garydchance
http://www.myspace.com/garydchance
http://www.youtube.com/garydchance
