Wed, 12 Dec 2012 - 18:45:41: BBC News - Pat Finucane murder: 'Shocking state collusion', says PM. RUC Officers: Proposed, Passed info & Obstructed http://bbc.in/ZgxITd
“The review, published on Wednesday, found RUC officers proposed Mr Finucane, 39, be killed, said they passed information to his killers and failed to stop the attack and then obstructed the murder investigation.”
RUC Officers: Proposed Killing; Passed Info & Obstructed Investigation
Wed, 12 Dec 2012 - 19:10:34: BBC News- MI5 role key aspect of Finucane review by Desmond de Silva. Who runs the country? Let's have a public review http://bbc.in/128rBjB
Wed, 12 Dec 2012 - 19:18:28: BBC News - How has collusion been defined? Lord Stevens, Judge Cory & Inquiry application development. http://bbc.in/XcDTSQ
“For some, a charge of collusion can only stick if there has been a secret agreement to deliberately and consciously plot to do something wrong.
“For others the definition would also cover having a mindset that means that officers were predisposed to behave or think in ways that meant some people were less protected than they should have been, that investigations were frustrated to protect agents and informers, regardless of their actions.
“Lord Stevens, the then Metropolitan Police Commissioner, carried out a major investigation into collusion in several murders.
“He said collusion ranges "from
1) the willful failure to keep records,
2) the absence of accountability,
3) the withholding of intelligence and evidence, through to
4) the extreme of agents being involved in murder."
“Applying that definition to his three inquiries he reported:
“ "The co-ordination, dissemination and sharing of intelligence were poor. Informants and agents were allowed to operate without effective control and to participate in terrorist crimes.
“ "Nationalists were known to be targeted but were not properly warned or protected. Crucial information was withheld from senior investigating officers. Important evidence was neither exploited nor preserved."
“In 2004, Canadian judge Peter Cory published six reports into alleged collusion in murders in Northern Ireland.
“In outlining his definition of collusion he highlighted several dictionary definitions of the word including "to co-operate secretly: to have a secret understanding."
“He added definitions of connive, a synonym of the verb collude, including this entry from the Oxford Compact Thesaurus:
"to deliberately ignore;
“to overlook;
“to disregard;
“to pass over; “
“to take no notice of;
“to turn a blind eye;
“to wink;
“to excuse;
“to condone;
“to look the other way;
“to let something ride."
“From the Webster dictionary, he quoted:
“ "To pretend ignorance or unawareness of something one ought morally, or officially or legally to oppose;
“ “to fail to take action against a known wrongdoing or misbehaviour - usually used with connive at the violation of a law."
“He went on to write: "How should collusion be defined for the purposes of this inquiry?"
“ "There cannot be public confidence in any government agency that is guilty of collusion or connivance with regard to serious crimes. Because of the necessity for public confidence in government agencies the definition of collusion must be reasonably broad when it is applied to such agencies.
“ "That is to say that they must not act collusively by ignoring or turning a blind eye to the wrongful acts of their servants or agents or by supplying information to assist those servants or agents in their wrongful acts or by encouraging others to commit a wrongful act." “
“An inquiry into the death of Billy Wright, in the Maze prison in 1997, took issue with the emphasis on connivance.
“ "For our part we consider that the essence of collusion is an agreement or arrangement between individuals or organisations, including government departments, to achieve an unlawful or improper purpose. The purpose may also be fraudulent or underhand."
“Her successor as police ombudsman, Al Hutchinson, applied a less broad definition in his report on the attack, in 1971, on McGurk's Bar.
“In the report he wrote: "The essence of collusion requires that a number of elements be present. Not only must there usually be an agreement between two or more parties, but there is also an additional requirement that a sufficiency of evidence exists to establish, on balance, that the act or omission complained of was deliberate and not merely negligent or inadvertent." “
Wed, 12 Dec 2012 - 20:39:44: Independent Editorial: Finucane lays bare the amoral face of Britain - MI5, police & Army's truly shocking behaviour. http://ind.pn/Sd5CpQ
Wed, 12 Dec 2012 - 20:53:43: It's going on today only much worse in London all reported to everybody including the Prime Minister, but no one does anything about it. Where is the “shocking” from him?
There is an alternate government determining life and death in the community attacking innocent people like me with distributed surveillance amongst neighbours for the power of those involved: police, NHS & various government departments. Collusion. Where's the media?
Hashing over the past is important, but dealing with the present is more so. No one wants to believe this could be happening. Everyone blames the victim. That's why it's happening just like all the rest of the historical abuse we're reading about today. [Posted to The Independent for above]
Thu, 20 Dec 2012 - 00:09:43: Telegraph - I fear Andrew Mitchell was set up, says Labour MP. Police Federation reshuffled gov? I can believe it.
Wednesday, 19 December 2012
“Polish It” means Fabricate
Wed, 19 Dec 2012 - 19:17:50: Mail Online - Plebgate: Fake 'plebgate' email that forced out Andrew Mitchell is revealed.
The problem between Andrew Mitchell and the Metropolitan Police officers is not to be taken as an isolated event. It exists within the context of what I've experienced directly for some 14+ years 24/7/365 in London's North Kensington as a massive effort to fabricate, called "polishing," to protect people as they carry out misdeeds and advance careers based upon a hoax carried out against one person.
The real problem occurs when I report what is happening, as I have been doing continuously since the beginning of the surveillance technology abuse from mid-August 1998, and nothing is done including extensive reporting to the police themselves from the top down all these years.
That doesn't mean the police are corrupt as a whole. There are many officers, in fact probably the majority, who are dedicated to doing the best job possible on behalf of law enforcement and protecting the public legitimately. However, those who do otherwise can dominate a wide section of police officers inside the police because of the fear to go against fellow officers due to retribution.
The most serious aspect of this failure over all these years is that such fabrication reaches to the top of government as has occurred here where apparently a police officer felt that he could make up a story using fabricated logs to bring down a minister in the government. The police then become an instrument of fear as has occurred with Damian Green and his family in 2008 when they arrested him and entered Parliament to search his office as well as his home. He is now the Minister of State for Police and Criminal Justice.
This whole episode has to be properly evaluated by the Metropolitan Police, but the video as shown in this BBC News article is quite devastating:
Wed, 19 Dec 2012 - 12:30:09: BBC News - 'Pleb' row: Claims extremely serious, says Met. Watch video report with 2 videos of scene. Astounding.
Wed, 19 Dec 2012 - 12:33:44: “We’re running it,” said a male from the kitchen window direction that sounded like Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret. If this was he, they (Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret and BS the mother of the abused children) are running an indefinite surveillance operation carried out for as long as it takes to destroy based upon fabrications with which an extended number of people and departments of government collude. This has been in operation against me for 14 years and four months 24/7/365 since mid-August 1998.
Fabrication and violence have become the standard in the community as I've experienced and keep reporting. This is how the adults behave in this environment and how the children are being taught to behave. Fundamentally, there is no law enforcement here, and Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret is operating a military surveillance operation where he is apparently above the law. Those using the surveillance technology, now on a distributed basis to neighbours as well, as I once again experienced last night are operating outside the democratic rule of law based upon fabrications and are allowed to do so.
They have been allowed to take the law into their own hands while the police stand by and watch based upon a long history of doing so including participating in the extreme abuse without doing anything to enforce the law properly. This has been allowed to grow to this point over these years and spread this standard so that these kinds of fabrications emerge at the top as has apparently occurred in the incident involving Andrew Mitchell and the Metropolitan Police at the gate to Number Ten.
Perhaps Andrew Mitchell's call for an inquiry should be heeded.
Wed, 19 Dec 2012 - 15:39:07: Channel 4 News - Andrew Mitchell 'plebgate' row: the key questions and answers. Well worth reading this.
Wed, 19 Dec 2012 - 16:16:51: The Washington Post - UK police investigating claims officer fabricated evidence against ‘plebgate’ politician.
The problem between Andrew Mitchell and the Metropolitan Police officers is not to be taken as an isolated event. It exists within the context of what I've experienced directly for some 14+ years 24/7/365 in London's North Kensington as a massive effort to fabricate, called "polishing," to protect people as they carry out misdeeds and advance careers based upon a hoax carried out against one person.
The real problem occurs when I report what is happening, as I have been doing continuously since the beginning of the surveillance technology abuse from mid-August 1998, and nothing is done including extensive reporting to the police themselves from the top down all these years.
That doesn't mean the police are corrupt as a whole. There are many officers, in fact probably the majority, who are dedicated to doing the best job possible on behalf of law enforcement and protecting the public legitimately. However, those who do otherwise can dominate a wide section of police officers inside the police because of the fear to go against fellow officers due to retribution.
The most serious aspect of this failure over all these years is that such fabrication reaches to the top of government as has occurred here where apparently a police officer felt that he could make up a story using fabricated logs to bring down a minister in the government. The police then become an instrument of fear as has occurred with Damian Green and his family in 2008 when they arrested him and entered Parliament to search his office as well as his home. He is now the Minister of State for Police and Criminal Justice.
This whole episode has to be properly evaluated by the Metropolitan Police, but the video as shown in this BBC News article is quite devastating:
Wed, 19 Dec 2012 - 12:30:09: BBC News - 'Pleb' row: Claims extremely serious, says Met. Watch video report with 2 videos of scene. Astounding.
Wed, 19 Dec 2012 - 12:33:44: “We’re running it,” said a male from the kitchen window direction that sounded like Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret. If this was he, they (Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret and BS the mother of the abused children) are running an indefinite surveillance operation carried out for as long as it takes to destroy based upon fabrications with which an extended number of people and departments of government collude. This has been in operation against me for 14 years and four months 24/7/365 since mid-August 1998.
Fabrication and violence have become the standard in the community as I've experienced and keep reporting. This is how the adults behave in this environment and how the children are being taught to behave. Fundamentally, there is no law enforcement here, and Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret is operating a military surveillance operation where he is apparently above the law. Those using the surveillance technology, now on a distributed basis to neighbours as well, as I once again experienced last night are operating outside the democratic rule of law based upon fabrications and are allowed to do so.
They have been allowed to take the law into their own hands while the police stand by and watch based upon a long history of doing so including participating in the extreme abuse without doing anything to enforce the law properly. This has been allowed to grow to this point over these years and spread this standard so that these kinds of fabrications emerge at the top as has apparently occurred in the incident involving Andrew Mitchell and the Metropolitan Police at the gate to Number Ten.
Perhaps Andrew Mitchell's call for an inquiry should be heeded.
Wed, 19 Dec 2012 - 15:39:07: Channel 4 News - Andrew Mitchell 'plebgate' row: the key questions and answers. Well worth reading this.
Wed, 19 Dec 2012 - 16:16:51: The Washington Post - UK police investigating claims officer fabricated evidence against ‘plebgate’ politician.
Monday, 17 December 2012
Violence in people is the source of the problem
Violent people manufacture a threat in order to be violent. They are called bullies.
Viciously violent people try to create violence in others to the point of manufacturing extreme violence to make them appear less violent while they carry out their violence against their scapegoat blaming their victim and covering up what they are actually doing by the abuse of surveillance technology 24/7/365 for 14 years and four months since mid-August 1998 as has been done to me.
There is all of this effort against guns and knives in the UK, but those reported for violent child abuse and ongoing general violence have been given surveillance technology to use as a weapon both perpetuating violence and hiding it at the same time while they have also been armed with guns and talk of slashing and sticking with knives as well.
The violence is being perpetuated by the government in this instance with people taking on the mantle of government which they believe permits them to be violent. These people brag about how important they are showing off their guns to prove that they are up against someone who is definitely violent when it’s all fabricated. Thus, the police have themselves introduced guns into the community on the same basis that others carry them for self protection which the police are trying to stop.
Mon, 17 Dec 2012 - 14:58:52: BBC News - Wales child abuse: 105 cases being investigated from those now residing in 22 police forces & Ireland
"Follow the evidence without fear or favour," said the police at the National Crime Agency (NCA) who are investigating the 105 child abuse claims to date from the 40 North Wales care homes. Violent people, i.e., bullies, pick on the vulnerable. Surveillance makes everyone vulnerable. Where is the “without fear or favour” in this London environment by the police after I reported child abuse in May 1998? Where is it now? The fear is manufactured and the favour is present to maintain power to cover up the crimes while blaming their surveillance target victim.
Mon, 17 Dec 2012 - 12:22:53: BBC News - Queen to attend cabinet meeting for first time tmrw 18 Dec in runup to my 15th Xmas as surveillance target.
Will it do any good to address the problem of violence?
Viciously violent people try to create violence in others to the point of manufacturing extreme violence to make them appear less violent while they carry out their violence against their scapegoat blaming their victim and covering up what they are actually doing by the abuse of surveillance technology 24/7/365 for 14 years and four months since mid-August 1998 as has been done to me.
There is all of this effort against guns and knives in the UK, but those reported for violent child abuse and ongoing general violence have been given surveillance technology to use as a weapon both perpetuating violence and hiding it at the same time while they have also been armed with guns and talk of slashing and sticking with knives as well.
The violence is being perpetuated by the government in this instance with people taking on the mantle of government which they believe permits them to be violent. These people brag about how important they are showing off their guns to prove that they are up against someone who is definitely violent when it’s all fabricated. Thus, the police have themselves introduced guns into the community on the same basis that others carry them for self protection which the police are trying to stop.
Mon, 17 Dec 2012 - 14:58:52: BBC News - Wales child abuse: 105 cases being investigated from those now residing in 22 police forces & Ireland
"Follow the evidence without fear or favour," said the police at the National Crime Agency (NCA) who are investigating the 105 child abuse claims to date from the 40 North Wales care homes. Violent people, i.e., bullies, pick on the vulnerable. Surveillance makes everyone vulnerable. Where is the “without fear or favour” in this London environment by the police after I reported child abuse in May 1998? Where is it now? The fear is manufactured and the favour is present to maintain power to cover up the crimes while blaming their surveillance target victim.
Mon, 17 Dec 2012 - 12:22:53: BBC News - Queen to attend cabinet meeting for first time tmrw 18 Dec in runup to my 15th Xmas as surveillance target.
Will it do any good to address the problem of violence?
Saturday, 1 December 2012
"The Experiment" 2010 Film Drawn on 1971 Stanford Prison Experiment
1. Cruelty in Society as a "Norm"
Sat, 01 Dec 2012 - 21:19:39: Mail Online - Abuse of elderly patients by NHS staff rises by a third in one year with a shocking 36,000 offences
"Some 36,600 offences were reported last year, mainly involving neglect, physical violence or bullying.
"But only this week the Health Secretary [Jeremy Hunt] admitted that ‘cruelty’ had become ‘normal’ in some health and social care organisations.
"Katherine Murphy, chief executive of the Patients’ Association, said: ‘This is a sad indictment of society. People are being abused by the supposedly caring professional who is meant to be looking after them.'
"Nearly 40 per cent of cases took place in the patient’s own home, 33 per cent happened in care homes and the remainder occurred in hospitals or day centres."
What happens when the NHS rolls out into the community with neurologically based surveillance technology for social control experimentation? Blame the victim cover up.
Sat, 01 Dec 2012 - 19:06:48: Stanford Prison Experiment: A Simulation Study of the Psychology of Imprisonment conducted by Phil Zimbardo Aug 1971
After reading the below comments about the film, I urge you to read the description of the actual 1971 experiment provided at the link above.
3. 2010 Film "The Experiment"
Sat, 01 Dec 2012 - 19:25:34: Wikipedia-The Experiment (2010 film) adapted fm 2001 German film of same name based on 1971 Stanford Prison Experiment
After viewing the above film on DVD, I sent the following Email to one of its producers:
Jeanette Buerling
Founder / Co-CEO
Magnet Media Group
468 N. Camden Dr. #200
Beverly Hills, CA 90210
Dear Ms Buerling
I've just finished watching a DVD of "The Experiment" and its special features noting your comments especially regarding these academic experiments and their impact or lack thereof along with questioning what they do with them. I also noted your saying that the abuse portrayed goes on all the time. It surely does, and no matter what is done it is not stopped in the real world today.
I've also viewed your magnificent film accompanied by those who have had me imprisoned by surveillance technology for 14 years and 3.5 months since mid-August 1998 using this as a weapon 24/7/365 to carry out the imprisonment, torture, medical experimentation, surveillance technology R&D and its ultimately lethal use.
This film has had no impact on them to deter their behaviour just as my viewings of "Das Experiment" on BBC4 a couple times earlier in London have had no impact in stopping this abuse. What emerges about Abu Ghraib and British torture as well as that from Guantanamo Bay has not had the least impact on stopping their imprisonment and torture with surveillance technology. The exposure of rendition flowed off their backs like water off a duck's back.
The most sophisticated surveillance technology ever known to human civilisation was introduced here against me in February 2001 by a Colonel Vine USMC Ret/Reserves, Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret/Reserves and others into an already existing surveillance operation that had been in existence for 2.5 years already.
The key person from that initial British operation was the mother of the abused children I had reported for child abuse in May 1998. She and her family group managed to get surveillance technology installed against me from an adjacent flat of which they had use to begin immediate 24/7/365 torture since they could see me inside my home. They were using radar imaging device(s) and other surveillance technology including Tempest against my computers.
These same people are still at it and hundreds have been involved all these years. No amount of communication to all and sundry in the UK and US has ever made a dent in stopping this at all at any time throughout all these years.
The reason is that these two key personalities, the mother of the abused children and Bird, are psychopaths. They do not have the human decency factor, i.e., conscience. This is lacking in about 1% of the population. This is why at this point nothing results from the research and presentations of such works as yours to alter the course of this abusive behaviour.
There is obviously some research that has been present for decades (Robert Hare) and law enforcement (FBI), but it just has not gotten the widespread recognition that is needed. People just do not understand the psychopathic personality in order to be able to recognise it so far, and it cannot be diagnosed by conventional methods of assessment. There must be a behavioural analysis. See John Douglas' book "Mindhunter."
This is not enough. There's more. 60% of the population is disposed to sadistic abuse, and they will follow the psychopaths especially if there is some pretext of official sanctioning underway. There has been research and comments about this problem from the likes of Erich Fromm in his 1973 book "The Anatomy of Human Destructiveness" where he described both the Stanley Milgram experiment at Yale in the early 1960s and the Stanford University experiment that had to be shut down without apparent comment since it was so disastrous as you depicted.
Martha Stout has taken the Milgram experiment further in her book "The Sociopath Next Door" by discussing his ongoing work in the 1960s to show that the 60% of people who were sadistically disposed was true for any group he assembled in different locations. Michael Portillo (former MP and Secretary of Defense in the UK) repeated Stanley Milgram's experiment on a BBC programme with the same 60% results.
The extraordinary difficulty in identifying the brutal psychopath can be seen in Ann Rule's book about Ted Bundy "The Stranger Beside Me." She worked with him in a suicide help line call centre and went for years before she could fully accept the fact that he was the psychopathic serial killer that in reality he turned out to be when he finally confessed to the 30+ murders shortly before his execution.
I wanted to tell you what a fine film "The Experiment" is from someone who has been subjected to that identical kind of abuse but on an extended basis for 14+ years in the real world today. In fact, an observer with the mother of the abused children and Bird said that this was the way they behaved while watching the film a little while ago. Still, it does no good.
I wanted to answer the question you posed in this context as well given some of the reading I've done to explore the character of these kinds of people and those who are susceptible to sadistic behaviour. There is much more happening here, and those involved are now an extended cult since the surveillance technology has been distributed into neighbouring flats where these people participate in the around-the-clock torture abuse as well as those who come from elsewhere to participate.
I want to offer you, if you are interested, my assistance and my information about what is happening if you might want to pursue this activity professionally for a film. I think that by addressing today's abuse as it exists in the real world you can make a significant contribution to communicating its understanding to a mass audience so that this problem can be moved forward to changing the world to prevent this kind of abuse in most of its aspects.
What you have to come to grips with is the neuroscience based surveillance technology that is being used and developed by the US and UK authorities to which I've been subjected since February 2001. That is probably the most difficult subject to grasp. It uses the principle of Tempest to monitor the human brain and its activity which has been accomplished quite successfully including feedback.
One other point that might be of interest to you as a film maker is the 1963 book and its 1976 film "The Sailor who fell from grace with the sea" with Sarah Miles and Kris Kristofferson. This deals with the psychological grooming of a group of 13-year-old boys by their "Chief" whom I view to be psychopathic.
This depicts the development of this kind of personality and others who are trained to behave this way. The principles involved are stunningly similar to this situation which is universal since this is a Japanese novel upon which the British film was based. Also, in this case the director wrote the screenplay, and I think did a magnificent job adapting the novel.
All the best
Gary
PS I'm going to be viewing "The Experiment" from time to time to study and note its aspects while putting it in the face of those carrying out the surveillance technology abuse against me and any others who are present from time to time. This will not phase the key people because the psychopathic are without conscience and go on behaving as if they will never get caught or stopped.
Further, I will be sending along with my various correspondence sent virtually each day about the continuous torture trying to get it stopped a recommendation for them to see your film so that they can see themselves. Thanks for making this film. It is marvelous, and I hope that it will begin to sink in where it can count the most.
Sat, 01 Dec 2012 - 21:19:39: Mail Online - Abuse of elderly patients by NHS staff rises by a third in one year with a shocking 36,000 offences
"Some 36,600 offences were reported last year, mainly involving neglect, physical violence or bullying.
"But only this week the Health Secretary [Jeremy Hunt] admitted that ‘cruelty’ had become ‘normal’ in some health and social care organisations.
"Katherine Murphy, chief executive of the Patients’ Association, said: ‘This is a sad indictment of society. People are being abused by the supposedly caring professional who is meant to be looking after them.'
"Nearly 40 per cent of cases took place in the patient’s own home, 33 per cent happened in care homes and the remainder occurred in hospitals or day centres."
What happens when the NHS rolls out into the community with neurologically based surveillance technology for social control experimentation? Blame the victim cover up.
Sat, 01 Dec 2012 - 19:06:48: Stanford Prison Experiment: A Simulation Study of the Psychology of Imprisonment conducted by Phil Zimbardo Aug 1971
After reading the below comments about the film, I urge you to read the description of the actual 1971 experiment provided at the link above.
3. 2010 Film "The Experiment"
Sat, 01 Dec 2012 - 19:25:34: Wikipedia-The Experiment (2010 film) adapted fm 2001 German film of same name based on 1971 Stanford Prison Experiment
After viewing the above film on DVD, I sent the following Email to one of its producers:
Jeanette Buerling
Founder / Co-CEO
Magnet Media Group
468 N. Camden Dr. #200
Beverly Hills, CA 90210
Dear Ms Buerling
I've just finished watching a DVD of "The Experiment" and its special features noting your comments especially regarding these academic experiments and their impact or lack thereof along with questioning what they do with them. I also noted your saying that the abuse portrayed goes on all the time. It surely does, and no matter what is done it is not stopped in the real world today.
I've also viewed your magnificent film accompanied by those who have had me imprisoned by surveillance technology for 14 years and 3.5 months since mid-August 1998 using this as a weapon 24/7/365 to carry out the imprisonment, torture, medical experimentation, surveillance technology R&D and its ultimately lethal use.
This film has had no impact on them to deter their behaviour just as my viewings of "Das Experiment" on BBC4 a couple times earlier in London have had no impact in stopping this abuse. What emerges about Abu Ghraib and British torture as well as that from Guantanamo Bay has not had the least impact on stopping their imprisonment and torture with surveillance technology. The exposure of rendition flowed off their backs like water off a duck's back.
The most sophisticated surveillance technology ever known to human civilisation was introduced here against me in February 2001 by a Colonel Vine USMC Ret/Reserves, Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret/Reserves and others into an already existing surveillance operation that had been in existence for 2.5 years already.
The key person from that initial British operation was the mother of the abused children I had reported for child abuse in May 1998. She and her family group managed to get surveillance technology installed against me from an adjacent flat of which they had use to begin immediate 24/7/365 torture since they could see me inside my home. They were using radar imaging device(s) and other surveillance technology including Tempest against my computers.
These same people are still at it and hundreds have been involved all these years. No amount of communication to all and sundry in the UK and US has ever made a dent in stopping this at all at any time throughout all these years.
The reason is that these two key personalities, the mother of the abused children and Bird, are psychopaths. They do not have the human decency factor, i.e., conscience. This is lacking in about 1% of the population. This is why at this point nothing results from the research and presentations of such works as yours to alter the course of this abusive behaviour.
There is obviously some research that has been present for decades (Robert Hare) and law enforcement (FBI), but it just has not gotten the widespread recognition that is needed. People just do not understand the psychopathic personality in order to be able to recognise it so far, and it cannot be diagnosed by conventional methods of assessment. There must be a behavioural analysis. See John Douglas' book "Mindhunter."
This is not enough. There's more. 60% of the population is disposed to sadistic abuse, and they will follow the psychopaths especially if there is some pretext of official sanctioning underway. There has been research and comments about this problem from the likes of Erich Fromm in his 1973 book "The Anatomy of Human Destructiveness" where he described both the Stanley Milgram experiment at Yale in the early 1960s and the Stanford University experiment that had to be shut down without apparent comment since it was so disastrous as you depicted.
Martha Stout has taken the Milgram experiment further in her book "The Sociopath Next Door" by discussing his ongoing work in the 1960s to show that the 60% of people who were sadistically disposed was true for any group he assembled in different locations. Michael Portillo (former MP and Secretary of Defense in the UK) repeated Stanley Milgram's experiment on a BBC programme with the same 60% results.
The extraordinary difficulty in identifying the brutal psychopath can be seen in Ann Rule's book about Ted Bundy "The Stranger Beside Me." She worked with him in a suicide help line call centre and went for years before she could fully accept the fact that he was the psychopathic serial killer that in reality he turned out to be when he finally confessed to the 30+ murders shortly before his execution.
I wanted to tell you what a fine film "The Experiment" is from someone who has been subjected to that identical kind of abuse but on an extended basis for 14+ years in the real world today. In fact, an observer with the mother of the abused children and Bird said that this was the way they behaved while watching the film a little while ago. Still, it does no good.
I wanted to answer the question you posed in this context as well given some of the reading I've done to explore the character of these kinds of people and those who are susceptible to sadistic behaviour. There is much more happening here, and those involved are now an extended cult since the surveillance technology has been distributed into neighbouring flats where these people participate in the around-the-clock torture abuse as well as those who come from elsewhere to participate.
I want to offer you, if you are interested, my assistance and my information about what is happening if you might want to pursue this activity professionally for a film. I think that by addressing today's abuse as it exists in the real world you can make a significant contribution to communicating its understanding to a mass audience so that this problem can be moved forward to changing the world to prevent this kind of abuse in most of its aspects.
What you have to come to grips with is the neuroscience based surveillance technology that is being used and developed by the US and UK authorities to which I've been subjected since February 2001. That is probably the most difficult subject to grasp. It uses the principle of Tempest to monitor the human brain and its activity which has been accomplished quite successfully including feedback.
One other point that might be of interest to you as a film maker is the 1963 book and its 1976 film "The Sailor who fell from grace with the sea" with Sarah Miles and Kris Kristofferson. This deals with the psychological grooming of a group of 13-year-old boys by their "Chief" whom I view to be psychopathic.
This depicts the development of this kind of personality and others who are trained to behave this way. The principles involved are stunningly similar to this situation which is universal since this is a Japanese novel upon which the British film was based. Also, in this case the director wrote the screenplay, and I think did a magnificent job adapting the novel.
All the best
Gary
PS I'm going to be viewing "The Experiment" from time to time to study and note its aspects while putting it in the face of those carrying out the surveillance technology abuse against me and any others who are present from time to time. This will not phase the key people because the psychopathic are without conscience and go on behaving as if they will never get caught or stopped.
Further, I will be sending along with my various correspondence sent virtually each day about the continuous torture trying to get it stopped a recommendation for them to see your film so that they can see themselves. Thanks for making this film. It is marvelous, and I hope that it will begin to sink in where it can count the most.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)