Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 2:47 PM
Major General Michael T Flynn, USA
Paul D Botcher, DIA
Captain Paul F Pottinger, USMC
Messrs
I am in the process of reading your report "Fixing Intel: A Blueprint for Making Intelligence Relevant in Afghanistan" made available on the Internet by the Center for New American Security.
I am quite pleased that your assessment has been made public for I believe that this is an essential way to manage intelligence today because it offers reassurance. It is also refreshing that the assessment from all reports so far appears to be objective and meaningful not relying upon gloss for image management which breeds mistrust and disgust.
I wish to comment upon my experience as a surveillance target for 11+ years 24/7/365 in North Kensington, London, England, which has involved for almost nine years since February 2001 a Colonel Vine and Lt Harry Bird each of whom are USMC and, I believe, now retired.
I believe that what I describe here is directly relevant to the overall effectiveness of the military action in Afghanistan and elsewhere and is directly relevant by its abuses to contributing to terrorism in the world which you are trying to counter. I believe that it is most certainly relevant to your intelligence activities professionally.
1. My military background
I served in the USAF Security Service from 1961 to 1964 at that height of the Cold War doing final analysis and reporting in communications intelligence at HQ USAFSS in San Antonio followed by a tour at Trabzon, Turkey which is on the Black Sea some 90 miles from the then Soviet Georgia border.
My father was a 30 year US Navy veteran who was stationed at Pearl Harbour on 7th December 1941 and was captain of a fleet tug (USS Zuni) during the Pacific war having received the Legion of Merit and commendation letters from Admirals Halsey and Nimitz. He then was captain a food cargo ship (USS Merapi) taking supplies to Korea during that military action. He is now buried in Arlington.
2. Afghanistan mission
I believe that your mission in Afghanistan is critically important to securing the world's safety from the threat of terrorism and that intelligence is at the core of this effort. For this reason I am writing to you with this information to show problems and perhaps solutions.
However, I have not agreed with the invasion of Iraq or with the Vietnam war believing these to be mistakes. The first Gulf War in 1991 was essential and critically important as well with the great tragedy at that time occurring from not removing Sadam Hussein who had invaded Kuwait.
3. Surveillance technology
I've been subjected to the most sophisticated surveillance technology known to human civilisation. It is difficult to see how anything more sophisticated could ever be developed.
It is brainwave monitoring and feedback surveillance that uses the principles of Tempest to decode the electromagnetic radiation halo surrounding the human head to read thoughts (words and images) and monitor senses (see through eyes, hear with ears, fee sensations).
It is also used to feedback sound (USA calls this "Voice to Skull" V2K), carry out surreptitious medication to incapacitate and induce words and images for memory probing during sleep.
The same basic Tempest derived surveillance technology can do the same with computer systems and any electronic device.
4. Abuses
This whole process has nothing to do with an investigation but everything to do with fabrication. The abuses to do this are extraordinary including continuous torture interrogation 24/7/365 by verbal abuse and complete monitoring along with sleep deprivation and physical injuries.
This has taken place in a multicultural environment where Muslims live adjacent to my flat and close by. Hundreds of people have been involved in this surveillance torture abuse process for all these years.
At the core of the abuse along with Lt Harry Bird is the mother of the abused children whom I reported for that abuse in May 1998. She is being used for her revenge and retaliation disposition against me along with her disposition and willingness to carry out any number of crimes including the overall objective of murder by surveillance technology.
Lt Harry Bird still uses his rank and military affiliation whatever that might be which reflects continuously on the USMC and US military for all the years he has been present since February 2001. He has openly shown many people the functioning of this surveillance technology on an indiscriminate basis.
I believe that this abuse to fabricate, unsuccessfully so far which is why it has gone on for so long as well as R&D objectives, has been a contributor to using scarce resources and deflecting attention away from critically important terrorism activity including 9/11 and the London bombings of 7/7/2005 and 21/7/2005.
The latter London attempted bombing similar to the one two-weeks before had bombs that failed to detonate. The bombers lived, worked and attempted to detonate a bomb in the proximity of this area.
Because of the involvement of the general public including the mother of the abused children and her family group, information about the surveillance technology and its operation has spread far and wide in a far more primary manner than my public efforts to bring it to an end.
5. Personnel
Colonel Vine established this activity in February 2001 as a long time operator introducing Lt Harry Bird to his first assignment. After the successful Afghan invasion at the end of 2001, Colonel Vine was reported as being in Kabul. Later, after the Tsunami five years ago, he was reported as being in Sri Lanka.
After setting up this operation against me in North Kensington, Colonel Vine has left it to Lt Harry Bird for the most part while he has travelled to other locations in the world and perhaps UK.
6. Conclusion
I believe that the understanding of what is happening here is directly relevant to your activity in Afghanistan as you can see by Colonel Vine's travels and activity.
Word of mouth spreads rapidly and goes through the community of radicals and potential terrorists creating more terrorists and inciting them to actions.
While you look at Afghanistan in-country intelligence activity from a relevance or lack thereof perspective, this intelligence activity is for worse and more extreme than that since it reflects the complete fabrication of information that comes from those using this surveillance knowingly and publicly operating completely outside the law.
This can only have a negative impact on US/UK intelligence operations everywhere.
Sincerely yours
Gary D Chance
