Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues proceedings on Monday, 28th February 2011: State of Neuroscience, Neuroimaging and Genetics webcasts of the presentations.
Prior to this first day's sessions of the Commission, I submitted the following comments on Tuesday, 22nd February 2011:
Valerie H Bonham
Executive Director
Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues
Suite C-100
1425 New York Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20005
Dear Ms Bonham
Re: 28th February 2011 State of the Science: Neuroscience and Neuroimaging: Current Issues in Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
With this first submission considering its unusual nature I wanted to run this by you given my earlier correspondence and your letter.
This actually opens a new dimension of your topic for Monday's meeting that is not precisely present in your draft agenda. Where you have indicated only neuroimaging, I have considered electromagnetic radiation monitoring and feedback.
This is nothing new since it's been done with electrodes for a long time with some similar results which I describe only they have used electrodes implanted in a cat's brain to see through its eyes as the BBC published in 1999. There is also more research that I have recently read about tracking the neural paths in this manner that is equally fascinating but uses electrodes.
My experience as a non-consenting research subject goes beyond electrodes involving only the interception of the electromagnetic radiation halo that surrounds the brain for monitoring its activity and for feedback. It's this feedback activity, e.g., sound, that is most abusive and dangerous which needs full consideration for protection.
You need to have another subject in addition to neuroimaging, but I don't know what you want to call it.
This lays the foundation of my experience as a subject and raises the issues which you cover later in the day and the next day with respect to protection. There is more to be considered, and I will send along my comments about those shortly.
I wanted to provide you with this foundation since it is quite different for the reasons I describe in its content. I believe that this involves the real issues of today that have created this current response to the experiments in Guatemala and behind that Tuskegee which I note in my conclusion.
What you do with this is, of course, your own decision. Personally, I wish that I could be present to make a presentation and answer questions, but I cannot. I would like to see it published on its own merits since these issues need to be raised and discussed.
Please feel to do anything you like with my submission. I have no privacy and confidentiality as I have described, so it does not matter to me what you do. All those using surveillance against me have watched me write this and have created a stir about its contents as is usual trying to intimidate and stop me from reporting as I do.
Of course, for me this validates what I am doing, but you don't know that, so it remains subjective from your point of view. That is one of the keys to protection which I want to make later in this context. There needs to be developed means to detect and monitor the feedback process of this surveillance technology to verify its existence and collect evidence.
I have included a copy of my submitted comments for next Monday morning's session enclosed below and as a *.PDF file attached. Sometimes attachments are automatically stripped, so I'm providing an enclosure too just in case.
After this I will submit my comments to info@bioethics.gov generally unless you want me to send these comments to the attention of anyone in particular.
Sincerely yours
Gary D Chance
http://garydchance.com/
http://garydchance.tripod.com/surveillance/
http://garydchance.bravejournal.com/
http://garydchance-gary.blogspot.com/
http://twitter.com/garydchance
http://www.facebook.com/garydchance
http://www.myspace.com/garydchance
http://www.youtube.com/garydchance
enclosure
Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues
28th February 2011
State of the Science
Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
Current Issues in Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
If you want to measure mass, do imaging. If you want to know about the content of the brain's activity, decode the electromagnetic radiation brainwaves surrounding the head.
The area which contains the greatest advance in neuroscience where the most abuse has occurred and currently exists with respect to R&D and its applications derive from neurological research involving decoding brainwaves and using this knowledge malevolently without any apparent public recognition of its existence or the benefits which are available.
Background Information
I speak from the position of a non-consenting human subject in this experiment carried out against me during the past ten years 24/7/365 since February 2001 with surveillance technology introduced by Colonel Vine USMC Ret, Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret and others with them to an already existing surveillance operation that had commenced in August 1998.
I have lived in a social housing environment in North Kensington, London, UK, since May 1996. Those carrying out this surveillance against me had been the local tenants/residents in a tenant managed environment whom I had reported for crimes and antisocial behaviour that included apparent rape, attempted murder, child abuse and road rage violence along with domestic violence.
By the time February 2001 arrived those involved with this activity included medical professionals from the National Health Service some of whom I had met and police whom I believed were from the then Metropolitan Police's Special Branch. There were numerous others involved as well.
I have just learned since 10th January 2011 that the Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) in the UK had several units operating outside the control of government and on a private basis since it was a private company. They used secret intelligence agents provocateurs for many years to infiltrate groups which were deemed to be a domestic threat to the UK.
There is the possibility that this activity might have had its foundation from the ACPO which formed as a private company in 1997 and began its secret police state activity. These units have now been taken over by the Metropolitan Police recently following the collapse of prosecution cases after a public admission from one of the police officers involved.
In any case Colonel Vine, Lt Bird and others joined with these people which also included the mother of the abused children in a key role as events developed from February 2001. Lt Harry Bird characterised his surveillance technology at that time as experimental. I learned what they were doing by its ability to transmit sound electronically which started the day of their arrival. I could also hear those with them. The intention was to “spook” me and cause an extreme abusive behaviour reaction by using this neurologically based surveillance technology right from the start.
Since I had already been subjected to surveillance technology abuse for 2.5 years 24/7/365, I knew the participants well by then and had met some NHS medical professionals so that I could easily recognise voices. There were no mysterious “they” in all of this. Anyone who came along I was able to determine for the most part who they were if they stayed long enough because of their talking, their relations with others I knew and the revelations they made about themselves.
Neurological Technology Development By Trial and Error Experiments
Implants are not necessary. The interception of electromagnetic radiation brainwaves is accomplished on the principle of Tempest which has been used against any electronic device for longer than the past five decades. The fundamental key to its use is the ability to intercept very low power electromagnetic radiation emissions.
Once this is understood as possible, the rest involves the arduous tasks of decoding the electromagnetic radiation emissions. Most familiar about this activity in recent years has been the ability to intercept and read computer monitor screen emissions. In fact, any component of a computer can be so monitored, decoded and read. This surveillance technology has advanced to the point where feedback and control of the computer technology is possible as well about which I began learning in 2001 too.
The same can be done to the human brain which has its own source of electricity from chemical reactions that leave an electromagnetic radiation halo around the head unique to every human being. First, every human being can be so identified and tracked wherever they are located.
I believe that this can be and is done by satellite in much the same way as Yuri Gagarin's April 1961 space flight was monitored from a satellite by listening to the very low power emissions that existed around the telephone cables in the Soviet space station on the ground. See James Bamford's “Body of Secrets” for a description of this activity which can be easily located through its index.
It is much less expensive to carry out this monitoring by other means I suspect. Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret has referenced the word “satellite” on numerous occasions, and another has described reading the communications although I have no verification of this. Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret has also referred to Vodafone on occasion as well. All possible methods are most likely being employed as part of this experiment for cost/benefit determinations.
Brainwave Decoding Capabilities
The decoding of the brainwaves that I have experienced so far which was present initially in 2001 consists of being able to accurately read the human senses: sight, hearing, feeling and smell. The most important are sight and hearing. Feelings while significant are not quite as important. And, smell has only been noted by comment. There has been no comment relating to taste.
Thoughts and images are also subject to accurate monitoring. I have tested these over and over and gotten verbal reactions from those using the surveillance technology accurately describing my thoughts and images many times throughout the past decade.
Very small printed type can be seen in this manner while I am reading which has been read out aloud by Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret in special circumstances to verify this facility. There is always the possibility that my thoughts about what I am reading can be read creating the impression that he can see through my eyes.
However, examples like the one where the mother of the abused children said “Look at his eyes” as the diplopia (double vision) was returning in September 2001 while I was walking across the football pitch in Holland Park “seeing” the trees in the distance separate into double vision confirmed this neurological surveillance technology facility.
What can be intercepted and decoded in this manner can also be fed back to the person as with a computer so that human activity such as hearing can be electronically transmitted. This is how I hear what those using the surveillance technology are saying anywhere I am located. They use this as a torture mechanism and interrogation tool to try to provoke the thought process which can be read as well as any other response reaction throughout the day and night 24/7/365. It's a means of continuous torture abuse.
Images can be implanted in the brain which in my experience is usually done at night to induce dreams and probe memory. On several occasions I have even seen a video being played as an image when woken by such dream inducement activity. I described exactly what had happened at that time as I do with everything verbally on an audio recorder which I use to keep continuous notes.
Pain can be induced by feedback as well and has been used as a torture method in the early years but has not been used that much lately about which I am directly aware. In February 2002 Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret simulated a cracked rib for an hour or two between midnight and about 0200 one night. Someone monitoring his activity outside and my response to its abuse caused him to drive down the road to tell Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret to stop since it was torture. He did, and the pain went away.
Initially, Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret had said to the mother of the abused children “Do you want to have some fun?” Then he initiated the pain which he himself called a “cracked rib” that described the pain precisely. I was writing notes on a notebook computer about all that was happening which was read from using Tempest by those outside in vehicles which caused the reaction as described.
Medication can also be carried out surreptitiously by emulating the brain's activity when subject to medication. This has been and is still used against me extensively to incapacitate and debilitate as a calmative not that it is needed. It is used on a false pretext in order to reduce function to create and look for errors that can then be pointed out and blamed on me the target.
It's purpose is simply sadistic abuse as was the pain inducement characterised by “Do you want to have some fun.” All of this activity which includes chronic sleep deprivation is intended to reduce and stop human activity. It's intention is to break down the human being. Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret frequently stated “Shut him down” to “Break him down” while carrying out this destructive behaviour against computer technology and myself to debilitate and incapacitate.
This was not successful over the years, and much conversation was devoted to it in terms of the efficacy of the surreptitious medication administered electronically. This was referenced by Colonel Vine USMC Ret working with Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret to send “it” back to the laboratory to get an improved surreptitious medication process. These particular medical procedures were being carried out by those who were not medical professionals and who also had a malicious objective to do as much harm as is possible.
There were also references to administering pain killers as calmatives with specific reference to morphine. This will have to be investigated further since I have no such addiction cravings and cannot determine precisely what has been administered although the fact of the surreptitious medication is well known to me subjectively and verified by what is being said.
I have allowed my hair to grow uncut throughout these years in order to be able to obtain a sample of any drugs administered surreptitiously by using a Mass Spectrograph for analysis since I have been drug free throughout this period and during my life taking prescription drugs only rarely when absolutely necessary. It is unlawful to administer drugs to a non-consenting adult outside a hospital environment in the UK. It is also unlawful for non-qualified medical professionals to do so at any time or any place.
As with all aspects of this neurologically based surveillance technology, it can be carried out anywhere the subject target is located by the accuracy of identification made possible by the unique signature of the human electromagnetic radiation halo surrounding the head.
I have thus been tracked and surreptitiously medicated while shopping, crossing the street, visiting an eye clinic or while at home. Often I will hear the phrase “He's drugged” just after I feel that I am hit by the surreptitious medication. They can monitor its impact. I was even hit with a loud verbal abuse comment while undergoing cataract surgery under local anaesthesia in the summer of 2003.
All human activity can be monitored wherever the subject target is located unless deep underground or protected by specially built rooms as now exist in many facilities as revealed by the Washington Post in its Top Secret America research last July 2010. It has occurred to me everywhere with all aspects of it used by targeting me accurately.
It creates an extraordinary surveillance technology, but the monitoring process has to be separated from the feedback activity. It's one thing to monitor against which there is no protection and which does not damage physically or psychologically except for the complete loss of privacy and confidentiality about which the subject target is totally unaware.
When the feedback occurs, however, as it does in my situation where it is being used for R&D, I am subjected to continuous verbal abuse which lets me know what is being done while abusing me at the same time. My location and activity are completely monitored by being able to see through my eyes and read my thoughts as well as being able to hear what I say if and when I speak.
At the same time all of this can be subjected to continuous comment which occurs in my situation for its experimental development as a torture tool. It is intended to cause physical and mental stress, distress and harm. The objective is to do as much damage as is possible for which this surveillance technology is being used against me in order to “teach him a lesson,” obtain “obedience” and ultimately be able to dominate and control human life and activity.
This sounds like a real life version of Stanley Milgram's 1960s Yale University experiment all over again or a similar one carried out at Stanford University a decade later that had to be shut down because it went out of control. See Erich Fromm's “Anatomy of Human Destructiveness” for a full description of these.
This surveillance technology is also a lethal weapon, and this experimental basis for its abuse against me is used to see how much can be done before harm is caused or death finally results. Killing the subject target in this manner is an objective of this R&D to hide what is happening by eliminating the target. This has been referenced frequently by the mother of the abused children who says “He should be dead by now.” Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret has said “You will die first” before he stops. I am subject to continuous death threats and threats of violence.
Side Effects
The side effects from the usage of the feedback portion of this neurological surveillance technology are quite noticeable and can be lethal. I can compare the past decade with the first 2.5 years of such surveillance activity carried out against me to see the similarities and differences.
Initially, the first 2.5 years consisted of radar imagining surveillance technology used in the flat above mine to watch my movements throughout my home. This started in mid-August 1998, and I was able to detect that something was happening immediately by the lymph oedema that occurred in my right forearm and hand. Subsequent verbal and other activity quickly confirmed what was being done.
The radar's electromagnetic radiation impacted the cells of the body triggering an immune system response as if the cells had been injured. This was not drained away in my right arm since I had had cancer surgery for a malignant melanoma on my right shoulder in August 1979 when all my lymph nodes under my right arm were removed. I was vulnerable to lymph oedema which I had experienced. Had it not been for the resulting lymph oedema, I would have never known about this side effect or its cause.
At the same time the radar imagining surveillance technology caused the cataracts to develop from mid-August 1998 to their diagnosis in December 2000. My eyes which had been stable for years although myopic began to deteriorate. I was already under hospital care for diplopia (double vision) which had started in February 1998 and was getting my eyes checked regularly by an optometrist as well.
The diplopia stablised by the end of 1998, but the damage to the lenses of the eyes took place as a result of the radar imaging devices located in the flat above. The deterioration was most pronounced in my otherwise stronger right eye because I slept on my left side more than my right which meant that my right eye was more exposed to the radar above.
After February 2001 when the neurological surveillance technology began to be used and especially after July 2002 when the brain probing began in some earnest, the same impact on the brain occurred as with that which had caused the lymph oedema in my right forearm and hand. There was an immune system response which resulted in the blood brain barrier being breached with what I call cranial fluid seeping into my sinus cavities.
There are no lymph nodes in the brain as you well know. That fluid then flows out with gravity. In my case I usually sleep on one side or another. The cranial fluid then blocks whatever nasal passage is on the downhill side. At the same time it seeps down my throat so I know what it is since I can taste it. If I turn over the nasal passage blockage disappears and reappears on the downhill side. If I sit or stand up, the blockage disappears altogether.
At the same time tinnitus occurs which is another side effect of this brain penetration by electromagnetic radiation activity during the night. If this is not done, there are no side effects. And, there is a diuretic impact from this neurological surveillance technology as well.
These side effects are signals to me about what is being done along with the actual process of dream inducements and periodic wake ups throughout each night. These abate from time to time which occur in conjunction with some restriction on what is being done as I continuously write about it and complain when I can. As is usual with all abuse, the victim is blamed, and this is no exception. I am blamed for what is happening while efforts are being made to deny what is being done as it goes on night and day.
I cannot tell any longer if there is any impact on my right arm from this activity since it remains permanently swollen. Whether this comes from the neurologically based surveillance technology or any ongoing abuse from the radar surveillance technology, I cannot tell.
In an issue of the Lancet at the end of October 1999 there was an excellent article about research into sleep deprivation. While well known as a torture method, this research article provided sound medical evidence of its adverse impact on the human body and its physiological systems. I happened to come across this article while reading in the library and was most interested because of the sleep deprivation to which I was being subjected at that time and had been since August 1998.
Chronic sleep deprivation will cause the collapse of one or more of the peripheral organ systems of the body most especially the cardiovascular system. It can destroy the cognitive ability of the brain and bring on weight gain and age onset diseases such as diabetes. Nutritional uptake is inhibited.
The chronic sleep deprivation to which I've been subjected for 12.5 years 24/7/365 has had as its intention to destroy life itself. This has been knowingly done since I have copied and communicated the contents of this Lancet article to numerous people since October 1999.
At one point early on when I was writing about the destruction of the cognitive capacity of the brain due to sleep deprivation, an NHS psychiatrist from a nearby hospital where I had met him at his request noted “At least he understands that” which I heard while working at an Internet shop as he was participating in the surveillance technology abuse. Years later a male said “I'm going to destroy your cognitive ability” again making violent threats as a consequence of the surveillance technology abuse.
Obviously, those with the surveillance technology who are creating this abuse know all about its impact and for this reason continue to carry out it. No one has ever stopped the intentional chronic sleep deprivation despite my continuous and complete reporting of it to a wide spectrum of people in positions of authority. What is being done is exactly the same as was done to suspected witches in the UK 400 years ago. The activity has not changed only the method by using today's technology.
Conclusion
I perceive here as a direct result of my 12.5 years of experience so far an ongoing pattern of medical and scientific research abuse made from US government sources based upon current technology development in much the same way that the infamous abuses from Tuskegee and Guatemala developed in their day based upon current medical science at that time. It also reflects the perverse elements of the Nazi experiments during WWII which were of a most extreme and abusive kind.
Given the indefinite usage of this neurologically based surveillance technology its objective is to obtain research on torture methods including interrogation and the ability to retrieve information from the human brain while making every effort to ultimately destroy the human being's activity and life itself. It is also focussing on developing incapacitating surreptitious medication electronically administered as well as social control.
It is the same process that was carried out at Tuskegee from 1932 to 1972 where the impact of syphilis was studied while watching the disease progress through its horrible stages to death at the same time penicillin was available but withheld while those suffering were not told that a cure existed. In this situation the deliberate destruction of life is being carried out for research purposes much like those experiments conducted by the Nazis during WWII while observing hoped for deterioration in human beings as they relate to mental and physical health until death occurs.
There are similarities to the Guatemala experiments of 1946-8 in that 700 vulnerable people who were mentally ill or prisoners were deliberately infected with SDTs in order to test the efficacy of penicillin as a cure. In my situation this surveillance makes people vulnerable. There is no defence against it by anyone. It also imprisons. I have been frequently called a “prisoner” or “He's my prisoner” by Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret and under “house arrest” which has been allowed to go on indefinitely with his presence for the past decade. This whole process replaces the democratic rule of law and its institutions.
In this situation every effort is being made to induce mental illness and physical disability as well as ultimately causing death to cover up what has been done by preventing me from accurately reporting all that has happened from my complete 24/7/365 database record which I have kept during all these years. There have also been similar references by Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret to the need to obtain my body at the time of death for “autopsy” purposes which I take to mean a cover up.
At the same time everything that is done is made to look like natural developments, and every effort is made to blame the victim as is the trademark of the abusive personality in order to discredit what I document and report. That is why Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret and the mother of the abused children are present 24/7/365 to perpetuate this fraud by “cooking the books.”
The key difference with this R&D is that it is distributive and not collective. The collection occurs at the central point of the use of this surveillance technology while the targets/subjects/victims are distributed. They are not collected together in one group as in the Tuskegee and Guatemala experiments. That is why I call this surveillance technology the portable concentration camp.
It is this characteristic that makes it far more difficult to detect and investigate. It looks like one person when, I believe, there are many involved who are distributed throughout the US and worldwide. This makes it all the more easy for those carrying out this abuse to hide and deny which is facilitated by blaming the target/subject/victim. That's why an investigation needs to be carried out to trace this back to its source to find its extent, all those who are participants and the other targets/subjects/victims. It's almost like a cell network of terrorists.
This neuroscience has been developed and is being applied to these destructive objectives while ongoing R&D proceeds unrestricted and unabated against non-consenting human subjects such as myself. I don't think I have to describe what positive and constructive benefits can be available from its proper use. These are self evident to all medical and scientific professionals.
This neuroscience is truly revolutionary, but it has fallen into the hands of those who are sadistically disposed in a secret research society with malicious intent to exploit it for material gain at the direct expense of the lives of those who are targeted by this surveillance technology. I believe that this can have a most beneficial legitimate use too, but it must be carefully controlled democratically to avoid these abuses which reflect the nature of the human character everywhere in the world.
Gary D Chance
London, UK
22nd February 2011
