1533
@BBCNews David Blunkett complains about phone hacking? As Home Secretary, he continued totally invasive surveillance imprisonment torture [Twitter]
1622
Hacking jury hears David Blunkett voicemails
10 in 2005 while DWP Secy. Home Secy 06.2001 - 12.2004 & targeting me. [Twitter]
"In one message, [David Blunkett] said: "Someone very, very close has done a really phenomenal piece of work on destroying both our lives at this moment in time and it's vile.
" "Whoever it is I hope they rot in hell."
"He said: "I do think that someone has done a pretty good stitch-up job, chapter and verse, times, places, everything. That's pretty sophisticated to say the least."
"In another message, Mr Blunkett said: "The hyenas are still trying to get me but when I'm back I will shed a little light and they will all run back into the jungle again."
"The court then heard from Mr Blunkett's former special adviser, Huw Evans, who said he frequently spoke to the then home secretary on mobile phones and used voicemails, but knew calls could be intercepted.
" "We were very careful if we were having a conversation on a mobile to stick to a general subject or use coded language," he said."
After Mr Blunkett was DWP Secretary, he made a statement about which I made a comment in an Email to him at the time when he was a back bencher. He sent me a letter reply in which he noted that I was still suffering from a mental illness since I continued to describe quite accurately and objectively the non-stop, 24/7/365 surveillance technology abuse to which I was subjected.
This was the third letter I had received from those connectged with the Home Office when David Blunkett, Charles Clarke and John Reid were Home Secretaries. The first two described and provided by link below came from a Simon Watkin who persisted in this abuse by blaming the victim calling me mentally ill in each letter which was sent within the first few months of the tenure of Charles Clarke and John Reid.
I did not receive a reply while David Blunkett was Home Secretary, but I did get the same abusive content about mental illness from him personnally after he was a back bencher referring to the period of time when he was Home Secretary.
1633
Mr Blunkett has two standards: one for himself and another for other people whom he abused while Home Secretary continuing with totally invasive surveillance technology imprisonment and torture.
In the first Labour government (1997 - 2001) David Blunkett was Education and Employment Secretary. I directed correspondence to him because of the serious problems I encountered. He was made aware of the surveillance technology abuse against me at this time.
In the second Labour government (2001 - 2005) David Blunkett was Home Secretary until forced to resign in December 2004 over the Kimberly Quin affair. I sent him extensive correspondence about the ongoing surveillance abuse against me.
In the third Labour government David Blunkett was DWP Secretary until Nov 2005 for only six months. This is when these phone hacked voicemails occurred which were played in court today as described in this article. His condemnation of them is extreme, but the surveillance technology abuse against me goes on as of this writing 15+ years after it began revealing the legacy of his real character.
Why is Mr Blunkett not on trial for this? [Facebook]
1702
02.03.2005 Simon Watkin Home Office abuse reply letter to my Home Secy Emails to Charles Clarke after David Blunkett
Following extensive correspondence to Home Secretary David Blunkett, I provided further information to his successor, Charles Clarke, who assumed this position in December 2004 until he departed in May 2006.
By attacking me as being mentally ill for reporting the surveillance technology abuses to which I was subjected and having kept meticulously documented diary/logs of which some 60 of these were sent to the Home Secretary David Blunkett on a daily basis in July and August 2001 before 9/11, I took this letter as an attempt to cover up what had been done to me.
Four months after this letter and my extensive previous correspondence, London was subjected to a terrorist attack on 7th July 2005 with 52 killed and over 700 injured followed by a similar attempted attack on 21st July 2005 when the rucksack bombs failed to detonate properly. These two groups of terrorists have been linked with some of them living and operating not far away. Simon Watkin had worked in David Blunkett's private office and was involved with developing technology in the community. [Facebook]
1740
08.08.2006 2nd Simon Watkin Home Office abuse reply letter to my Home Secretary Emails to John Reid after Charles Clarke and David Blunkett
During this second Labour government. John Reid had just taken on this position in May 2006 after Mr Clarke's departure following an immigration records debacle and prisoner release fiasco.
John Reid went on to characterise the Home Office as "dysfunctional" and "unfit for purpose" which led to its being separated into two different departments with the Justice Department created for the courts and prison systems.
Simon Watkin gets more abusive in this reply letter which I again took as an effort to hide what was actually going on and stop my correspondence about this extreme abuse of power which was continuing. Dr Reid was most certainly right, and Simon Watkin's correspondence to me reflected this problem where key issues were swept under the carpet by blaming the victim rather than addressing the problem. [Facebook]
