"Can we assess every threat?"
"Assess every threat" means gaining information about terrorism in advance for prevention/deterrence that is the role of the intelligence community you are evaluating. So far that has been a rather dismal and unsuccessful process in which you have played a key role to expose abuses.
To get at the mind of the terrorist torture has been mainly used as featured in Guantanamo, Abu Ghraib and your exposure of rendition as means to get that information. Now, you have shown us this whole intelligence community so huge and diversified as to be beyond control telling us once again that hidden away are methods and activities which need to be kept in the utmost secrecy.
Given all the facts of the past decade it is clear to me that we are headed toward a secret police torture state unless we can control the means to get the information necessary to ensure security by successfully doing so without brute force torture. I believe that this is what is being developed in this massive US intelligence community based upon Tempest.
However, due to IC's fundamental secrecy and being beyond control, the serious problem of sadistic torture abuse continues to grow "out of control" toward a secret police torture state. This can be changed by using the very Tempest technology based methods being developed if we first assess ourselves completely and thoroughly.
I want to back up to start with the definition of terrorism: any effort to cause fear in others. It has a common denominator, but there are many expressions of terror intended to create fear. I also believe that there is a common set of psychological characteristics which lead to behaviour we would consider terrorism. I think it's important to look at the criminal terrorist as well as the international terrorist. They overlap and merge at the foundation but diverge in acts which draw upon different law enforcement and prevention strategies.
I like the television drama series "Criminal Minds" featuring the FBI's Behavioural Analysis Unit (BAU). They seek to create a psychological profile of someone or people who is/are already on a terror spree as a serial violent criminal in order to stop further crimes usually torture and murder. So far this has not been applied to the population at large to stop such criminal terrorism that victimises the innocent on a random and arbitrary basis because of the limitations of profiling.
I think that this process is analogous to issues involving international terrorism and the approach to stop attacks by what appears to be a "one size fits all" approach. Can we assess its threat? Can we asses the threat of a serial killer, rapist, torturer and murderer before the fact? Yes, in limited circumstances but on the whole no. The same is true for international terrorism, but its real threat is from WMD against mass populations and geography which means that some means must be undertaken to assess this threat and stop it. How can this be done?
We have to properly analyse and evaluate all those concerned with the problem on the basis of an accurate and productive psychological profile to assess their disposition toward being a threat. As described in TSA, the Fort Hood shooter was not assessed despite obvious signs while a US Army unit declared its intention to go after Al Qaeda instead of looking inward at its own people. A threat was missed because this US Army unit jumped on the Al Qaeda bandwagon for whatever reason.
One size cannot fit all, so there must be a divergence of activities and objectives relevant to an organisation's existence and relations to its own environment, i.e., the US Army unit's need to look at its own organisation and not something done by many others. Like the FBI's BAU, we are learning these approaches by trial and error where the errors have horrendous consequences.
I've been at the centre of US Intel abuse for almost a decade from February 2001 and have developed an expertise from the point of view of the surveillance target who is abused for R&D purposes across a spectrum of applications from technology and torture Those carrying out this abuse are terrorists by definition as seen in their acts and psychological characteristics which fit a Criminal Minds' profile, yet they are acting out behaviour on behalf of the state in a position of trust which they abuse in the extreme.
The problem is that the psychological characteristics and disposition to create general fear by terrorising an environment is widespread and turns up from time to time in dramatic revelations from places and operations such as Guantanamo, Abu Graib and rendition. This is the US Intel community at work as terrorist torturers whom all the world has seen in photographs taken by those who carried out the torture terrorism at Abu Ghraib. This reflects an institutional disposition to what is called in the civilian world criminal "Happy Slappy."
Just yesterday in the UK two teens were sentenced to prison after pleading guilty to manslaughter in the death of a 67-year-old man who was attacked in front of his 3-year-old granddaughter by these youths running by, hitting him and knocking him to the ground where he sustain a head injury from which he later died. This was caught on CCTV. They did not film this on their mobile phones as usual. When police searched their homes, they found six such "Happy Slappy" videos on mobile phones just like the Abu Ghraib photographs.
Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret, one of those from the US Intel community's dedicated to surveillance and torture techniques R&D in London against me, took pictures of me on the last Friday of March 2001 using a large group of people under my front windows yelling and shouting about what they were doing. Taking photographs like this for entertainment and fun connected with gratuitous torture violence is an ongoing process by these surveillance abusers. Just this morning BS, the mother of the abused children whom I reported for child abuse in May 1998, said "It's boring." They seek external stimulus by using surveillance technology as a torture weapon for entertainment and fun. It's also part of a never ending torture interrogation process.
I believe that we can assess threats of international terrorism much, much better than we are doing at present because we are bogged down in terrorism ourselves. The surveillance technology which has been used against me 24/7/365 since February 2001 is so sophisticated that it can track and completely monitor human beings as it does with computer technology. This enables those who are picking up relationships between terrorists to keep monitoring them and establishing cell structures while knowing all that they are doing at minimal costs and usage of resources.
This surveillance technology is currently being developed by the US Intel community with R&D carried out in my experience in London on an extremely abusive basis so much so that it constitutes a secret police torture state that has destroyed this environment during the past decade. The reason for this abuse derives from the psychological aberration of those using this surveillance technology who have not been faxed in the least by the revelations about Guantanamo, Abu Ghraib or rendition. If fact, I anticipated these in advance as a result of the treatment I received from February 2001 onward.
The TSA project is magnificent with respect to all the work that has been accomplished. It reinforces what I am experiencing and shows the foundation for what is truly beyond control in terms of the usage of intelligence product emerging from this huge, dispersed and unaccountable US Intel community. However, missing from this as yet since I'm sure that this project has to proceed from a firm foundation forward are the activities which are being being carried out in all of these buildings.
In this situation all that has been done has been made generally known to hundreds of people who have come along to participate as well as myself by the very nature of the surveillance technology's torture capacity. This has declassified the technology completely which means that there are no constraints on reporting it as I do openly and freely but under the constant scrutiny of those using the surveillance technology who seek to stop me in any way that they can. So far I am still stumbling along getting the message out.
I believe that we can just about asses every threat democratically and freely without destroying people and democracy, but that is not being done to state the obvious. I think that the first step has to recognise the terrorist within who tries to rule by fear using terrorist's methods and those of the criminal mind. We are a long way from doing that which the massively diversified (1300?) US Intel community units are helping to sustain by being unknown, unaccountable and beyond control. As a result, we are moving toward a secret police torture state which needs to be halted by the recognition of what is happening. So far no one wants to do that. Afraid?
We have to assess ourselves first before we can properly and fully assess the threat from elsewhere that can carry with it weapons of mass destruction. Unless we properly, accurately, honestly and truthfully assess ourselves first, the enemy from within will defeat any opportunity to assess and prevent the terrorist threat from without. What I've been observing for a decade has been efforts to manufacture threats to milk the system while the real threats succeeded.
Tuesday, 27 July 2010
Sunday, 25 July 2010
"Is the intelligence community 'out-of-control' ?" TSA Response
"Is the intelligence community 'out-of-control'?"
If those in charge do not know or profess not to know what is happening in their areas of responsibility, it is "out of control" by definition. Further, if it can be seen that unacceptable actions are taken which violate the fundamental purpose of an organisation, it can be said to be "out-of-control." By either of these criteria the intelligence community is "out-of-control."
Getting the opinions of six people at the top in one way or another can be meaningful but also presents pitfalls since there can be vested interests in maintaining image while hiding problems. Would anyone have said that the FBI was "out-of-control" in the 1960s and early 1970s with respect to abuses carried out under COINTELPRO? What about the CIA in Southeast Asia and elsewhere during the same period?
By the last half of the 1970s abuses due to "out-of-control" intelligence and law enforcement organisations were called to account by Senator Frank Church's committee in 1975 and 1976 with respect to the CIA and FBI (Watergate: cue Washington Post"). Admiral Bobby Inman, then DIRNSA, took NSA public to the horror of all concern for it truly had been "No Such Agency" for decades. Reforms, such as they were, didn't last long, did they? See Church Committee.
I believe that the disposition to carry out the activities for which these and other organisations were criticised and held to significant public account continued and found its outlet in contractors and dedicated intelligence organisations independent of government control but paid by government. True, there was much to be done which needed the best people who had to be paid for their services. At the same time this opened the door to those who had little or no qualifications to abuse the system.
Without control and accountability those who betrayed trust could do so and get away with it causing immense damage from the latest and most sophisticated espionage/surveillance technology ever known to human civilisation. While those who developed this technology were most likely above reproach, it was passed along for use by those who had less than honourable scruples. What they did with it was even worse and reflects the worst of COINTELPRO and CIA assassination abuses all wrapped into one activity.
I know this because I have been a surveillance target for 12 years since mid-August 1998 and subjected to this most sophisticated surveillance technology since February 2001. The latter was brought to the UK by a couple retired US Marines the senior of whom then started travelling elsewhere after the successful invasion of Afghanistan following 9/11 making his first stop a report Kabul.
Because of their disturbed personalities committed to sadistic torture abuse 24/7/365 I learned a great deal about what they were doing and the technology they had founded upon Tempest used against computer technology and the human being alike. They used V2K (Voice-to-Skull, i.e., electronic transmission of sound) for torture purposes that allowed me to hear much of what they were doing or trying to do wherever I was located day and night.
Since they joined a surveillance operation already in progress for 2.5 years, I already had a foundation of people whom I knew so there were no mysterious "they" in all of this. I then learned a great deal about these people and their activity which has gone on since before 9/11 for 9.5 years starting in February 2001. They spread the information all around about their marvellous surveillance technology which they allowed others to use. It became COINTELPRO all over again and goes on as of this writing.
Asking the experts to provide their opinion is a useful step but not a complete one. It's a necessary condition for assessment but not a sufficient one. All sources of information need to be considered most especially those many of us who have been on the receiving end of the abuse and denied any opportunity to get the real story out in any meaningful way. That, of course, is the purpose of this abuse.
I especially like General Michael Hayden's response for its evasiveness and support of the intelligence community. He is noted as being the CIA Director from 2006 to 2009, but he was also DIRNSA from 1999 to 2005 the longest serving DIRNSA ever. What little I knew about General Hayden was fascinating. I thought he was good and the kind of enlightened leader needed at the time since he remained so long in a job that rotated between the various military services. NSA was and is the focal point for military SIGINT coordinating all that activity among the various branches of the US military.
Given what I had learned by 2006, his move to the CIA as its director communicated to me what I had already concluded as existing in this world where HUMINT and SIGINT had merged in a single intelligence technology based upon Tempest which had been my direct experience as a target since February 2001.
In fact, I was so alarmed by its abuse given my former experience with the USAF Security Service (1961 to 1964) that I tried to send General Hayden an Email to advise him of what I considered a most serious breach of security. NSA is not open to receiving Emails from the outside world except for those looking for work. I thus sent this Email to personnel with the request that they forward it to DIRNSA, General Hayden.
"US National Security Breach: Email to DIRNSA" My 30th March 2002 Email to General Michael Hayden
Here's a situation which I recognised as being "out-of-control." I have sent a great deal of communication about this situation to bring it to light so that it could be ended. Even sending an Email to General Michael Hayden as best I could was not sufficient to bring any relief to what I knew as being terribly "out-of-control."
However, today Michael Hayden claims it is not "out-of-control" in the Washington Post. I beg to disagree. I believe that he, like many others, has a vested interest to serve and cannot or will not grapple with the monstrosity that has developed over the decades since the end WWII.
He spent ten years at the head of the NSA and the CIA without addressing the abuses which I had attempted to bring to his attention.
I believe that these abuses are widespread given the people involved and those who report as I do on the Internet. I believe that what we have today are intelligence community and law enforcement/security agencies who were "out-of-control" as they were in the 1960s and 1970s only more so since this is being carried out by contractors who are not responsible and are not accountable to anyone. General Michael Hayden has not taken any responsibility as far as I can see to bring accountability into his world of SIGINT and HUMINT. I believe that he could not do this because it was and is out of control.
Naturally, there is a massive cover up effort under way as there always is in these matters. The Washington Post needs to dig deeper and talk with a wider spectrum of people. As in Watergate they need to "follow the money trail." This will make Watergate look like a kindergarten picnic.
What really exists here is an alternative government not just alternative geography.
Those at the top haven't a clue about what is happening on the ground in the real world. There is a huge dichotomy between those trying to manage at the top and what is actually being done at ground level by those whom they are supposed to be managing. Those at the top create solutions and organisations to suite themselves based upon their belief about the way they think the world is matching what the want as a solution. The solution doesn't fit the problem. If fits their conception of the problem enabling them to do what they want.
As a result they create terrorism because they have not grasped the essence that terrorism is hatred against what they are and do to such a degree that a terrorist is willing to kill innocent people including women and children along with him/herself. As a result they are fighting something which they create further by fighting it as they do. Worst of all are those like Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret who are sent into areas that breed terrorists who do all the things which support such creation as well as carry out the job of the terrorist by destroying democracy and its institutions.
I sent Michael Hayden an Email about this problem over eight years ago. The proof that the US intelligence community is out of control rests with the fact that this Email produced no results when they were necessary. There is no point of contact. Those in significant positions are either ill served by those under them, or they do not know where else to go to solve a problem brought to their attention as I did regarding the out of control abuse from surveillance technology billed as an "experiment."
The vast array of intelligence agencies brought to the attention of the world by the Washington Post" confirms why the intelligence community is out of control and why those who want to abuse in the extreme do so with impunity for many years despite my explicit information to many in positions of significant authority Michael Hayden among them which fails to have any effect. They then have got to hide the truth while they cover up the reality of what is happening. This then creates more terrorists.
If those in charge do not know or profess not to know what is happening in their areas of responsibility, it is "out of control" by definition. Further, if it can be seen that unacceptable actions are taken which violate the fundamental purpose of an organisation, it can be said to be "out-of-control." By either of these criteria the intelligence community is "out-of-control."
Getting the opinions of six people at the top in one way or another can be meaningful but also presents pitfalls since there can be vested interests in maintaining image while hiding problems. Would anyone have said that the FBI was "out-of-control" in the 1960s and early 1970s with respect to abuses carried out under COINTELPRO? What about the CIA in Southeast Asia and elsewhere during the same period?
By the last half of the 1970s abuses due to "out-of-control" intelligence and law enforcement organisations were called to account by Senator Frank Church's committee in 1975 and 1976 with respect to the CIA and FBI (Watergate: cue Washington Post"). Admiral Bobby Inman, then DIRNSA, took NSA public to the horror of all concern for it truly had been "No Such Agency" for decades. Reforms, such as they were, didn't last long, did they? See Church Committee.
I believe that the disposition to carry out the activities for which these and other organisations were criticised and held to significant public account continued and found its outlet in contractors and dedicated intelligence organisations independent of government control but paid by government. True, there was much to be done which needed the best people who had to be paid for their services. At the same time this opened the door to those who had little or no qualifications to abuse the system.
Without control and accountability those who betrayed trust could do so and get away with it causing immense damage from the latest and most sophisticated espionage/surveillance technology ever known to human civilisation. While those who developed this technology were most likely above reproach, it was passed along for use by those who had less than honourable scruples. What they did with it was even worse and reflects the worst of COINTELPRO and CIA assassination abuses all wrapped into one activity.
I know this because I have been a surveillance target for 12 years since mid-August 1998 and subjected to this most sophisticated surveillance technology since February 2001. The latter was brought to the UK by a couple retired US Marines the senior of whom then started travelling elsewhere after the successful invasion of Afghanistan following 9/11 making his first stop a report Kabul.
Because of their disturbed personalities committed to sadistic torture abuse 24/7/365 I learned a great deal about what they were doing and the technology they had founded upon Tempest used against computer technology and the human being alike. They used V2K (Voice-to-Skull, i.e., electronic transmission of sound) for torture purposes that allowed me to hear much of what they were doing or trying to do wherever I was located day and night.
Since they joined a surveillance operation already in progress for 2.5 years, I already had a foundation of people whom I knew so there were no mysterious "they" in all of this. I then learned a great deal about these people and their activity which has gone on since before 9/11 for 9.5 years starting in February 2001. They spread the information all around about their marvellous surveillance technology which they allowed others to use. It became COINTELPRO all over again and goes on as of this writing.
Asking the experts to provide their opinion is a useful step but not a complete one. It's a necessary condition for assessment but not a sufficient one. All sources of information need to be considered most especially those many of us who have been on the receiving end of the abuse and denied any opportunity to get the real story out in any meaningful way. That, of course, is the purpose of this abuse.
I especially like General Michael Hayden's response for its evasiveness and support of the intelligence community. He is noted as being the CIA Director from 2006 to 2009, but he was also DIRNSA from 1999 to 2005 the longest serving DIRNSA ever. What little I knew about General Hayden was fascinating. I thought he was good and the kind of enlightened leader needed at the time since he remained so long in a job that rotated between the various military services. NSA was and is the focal point for military SIGINT coordinating all that activity among the various branches of the US military.
Given what I had learned by 2006, his move to the CIA as its director communicated to me what I had already concluded as existing in this world where HUMINT and SIGINT had merged in a single intelligence technology based upon Tempest which had been my direct experience as a target since February 2001.
In fact, I was so alarmed by its abuse given my former experience with the USAF Security Service (1961 to 1964) that I tried to send General Hayden an Email to advise him of what I considered a most serious breach of security. NSA is not open to receiving Emails from the outside world except for those looking for work. I thus sent this Email to personnel with the request that they forward it to DIRNSA, General Hayden.
"US National Security Breach: Email to DIRNSA" My 30th March 2002 Email to General Michael Hayden
Here's a situation which I recognised as being "out-of-control." I have sent a great deal of communication about this situation to bring it to light so that it could be ended. Even sending an Email to General Michael Hayden as best I could was not sufficient to bring any relief to what I knew as being terribly "out-of-control."
However, today Michael Hayden claims it is not "out-of-control" in the Washington Post. I beg to disagree. I believe that he, like many others, has a vested interest to serve and cannot or will not grapple with the monstrosity that has developed over the decades since the end WWII.
He spent ten years at the head of the NSA and the CIA without addressing the abuses which I had attempted to bring to his attention.
I believe that these abuses are widespread given the people involved and those who report as I do on the Internet. I believe that what we have today are intelligence community and law enforcement/security agencies who were "out-of-control" as they were in the 1960s and 1970s only more so since this is being carried out by contractors who are not responsible and are not accountable to anyone. General Michael Hayden has not taken any responsibility as far as I can see to bring accountability into his world of SIGINT and HUMINT. I believe that he could not do this because it was and is out of control.
Naturally, there is a massive cover up effort under way as there always is in these matters. The Washington Post needs to dig deeper and talk with a wider spectrum of people. As in Watergate they need to "follow the money trail." This will make Watergate look like a kindergarten picnic.
What really exists here is an alternative government not just alternative geography.
Those at the top haven't a clue about what is happening on the ground in the real world. There is a huge dichotomy between those trying to manage at the top and what is actually being done at ground level by those whom they are supposed to be managing. Those at the top create solutions and organisations to suite themselves based upon their belief about the way they think the world is matching what the want as a solution. The solution doesn't fit the problem. If fits their conception of the problem enabling them to do what they want.
As a result they create terrorism because they have not grasped the essence that terrorism is hatred against what they are and do to such a degree that a terrorist is willing to kill innocent people including women and children along with him/herself. As a result they are fighting something which they create further by fighting it as they do. Worst of all are those like Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret who are sent into areas that breed terrorists who do all the things which support such creation as well as carry out the job of the terrorist by destroying democracy and its institutions.
I sent Michael Hayden an Email about this problem over eight years ago. The proof that the US intelligence community is out of control rests with the fact that this Email produced no results when they were necessary. There is no point of contact. Those in significant positions are either ill served by those under them, or they do not know where else to go to solve a problem brought to their attention as I did regarding the out of control abuse from surveillance technology billed as an "experiment."
The vast array of intelligence agencies brought to the attention of the world by the Washington Post" confirms why the intelligence community is out of control and why those who want to abuse in the extreme do so with impunity for many years despite my explicit information to many in positions of significant authority Michael Hayden among them which fails to have any effect. They then have got to hide the truth while they cover up the reality of what is happening. This then creates more terrorists.
Friday, 23 July 2010
TSA Cmments Friday 23rd July 2010
That's right. No one knows if it's "fit for purpose" because no one knows what's happening including the Secretary of Defense about his own office. He may want it that way to deny as the DoD did with Clinton when questions about abuses arose.
This massive infrastructure magnificently revealed in TSA can hide black ops and R&D that would terrify if known. Worse, it would lead to proper oversight. At the moment the very dark side of the human character can find expression in this monstrous mountain of buildings, companies and people.
This morass can be seen as intentional since it hides and avoids the legal constraints placed upon government and its employees. The essence of spying is to keep it all secret since it's illegal. What is known and how it is obtained must never be known. Confusion is the ultimate cover.
Fortunately, TSA is beginning to peel the onion.
I can see President Obama more and more inside the bubble. If a whistle blower crackdown exists, then the abuses will flourish all the more from inside this intelligence monolith. What's really needed are for those who are targeted with abuse to speak up and communicate it. They are not subject to secrecy laws just more abuse to discredit the truth they report and the reluctance of the recipient of the information to accept it. I'm reminded of the 1980's film "The Whistleblower" with Michael Caine where GCHQ issues were suppressed by methods more associated with the USSR against whom the intelligence effort was being directed.
What is splendid and magnificent about TSA are the uses of the Internet employed so that networking can work to provide the Washington Post, Dana Priest, Bill Arkin, et al with feedback and comment from many sources. People can work through their reported information to provide them with more information. They in turn have a problem about publishing classified information that readers especially targets of intelligence abuse do not have when posting what they've learned from the abusers.
The @PostTSA etc can bring all of this together for the world to see and turn it into a meaningful whole. What they are doing is truly mind boggling in all its aspects, and they could not have selected a better or more important project. It's a real coup for democratic journalism that will keep those who seek to deceive honest (we all hope).
One or two specialist intelligence agencies are needed to track al-Qaeda whatever or whoever they might be. The other 1298 are needed for domestic and international surveillance to identify, track, monitor and generally interfere with or kill if necessary those who are not liked for whatever reason. It's called internal security but exists on a global basis under the ruse of seeking out Osama bin Laden and his ever multiplying network. Taliban?
Fundamentally, the intelligence agency build up occurred as a means to keep those who were in power at 9/11 at the top indefinitely. It didn't quite work out that way, but don't worry they will be back. The few can control the hundreds of millions as Mao, Stalin & Hitler did for a time. Fear generated by creating an elusive enemy that is never ending allows a structure to grow for the control of dissent under the ruse of dealing with the forever elusive enemy al-Qaeda.
1300 intelligence agencies reflect empire building by those who have something to hide and fear exposure. Has the world ever seen anything like it? The huge wealth of the US has been diverted by the current $75 billion/year to an intelligence community for control purposes of the domestic population in the US and elsewhere. It has nothing to do with al-Qaeda, obviously, and reflects the rise of those who have no ability to do anything based upon an inclination and to lie, cheat and steal for their own greed, glory and power.
By the way I do think the terrorist threat is real and needs a proportional, specific and intelligent response. What has happened, however, is that the intelligence community has developed into an industry that thrives on terrorism and needs to keep it going in order to survive. Do not expect this conflict to end anytime soon. It will be perpetual as George Orwell described in "1984" where Big Brother mechanisms were used to control the population. Room 101 is now quite real and operating worldwide.
Since the comments here raise the issue of HUMINT and SIGINT, I'll add this to the discussion since it has not even begun to sink in that these are now combined. The human being can be tracked and completely monitored by Tempest with brainwaves decoded as i've described in other communications this week which I have put on my blog. It's a big step to present this to the world that takes enormous courage because of the ridicule that will result and official attacks which will occur the mildest of which will be "sensationalism."
As I see it, what you are doing is preparing a massive and absolutely essential foundation for going in the direction of ever elusive truth made doubly so by the very nature of the intelligence community. Whether you get to the point of broaching this essential step forward by the intelligence community that I believe has come from the NSA remains to be seen. You have a great difficulty in reporting what might be considered classified. In any case no discussion can move forward in any meaningful way until the fact of brainwave monitoring and feedback is established.
As I've described, I've been a surveillance target for 12 years 9.5 years of that subjected to 24/7/365 brainwave monitoring and feedback surveillance technology based upon Tempest since February 2001 seven months before 9/11. This was introduced by two USMC (Ret) US Agents the senior of whom went off to Kabul after the end of the successful invasion of Afghanistan following 9/11.
Based upon all my experience during these 12 years 24/7/365 which I have completely documented continuously to create a complete record, I believe that the whole thrust of the intelligence community is toward this type of intelligence gathering against the human being which can be done by satellite from any location in the world. Once you understand this, many events over these years will fall into place. This is why there are 1300 agencies using the al-Qaeda ruse to do this work.
It will require massive computer power for it's a step forward from Echelon to intercepting electromagnetic radiation from the human being and decoding it as will also be done with computer technology and all electronic devices. Wire tapping is a thing of the past. So is cryptography. Proximity to electronic devices is the future not turning senior people to divulge information. Their brains can be read, eyes seen through, ears listened with and so on. HUMINT old style has merged with SIGINT. What do you want to call it? Have a naming contest.
Massive supercomputers will be needed to process this information Every language will be needed to read the minds of targets and understand what people are thinking, saying and hearing. When the target uses a computer, as I am doing now to write this, the language will have to be known to the person monitoring. All of these intercepts can be electronically stored, scanned dictionary style and then examined. This is what I believe the 1300 agencies are doing and especially the contractors who are not government employees. Everything is being done to keep this secret.
In my Facebook comment I described this same conclusion based upon my experience from the external observation position of its observable effects. This ties in with that by providing the foundation of what is actually being done and how it is being developed using non-consenting human guinea pigs like myself as indefinite surveillance targets until silenced by death. In the meantime everything is used to discredit what I report by any means, and the media (yup, that's you) will not pick it up. You will not get this one from the top It will have to come from people like me who are subjected to it at the bottom.
There is much more to be said about these 1300 agencies, and my Facebook comments go in that direction. The discussion needs to be opened to include brainwave monitoring surveillance.
I cannot praise you and Bill Arkin enough for what you are doing. I believe that I know what is going on inside all those buildings. I know why they all have special rooms. I know why it's so important to have a secure phone system. It's all because of Tempest which is now able to intercept and decode the human brainwaves surrounding the head
This massive infrastructure magnificently revealed in TSA can hide black ops and R&D that would terrify if known. Worse, it would lead to proper oversight. At the moment the very dark side of the human character can find expression in this monstrous mountain of buildings, companies and people.
This morass can be seen as intentional since it hides and avoids the legal constraints placed upon government and its employees. The essence of spying is to keep it all secret since it's illegal. What is known and how it is obtained must never be known. Confusion is the ultimate cover.
Fortunately, TSA is beginning to peel the onion.
I can see President Obama more and more inside the bubble. If a whistle blower crackdown exists, then the abuses will flourish all the more from inside this intelligence monolith. What's really needed are for those who are targeted with abuse to speak up and communicate it. They are not subject to secrecy laws just more abuse to discredit the truth they report and the reluctance of the recipient of the information to accept it. I'm reminded of the 1980's film "The Whistleblower" with Michael Caine where GCHQ issues were suppressed by methods more associated with the USSR against whom the intelligence effort was being directed.
What is splendid and magnificent about TSA are the uses of the Internet employed so that networking can work to provide the Washington Post, Dana Priest, Bill Arkin, et al with feedback and comment from many sources. People can work through their reported information to provide them with more information. They in turn have a problem about publishing classified information that readers especially targets of intelligence abuse do not have when posting what they've learned from the abusers.
The @PostTSA etc can bring all of this together for the world to see and turn it into a meaningful whole. What they are doing is truly mind boggling in all its aspects, and they could not have selected a better or more important project. It's a real coup for democratic journalism that will keep those who seek to deceive honest (we all hope).
One or two specialist intelligence agencies are needed to track al-Qaeda whatever or whoever they might be. The other 1298 are needed for domestic and international surveillance to identify, track, monitor and generally interfere with or kill if necessary those who are not liked for whatever reason. It's called internal security but exists on a global basis under the ruse of seeking out Osama bin Laden and his ever multiplying network. Taliban?
Fundamentally, the intelligence agency build up occurred as a means to keep those who were in power at 9/11 at the top indefinitely. It didn't quite work out that way, but don't worry they will be back. The few can control the hundreds of millions as Mao, Stalin & Hitler did for a time. Fear generated by creating an elusive enemy that is never ending allows a structure to grow for the control of dissent under the ruse of dealing with the forever elusive enemy al-Qaeda.
1300 intelligence agencies reflect empire building by those who have something to hide and fear exposure. Has the world ever seen anything like it? The huge wealth of the US has been diverted by the current $75 billion/year to an intelligence community for control purposes of the domestic population in the US and elsewhere. It has nothing to do with al-Qaeda, obviously, and reflects the rise of those who have no ability to do anything based upon an inclination and to lie, cheat and steal for their own greed, glory and power.
By the way I do think the terrorist threat is real and needs a proportional, specific and intelligent response. What has happened, however, is that the intelligence community has developed into an industry that thrives on terrorism and needs to keep it going in order to survive. Do not expect this conflict to end anytime soon. It will be perpetual as George Orwell described in "1984" where Big Brother mechanisms were used to control the population. Room 101 is now quite real and operating worldwide.
Since the comments here raise the issue of HUMINT and SIGINT, I'll add this to the discussion since it has not even begun to sink in that these are now combined. The human being can be tracked and completely monitored by Tempest with brainwaves decoded as i've described in other communications this week which I have put on my blog. It's a big step to present this to the world that takes enormous courage because of the ridicule that will result and official attacks which will occur the mildest of which will be "sensationalism."
As I see it, what you are doing is preparing a massive and absolutely essential foundation for going in the direction of ever elusive truth made doubly so by the very nature of the intelligence community. Whether you get to the point of broaching this essential step forward by the intelligence community that I believe has come from the NSA remains to be seen. You have a great difficulty in reporting what might be considered classified. In any case no discussion can move forward in any meaningful way until the fact of brainwave monitoring and feedback is established.
As I've described, I've been a surveillance target for 12 years 9.5 years of that subjected to 24/7/365 brainwave monitoring and feedback surveillance technology based upon Tempest since February 2001 seven months before 9/11. This was introduced by two USMC (Ret) US Agents the senior of whom went off to Kabul after the end of the successful invasion of Afghanistan following 9/11.
Based upon all my experience during these 12 years 24/7/365 which I have completely documented continuously to create a complete record, I believe that the whole thrust of the intelligence community is toward this type of intelligence gathering against the human being which can be done by satellite from any location in the world. Once you understand this, many events over these years will fall into place. This is why there are 1300 agencies using the al-Qaeda ruse to do this work.
It will require massive computer power for it's a step forward from Echelon to intercepting electromagnetic radiation from the human being and decoding it as will also be done with computer technology and all electronic devices. Wire tapping is a thing of the past. So is cryptography. Proximity to electronic devices is the future not turning senior people to divulge information. Their brains can be read, eyes seen through, ears listened with and so on. HUMINT old style has merged with SIGINT. What do you want to call it? Have a naming contest.
Massive supercomputers will be needed to process this information Every language will be needed to read the minds of targets and understand what people are thinking, saying and hearing. When the target uses a computer, as I am doing now to write this, the language will have to be known to the person monitoring. All of these intercepts can be electronically stored, scanned dictionary style and then examined. This is what I believe the 1300 agencies are doing and especially the contractors who are not government employees. Everything is being done to keep this secret.
In my Facebook comment I described this same conclusion based upon my experience from the external observation position of its observable effects. This ties in with that by providing the foundation of what is actually being done and how it is being developed using non-consenting human guinea pigs like myself as indefinite surveillance targets until silenced by death. In the meantime everything is used to discredit what I report by any means, and the media (yup, that's you) will not pick it up. You will not get this one from the top It will have to come from people like me who are subjected to it at the bottom.
There is much more to be said about these 1300 agencies, and my Facebook comments go in that direction. The discussion needs to be opened to include brainwave monitoring surveillance.
I cannot praise you and Bill Arkin enough for what you are doing. I believe that I know what is going on inside all those buildings. I know why they all have special rooms. I know why it's so important to have a secure phone system. It's all because of Tempest which is now able to intercept and decode the human brainwaves surrounding the head
Thursday, 22 July 2010
"A hidden world, growing beyond control" TSA Part 1
"A hidden world, growing beyond control" by Dana Priest and William Arkin Washington Post Monday, 19th July 2010.
The intelligence system is already out of control in a most malignant way, and that is the problem. It is not possible to communicate about those who are out of control adding to the deluge of information including their faked allegations and false negative characterisations so that they can be stopped to ensure valid information is not buried.
When failures occur as described by Dana Priest and Bill Arkin in this initial article about "Top Secret America" published in the Washing Post Monday last, 19th July 2010, there is a call for more money, more analysts, more buildings to do the work of getting what they aren't going to get done anyway given the current abuse in the system.
No one identifies the source of deliberately generated bad information used to make the incompetent abusers look good and keep getting paid while they try to increase their power and stature. In the secret intelligence world it's far too easy to make up whatever one wants and keep from getting caught. As a result, terrorists succeed, crime flourishes and the social order collapses as if dominated and controlled by organised crime.
In this fabulously informative "Top Secret America" project emerging from the Washington Post there is a brilliant and fascinating description of information overload where the response is always to grow to competence rather than to cut out the malfeasance to ensure quality. The existence of those who fake it is so significant in my direct experience as to constitute the major menace to the success of the intelligence mission.
This article highlights as one example of intelligence failure the newly sprung National Counterterrorism Centre (NCTC) which is part of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) now ensconced it its new building Liberty Crossing in McLean, Virginia. Dana Priest and Bill Arkin discuss the role and activity of the NCTC director Micheal Leiter in conjunction with the Xmas Day Detroit bomber.
The failure occurred at the NCTC as described succinctly by them with a response that more money for analysts and whatever else are needed to solve the problem. I do not believe that this is the solution to the problem which rests with the failure to recognise and jettison those who are known to deliberately fake it as I described five months before the Xmas Day Detroit would-be bombing when noting that the enemy was within.
"Achilles Heel at National Counterterrorism Centre" contains a copy of my Email to the Editor of the Columbia Magazine sent on 23rd July 2009 (a year ago as it happens) after reading an article about NCTC director Michael Leiter a Columbia College graduate. Links to the original article are provided and the wee bit of my letter that was subsequently published.
I identified the risks from a terrorist attack as occurring at the NCTC five months before the Xmas Day Detroit bombing attempt occurred. I pointed out that the enemy was within which was not being addressed. What I meant by this was the rubbish information being generated by the likes of Colonel Vine, Lt Harry Bird (both USMC Ret) and others as they intentionally puff up everything for their own corrupt self interest.
They started in February 2001 carrying out their surveillance technology abuse against me in North Kensington, London, UK, seven months before 9/11. The rubbish industry was already in place. Colonel Vine argued in May 2001 to kidnap and remove me from the UK for no justifiable reason whatsoever just as there was no justifiable reason to use the surveillance technology against me 24/7/365. He cited an earlier instance of kidnapping someone after a Royal Festival Hall concert as an example where no fuss was ever made.
Thus, I had an early glimpse at rendition and torture abuse which in this instance was carried out 24/7/365 by surveillance technology abuse using it as a lethal weapon. I call it Toxic Surveillance. This was fully operational and in place before 9/11. It just grew afterwards as revealed by Colonel Vine going to Kabul after the success of the US invasion of Afghanistan following 9/11. He was later described as in Sri Lanka after the Boxing Day Tsunami hit there.
There is no doubt then that Colonel Vine and Lt Harry Bird are connected with the wider US global intelligence and surveillance effort which has existed before 9/11 although the whole effort has grown extraordinarily afterwards. Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret has been a permanent surveillance fixture against me 24/7/365 all these years making up a whole spectrum of allegations and false characterisation for almost a decade so that I was able to write with confidence a year ago that the real problem for US intelligence and counter terrorism was rubbish in the information pipeline.
Not only did I write that Email to the Editor of the Columbia Magazine, but I also faxed a copy of it to President Barack Obama and Prime Minister Gordon Brown later that same night since I felt so strongly that this was a prime risk for a terrorist attack which occurred almost exactly five months later. No effort was made to stop this abuse which I continuously documented and reported. The NCTC had no Email address for public use on its web site.
It is just not the information overload with which the NCTC had to contend, but it was the load of rubbish that was jammed into the pipeline on a continuous basis from before 9/11 that then got included in the build up following 9/11 as more incompetent and inexperienced people were added because of the 9/11 failure. Nobody said we've got rubbish in the system from bad people: let's get it out. As a result, Quantanamo filled with innocents, increased rendition flights carried the innocent and torture was the standard all around. This activity all existed before 9/11 and was just increased afterwards to the point where it became exposed.
Still as of this writing, right now, this same surveillance torture abuse goes on. There has never been the slightest respite in almost 12 years in total from this disposition to carry out indefinite surveillance abuse by US and UK agents. The result has been a wasting of resources and diversion of attention away from those who are the real threats as occurred with the London bombers on 7/7/2005 and would-be bombers of 21/7/2005.
At the same time the Christmas Day Detroit would-be bomber was recognised while studying at University College London but not tracked. However, I, who was completely and totally innocent and one who reported risks and possible threats, was being subjected to complete and totally invasive surveillance abuse throughout all these years 24/7/365. The world of intelligence and counter terrorism was out of control and had been before 9/11 in my direct experience from US and UK agents abusing me in the extreme for three years prior to 9/11.
These people have dug themselves in so deeply that they can never admit the truth and continue to demand more of everything so that they can "dig deeper" to succeed where they have failed for almost 12 years. They want more people, more resources and more money to get on with their execution so that they can cover up what they have really done by my death enabling them to say anything they please without opposition and go on clogging the intelligence pipeline with their next victim. Serial killers using Toxic Surveillance.
"No Excuse For Not Tracking Delta Aircraft Bomberr" On Xmas Eve the day before the Xmas Day Detroit would-be bomber struck, I sent this Email to the BBC following a broadcast report about MI5 disagreeing with a couple points made. My last sentence concludes with ". . . for the very foundation of democracy is at threat from within."
US Intelligence is a $75 billion industry, but the NCTC did not have an Email address for me to send my Email noted at the start above. Just take a look at the razzle dazzle photographs from the Washington Post of Liberty Crossing. See photos 2 through 6 including Michael Leiter walking down the hall. They have all this, but no one can think while I have nothing and get it right.
They want power, prestige, status, domination and control for which they will do anything and is why I've been subjected to Toxic Surveillance for nearly 12 years with all the other disasters happening. No one stops this abuse despite full knowledge of all that is happening. That is the real enemy within. Toxic Surveillance will bring about the end of the world as we know it unless stopped.
Liberty Crossing has a second much darker meaning much like crossing the river Styx that is quite close to reality.
The intelligence system is already out of control in a most malignant way, and that is the problem. It is not possible to communicate about those who are out of control adding to the deluge of information including their faked allegations and false negative characterisations so that they can be stopped to ensure valid information is not buried.
When failures occur as described by Dana Priest and Bill Arkin in this initial article about "Top Secret America" published in the Washing Post Monday last, 19th July 2010, there is a call for more money, more analysts, more buildings to do the work of getting what they aren't going to get done anyway given the current abuse in the system.
No one identifies the source of deliberately generated bad information used to make the incompetent abusers look good and keep getting paid while they try to increase their power and stature. In the secret intelligence world it's far too easy to make up whatever one wants and keep from getting caught. As a result, terrorists succeed, crime flourishes and the social order collapses as if dominated and controlled by organised crime.
In this fabulously informative "Top Secret America" project emerging from the Washington Post there is a brilliant and fascinating description of information overload where the response is always to grow to competence rather than to cut out the malfeasance to ensure quality. The existence of those who fake it is so significant in my direct experience as to constitute the major menace to the success of the intelligence mission.
This article highlights as one example of intelligence failure the newly sprung National Counterterrorism Centre (NCTC) which is part of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) now ensconced it its new building Liberty Crossing in McLean, Virginia. Dana Priest and Bill Arkin discuss the role and activity of the NCTC director Micheal Leiter in conjunction with the Xmas Day Detroit bomber.
The failure occurred at the NCTC as described succinctly by them with a response that more money for analysts and whatever else are needed to solve the problem. I do not believe that this is the solution to the problem which rests with the failure to recognise and jettison those who are known to deliberately fake it as I described five months before the Xmas Day Detroit would-be bombing when noting that the enemy was within.
"Achilles Heel at National Counterterrorism Centre" contains a copy of my Email to the Editor of the Columbia Magazine sent on 23rd July 2009 (a year ago as it happens) after reading an article about NCTC director Michael Leiter a Columbia College graduate. Links to the original article are provided and the wee bit of my letter that was subsequently published.
I identified the risks from a terrorist attack as occurring at the NCTC five months before the Xmas Day Detroit bombing attempt occurred. I pointed out that the enemy was within which was not being addressed. What I meant by this was the rubbish information being generated by the likes of Colonel Vine, Lt Harry Bird (both USMC Ret) and others as they intentionally puff up everything for their own corrupt self interest.
They started in February 2001 carrying out their surveillance technology abuse against me in North Kensington, London, UK, seven months before 9/11. The rubbish industry was already in place. Colonel Vine argued in May 2001 to kidnap and remove me from the UK for no justifiable reason whatsoever just as there was no justifiable reason to use the surveillance technology against me 24/7/365. He cited an earlier instance of kidnapping someone after a Royal Festival Hall concert as an example where no fuss was ever made.
Thus, I had an early glimpse at rendition and torture abuse which in this instance was carried out 24/7/365 by surveillance technology abuse using it as a lethal weapon. I call it Toxic Surveillance. This was fully operational and in place before 9/11. It just grew afterwards as revealed by Colonel Vine going to Kabul after the success of the US invasion of Afghanistan following 9/11. He was later described as in Sri Lanka after the Boxing Day Tsunami hit there.
There is no doubt then that Colonel Vine and Lt Harry Bird are connected with the wider US global intelligence and surveillance effort which has existed before 9/11 although the whole effort has grown extraordinarily afterwards. Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret has been a permanent surveillance fixture against me 24/7/365 all these years making up a whole spectrum of allegations and false characterisation for almost a decade so that I was able to write with confidence a year ago that the real problem for US intelligence and counter terrorism was rubbish in the information pipeline.
Not only did I write that Email to the Editor of the Columbia Magazine, but I also faxed a copy of it to President Barack Obama and Prime Minister Gordon Brown later that same night since I felt so strongly that this was a prime risk for a terrorist attack which occurred almost exactly five months later. No effort was made to stop this abuse which I continuously documented and reported. The NCTC had no Email address for public use on its web site.
It is just not the information overload with which the NCTC had to contend, but it was the load of rubbish that was jammed into the pipeline on a continuous basis from before 9/11 that then got included in the build up following 9/11 as more incompetent and inexperienced people were added because of the 9/11 failure. Nobody said we've got rubbish in the system from bad people: let's get it out. As a result, Quantanamo filled with innocents, increased rendition flights carried the innocent and torture was the standard all around. This activity all existed before 9/11 and was just increased afterwards to the point where it became exposed.
Still as of this writing, right now, this same surveillance torture abuse goes on. There has never been the slightest respite in almost 12 years in total from this disposition to carry out indefinite surveillance abuse by US and UK agents. The result has been a wasting of resources and diversion of attention away from those who are the real threats as occurred with the London bombers on 7/7/2005 and would-be bombers of 21/7/2005.
At the same time the Christmas Day Detroit would-be bomber was recognised while studying at University College London but not tracked. However, I, who was completely and totally innocent and one who reported risks and possible threats, was being subjected to complete and totally invasive surveillance abuse throughout all these years 24/7/365. The world of intelligence and counter terrorism was out of control and had been before 9/11 in my direct experience from US and UK agents abusing me in the extreme for three years prior to 9/11.
These people have dug themselves in so deeply that they can never admit the truth and continue to demand more of everything so that they can "dig deeper" to succeed where they have failed for almost 12 years. They want more people, more resources and more money to get on with their execution so that they can cover up what they have really done by my death enabling them to say anything they please without opposition and go on clogging the intelligence pipeline with their next victim. Serial killers using Toxic Surveillance.
"No Excuse For Not Tracking Delta Aircraft Bomberr" On Xmas Eve the day before the Xmas Day Detroit would-be bomber struck, I sent this Email to the BBC following a broadcast report about MI5 disagreeing with a couple points made. My last sentence concludes with ". . . for the very foundation of democracy is at threat from within."
US Intelligence is a $75 billion industry, but the NCTC did not have an Email address for me to send my Email noted at the start above. Just take a look at the razzle dazzle photographs from the Washington Post of Liberty Crossing. See photos 2 through 6 including Michael Leiter walking down the hall. They have all this, but no one can think while I have nothing and get it right.
They want power, prestige, status, domination and control for which they will do anything and is why I've been subjected to Toxic Surveillance for nearly 12 years with all the other disasters happening. No one stops this abuse despite full knowledge of all that is happening. That is the real enemy within. Toxic Surveillance will bring about the end of the world as we know it unless stopped.
Liberty Crossing has a second much darker meaning much like crossing the river Styx that is quite close to reality.
Wednesday, 21 July 2010
"The Secrets Next Door" TSA Part 3:
"The Secrets Next Door" by Dana Priest and William M Arkin Washington Post
About 5:30 am one morning in February 2001 I heard a male voice rattling off some of my biographical information while I was taking a bath. It could not have been acoustic sound. I would not have heard anyone like this. It was the electronic transmission of sound aka Voice-to-Skull or V2K the US Army calls it I later learned.
I was patient with things surveillance by this time since I had been a surveillance target for two and one-half years from mid-August 1998 and had gotten used to 24/7/365 monitoring and disturbances of all kinds. This was just one more but a much more sophisticated surveillance technology I determined as the torture abuse continued.
In December 2000 I was diagnosed with cataracts after tracking the deterioration of my eyes since September 1998 resulting from the use of radar imagining technology installed in the flat above in mid-August 1998 which escalated after my extensive letter to the Prime Minister in September 1998. The surveillance technology was at the disposal of those whom I had reported for child abuse in May 1998, the various occupants in surrounding flats, the general public, local and central government departments including the NHS, police, elected officials and others.
They all carried out a massive torture campaign 24/7/365 including sleep deprivation and personal injuries such as the cataracts that developed. As a result, I was seeking protection from this harassment and human rights abuses in the High Court and was preparing my information and papers in January and February 2001 when the additional escalation of surveillance technology occurred introduced by Colonel Vine (USMC Ret), Lt Harry Bird (USMC Ret) and others.
I had been used to monitoring by Tempest which intercepted computer monitor screen emissions so they could read what I typed from adjacent flats and outside in parked vehicles. I was used to ultrasound photography and its loud click in plastic that occurs as the sound waves merge. There were listening devices as well. All of this was made known to me by the excessively loud talking from all these people 24/7/365 enabling me to know what was happening while they abused me.
It was not strange then to hear a couple more voices from retired US Marines Colonel Vine and Lt Harry Bird. I just listened and took notes as I had been doing 24/7/365 for the prior two and one-half years. I learned that the surveillance technology which they introduced was an expansion of Tempest against both computer technology and the human being. That ability to intercept very small electromagnetic radiation emissions from any electronic device could be used against the human brain as well.
I learned that they could see with my eyes, hear with my ears, feel what I did such as muscle movements and detect smell too. They could also read my thoughts including words and images which I tested and got verbal responses that this was valid.
They could also feed back these sensory perceptions. I had already first learned about electronic sound transmission initially aka S2K. But, images could be induced as well as language for memory probing and dream inducements while I slept. These included videos some of which have been used more then once which I recognise. They could also induce pain. On top of this they can surreptitiously medicate to incapacitate and debilitate along with other emulations for chemicals in the human body.
All of this is carried out by satellite communications so that I can be tracked, monitored and subjected to feedback wherever I am located all of which has been done 24/7/365 for almost nine and one-half years since February 2001. They, Colonel Vine, Lt Harry Bird, the mother of the abused children and others, sabotaged the High Court legal proceedings after two hearings in March 2001. Since then they have set their sights on destroying all my human activity and life itself.
Initially, Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret said that this surveillance was "experimental." They have been using it with the NHS, police and others participating from the UK government for false imprisonment, torture interrogation punishment, medical experimentation and surveillance R&D all predicated on a presumption of guilt from false allegations and false negative characterisations. They make every effort to cause mental illness and/or physical injuries in the hopes of having me removed and incarcerated or hospitalised.
They have been confounded by my survival so far for a total of almost 12 years. Along the way they have described incidents of going back to the "laboratory" to improve their surreptitious medication which was not getting the ultimate job done to destroy. At the same time there has been an extensive effort to use Tempest against all computer and electronic components for intercepting and controlling electronic technology. What has been done with computer technology can be done to the human being and vice versa.
This is what has been developed in my direct experience for the past 12 years which was going on long before this as reported by other non-consenting human guinea pigs such as myself. NSA's use of Tempest goes back to at least the 1950s. It was used on the USS Oxford during the Cuban Missile Crisis, and was used by satellite to monitor the USSR space centre land lines from satellite during Yuri Gagarin's space flight in April 1962. See James Bamford's "Body of Secrets" for each of these.
The USAF Security Service took over Tempest in the early 1970s to use it euphemistically for communication security purposes. See the USAF Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance Agency (ISR) web site for a history of USAF Security Service Tempest has since cropped up in television dramas such as a "Numb3rs" programme entitled "Sacrifice" where computer monitor emissions were intercepted by what was called alternatively as "van Eck Phreaking." There is no protection against such interception which is why the GPS signal goes haywire near Fort George Meade, Maryland, home of NSA as they scramble all signals.
Dana Priest and Bill Arkin describe the intense security surrounding this vast complex of intelligence development surrounding NSA where no one says a word about what they are doing. Yet, here are Colonel Vine, Lt Harry Bird (USMC Ret) and others giving it all away to a multitude of people in North Kensington, London, including training the mother of the abused children so that she has operational control of this surveillance technology to torture me as much as possible while she goes on with her violent abuse against children and others.
There has been no vetting for any kind of clearance here top secret or otherwise or any evaluation of qualifications based upon ability, education, training or experience. This most sophisticated of surveillance technologies has been freely given away to all and sundry by Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret who brags about it and shows it off to anyone close by to create his own self importance.
For all those who think that people they know are doing a service for everyone by making life possible in a free and democratic state please think again. As my experience has shown me during the past 12 years, the waste and abuse is of a most extreme kind that directly destroys democracy and all human and civil rights. Dana Priest, Bill Arkin, the other staff members and the Washington Post are doing a phenomenal job of the utmost importance with "Top Secret America," but it extends way beyond the US as can be seen here.
In fact, NSA cannot legally spy domestically in the US. It is called the largest intelligence organisation in the US and probably the world. It was formed to consolidate the US military intelligence activities after WWII concentrating on intercepting communications, analysing them and decoding messages. The decoding has moved to the signals themselves. When the essence of Tempest was brought to this mission, it expanded addressing every useful electromagnetic radiation emission possible. It has now reached the human being thus combining Humint with Sigint for the most reliable intelligence possible: decoding human brainwaves.
The growth anticipated at NSA and its surrounding satellite villages in the future will, I believe, concentrate on this aspect of signals intelligence: brainwave monitoring and feedback for information and control. That is why this reporting involving "Top Secret America" is critically important for every person on the planet. This goes well beyond Watergate and must be exposed so that it cannot be abused as I've experienced during the past decade.
At the same time its beneficial uses for medicine are extraordinary and must be cultivated by making this technology and brainwave decoding available to the world. It's like nuclear energy when once discovered, it had both a military and beneficial use. It's time to stop the malignant abuse of this neuroscience for extreme destruction purposes and bring it under the proper controls of the democratic rule of law.
It is not Cyber Security that is the real threat. It's Tempest which circumvents Cyber Security.
Trabzon Air Station, Trabzon, Turkey, 1964. During the height of the Cold War Sigint was critically important. This was an NSA intercept site 90 miles from the Soviet Georgia border. Yes, I had a Top Secret Codeword Crypto security clearance. See James Bamford's "Puzzle Palace" for some pages describing Trabzon, Turkey.
Today, all of this has changed as I've directly experienced during the past 12 years 24/7/365. Dana Priest, Bill Arkin, all those working on this project and the Washington Post are doing the world an invaluable service. It's time for all to pay very close attention to what is happening "next door" as they report it and take the necessary steps to ensure that democracy is not destroyed in the interest of security.
About 5:30 am one morning in February 2001 I heard a male voice rattling off some of my biographical information while I was taking a bath. It could not have been acoustic sound. I would not have heard anyone like this. It was the electronic transmission of sound aka Voice-to-Skull or V2K the US Army calls it I later learned.
I was patient with things surveillance by this time since I had been a surveillance target for two and one-half years from mid-August 1998 and had gotten used to 24/7/365 monitoring and disturbances of all kinds. This was just one more but a much more sophisticated surveillance technology I determined as the torture abuse continued.
In December 2000 I was diagnosed with cataracts after tracking the deterioration of my eyes since September 1998 resulting from the use of radar imagining technology installed in the flat above in mid-August 1998 which escalated after my extensive letter to the Prime Minister in September 1998. The surveillance technology was at the disposal of those whom I had reported for child abuse in May 1998, the various occupants in surrounding flats, the general public, local and central government departments including the NHS, police, elected officials and others.
They all carried out a massive torture campaign 24/7/365 including sleep deprivation and personal injuries such as the cataracts that developed. As a result, I was seeking protection from this harassment and human rights abuses in the High Court and was preparing my information and papers in January and February 2001 when the additional escalation of surveillance technology occurred introduced by Colonel Vine (USMC Ret), Lt Harry Bird (USMC Ret) and others.
I had been used to monitoring by Tempest which intercepted computer monitor screen emissions so they could read what I typed from adjacent flats and outside in parked vehicles. I was used to ultrasound photography and its loud click in plastic that occurs as the sound waves merge. There were listening devices as well. All of this was made known to me by the excessively loud talking from all these people 24/7/365 enabling me to know what was happening while they abused me.
It was not strange then to hear a couple more voices from retired US Marines Colonel Vine and Lt Harry Bird. I just listened and took notes as I had been doing 24/7/365 for the prior two and one-half years. I learned that the surveillance technology which they introduced was an expansion of Tempest against both computer technology and the human being. That ability to intercept very small electromagnetic radiation emissions from any electronic device could be used against the human brain as well.
I learned that they could see with my eyes, hear with my ears, feel what I did such as muscle movements and detect smell too. They could also read my thoughts including words and images which I tested and got verbal responses that this was valid.
They could also feed back these sensory perceptions. I had already first learned about electronic sound transmission initially aka S2K. But, images could be induced as well as language for memory probing and dream inducements while I slept. These included videos some of which have been used more then once which I recognise. They could also induce pain. On top of this they can surreptitiously medicate to incapacitate and debilitate along with other emulations for chemicals in the human body.
All of this is carried out by satellite communications so that I can be tracked, monitored and subjected to feedback wherever I am located all of which has been done 24/7/365 for almost nine and one-half years since February 2001. They, Colonel Vine, Lt Harry Bird, the mother of the abused children and others, sabotaged the High Court legal proceedings after two hearings in March 2001. Since then they have set their sights on destroying all my human activity and life itself.
Initially, Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret said that this surveillance was "experimental." They have been using it with the NHS, police and others participating from the UK government for false imprisonment, torture interrogation punishment, medical experimentation and surveillance R&D all predicated on a presumption of guilt from false allegations and false negative characterisations. They make every effort to cause mental illness and/or physical injuries in the hopes of having me removed and incarcerated or hospitalised.
They have been confounded by my survival so far for a total of almost 12 years. Along the way they have described incidents of going back to the "laboratory" to improve their surreptitious medication which was not getting the ultimate job done to destroy. At the same time there has been an extensive effort to use Tempest against all computer and electronic components for intercepting and controlling electronic technology. What has been done with computer technology can be done to the human being and vice versa.
This is what has been developed in my direct experience for the past 12 years which was going on long before this as reported by other non-consenting human guinea pigs such as myself. NSA's use of Tempest goes back to at least the 1950s. It was used on the USS Oxford during the Cuban Missile Crisis, and was used by satellite to monitor the USSR space centre land lines from satellite during Yuri Gagarin's space flight in April 1962. See James Bamford's "Body of Secrets" for each of these.
The USAF Security Service took over Tempest in the early 1970s to use it euphemistically for communication security purposes. See the USAF Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance Agency (ISR) web site for a history of USAF Security Service Tempest has since cropped up in television dramas such as a "Numb3rs" programme entitled "Sacrifice" where computer monitor emissions were intercepted by what was called alternatively as "van Eck Phreaking." There is no protection against such interception which is why the GPS signal goes haywire near Fort George Meade, Maryland, home of NSA as they scramble all signals.
Dana Priest and Bill Arkin describe the intense security surrounding this vast complex of intelligence development surrounding NSA where no one says a word about what they are doing. Yet, here are Colonel Vine, Lt Harry Bird (USMC Ret) and others giving it all away to a multitude of people in North Kensington, London, including training the mother of the abused children so that she has operational control of this surveillance technology to torture me as much as possible while she goes on with her violent abuse against children and others.
There has been no vetting for any kind of clearance here top secret or otherwise or any evaluation of qualifications based upon ability, education, training or experience. This most sophisticated of surveillance technologies has been freely given away to all and sundry by Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret who brags about it and shows it off to anyone close by to create his own self importance.
For all those who think that people they know are doing a service for everyone by making life possible in a free and democratic state please think again. As my experience has shown me during the past 12 years, the waste and abuse is of a most extreme kind that directly destroys democracy and all human and civil rights. Dana Priest, Bill Arkin, the other staff members and the Washington Post are doing a phenomenal job of the utmost importance with "Top Secret America," but it extends way beyond the US as can be seen here.
In fact, NSA cannot legally spy domestically in the US. It is called the largest intelligence organisation in the US and probably the world. It was formed to consolidate the US military intelligence activities after WWII concentrating on intercepting communications, analysing them and decoding messages. The decoding has moved to the signals themselves. When the essence of Tempest was brought to this mission, it expanded addressing every useful electromagnetic radiation emission possible. It has now reached the human being thus combining Humint with Sigint for the most reliable intelligence possible: decoding human brainwaves.
The growth anticipated at NSA and its surrounding satellite villages in the future will, I believe, concentrate on this aspect of signals intelligence: brainwave monitoring and feedback for information and control. That is why this reporting involving "Top Secret America" is critically important for every person on the planet. This goes well beyond Watergate and must be exposed so that it cannot be abused as I've experienced during the past decade.
At the same time its beneficial uses for medicine are extraordinary and must be cultivated by making this technology and brainwave decoding available to the world. It's like nuclear energy when once discovered, it had both a military and beneficial use. It's time to stop the malignant abuse of this neuroscience for extreme destruction purposes and bring it under the proper controls of the democratic rule of law.
It is not Cyber Security that is the real threat. It's Tempest which circumvents Cyber Security.
Trabzon Air Station, Trabzon, Turkey, 1964. During the height of the Cold War Sigint was critically important. This was an NSA intercept site 90 miles from the Soviet Georgia border. Yes, I had a Top Secret Codeword Crypto security clearance. See James Bamford's "Puzzle Palace" for some pages describing Trabzon, Turkey.
Today, all of this has changed as I've directly experienced during the past 12 years 24/7/365. Dana Priest, Bill Arkin, all those working on this project and the Washington Post are doing the world an invaluable service. It's time for all to pay very close attention to what is happening "next door" as they report it and take the necessary steps to ensure that democracy is not destroyed in the interest of security.
Monday, 19 July 2010
Barack Obama & David Cameron 20th July 2010 Meeting
Barack Obama, President
United States of America
1600 Pennsylvania Avnue NW
Washington, DC 20500
Dear Mr President
My father died on 20th July 1968 and is now buried in Arlington National Cemetery. When you meet with Prime Minster David Cameron tomorrow on the anniversary of his death, I want you to spare a thought for what he did to preserve and protect democracy and its values.
Then give a thought to what has actually happened and some consideration to what you and David Cameron are going to do about the US/UK surveillance imprisonment, torture, medical experimentation and surveillance R&D carried out against me 24/7/365 since mid-August 1998 for almost 12 years so far on an indefinite basis.
I've lived all my life with the background of a surprise attack that has been an integral part of my awareness from the time I was born in Honolulu in December 1942 although I was not exactly conscious of it for some years.
My father, a career US Naval officer, was stationed at Pearl Harbour on 7th December 1941 and changed his mind at the last minute not to take a Chinese junk out to Ford Island at 0745 that Sunday morning. He survived the attack and was captain of fleet tug, USS Zuni, during the Pacific war receiving letters of commendation from Admirals Halsey and Nimitz as well as the Legion of Merit.
I went to the first year of school in Guam in 1948/9 where the remnants of WWII were very much in evidence in the caves we explored and still in the ground where the M1 spent cartridges were all over. My lunch box was an M1 ammunition box.
During the Korean War he took food supplies to Korea from Oakland as captain of a food cargo ship, USS Merapi. I got to go aboard as a 9-year-old for a sail around San Francisco Bay once, and he brought along our Cub Scout pack for a visit. .
I've been an analyst all my life and have gotten the most important judgements correct. I've been respected for my integrity in "telling it like it is" having earned that reputation internationally some 30 years ago as a pension fund manager in the US, Canada and UK. and continue to do so.
I served in the USAF Security Service from 1961 to 1964 working at its HQs doing final analysis and reporting the reports of which went on to NSA and GCHQ. I was there during the Cuban Missile Crisis. I was stationed in Trabzon, Turkey afterwards some 90 miles from the border of the then Soviet Georgia. James Bamford's "The Puzzle Palace" has some discussion of Trabzon.
The foundation of protecting against a surprise attack as been an integral part of my life as you can see from Pearl Harbour through the Cold War where I served in intelligence for my military service.
I take what I do seriously and try to be as accurate as I can. I deeply resent those who fake it for their own personal benefit at the expense of everyone else not just myself as I've experienced during the past 12 years. This is why I continue to document and report so that a foundation of accuracy and truth can be developed for security.
Fortunately, after the first wave attack at Pearl Harbour, the Japanese did not return for a planned second wave. The US military was thus spared further decimation and able to get back on a war footing to win at Midway some six months later which turned the Pacific war.
It's better, however, not to have any Pearl Harbours such as occurred again on 9/11. It is also important to realise that the abuses which I have experienced went on for three years before 9/11 and included US agents as well as a rendition proposal.
In the early 1980s I attended a luncheon whose speaker was William Sullivan the former US Ambassador to Iran who had been its ambassador at the time of the US Embassy takeover.
I asked him a question about the Intelligence being supplied to Washington at that time and whether it was sufficient. He replied there was no lack of "Intelligence" sent to Washington about the risks. There was a lack of "intelligence" in Washington.
One of Admiral Nimitz' top commanders was Admiral Spruance whom he claimed was responsible for winning the victory at Midway. He said about him "The one supreme thing Spruance had was judgement--judgement based on intelligence and knowledge of his profession." ("Miracle at Midway," Gordon W Prange, Penguin Books, 1983, p 394)
My job of late has been to try to keep the faked information out of the Intelligence pipeline so that resources are not wasted, and no one is distracted.
The surveillance technology being used today has great beneficial uses for humans in medicine and great beneficial uses with regard to protecting the security of the world.
The latter has to be used under proper democratic management controls while the former has to be used openly as part of the scientific and medical community.
This is your challenge today since we now live in a completely different world.
What are you and David Cameron going to do about this extreme abuse of power carried out jointly and overtly in North Kensington by US and UK agents since February 2001 close to where David Cameron used to have his London home?
United States of America
1600 Pennsylvania Avnue NW
Washington, DC 20500
Dear Mr President
My father died on 20th July 1968 and is now buried in Arlington National Cemetery. When you meet with Prime Minster David Cameron tomorrow on the anniversary of his death, I want you to spare a thought for what he did to preserve and protect democracy and its values.
Then give a thought to what has actually happened and some consideration to what you and David Cameron are going to do about the US/UK surveillance imprisonment, torture, medical experimentation and surveillance R&D carried out against me 24/7/365 since mid-August 1998 for almost 12 years so far on an indefinite basis.
I've lived all my life with the background of a surprise attack that has been an integral part of my awareness from the time I was born in Honolulu in December 1942 although I was not exactly conscious of it for some years.
My father, a career US Naval officer, was stationed at Pearl Harbour on 7th December 1941 and changed his mind at the last minute not to take a Chinese junk out to Ford Island at 0745 that Sunday morning. He survived the attack and was captain of fleet tug, USS Zuni, during the Pacific war receiving letters of commendation from Admirals Halsey and Nimitz as well as the Legion of Merit.
I went to the first year of school in Guam in 1948/9 where the remnants of WWII were very much in evidence in the caves we explored and still in the ground where the M1 spent cartridges were all over. My lunch box was an M1 ammunition box.
During the Korean War he took food supplies to Korea from Oakland as captain of a food cargo ship, USS Merapi. I got to go aboard as a 9-year-old for a sail around San Francisco Bay once, and he brought along our Cub Scout pack for a visit. .
I've been an analyst all my life and have gotten the most important judgements correct. I've been respected for my integrity in "telling it like it is" having earned that reputation internationally some 30 years ago as a pension fund manager in the US, Canada and UK. and continue to do so.
I served in the USAF Security Service from 1961 to 1964 working at its HQs doing final analysis and reporting the reports of which went on to NSA and GCHQ. I was there during the Cuban Missile Crisis. I was stationed in Trabzon, Turkey afterwards some 90 miles from the border of the then Soviet Georgia. James Bamford's "The Puzzle Palace" has some discussion of Trabzon.
The foundation of protecting against a surprise attack as been an integral part of my life as you can see from Pearl Harbour through the Cold War where I served in intelligence for my military service.
I take what I do seriously and try to be as accurate as I can. I deeply resent those who fake it for their own personal benefit at the expense of everyone else not just myself as I've experienced during the past 12 years. This is why I continue to document and report so that a foundation of accuracy and truth can be developed for security.
Fortunately, after the first wave attack at Pearl Harbour, the Japanese did not return for a planned second wave. The US military was thus spared further decimation and able to get back on a war footing to win at Midway some six months later which turned the Pacific war.
It's better, however, not to have any Pearl Harbours such as occurred again on 9/11. It is also important to realise that the abuses which I have experienced went on for three years before 9/11 and included US agents as well as a rendition proposal.
In the early 1980s I attended a luncheon whose speaker was William Sullivan the former US Ambassador to Iran who had been its ambassador at the time of the US Embassy takeover.
I asked him a question about the Intelligence being supplied to Washington at that time and whether it was sufficient. He replied there was no lack of "Intelligence" sent to Washington about the risks. There was a lack of "intelligence" in Washington.
One of Admiral Nimitz' top commanders was Admiral Spruance whom he claimed was responsible for winning the victory at Midway. He said about him "The one supreme thing Spruance had was judgement--judgement based on intelligence and knowledge of his profession." ("Miracle at Midway," Gordon W Prange, Penguin Books, 1983, p 394)
My job of late has been to try to keep the faked information out of the Intelligence pipeline so that resources are not wasted, and no one is distracted.
The surveillance technology being used today has great beneficial uses for humans in medicine and great beneficial uses with regard to protecting the security of the world.
The latter has to be used under proper democratic management controls while the former has to be used openly as part of the scientific and medical community.
This is your challenge today since we now live in a completely different world.
What are you and David Cameron going to do about this extreme abuse of power carried out jointly and overtly in North Kensington by US and UK agents since February 2001 close to where David Cameron used to have his London home?
Wednesday, 7 July 2010
St Charles Hospital Porn Financed Surveillance S&M Torture
The Rt Hon Sir Malcolm Rifkind KCMG QC MP
Kensington
House of Commons
London SW1A 0AA
Dear Sir Malcolm
Publication yesterday of the fact that St Charles Hospital in North Kensington (Exmoor Street between St Marks Road and Ladbroke Grove) earned "significant income" from renting a ward for the location filming of a pornographic film has revealed to me a most sinister connection between income and expense that heightens concern for transparency in government.
Penny Mordaunt, MP, North Portsmouth and former director of the Kensington & Chelsea Council revealed in the House of Commons that a hospital which she did not name had leased a ward to a film company in Kensington & Chelsea which turned out to be a pornographic film. She did not say when this event occurred but indicated that this was important as regards to transparency in government characterising the income as "significant."
I want to explain why this is far more important than she has acknowledged at present because the income thus generated has been used for insidious and sinister medical experimentation venturing into surveillance rather than the "presumably" normal health care.
I've connected this "off the books" financing for the nearby St Charles Hospital to its professional staff coming out into the community to participate in surveillance torture abuse including surreptitious medication, medical experimentation and generally supporting the false allegations of those whom I reported for child abuse in May 1998 with extreme abuse I call "Repression By Psychiatry." (See link below)
The Evening Standard has disclosed that the hospital was the St Charles Hospital although no one there will confirm this they report. Further, comments by Evening Standard readers have indicated the probable name of the film, its director's name and that it was made in 1999.
This was the time those in the NHS began to roll out into the community in the proximity of my flat in the fourth quarter of 1999 following my lengthy letter about the whole problem to the Prime Minister sent by fax and post in September, 1999. (See links below)
In early 2000 I met with two psychiatrists at the St Charles Hospital, Drs Richard Evans and Mo Zoha, along with a psychiatric nurse, Guy Caplan, who was present at each of these meetings on 13th January (Mo Zoha and Guy Caplan) and 2nd February (Richard Evans and Guy Caplan).
My complaint letters to the St Charles Hospital Chief Executive and subsequently to Richard Evans himself following an extremely abusive and threatening letter from him can be read at the links provided below. They will explain these meetings and their results in full.
I was then subjected to very intense prowling, stalking and harassment by these doctors in proximity to my flat participating in the surveillance technology torture abuse driven by those whom I had reported for child abuse in the flat below.
On one such evening about 2330 on or before 8th March 2000 people were approaching my front door which I heard while in the bathroom. A male said "No, you go first, you're the doctor." Just after this they departed. Reference to this can be seen in item number 4 in the link below to "St Charles Hospital "Repression By Psychiatry" Correspondence to My Member of Parliament - Abuse of Power II"
The whole surveillance torture abuse activity consisted of many participants among them NHS professionals from St Charles Hospital whose voices I recognised because I had met with them. Dr Richard Evans was the most prominent with Dr Mo Zoha appearing once coincident with the psychiatric nurser Guy Caplan. This activity went on intensely for years and continues up to the present day.
Some examples of their participation consisted of watching me take a bath when Dr Richard Evans said "I didn't see anything, but he still has to go" among a large group in the flat below my bathroom. Extensive early in the morning activity occurred which included Dr Richard Evans answering questions about which kind of medication he was providing surreptitiously.
On one occasion in the middle of the night Dr Richard Evans dictated a statement for . . . the mother of the abused children, to write in her own hand writing and sign. He specified that she had to use the word "psychotic."
After she had signed it, she wanted to withdraw it, but was not allowed to do so. This was done in the presence of Metropolitan Police officer "Paul Winston" whom I believe was with Special Branch at that time which has now become the Anti Terror Unit.
On another occasion during the evening Dr Mo Zoha and psychiatric nurse Guy Caplan were present in the flat below while a large group of people were out front acting as observers. Dr Mo Zoha was sitting on the balcony below my front window apparently with a monitor screen facing those seated below which showed me inside my flat so all could see. This was accomplished by the use of radar imaging devices in the flat above used at that time to be able to see all my activity.
There are many more examples of their presence along with the police and others which are part of my continuously detailed daily diary/logs that I have kept all these 12 years 24/7/365.
This is just one aspect of the whole torture abuse activity carried out against me during the past 12 years 24/7/365 by the use of surveillance technology based upon a whole spectrum of false allegations including terrorism, crimes and antisocial behaviour manufactured by those using the surveillance to sustain its usage in order to hide the child abuse and all the other crimes in which they engaged.
This is why I find the objective of the torture inquiry announced yesterday tantamount to a whitewash at its beginning because it is limited to international torture that took place overseas while the most important torture has taken place domestically in the UK for the past 12 years which started three years before 9/11 and included US government agents from February 2001 seven months before 9/11.
This torture inquiry as it now stands will be unable to put the stigma of UK torture behind because it is not even addressing the most important torture that has existed well before 9/11 and continues while I write this Email.
I believe that the "off the books" financing from a porn film production enabled domestic torture by surveillance to be carried out by the NHS so that it would not show up explicitly as a drain on financial resources described in revealing terms of what these expenditures actually were.
The fact that this occurred before 2002 when the Kensington & Chelsea Primary Care Trust (PCT) was instituted is irrelevant because this torture abuse by NHS personal participating in the surveillance activity has continued all along. The last I looked the K&C PCT had a substandard rating of "Fair."
It's quite obvious from what can be seen here in 1999/2000 that a cover up was under way to suppress what I was reporting. That has continued all along up to the present day.
I believe that the funds gained by St Charles Hospital from renting a ward to a film company to make a porn film have been used to carry out unlawful and criminal acts by the NHS professionals described and named herein as well as others whose names are not known as they engaged in surveillance torture abuse in the community.
I heard Dr Richard Evans telling someone in the flat below that he wanted to show his girlfriend where he had spent so much of his time. I believe that this was a very costly operation and that its NHS costs were hidden from direct NHS government funding budget scrutiny by the alternative source of "significant income" derived from porn film production at St Charles Hospital at this same time in 1999.
Sincerely yours
Gary D Chance
cc The Hon Penny Mordaunt, MP, North Portsmouth
Notting Barns Ward Safer Neighbourhood Team
BBC News Channel
Magnus Gardham, Political Editor, DailyRecord.co.uk
Lester Haines, The Register
Mail Online
Adrian Seal, Multimedia Content Manager, K&C Chronicle
Links:
Media news reports:
Chelsea hospital used a porno set - Kensington & Chelsea Chronicle: via @addthis hired out a ward for seedy shoot. Wed, 7 Jul 2010 - 00:55:15
Porn film shot at London hospital claims Tory MP Penny Mordaunt | Mail Online: via @addthis ES: St Charles Hospital Wed, 7 Jul 2010 - 01:03:10
London hospital hosted grumble flick shoot. The
Register: via @addthis K&C "spread 'em for 'big budget' movie" Wed, 7 Jul 2010 - 01:16:25
London hospital hires out ward to porn company for film - The Daily Record: via @addthis "substantial income" Wed, 7 Jul 2010 -
01:21:56
BBC News - 'Big budget' porn film shot in London hospital: via @addthis NHS K&C said the filming occurred before 2002 Wed, 7 Jul 2010 - 01:24:44
'Big budget' porn movie filmed in London hospital | News via @addthis St Charles Hospital off Ladbroke Grove west London Wed, 7 Jul 2010 - 10:52:10
Evening Standard comments indicate St Charles Hosp porn film made in 1999 which was at beginning of its abuse against me. Wed, 7 Jul 2010 - 11:56:34
Previously published web site correlations
Letter to the Prime Minister 23rd September 1999
Appendix A to PM's 23.09.1999 Letter: Apparently Abused [Son of BS] Taken Away Crying
Appendix B to PM's 23.09.1999 Letter: Screaming Infant Possibly Slapped and Hit
Appendix C to PM's 23.09.1999 Letter: Son of BS Chokes Another Child. Evident Ability to See Me and Computer Monitor Screen.
Appendix D to PM's 23.09.1999 Letter: Extreme Verbal Abuse Against Son of BS Who Hits, Kicks and Chokes Other Children
Appendix E to PM's 23.09.1999 Letter: Various Incidents of Extensive Abuse and Recognition of "You Are Spying On Him."
Saturday, 8th January 2000, Letter to Community Mental Health Team Administrator re Access Attempt to Premises
Thursday, 3rd February 2000, Complaint Letter to St Charles Hospital Chief Executive Richard Higgins re Interviews with Drs Evans and Zoha
Wednesday, 1st March 2000, Complaint Letter Directly to Dr Richard Evans at St Charles Hospital Following His Threatening and Abusive Letter
St Charles Hospital "Repression By Psychiatry" Correspondence to My Member of Parliament - Abuse of Power II: via @addthis Wed, 7 Jul 2010 - 01:36:29
Kensington
House of Commons
London SW1A 0AA
Dear Sir Malcolm
Publication yesterday of the fact that St Charles Hospital in North Kensington (Exmoor Street between St Marks Road and Ladbroke Grove) earned "significant income" from renting a ward for the location filming of a pornographic film has revealed to me a most sinister connection between income and expense that heightens concern for transparency in government.
Penny Mordaunt, MP, North Portsmouth and former director of the Kensington & Chelsea Council revealed in the House of Commons that a hospital which she did not name had leased a ward to a film company in Kensington & Chelsea which turned out to be a pornographic film. She did not say when this event occurred but indicated that this was important as regards to transparency in government characterising the income as "significant."
I want to explain why this is far more important than she has acknowledged at present because the income thus generated has been used for insidious and sinister medical experimentation venturing into surveillance rather than the "presumably" normal health care.
I've connected this "off the books" financing for the nearby St Charles Hospital to its professional staff coming out into the community to participate in surveillance torture abuse including surreptitious medication, medical experimentation and generally supporting the false allegations of those whom I reported for child abuse in May 1998 with extreme abuse I call "Repression By Psychiatry." (See link below)
The Evening Standard has disclosed that the hospital was the St Charles Hospital although no one there will confirm this they report. Further, comments by Evening Standard readers have indicated the probable name of the film, its director's name and that it was made in 1999.
This was the time those in the NHS began to roll out into the community in the proximity of my flat in the fourth quarter of 1999 following my lengthy letter about the whole problem to the Prime Minister sent by fax and post in September, 1999. (See links below)
In early 2000 I met with two psychiatrists at the St Charles Hospital, Drs Richard Evans and Mo Zoha, along with a psychiatric nurse, Guy Caplan, who was present at each of these meetings on 13th January (Mo Zoha and Guy Caplan) and 2nd February (Richard Evans and Guy Caplan).
My complaint letters to the St Charles Hospital Chief Executive and subsequently to Richard Evans himself following an extremely abusive and threatening letter from him can be read at the links provided below. They will explain these meetings and their results in full.
I was then subjected to very intense prowling, stalking and harassment by these doctors in proximity to my flat participating in the surveillance technology torture abuse driven by those whom I had reported for child abuse in the flat below.
On one such evening about 2330 on or before 8th March 2000 people were approaching my front door which I heard while in the bathroom. A male said "No, you go first, you're the doctor." Just after this they departed. Reference to this can be seen in item number 4 in the link below to "St Charles Hospital "Repression By Psychiatry" Correspondence to My Member of Parliament - Abuse of Power II"
The whole surveillance torture abuse activity consisted of many participants among them NHS professionals from St Charles Hospital whose voices I recognised because I had met with them. Dr Richard Evans was the most prominent with Dr Mo Zoha appearing once coincident with the psychiatric nurser Guy Caplan. This activity went on intensely for years and continues up to the present day.
Some examples of their participation consisted of watching me take a bath when Dr Richard Evans said "I didn't see anything, but he still has to go" among a large group in the flat below my bathroom. Extensive early in the morning activity occurred which included Dr Richard Evans answering questions about which kind of medication he was providing surreptitiously.
On one occasion in the middle of the night Dr Richard Evans dictated a statement for . . . the mother of the abused children, to write in her own hand writing and sign. He specified that she had to use the word "psychotic."
After she had signed it, she wanted to withdraw it, but was not allowed to do so. This was done in the presence of Metropolitan Police officer "Paul Winston" whom I believe was with Special Branch at that time which has now become the Anti Terror Unit.
On another occasion during the evening Dr Mo Zoha and psychiatric nurse Guy Caplan were present in the flat below while a large group of people were out front acting as observers. Dr Mo Zoha was sitting on the balcony below my front window apparently with a monitor screen facing those seated below which showed me inside my flat so all could see. This was accomplished by the use of radar imaging devices in the flat above used at that time to be able to see all my activity.
There are many more examples of their presence along with the police and others which are part of my continuously detailed daily diary/logs that I have kept all these 12 years 24/7/365.
This is just one aspect of the whole torture abuse activity carried out against me during the past 12 years 24/7/365 by the use of surveillance technology based upon a whole spectrum of false allegations including terrorism, crimes and antisocial behaviour manufactured by those using the surveillance to sustain its usage in order to hide the child abuse and all the other crimes in which they engaged.
This is why I find the objective of the torture inquiry announced yesterday tantamount to a whitewash at its beginning because it is limited to international torture that took place overseas while the most important torture has taken place domestically in the UK for the past 12 years which started three years before 9/11 and included US government agents from February 2001 seven months before 9/11.
This torture inquiry as it now stands will be unable to put the stigma of UK torture behind because it is not even addressing the most important torture that has existed well before 9/11 and continues while I write this Email.
I believe that the "off the books" financing from a porn film production enabled domestic torture by surveillance to be carried out by the NHS so that it would not show up explicitly as a drain on financial resources described in revealing terms of what these expenditures actually were.
The fact that this occurred before 2002 when the Kensington & Chelsea Primary Care Trust (PCT) was instituted is irrelevant because this torture abuse by NHS personal participating in the surveillance activity has continued all along. The last I looked the K&C PCT had a substandard rating of "Fair."
It's quite obvious from what can be seen here in 1999/2000 that a cover up was under way to suppress what I was reporting. That has continued all along up to the present day.
I believe that the funds gained by St Charles Hospital from renting a ward to a film company to make a porn film have been used to carry out unlawful and criminal acts by the NHS professionals described and named herein as well as others whose names are not known as they engaged in surveillance torture abuse in the community.
I heard Dr Richard Evans telling someone in the flat below that he wanted to show his girlfriend where he had spent so much of his time. I believe that this was a very costly operation and that its NHS costs were hidden from direct NHS government funding budget scrutiny by the alternative source of "significant income" derived from porn film production at St Charles Hospital at this same time in 1999.
Sincerely yours
Gary D Chance
cc The Hon Penny Mordaunt, MP, North Portsmouth
Notting Barns Ward Safer Neighbourhood Team
BBC News Channel
Magnus Gardham, Political Editor, DailyRecord.co.uk
Lester Haines, The Register
Mail Online
Adrian Seal, Multimedia Content Manager, K&C Chronicle
Links:
Media news reports:
Chelsea hospital used a porno set - Kensington & Chelsea Chronicle: via @addthis hired out a ward for seedy shoot. Wed, 7 Jul 2010 - 00:55:15
Porn film shot at London hospital claims Tory MP Penny Mordaunt | Mail Online: via @addthis ES: St Charles Hospital Wed, 7 Jul 2010 - 01:03:10
London hospital hosted grumble flick shoot. The
Register: via @addthis K&C "spread 'em for 'big budget' movie" Wed, 7 Jul 2010 - 01:16:25
London hospital hires out ward to porn company for film - The Daily Record: via @addthis "substantial income" Wed, 7 Jul 2010 -
01:21:56
BBC News - 'Big budget' porn film shot in London hospital: via @addthis NHS K&C said the filming occurred before 2002 Wed, 7 Jul 2010 - 01:24:44
'Big budget' porn movie filmed in London hospital | News via @addthis St Charles Hospital off Ladbroke Grove west London Wed, 7 Jul 2010 - 10:52:10
Evening Standard comments indicate St Charles Hosp porn film made in 1999 which was at beginning of its abuse against me. Wed, 7 Jul 2010 - 11:56:34
Previously published web site correlations
Letter to the Prime Minister 23rd September 1999
Appendix A to PM's 23.09.1999 Letter: Apparently Abused [Son of BS] Taken Away Crying
Appendix B to PM's 23.09.1999 Letter: Screaming Infant Possibly Slapped and Hit
Appendix C to PM's 23.09.1999 Letter: Son of BS Chokes Another Child. Evident Ability to See Me and Computer Monitor Screen.
Appendix D to PM's 23.09.1999 Letter: Extreme Verbal Abuse Against Son of BS Who Hits, Kicks and Chokes Other Children
Appendix E to PM's 23.09.1999 Letter: Various Incidents of Extensive Abuse and Recognition of "You Are Spying On Him."
Saturday, 8th January 2000, Letter to Community Mental Health Team Administrator re Access Attempt to Premises
Thursday, 3rd February 2000, Complaint Letter to St Charles Hospital Chief Executive Richard Higgins re Interviews with Drs Evans and Zoha
Wednesday, 1st March 2000, Complaint Letter Directly to Dr Richard Evans at St Charles Hospital Following His Threatening and Abusive Letter
St Charles Hospital "Repression By Psychiatry" Correspondence to My Member of Parliament - Abuse of Power II: via @addthis Wed, 7 Jul 2010 - 01:36:29
Thursday, 1 July 2010
Surveillance Authorisation & Control
I am in the process of entering this "idea" under civil liberties on the new Your Freedom web site for the Deputy Prime Minister, Nick Clegg, at the Cabinet Office.
The number of users has bogged the website down for the moment. That's great. I hope everyone gets onto it.
What is your idea?
I believe Nick Clegg wanted surveillance authorisation and control to be carried out at the magistrate level so that a judge was responsible., and the former Labour government wanted a senior executive level person in the Council to be able to authorise and control surveillance.
At the very least surveillance authorisation and control needs to be accomplished at the magistrate level so that a judge authorises and can control what is being done. If this needs to be strengthened so that specialist judges are responsible for authorisation and control of surveillance, then so be it.
There needs to be a redress of grievance process connected with the authorisation and control of surveillance so that the specialist judge can receive feedback directly from those who experience abuse in order for problems to be addressed promptly before excessive damage is done.
I’ve been subjected to totally invasive surveillance for almost 12 years since mid-August 1998 24/7/365 which has nothing to do with an investigation and everything to do with fabrication by extreme abuse including imprisonment, torture interrogation, medical experimentation, surveillance R&D and destruction of all human activity and life.
This is very much a reality of the past 12 years under the former Labour government, and all my continuous and extensive efforts to address this problem failed by a system of denial that blamed the victim, me, in order to protect those abusing surveillance so that many benefit from the attempt to silence my reporting and discrediting what I did report.
I call this Toxic Surveillance that is very much a fact of life in the UK which will get much worse if it is not subject to careful authorisation and control. Below are some links to information about my experience if you want more information about what has happened and continues to happen while I write. It is most important to understand the nature of the surveillance technology today and how very important it is to have the best authorisation and control process possible well connected to a central grievance process.
http://www.garydchance.com
http://garydchance.tripod.com/surveillance
http://garydchance.bravejournal.com
http://garydchance-gary.blogspot.com/
http://www.youtube.com/garydchance
http://www.myspace.com/garydchance
http://twitter.com/garydchance
Why is it important?
Having directly experienced surveillance abuse of power for nearly 12 years 24/7/365 I consider this the most important problem facing the UK today bar none for it impacts the life of everyone everywhere in some way. Just the possibility that this can occur and has actually happened indefinitely for a dozen years without the prospect of ending it or obtaining any protection whatsoever under the democratic rule of law implies that the UK is a totalitarian state where every person is at risk of being subjected to this kind of total abuse and destruction of human activity and life.
I cannot overstate its importance and can only communicate its comprehension so that all can recognise the horror from such surveillance abuse that exists given the state-of-the-art technology that has existed for the past decade which continues to be developed in situations like mine. The implications for such future abuse are quite profound indeed. It goes beyond anything that has been imagined in the past and threatens democracy itself. If this surveillance technology abuse continues in this manner in the future, these forms for responding as I am doing here will not exist.
The number of users has bogged the website down for the moment. That's great. I hope everyone gets onto it.
What is your idea?
I believe Nick Clegg wanted surveillance authorisation and control to be carried out at the magistrate level so that a judge was responsible., and the former Labour government wanted a senior executive level person in the Council to be able to authorise and control surveillance.
At the very least surveillance authorisation and control needs to be accomplished at the magistrate level so that a judge authorises and can control what is being done. If this needs to be strengthened so that specialist judges are responsible for authorisation and control of surveillance, then so be it.
There needs to be a redress of grievance process connected with the authorisation and control of surveillance so that the specialist judge can receive feedback directly from those who experience abuse in order for problems to be addressed promptly before excessive damage is done.
I’ve been subjected to totally invasive surveillance for almost 12 years since mid-August 1998 24/7/365 which has nothing to do with an investigation and everything to do with fabrication by extreme abuse including imprisonment, torture interrogation, medical experimentation, surveillance R&D and destruction of all human activity and life.
This is very much a reality of the past 12 years under the former Labour government, and all my continuous and extensive efforts to address this problem failed by a system of denial that blamed the victim, me, in order to protect those abusing surveillance so that many benefit from the attempt to silence my reporting and discrediting what I did report.
I call this Toxic Surveillance that is very much a fact of life in the UK which will get much worse if it is not subject to careful authorisation and control. Below are some links to information about my experience if you want more information about what has happened and continues to happen while I write. It is most important to understand the nature of the surveillance technology today and how very important it is to have the best authorisation and control process possible well connected to a central grievance process.
http://www.garydchance.com
http://garydchance.tripod.com/surveillance
http://garydchance.bravejournal.com
http://garydchance-gary.blogspot.com/
http://www.youtube.com/garydchance
http://www.myspace.com/garydchance
http://twitter.com/garydchance
Why is it important?
Having directly experienced surveillance abuse of power for nearly 12 years 24/7/365 I consider this the most important problem facing the UK today bar none for it impacts the life of everyone everywhere in some way. Just the possibility that this can occur and has actually happened indefinitely for a dozen years without the prospect of ending it or obtaining any protection whatsoever under the democratic rule of law implies that the UK is a totalitarian state where every person is at risk of being subjected to this kind of total abuse and destruction of human activity and life.
I cannot overstate its importance and can only communicate its comprehension so that all can recognise the horror from such surveillance abuse that exists given the state-of-the-art technology that has existed for the past decade which continues to be developed in situations like mine. The implications for such future abuse are quite profound indeed. It goes beyond anything that has been imagined in the past and threatens democracy itself. If this surveillance technology abuse continues in this manner in the future, these forms for responding as I am doing here will not exist.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)