Full Truth of JFK's Assassination Needs Light of Day

Review: JFK's Last Hundred Days: The Transformation of a Man and the Emergence of a Great President By Thurston Clarke

Mon 11.11.2013: JFK's political side probably brought down the wrath of Pentagon extremists after the private, secret deal he did with Khrushchev to pull US Jupiter missiles out of Turkey as a quid pro quo over Cuba

Date: 11-11-2013 16:24

William B Shavelson
Editor in Chief
Columbia Magazine

Dear Mr Shavelson

I agree with Thurston Clarke's assessment of JFK as reviewed by William Keylor about his book in "Autumn of the President." The world would be completely different today had he lived. I served in the USAF Security Service from 1961 to 1964 while JFK was in office until his tragic assassination 50 years ago. I served from the Berlin Wall's building to the election of LBJ and spent 18 months at its HQ in San Antonio during which the Cuban Missile Crisis occurred.

I had been just three weeks into my one-year tour in Trabzon, Turkey, on the Black Sea 90 miles from the Soviet border at Hopa, Georgia, when he was assassinated. I am surprised, however, by this time that the myth he "stared down" Khrushchev over Cuba is not fully recognised for what really happened. He bargained on his own with the Soviet leader and agreed to swap out the aging US Jupiter missiles from Turkey for the withdrawal of Soviet missiles from Cuba. Nobody knew about this except a few people [See James Bamford's Body of Secrets]. He kept it a secret from the American public with mid-term elections pending in early November 1962. [See Seymour Hersh, The Dark Side of Camelot, chapter 20: Missile Crisis]

This did not become public in the US for over 20 years. While I was stationed at Trabzon, I met several employees of Hawker-Siddely (diesel engines) and Marconi (electronics) who were working under NATO contract to retrain Turkish missile men into radar at Rize which was on the Black Sea half way to the Soviet border from Trabzon. They were from England, Scotland, Ireland and France. This was not classified information and was openly known. Still, I never said anything about it and never heard anything for decades until the 1980s. I worked in an area that did not officially exist and was completely unkown. I Never Said Anything for decades.

I think the secrecy was a huge mistake, and in a democracy such as the US the public should have been told. He created a political image, but his actions were different from that image which left him open to blackmail by the Soviet Union for making a secret deal with Khrushchev. This had to send some of the ultra right-wing generals at the Pentagon into the stratosphere for they surely learned about it. After all, NATO was involved.

Also, JFK wouldn't accept the Army's lie as described by Neil Sheehan in his "Bright and Shining Lie" from the beginning of 1963 when the South Vietnamese Army were not willing or able to undertake the fighting against the Viet Cong. He wanted to withdraw from South Vietnam as described, but the president of South Vietnam was assassinated just three weeks before JFK. The CIA was on the move, and Mongoose might very well have been out of control and operating beyond JFK's knowledge. I believe that the full information about his assassination has still to see the light of day.

Sincerely yours

Gary D Chance, '69 GS, '73 GSB

Virtually no military alert was made when JFK assassinated except by CINCPAC, documents altered & code books missing. [Twitter]

Columbia Professors Discuss the Legacy of President John F. Kennedy including the Peace Corps

Surveillance Violence Creates Captivity & Enslavement

These two news articles today when put together explain how it is possible to imprison and enslave someone indefinitely by surveillance technology while carrying out a long drawn out assassination.

1. British Soldiers in Belfast 40 years ago terrorise just as the US Marines have been terrorising London since mid-February 2001

Undercover soldiers 'killed unarmed civilians in Belfast' 40 years ago

1136
See BBC One's Panorama tonight at 2100 for Britain's Secret Terror Force. These British soldiers acted out of uniform to carry out surveillance from the gutter vantage point as dustmen and similar workers.

Today the same goes on in London's North Kensington against me with US Marines using the most sophisticated surveillance technology ever known that they introduced with their arrival in February 2001. They and others with them threaten to kill continuously as part of their torture abuse. They are actually killing, however, with electronic weapons at the same time while causing as much damage as possible hoping to discredit what I report by blaming their innocent victim (me). They do not wear uniforms and participate in the community with those I reported for child abuse as far back as 1998.

They have expanded this operation by distributing the surveillance technology to neighbours apparently at a price for profit and have also used me as an additional non-consenting marketing guinea pig to attempt to sell the surveillance technology on a wider basis. At the same time they are trying to take over all my property and my home by eliminating me. This totally invasive surveillance technology violence has become a standard of my daily life 24/7/365 since mid-August 1998.

Will it be 40 years before this is revealed too?

Are the US Marines an occupying force in the United Kingdom as the British were in Northern Ireland?

2. Three women enslaved for 30 years in London's Lambeth


The police say:

1. The women had a controlled existence with some degree of freedom; and

2. The police have never seen anything on this scale before (length of time).

The police have been knowing participants in my enslavement and captivity with torture by surveillance technology for over 15 years 24/7/365 since mid-August 1998, and they are making every effort to wipe me out now to cover up this horrendous crime in which they are directly involved.

1546
3 women 'held as slaves for 30 years' in S London aged 69 (Malaysan), 57 (Irish) & 30 (British). A male & female aged 67 are being held by police. A television programme on forced marriages brought one of them to contact a charity who then informed police. I am not surprised by this at all and wait to see the full information disclosed.

One wonders about slavery in the UK where the right to life is allowed to be denied for decades even while everyone knows about it as has occurred in my direct experience for over 15 years by those using surveillance technology against me whom I initially reported for child abuse in May 1998.

They keep me enslaved by surveillance technology stealing all that I do and using it in an inverted fashion as their own work against me although it is about them. They maintain false allegations against me to discredit the truth about what I report which has just happened again with an hysterical vigilante mob running around outside making these false allegations.

They seek to destroy, blame me for what they are doing and take over everything for themselves by using the police and NHS through their non-stop false allegations which can be seen to be false. The government has been so duped and misled that it has been trapped in this web of image deception that those involved want to perpetuate it goes beyond identity theft constituting the theft of life itself which is the new crime based upon surveillance technology abuse 24/7/365 by the same people indefinitely until they succeed. [Facebook]

@BBCNews Home Secy shocked by appalling 3 decades of enslavement needs to be asked why she ignored my continuous Emails & had them spiked. [Twitter]

Abusive Management Creates Child Protection Workers' Pressure

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-24999826

77% said the increased thresholds were due to increased referrals.

"One respondent told the survey: "We were told if you have a teenager on your case who is 14 to 16 years old then they cannot have child protection plans anymore because they are either deemed 'capable of voting with their feet' or 'able to self-protect'." "

Oh, good, a 14-year-old gets to run away from home and be subjected to the street predators instead but deemed capable of self protection. The abusers are managing the system.

In a world of phenomenal technological advances, why is it that the most sophisticated surveillance technology ever known has been given to those whom I reported for child abuse along with others reported for antisocial behaviour and crimes?

This has been going on indefinitely 24/7/365 since 1998 and continues as of this writing. The abusers have come to dominate and control government.

Family and Children Services in Kensington & Chelsea merged into Westminster and Hammersmith & Fulham councils at the end of 2010. Obviously, the budget whatever it was could not possibly handle child abusers who were using the most sophisticated surveillance technology ever known. That must have been quite expensive as child abuse flourished and grew.

When I tried to report this at the end of 1999 to the Prime Minister, I was summoned before a couple psychiatrists at the nearby St Charles Hospital where my letter to the Prime Minister was displayed to me in a folder bearing my name. I had described the ongoing child abuse that summer where the abused child was acting out violence against other children as he continued to receive abuse.

I was the one who was then subjected to extreme abuse by these psychiatrists and a psychiatric nurse who joined in the surveillance technology abuse against me. When I met with them in early 2000, it was the time when Victoria Climbie was being tortured to death. They paid no attention to the fact that I was reporting child abuse and reiterating it to them. They did not listen to me and embarked on an abuse campaign against me instead.

This year I was once again summoned to attend a meeting with one of these psychiatrists with whom I would have nothing to do and filed a complaint. My third major complaint over these years. Part of the complaint resolution was an invitation to make an appointment with them. Yesterday Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt said he had never met a doctor who did not want to help patients. There are many Dr Shipmans in the NHS and many doctors who mis-prescribe medications for the wrong reasons such as powerful antipsychotics as calmatives that have serious side effects. These doctors are helping themselves not the patients.

The police have been the same. Try to file a complaint against the police with the IPCC as I have done this year and see what happens. Those charged with protecting children not only fail to do so but set up a process so that child abuse can continue which is covered up by all those involved who seek to blame and eradicate the person who reports the child abuse. Jimmy Savile flourished in the NHS, and the police did not act properly when complaints were made in numerous locations around the country. This goes on today as of this writing still.

The problem is far from solved, and those charged with child protection fail miserably bringing about all the pressure on themselves about which they complain. No one wants to get involved with people like these so high vacancy rates develop. Then along comes Jeremy Hunt who pretends these kinds of violently destructive problems are so rare that he's never met a psychopathic doctor when 1% of the population is psychopathic. How many people are employed by the NHS? How many psychopathic personalities become involved in child protection who happen to be child abusers and set up a structure of institutionalised child abuse?

1117
@BBCNews Child protection workers under terrific pressure? Are they being screamed at and beaten? Think about pressure abused children suffer. [Twitter]

" "A child disclosed he'd been hit by his father; there were significant injuries to substantiate. The child then confirmed regular abuse - the first time social care became aware of it.

" "A decision was made by higher management to allow the child to stay home, therefore reducing child protection numbers." "

1130
@BBCNews Child protection workers do not get sympathy from me when abusers I reported in 1998 given surveillance & still using it to abuse. [Twitter] 

UK Human Rights Abuses While David Cameron in Sri Lanka & Charles Clarke at Phone Hacking Trial

 I.  Prime Minister David Cameron in Sri Lanka with Human Rights Issues
 
1047
@BBCNews Mr Cameron ignores London human rights violations by Colonel Vine USMC (Res/Ret) who went to Sri Lanka fm here just after tsunami. [Twitter]

Sri Lankan 'war crimes' warning for UK PM Cameron  who proposes to raise human rights issues re 2009 Tamil bombings.

Colonel Vine USMC (Ret/Res) who set up surveillance technology abuse against me in February 2001 with Lt Harry Bird USMC (Ret/Res) went to Sri Lanka just after the tsunami on Boxing Day 2004. He had gone to Kabul at the end of 2001 just after the successful invasion of that country. He's an apparent frequent traveler to trouble spots like these at critical times which I believe are connected with bringing his extreme suppressive activities to areas of insurgency throughout the world.

So far this surveillance technology operation against me in London's North Kensington continues 24/7/365 consisting of imprisonment, torture interrogation under threat of death, medical experimentation and surveillance technology R&D. While the Tamil Tigers were blocked from escape and bombed, those using the surveillance technology against me in effect do the same thing only with electronic weapons on a continuous experimental basis.

David Cameron has received extensive information from me about this for many years. His proposed critical words in Sri Lanka to shine a light on the problem there reflects extreme hypocrisy since he does not address a similar problem in London about which he is fully aware. The activity being carried out against me is lethal and appears to be exported elsewhere.

"Asked about the comments, Mr Cameron maintained he was right to raise questions, adding: "That's exactly what I'll be doing."

"The UN estimates that 40,000 civilians were killed in the last five months of the 26-year conflict but the Sri Lankan authorities deny responsibility.

"British media in Sri Lanka who have been asking questions about the government's human rights record have struggled to get answers.

"A Channel 4 documentary team was forced to give up on reaching the north of the south Asian state after being stopped by pro-government demonstrators.

"Many critical Sri Lankan journalists have been murdered, the BBC's diplomatic correspondent James Robbins says." [Facebook]

1219
@BBCNews @David_Cameron Would you kindly shine a light on 15+ years 24/7/365 surveillance human rights abuses in London's N Kensington plse? [Twitter]



II.  Former Home Secretary Charles Clarke (Dec 2004 to June 2006) Testifies at the News of the World (NoW) Phone Hacking Trial

1603
Charles Clarke adviser Hannah Pawlby 'was hacked by NoW'  along with family & a senior MI6 agent family friend in 2005.

BBC News Channel broadcast noted that Andy Coulson called her in June 2005. Here there are reported two phone messages left for her regarding an important story apparently involving the false allegations against her and Mr Clarke. She and others were hacked at least 12 times noted by evidence found by the police. The great tragedy is that this was just before the 7/7 deadly London terror attack. It is outrageous that the NoW was hacking the Home Secretary's personal adviser and a senior MI6 agent at this time about false sewer allegations.

Even worse, however, was the fact that the Home Office was involved in a far worse surveillance operation against me and had been for years since 1998 at this time in 2005. I received the first of two abusive letters from the Home Office's Simon Watkin dated 3rd March 2005 (link to this letter posted here a couple days ago) concerning my correspondence to the Home Secretary who was Charles Clarke at this time having just taken over from David Blunkett in Dec 2004.

I was subjected to continuous 24/7/365 false allegations of the most destructive kind straight out of the sewer in an effort to "shut him down" in order to "break him down." I was then falsely accused by the Home Office of being mentally ill in order to deny my complaint by blaming me the victim.

I note here at this same time Charles Clarke was not deemed mentally ill and is testifying in court today on behalf of the prosecution against the NoW defendants when he was in charge of running a far worse abusive operation. [Facebook]


III.  Blocked from the Internet While in the Middle of the Above News and Postings

1251
@BBCNews Home Secy Charles Clarke phone hacked 2005 re non-existent affair, yet I received Home Ofc abusive letter re surveillance complaint [Twitter Posted But Internet Connection Blocked]

1357
@BBCNews Just like China here. I'm blocked from BBC News online by those surveillance hackers when PM in Sri Lanka & Charles Clarke at Court [Twitter apparently went through OK but could not be retrieved for my viewing]

1412
Android Tablet blocked from Internet completely now having sent the above Tweet when blocked from the BBC. This has been going on for over an hour since just before 1300 when I posted that Tweet about Charles Clarke above. Now the mother of the abused children and Lt Harry Bird USMC (Ret/Res) are making up a false allegation of the sewage kind to justify this blockage.

1434
Rebooted Android Tablet with no change after resetting router with WiFi connecting but no Google connection. Now, there is no WiFi connection.

1438
Reset router and WiFi with no connection from Google afterwards. Grey systray WiFi icon.

1441
@BBCNews Charles Clarke destroys NoW criminal prosecution since he did worse as Home Secretary setting this hacking standard and cover up. [Twitter Failed to retrieve]

1523
1. Prime Minister David Cameron is in Sri Lanka talking about human rights.
2. Former Home Secretary Charles Clarke is testifying at the NoW phone hacking trial.
3. I'm denied Internet access by surveillance hackers to suppress the truth about these.

1540
Connected to the Internet once again after resetting router and bringing Android Tablet back from sleep mode with blue systray icon appearing.

David Blunket Screams at Phone Hacking But Did Far Worse as Home Secretary

1533
@BBCNews David Blunkett complains about phone hacking? As Home Secretary, he continued totally invasive surveillance imprisonment torture [Twitter]

1622
Hacking jury hears David Blunkett voicemails

10 in 2005 while DWP Secy. Home Secy 06.2001 - 12.2004 & targeting me. [Twitter]

"In one message, [David Blunkett] said: "Someone very, very close has done a really phenomenal piece of work on destroying both our lives at this moment in time and it's vile.

" "Whoever it is I hope they rot in hell."

"He said: "I do think that someone has done a pretty good stitch-up job, chapter and verse, times, places, everything. That's pretty sophisticated to say the least."

"In another message, Mr Blunkett said: "The hyenas are still trying to get me but when I'm back I will shed a little light and they will all run back into the jungle again."

"The court then heard from Mr Blunkett's former special adviser, Huw Evans, who said he frequently spoke to the then home secretary on mobile phones and used voicemails, but knew calls could be intercepted.

" "We were very careful if we were having a conversation on a mobile to stick to a general subject or use coded language," he said."

After Mr Blunkett was DWP Secretary, he made a statement about which I made a comment in an Email to him at the time when he was a back bencher. He sent me a letter reply in which he noted that I was still suffering from a mental illness since I continued to describe quite accurately and objectively the non-stop, 24/7/365 surveillance technology abuse to which I was subjected.

This was the third letter I had received from those connectged with the Home Office when David Blunkett, Charles Clarke and John Reid were Home Secretaries. The first two described and provided by link below came from a Simon Watkin who persisted in this abuse by blaming the victim calling me mentally ill in each letter which was sent within the first few months of the tenure of Charles Clarke and John Reid.

I did not receive a reply while David Blunkett was Home Secretary, but I did get the same abusive content about mental illness from him personnally after he was a back bencher referring to the period of time when he was Home Secretary.

1633
Mr Blunkett has two standards: one for himself and another for other people whom he abused while Home Secretary continuing with totally invasive surveillance technology imprisonment and torture.

In the first Labour government (1997 - 2001) David Blunkett was Education and Employment Secretary. I directed correspondence to him because of the serious problems I encountered. He was made aware of the surveillance technology abuse against me at this time.

In the second Labour government (2001 - 2005) David Blunkett was Home Secretary until forced to resign in December 2004 over the Kimberly Quin affair. I sent him extensive correspondence about the ongoing surveillance abuse against me.

In the third Labour government David Blunkett was DWP Secretary until Nov 2005 for only six months. This is when these phone hacked voicemails occurred which were played in court today as described in this article. His condemnation of them is extreme, but the surveillance technology abuse against me goes on as of this writing 15+ years after it began revealing the legacy of his real character.

Why is Mr Blunkett not on trial for this? [Facebook]

1702
02.03.2005 Simon Watkin Home Office abuse reply letter to my Home Secy Emails to Charles Clarke after David Blunkett

Following extensive correspondence to Home Secretary David Blunkett, I provided further information to his successor, Charles Clarke, who assumed this position in December 2004 until he departed in May 2006.

By attacking me as being mentally ill for reporting the surveillance technology abuses to which I was subjected and having kept meticulously documented diary/logs of which some 60 of these were sent to the Home Secretary David Blunkett on a daily basis in July and August 2001 before 9/11, I took this letter as an attempt to cover up what had been done to me.

Four months after this letter and my extensive previous correspondence, London was subjected to a terrorist attack on 7th July 2005 with 52 killed and over 700 injured followed by a similar attempted attack on 21st July 2005 when the rucksack bombs failed to detonate properly. These two groups of terrorists have been linked with some of them living and operating not far away. Simon Watkin had worked in David Blunkett's private office and was involved with developing technology in the community. [Facebook]

1740
08.08.2006 2nd Simon Watkin Home Office abuse reply letter to my Home Secretary Emails to John Reid after Charles Clarke and David Blunkett

During this second Labour government. John Reid had just taken on this position in May 2006 after Mr Clarke's departure following an immigration records debacle and prisoner release fiasco.

John Reid went on to characterise the Home Office as "dysfunctional" and "unfit for purpose" which led to its being separated into two different departments with the Justice Department created for the courts and prison systems. 

Simon Watkin gets more abusive in this reply letter which I again took as an effort to hide what was actually going on and stop my correspondence about this extreme abuse of power which was continuing. Dr Reid was most certainly right, and Simon Watkin's correspondence to me reflected this problem where key issues were swept under the carpet by blaming the victim rather than addressing the problem. [Facebook]

Royal Marine's Murder Conviction Reflects Philip Zimbardo's Lucifer Effect, i.e., the Rotten Barrel

Marine guilty of Afghanistan murder of wounded insurgent

Other 2 cleared. Given what was said why were they cleared? I don't understand why they were not convicted as accessories to murder at the very least.

One of the others offered to shoot him in the head which was deemed too obvious by another.

They all refused to treat him before he was shot dead in the chest.

None of them reported what had happened, and there was a silence statement made with reference to the Geneva convention.

It was inadvertently filmed and recorded by a helmet camera which only accidentally became available when discovered on a notebook computer.

How can the other two go back to active duty?

The barrel is rotten here and needs very close examination including the legal procedures and foundation.

Is British military law capable of coping with serious incidents? [Facebook]

@BBCNews Phenomenally good interview with Robert Fox, Defence Editor, Evening Standard, re Royal Marine's execution conviction of Taliban. [Twitter]

Well, finally, the whole process of why these extreme abuses occur is emerging on the BBC News Channel. Robert Fox brought in the scope of the understanding which originated with Philip Zimbardo at Stanford in his 1971 prison experiment. He was a 1950s classmate in the Bronx with Sidney Milgram who did his famous experiment at Yale in the early 1960s where he found that 60% of the population was disposed to sadistic behaviour to the point of administering electronic shocks which could be lethal. Actually, they were both in the same graduating class in their Bronx high school.

Essentially, in the Zimbardo experiment and at Abu Ghraib, the fault was lack of supervision. The other problem that Zimbardo discovered which impacted himself was that those involved became indentified themselves with the institutional objectives and lapsed on human grounds. This is what Milgram brought out in his experiment where the 60% number results from people believing that they are participating in a sanctioned activity. Actually, Michael Portillo redid his experiment on the BBC during the past decade and came up with the same 60% number.

Matthew A's questions were superb as always, but it is not valid to say that so many behave properly: only 35% or sightly more do so. Only a very few will actually report what has happened. None did so in this instance. Others stand around and do nothing for the most part which is what actually happened in the Zimbardo experiment until a woman psychologist visited the faked prison with its inmates and guards, saw the cruelty and reacted vehemently against it telling Zimbardo he had to close it down which he did the following day.

Exactly the same thing has been happening in North Kensingon for over 15 years against me with surveillance technology that has been unsupervised so that it has run sadistically berserk with intense torture abuse 24/7/365. I have been imprisoned and tortured, subjected to medical experimentation and surveillance technology R&D by large groups of people at whose core is the mother of the children whom I reported for child abuse in May 1998 three months before the surveillance technology was given to her family group to use against me.

They were thus sanctioned by authority to use surveillance technology against me to cover up their abuse as they went on to increase it on a widespread basis. They were joined after 2.5 years of this torture by US Marines (Res/Ret) in February 2001 with their most sophisticated surveillance technology. This included a Colonel Vine, Lt Harry Bird and others with them operating under the auspices of what I believed to be the Metropolitan Police's Special Branch. These were "Paul Winston" and "Mike" the latter of whom has clearly re-emerged in this environment recently.

This is a perfect example of this kind of a situation run amok due to lack of supervision because no one can know what these people are doing with the surveillance technology, and as a group, they behave exactly like those guards at the Stanford experiment and at Abu Ghraib only they keep getting away with it because no one stops them while they abuse me in the extreme to discredit what I am accurately reporting continuously.

Since this has a military aspect from control of the environment by US Marines, I would like to see Robert Fox apply his psychological expertise to this situation which has run amok for so many years with Lt Harry Bird USMC Res/Ret declaring that he has a beachhead and war office as he denotes me as the enemy and supplies the directed energy weapon, i.e., surveillance technology, on a distributed basis to the recruits in this environment. Someone needs to publicise this abuse to stop it so that it can all be brought to light before it gets worse by spreading. After all this is social housing not a concentration camp.

Zimbardo calls these situations ones where the barrel is rotten that then creates the bad apples. That's the answer to Matthew A's all important question. It's a failure of management and supervision which often times occurs in fast moving military situations where soldiers are left on their own, e.g., Casualties of War, from the Vietnam War or My Lai. The exact same thing is happening right here in North Kensington, and Robert Fox is not very far away just on the other side of Kensington High Street. Maybe he can get it right for the British public.

Baloney Served as ISC Meets UK Intel Chiefs Where Lords & Knights of the Realm Gather

UK intelligence work defends freedom, say spy chiefs Baloney I say after 15+ years surveillance imprisonment torture

@BBCNews ISC hearings: my direct experience at ground level revealed an alarming disassociation between it and the top of MI5, MI6 and GCHQ.

There is clearly a need for a very strong and robust ISC to bring together the public, its information and its questions with respect to those at the top of the intelligence services.

The problem as I see it involves management which appears to be absent in a meaningful sense with respect to intelligence, i.e., despite having surveillance powers, they cannot get it right. As a result, there is a huge risk being ignored.

Here are a few examples:

Let's just consider the first three years of my 15+ years being subjected to 24/7/365 surveillance technology abuse from mid-August 1998 to mid-September 2001. The level of UK surveillance technology was tops for that period but misapplied based upoon emotional nonsense, those who sought easy career advancement and the utilisation of people who were hopelessly substandard and criminal in their intent and actions. This persists as of this writing making it relevant and extraordinarily damaging for today as it was in the past putting this country at grave risk.

Tempest

Surveillance technology was given to those whom I reported for child abuse in May1998. During following year or so, I placed a colour transparency on the computer notebook screen which resulted in changing the frequency of the electromagnetic radiation emission. Those using Tempest intercept technology in the flat below who were the child abusers began screaming that something was wrong with the surveillance technology because they could no longer see the computer screen. They began making false and irrelevant allegations as they called the technician to come service it. After he arrived and reviewed the situation, he saw what I had done and instructed them on how to tune in the new frequency. This revealed the fact that they were using Tempest at that time c 1999/2000.

In February 2001 US government agents/contractors Colonel Vine and Lt Harry Bird, each USMC Res/Ret, arrived with there totally enhanced Tempest surveillance technology to be used against any electronic device including the computer and human brain. This surveillance technology had the ability to detect the electromagnetic radiation emissions from each component of the computer and feedback to it commands which enabled the computer to be controlled remotely quite independent of any communication or Internet connection. This surveillance software was loaded at boot including a keyboard map.

During the summer of 2001 while I was working in the easyEverything Internet shop on Kensington High Street, I could not use the notebook computer. I could not enter the password required at the BIOS boot to continue. Lt Harry Bird USMC Res/Ret had not brought along with him the keyboard map software that he loaded right at the initial BIOS boot which stopped me from tying in any characters. This was all revealed by an explanation and apology he made to"Paul Winston" whom I believed to be Metropolitan Police Special Branch at that time supervising his activity. They were using Voice-to-Skull (V2K) as part of the human brain surveillance technology, so I could hear all they said.

Rendition

During May/June 2001 again while working at the easyEverything Internet shop on Kensington High Street, Colonel Vine strongly advocated and argued for kidnapping me to which "Paul Winston" objected completely and made him promise that he would not kidnap me. Colonel Vine went so far to cite as an example of their kidnapping success incident where he claimed that they had picked up someone following a Royal Festival Hall concert without anyone ever knowing anything about it.

Torture

During July and August 2001, I sent 60 separate daily Emails to a distribution list including cabinet members, the Home Secretary, the Chancellor and Prime Minister which included the 24/7 diary/log of the extreme torture sleep deprivation to which I was being subjected. Each of these Emails were 15 to 20 pages long and contained a completely detailed account of all that happened along with a meticulous sleep log revealing about four hours of sleep on average per night in multiples of about six to eight segments during an extended attempt to get some sleep.

Terrorism

All of this occurred before 9/11 and started when these resources were being expended in 1998 while Abu Hamza recruited, trained and sent to Yemen eight terrorists to bomb during the Christmas of 1998 including his son and son-in-law. They were not tracked.  I was. And, such continued to be the case missing opportunities to pick up 9/11 terrorists and others as they passed through the Finsbury Park mosque. The surveillance technology was the best it could be at that time but was not being used properly. To quote William Sullivan US the ambassador to Iran in 1979 in a slightly different way: there was no lack of "Intelligence," but there was a lack of "intelligence." Intelligence was faked against me while the real terrorists flourished and went undetected.

Management

Jack Straw was Home Secretary from 1997 to 2001 and moved to Foreign Secretary after the May 2001 election. David Blunkett moved to Home Secretary at that time. The UK had imported surveillance thugs in the quise of Vine and Bird in February 2001 who then implemented an escalation of torture and interference that continues as of this writing. When Dana Priest of the Washington Post revealed rendition, I learned what the kidnapping proposal was all about. Then the Abu Ghraib abuses were revealed in 2004. When both of these became public, I thought that surely the talk of kidnapping me and the torture would cease. This has not happened. If anything, the talk of kidnapping me and the torture go on at accelerated levels.

What was said today by the heads of MI5, MI6 and GCHQ can only be characterised by me as so much baloney. They haven't a clue about what actually happens at ground level while they use glossy words to paint a rosy, but faked, picture. This reminds me of the period of time when Frank Serpico was part of the NYPD in the late 1960s, and corruption permeated New York City's police officers. The change that occurred following the Knapp Commission Report was that senior officers were responsible for what those on the ground did as if they had done it themselves. Ignorance was no excuse. Senior police officers then started crawling around on rooftops in the middle of the night so that they could see what their men were doing. Top ranks of the NYPD were also changed.

Surely this cannot be the Intelligence services of the UK for they don't even know what is happening in their own ranks and inside the UK that has been present for 15+ years. Maybe each of them should have a publicly available Email address to get the facts straight from the public. Naturally, this would be subjected to interception by each other and NSA, etc.

1859
@BBCNews Lord Reid: if GCHQ or whoever wants to read the content of a message, it has to apply to a minister for a warrant. Political! [Twitter]