On Christmas Eve I sent the following Email to the BBC News Channel after watching a documentary about MI5 expressing my concerns about abuse, waste and the inability to track possible terrorists a day before such a terrorist tried to blow up a Delta aircraft landing in Detroit on Christmas Day.
Today the day after Christmas on Boxing Day we are learning that the would-be bomber was London based and an engineering student at some point at University College London.
"Met Police search London flat in US plane attack probe"
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8430872.stm
To: "BBC News Channel" <news24@bbc.co.uk>
Today the day after Christmas on Boxing Day we are learning that the would-be bomber was London based and an engineering student at some point at University College London.
"Met Police search London flat in US plane attack probe"
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8430872.stm
To: "BBC News Channel" <news24@bbc.co.uk>
Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2009 1:54 PM
Subject: Our World: Inside MI5. Excellent documentary although I have a couple comments (as usual).
1. Not enough surveillance to cover everyone: wrong.
This is simply not true. As you well know, I've been subjected to totally invasive surveillance technology since mid-August 1998 and the brainwave monitoring and feedback surveillance since February 2001.
This most sophisticated surveillance technology introduced into my life and North Kensington ever known to human civilisation can track and fully monitor many people with very limited resources.
This has been misused and abused against me during this period from seven months before 9/11 until this writing. It has been used as a weapon to destroy and report false information.
Given how this has been used in this environment I believe that it has directly contributed to terrorism and most certainly distracted resources from the real terrorists by continuing the torture activity and false allegations for perverse objectives.
2. "Spooks" & MI5: entertainment v reality: not precisely correct.
Former MI5 DG Stella Rimington said that there was far more risk and conflict in "Spooks" than actually exists at MI5 in its operations characterising the former as entertainment.
She added that every effort is made not to put agents at risk in confrontations although her books are quite dramatic which I'm sure she will acknowledge while at the same time maintaining that there is a close parallel with MI5.
The same is true for "Spooks." I watch "Spooks" looking for the essence of what is happening, betrayal, alt-gov and surveillance, and find it to be quite close to reality in the turmoil that exists inside intelligence agencies especially the CIA with rogues high up seeking more power to bring about what they want with respect to other nations in this world.
The alt-gov issue has been most important tied up recently with what is called "Nightingale" as a "New World Order" of those who are trying to gain power for themselves by manipulating governments.
The essence of MI5 is to protect democracy so that this cannot happen, and I am sure that agents are at risk and in dramatic conflict situations which never emerge.
You do not have to go any further than the operations being carried out against me by Colonel Vine and Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret since February 2001 for almost nine years 24/7/365.
They are using brainwave monitoring and feedback surveillance technology to usurp and destroy the sovereignty of the UK and its democratic rule of law including the destruction of law enforcement, justice and prison systems along with the NHS just for starters.
Everything that they have been doing undermines and destroys all that this society is supposed to represent. They are doing so intentionally and refuse any instructions to behave according to law, policy or standards.
The mere fact that they have been operating for almost nine years 24/7/365 is totally outside the law of the UK (RIPA 2000 [Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000]). They are engaged in torture, medical experimentation and surveillance R&D for their own benefit at the expense of everyone in the UK.
And, nobody including MI5 is stopping them. As a result we have had terrorist attacks in London in 2005 which are related to this area by those who lived and set up bomb factory works not far away while one of them tried to detonate a bomb on a train near the BBC while another dumped his rucksack in Wormwood Scrubs again not far from the BBC. [These are all areas within easy walking distance of where I live and this surveillance abuse takes place.]
Incidentally, these two groups (7/7 and 21/7) were linked but not tracked ostensibly for lack of resources.
This is a situation that calls into questions these and other public representations about MI5 and the police regarding the protection of this country which need to be made public and openly discussed for the very foundation of democracy is at threat from within.
Gary
