From: "Gary D Chance"
Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 6:40 PM
Subject: 3 violent abuse cases sentenced today all inter-related and all of which reflect the abuse to which I've been subjected for 11+ years with the intent to kill by surveillance.
I. Three abuse and murder cases sentencing occurred today:
1. Edlington sadistic 90 minute attack by two boys against two other boys;
2. Mother carries out Munchhausen's By Proxy abuse against son subjecting him to horrible abuse by medical intervention; and
3. Brother, sister & adult torture to death sister's 35-year-old partner.
II. All three of these cases have sadism associated with the abuse with this word used in each instance:
1. Children abusing children in vicious sadistic attack all but killing them with a background of "toxic" family abuse;
2. Mother fakes medical conditions against son characterised as sadistic 24/7 torture for her own gain, attention and to put one over on those more powerful; and
3. Adult sadistic torture abuse to death.
III. Child abuse behind one of the three known and presumed with other two:
1. There is also child abuse explicitly behind children's abuse of other children.
2. Child abuse explicitly exists in Munchhausen's By Proxy and presumed that this formed mother's motivation; and
3. Adult torture abuse resulted in death probably has child abuse in the background with the brother and sister's family.
For 11+ years I've been subjected to the sadistic abuse reflected by these three cases from the abuse of surveillance technology in the hands of child abusers whom I had reported for their abuse in May 1998.
GBH [Grevious Bodily Harm] with intent and SBH [Serious Bodily Harm] in early years and carrying along led to escalations directly involving police and NHS in late 1999 and in early 2001 with surveillance technology when I sought the protection of the High Court after 2.5 years. Legal proceedings destroyed.
Adult abuse against an adult including Munchhausen's By Proxy with child abuse passed along from generation to generation over three generations visible in the abusively violent and dysfunctional family.
This abuse with surveillance reflects institutionalised abuse with those in authority participating by proxy on an indefinite basis without ever stopping it.
The results are that it permeates the community and has inverted standards to antisocial and criminal. Children develop with abusive personalities.
Kensington & Chelsea have done the reverse of protecting children and adults. They have instituted systematic institutionalised abuse.
K&C tenant management in an Estate has given power to the sadistic criminal abuser. K&C has 100% of its social housing under tenant management which tried to manage with surveillance technology abuse in the hands of the criminals for 11+ years.
My extensive correspondence about all of this throughout all these years has brought no relief or respite of any kind whatsoever. Tell people exactly what the problem is with evidence, and if they want to believe something else, they will without evidence.
The following comments were made by these people today:
Ed Balls (out of touch and clueless):
"Should have known violence at home was leading to this."
"Hard to understand how children can do this to other children."
"While they were abused at home, it's no excuse for what they did,"
Yes, it is an excuse. It's the reason why it happened. The children behaved with a degree of rage and violence commensurate with that to which they were subjected.
They have to be held responsible for their acts, but they are not responsible for their character development.
David Cameron (has his London home not far away yet has done nothing about cthis although he's correct):
"Symbolic of deeper problems in British society "
"Not just some isolated incident from which we should look away"
"We should ask what went wrong, and what we are going to do about it?"
The answer is right under his nose, but he's ignored it for years.
Caroline Flint, MP, Edlington part of her constituency (reflects party line which is a key reason that this continues):
Comment on David Cameron's "Break down Britain"
She does not believe for one minute that the abuse cases really represent what exists in this country. That's exactly why sadism is the predominant character trait in this country which her abusive statement subtly reflects. It's the sadistic violence that produces this outcome.
Lucy Russell, Young Minds (had meaningful statements about which I Emailed & will publish later along with this unless surveillance censorship destroys this effort):
"Intervene very early; as early as pregnancy."
But, not like K&C by giving surveillance technology to the viciously violent sadistic characters.
Gary
cc Ed Balls, MP, Secretary of State, Children, Families and Schools
David Cameron, MP, Leader, Conservative Party
Caroline Flint, MP
To: "BBC News Channel"; "BBC Panorama"; "BBC London"; "David Cameron"; "Ed Balls"; "Caroline Flint"
Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 6:40 PM
Subject: 3 violent abuse cases sentenced today all inter-related and all of which reflect the abuse to which I've been subjected for 11+ years with the intent to kill by surveillance.
I. Three abuse and murder cases sentencing occurred today:
1. Edlington sadistic 90 minute attack by two boys against two other boys;
2. Mother carries out Munchhausen's By Proxy abuse against son subjecting him to horrible abuse by medical intervention; and
3. Brother, sister & adult torture to death sister's 35-year-old partner.
II. All three of these cases have sadism associated with the abuse with this word used in each instance:
1. Children abusing children in vicious sadistic attack all but killing them with a background of "toxic" family abuse;
2. Mother fakes medical conditions against son characterised as sadistic 24/7 torture for her own gain, attention and to put one over on those more powerful; and
3. Adult sadistic torture abuse to death.
III. Child abuse behind one of the three known and presumed with other two:
1. There is also child abuse explicitly behind children's abuse of other children.
2. Child abuse explicitly exists in Munchhausen's By Proxy and presumed that this formed mother's motivation; and
3. Adult torture abuse resulted in death probably has child abuse in the background with the brother and sister's family.
For 11+ years I've been subjected to the sadistic abuse reflected by these three cases from the abuse of surveillance technology in the hands of child abusers whom I had reported for their abuse in May 1998.
GBH [Grevious Bodily Harm] with intent and SBH [Serious Bodily Harm] in early years and carrying along led to escalations directly involving police and NHS in late 1999 and in early 2001 with surveillance technology when I sought the protection of the High Court after 2.5 years. Legal proceedings destroyed.
Adult abuse against an adult including Munchhausen's By Proxy with child abuse passed along from generation to generation over three generations visible in the abusively violent and dysfunctional family.
This abuse with surveillance reflects institutionalised abuse with those in authority participating by proxy on an indefinite basis without ever stopping it.
The results are that it permeates the community and has inverted standards to antisocial and criminal. Children develop with abusive personalities.
Kensington & Chelsea have done the reverse of protecting children and adults. They have instituted systematic institutionalised abuse.
K&C tenant management in an Estate has given power to the sadistic criminal abuser. K&C has 100% of its social housing under tenant management which tried to manage with surveillance technology abuse in the hands of the criminals for 11+ years.
My extensive correspondence about all of this throughout all these years has brought no relief or respite of any kind whatsoever. Tell people exactly what the problem is with evidence, and if they want to believe something else, they will without evidence.
The following comments were made by these people today:
Ed Balls (out of touch and clueless):
"Should have known violence at home was leading to this."
"Hard to understand how children can do this to other children."
"While they were abused at home, it's no excuse for what they did,"
Yes, it is an excuse. It's the reason why it happened. The children behaved with a degree of rage and violence commensurate with that to which they were subjected.
They have to be held responsible for their acts, but they are not responsible for their character development.
David Cameron (has his London home not far away yet has done nothing about cthis although he's correct):
"Symbolic of deeper problems in British society "
"Not just some isolated incident from which we should look away"
"We should ask what went wrong, and what we are going to do about it?"
The answer is right under his nose, but he's ignored it for years.
Caroline Flint, MP, Edlington part of her constituency (reflects party line which is a key reason that this continues):
Comment on David Cameron's "Break down Britain"
She does not believe for one minute that the abuse cases really represent what exists in this country. That's exactly why sadism is the predominant character trait in this country which her abusive statement subtly reflects. It's the sadistic violence that produces this outcome.
Lucy Russell, Young Minds (had meaningful statements about which I Emailed & will publish later along with this unless surveillance censorship destroys this effort):
"Intervene very early; as early as pregnancy."
But, not like K&C by giving surveillance technology to the viciously violent sadistic characters.
Gary
cc Ed Balls, MP, Secretary of State, Children, Families and Schools
David Cameron, MP, Leader, Conservative Party
Caroline Flint, MP
