To: "BBC News Channel" <news24@bbc.co.uk>
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 5:40 PM
Subject: Vanessa George & Angela Allen indeterminant sentence for a minimum of 7 and 5 years respectively. Justice's statement was stunning, but . . .
"Nursery paedophile Vanessa George jailed indefinitely"
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/8345756.stm
Who is really being betrayed? The children obviously but by a far wider group of people than most would want to contemplate.
It was amazing how Vanessa George was located since there wasn't a clue about her abuse in Plymouth. The police did a superb job in tracking down all the connections, but why is it when something is handed to them on a silver platter by reporting it, they join in the abuse?
I've been reporting child abuse by a family group and most especially the mother of the abused children since early May 1998. They were given surveillance technology in mid-August 1998 to use against me in a most sexually sadistic and physically destructive way possible while trying to create mental illness.
At the same time the child abuse went on sparking an extensive letter with diary/log exhibits from the summer of 1999 [that] was sent to the Prime Minister in September 1999 after failures of my reporting. The abuse against me was escalated in a most significant way.
These child abusers and especially the mother of the abused children involved the abused children and other children in the surveillance technology abuse against me and tried to stop my reporting about other incidents of child abuse that occurred here.
They have gone on doing this by creating antisocial behaviour and criminal activity as a standard in this environment which included ongoing child abuse on a community basis in this manner.
The mother of the abused children more recently tried to get one of the originally abused children to officially participate in the surveillance abuse against me.
All in all this is a horrendous situation where no one has done anything about the ongoing abuse against adults and children with the government supporting and sustaining the surveillance abuse. It still goes on.
"Distressing and shocking case" said Louise Hubbel about this case taking over from Louisa Baldini who's been there all day.
The great problem about this case for me is that it does not reflect that anything significant is being done to address the problem of child abuse, and as I experience it, child abuse is being fostered by those in positions of responsibility so that they can join in too with abuse all around.
Using surveillance technology permits these abusers to keep abusing, and no one does anything to effectively bring it to an end.
Nothing will ever be as shocking and distressing for the nation when the details of this extensive institutionalised abuse comes out after its 11.33 years so far from surveillance technology torture in the hands and under the operational control a viciously violent and murderous child abusers.
Why you do not report this in the public's interest is quite incomprehensible. In light of what is continuously being exposed in this country month after month, how can you allow child and adult abuse to go on when it has been reported to you (BBC) continuously since the end of August 2000 to many BBC radio and television programmes?
"He killed his mother," said Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret just now by way of justifying the abuse against me based upon this presumption of guilt relating to a totally fabricated crime that has never occurred. Or, as I always say "No, he didn't."
This is abuse justifying abuse that establishes a law enforcement, legal justice and prison system completely outside the democratic institutions of the UK and its democratically determined rule of law.
So, there you have it. There is an alt-gov clearly established in the UK that is flourishing with its foundation based upon abuse with child abusers at its core.
And, you won't report a word about it. There isn't much optimism about reducing child abuse, is there?
Gary
