Wednesday, 20 November 2013
Abusive Management Creates Child Protection Workers' Pressure
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-24999826
77% said the increased thresholds were due to increased referrals.
"One respondent told the survey: "We were told if you have a teenager on your case who is 14 to 16 years old then they cannot have child protection plans anymore because they are either deemed 'capable of voting with their feet' or 'able to self-protect'." "
Oh, good, a 14-year-old gets to run away from home and be subjected to the street predators instead but deemed capable of self protection. The abusers are managing the system.
In a world of phenomenal technological advances, why is it that the most sophisticated surveillance technology ever known has been given to those whom I reported for child abuse along with others reported for antisocial behaviour and crimes?
This has been going on indefinitely 24/7/365 since 1998 and continues as of this writing. The abusers have come to dominate and control government.
Family and Children Services in Kensington & Chelsea merged into Westminster and Hammersmith & Fulham councils at the end of 2010. Obviously, the budget whatever it was could not possibly handle child abusers who were using the most sophisticated surveillance technology ever known. That must have been quite expensive as child abuse flourished and grew.
When I tried to report this at the end of 1999 to the Prime Minister, I was summoned before a couple psychiatrists at the nearby St Charles Hospital where my letter to the Prime Minister was displayed to me in a folder bearing my name. I had described the ongoing child abuse that summer where the abused child was acting out violence against other children as he continued to receive abuse.
I was the one who was then subjected to extreme abuse by these psychiatrists and a psychiatric nurse who joined in the surveillance technology abuse against me. When I met with them in early 2000, it was the time when Victoria Climbie was being tortured to death. They paid no attention to the fact that I was reporting child abuse and reiterating it to them. They did not listen to me and embarked on an abuse campaign against me instead.
This year I was once again summoned to attend a meeting with one of these psychiatrists with whom I would have nothing to do and filed a complaint. My third major complaint over these years. Part of the complaint resolution was an invitation to make an appointment with them. Yesterday Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt said he had never met a doctor who did not want to help patients. There are many Dr Shipmans in the NHS and many doctors who mis-prescribe medications for the wrong reasons such as powerful antipsychotics as calmatives that have serious side effects. These doctors are helping themselves not the patients.
The police have been the same. Try to file a complaint against the police with the IPCC as I have done this year and see what happens. Those charged with protecting children not only fail to do so but set up a process so that child abuse can continue which is covered up by all those involved who seek to blame and eradicate the person who reports the child abuse. Jimmy Savile flourished in the NHS, and the police did not act properly when complaints were made in numerous locations around the country. This goes on today as of this writing still.
The problem is far from solved, and those charged with child protection fail miserably bringing about all the pressure on themselves about which they complain. No one wants to get involved with people like these so high vacancy rates develop. Then along comes Jeremy Hunt who pretends these kinds of violently destructive problems are so rare that he's never met a psychopathic doctor when 1% of the population is psychopathic. How many people are employed by the NHS? How many psychopathic personalities become involved in child protection who happen to be child abusers and set up a structure of institutionalised child abuse?
1117
@BBCNews Child protection workers under terrific pressure? Are they being screamed at and beaten? Think about pressure abused children suffer. [Twitter]
" "A child disclosed he'd been hit by his father; there were significant injuries to substantiate. The child then confirmed regular abuse - the first time social care became aware of it.
" "A decision was made by higher management to allow the child to stay home, therefore reducing child protection numbers." "
1130
@BBCNews Child protection workers do not get sympathy from me when abusers I reported in 1998 given surveillance & still using it to abuse. [Twitter]