I. WikiLeaks Documents China’s Google Hack, UN Spying, More Secrets - The Daily Beast - Just scratches surface of real problem
"The whistleblower’s latest document dump exposes Saudi Arabia’s plot against Iran, a corrupt Afghan’s $52 million payday, Putin and Berlusconi’s “bromance,” and more. See nine of the most startling details."
My comments:
There was a time when espionage was legitimately carried out against nasty foes. There are still many bad guys in this world, but, unfortunately, there are too many enemies within who are perverting what was legitimately done for their own greed, glory and power today at everyone's expense.
Francis Gary Powers was flying a legitimate mission in 1960 when he was shot down. So were the 17 US airmen in their C-130 tail number 60528 who were shot down by MIG-17s when they strayed into Soviet Armenia in 1958 while on a recon mission. 11 of them were USAF Security Service airmen whom the Soviets never acknowledged as being killed. I served in the USAFSS from 1961 to 1964 including Trabzon, Turkey, 1963/4 the IP for 60528's mission. The threat was real, e.g., Cuban Missile Crisis Oct 1962. The work legitimate. It had to be kept completely secret.
All of that has now changed. I've been the innocent target of totally invasive surveillance for 12 years 24/7/365 since mid-August 1998 and carried out by two former US Marines, Colonel Vine and Lt Harry Bird, since February 2001 seven months before 9/11. I've experienced it all and know directly what is being done which goes way beyond these revelations today.
I do believe that US embassies around the world will be sponsoring, supporting and sustaining this kind of totally invasive surveillance for espionage purposes. Vine and Bird have often referred people to the US embassy here in London where they apparently are connected in some manner.
I think that while these leaks are important in providing a sense of direction for abuse, they do not even begin to go far enough into what is really happening. Some of the information sought is what would be expected of diplomats abroad. None of it is really shocking. What is really shocking is the kind of Toxic Surveillance currently being carried out against innocents like me indefinitely as part of US/UK policy that includes imprisonment, torture, medical experimentation, R&D and eventual assassination.
I served loyally with dedicated effort as part of the US intelligence effort during a critical period of the Cold War only to receive this kind of treatment by US Marines and others for over 12 years so far as my reward. There can be no more secrets, and everything must be revealed if democracy is expected to survive. The bad guys are now on the inside. They have to be weeded out, or the bad guys outside will succeed.
10:01 am, 29th Nov 2010
II. AFSC 20330? 1966-1970, RAF Chicksands. We used to triangulate with your outfit, as I recall. That and the former base in Peshawar. Hope no one is surveilling me!
10:55 am, 29th Nov 2010
20250 mission control. You were lucky. Not many realise that Chicksands was in Luton near London, and you had a FLR-9 aka Elephant Cage. Everyone wanted to go to Chicksands. I worked with then for a SSgt at USAFSS HQ who had been at Chicksands. His wife was British. I saw a photo on its website (now gone) of Johnny and June Carter Cash at the bar in the club after he gave a concert there once. Did he stop by for one of these concerts while you were there? He was a 292 in Germany for three years (1952-5) and blames USAFSS for his tinnitus. He also said he was able to empathise with the inmates in the prisons where he performed because of his years in USAFSS. Daughter Rosanne Cash had a song called "Radio Operator" for him on her Black album after he died.
Finally, after Richard Branson's Virgin airline (one aircraft at that time in the early 1980s) completed its first year, the aircraft spent a week in the BA maintenance facility at Heathrow. I had flown from NYC to London on its last flight before that week and was scheduled to fly back on its first day out. We all including the flight crew had to be bused from Gatwick to Heathrow for the plane. On the bus I sat next to a young British Luton woman who had just married a USAFSS guy from Chicksands, and he had been sent to NSA. She was going to join him there. Small world as always.
Tell me: was there a sign inside the building at Chicksands that pointed out that the activity was against international law as the now defunct website described back in the 1990s?
USAFSS has evolved into the USAF ISR Agency with ISR standing for Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance with a Wing at NSA. I find the surveillance aspect of its name quite worrisome given what Tempest has now become having been a target of it for the last 12 years. USAFSS took over Tempest in the early 1970s its history website states. If you were under surveillance, you would probably know as I do from these abusers.
12:19 pm, 29th Nov 2010
III. Why would anyone possibly want to surveil you in the past 12 years? You served during the Cold War. What possible intelligence benefit could be gained?
2:20 am, 30th Nov 2010
Power to the no-hopers who have no ability, training, education, experience or qualifications for anything other than abuse. That's why its necessary to watch out for the revolving door with current military people entering what the Washington Post calls Top Secret America. Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret claims to have been a former commando. He has no qualifications for anything.
Using this Tempest based surveillance technology provides the opportunity for them to lie, cheat, steal and destroy. It creates a life of crime hidden behind surveillance technology. It is beyond comprehension at present. That's why it's being done successfully. No one wants to believe this exists.
It's also surveillance R&D against the human brain to decode its electromagnetic radiation (no implants needed) which takes all these years and many more people and years. This is where the real threat lies by using this surveillance technology against the human being maliciously. It can have an extraordinary beneficial impact which is why I am seeking to expose what has happened and continues to happen to bring it under democratic control before its own ability to control makes that impossible. First, however, everyone must understand that it exists and what it can do.
I've just begun reading James Bamford's "The Shadow Factory" which came out in 2008. He starts off with Michael Hayden (then Director NSA (DIRNSA)) in his office totally protected against Tempest interception noting that not an electron could escape. Michael Hayden went on to become CIA Director (DCI) which for me meant merging this Tempest intercept technology or communications intelligence (COMINT) against the human being into human intelligence (HUMINT).
Now Michael Hayden sits on the board of a company who has just sold security contractors to the State Department as reported by the Washington Post/Top Secret America to be deployed around the world. This includes as part of the deal the current incarnation of Blackwater who are known for their brutality and changed their name to Xe. See www.blackwaterusa.com
If you keep track of the bits and pieces you can see how this all fits together giving the Wikileaks significance when considered against this background of the US State Department sending out to all its embassies worldwide an augmented force of security contractors who might very well act in a similar capacity as have Colonel Vine USMC Ret and Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret which I've experienced for the past decade.
There are reports of such US embassy espionage surfacing in Sweden and Denmark recently. All that is happening must be taken very seriously with excellent questions asked like yours: why? What's the point? I'm just a non-consenting human guinea pig used for much bigger things to come unless it is exposed and brought under the democratic rule of law umbrella. Actually, they made a terrible mistake in targeting me as they have been learning all along.
9:55 am, 30th Nov 2010
Tuesday, 30 November 2010
Saturday, 27 November 2010
Taliban Peace Talks Hoax Facilitated By UK
After Revelation of Taliban Negotiation Imposter, Taliban Commanders Laugh at U.S. - The Daily Beast Sat 27.11.2010
Karzai's aide: UK 'to blame' for Taliban impostor - AP Fri 26.11.2010 It was the Brits what done it. Gullible ain't they?
Taliban Leader in Peace Talks Was an Impostor - NYT Mon 22.11.2010 You've been had by gad.
Taliban Elite, Aided by NATO, Join Talks for Afghan Peace - NYT 19.10.2010 Oh, what a lovely hoax!
Former Gitmo detainee turned Taliban leader threatens Afghan elders - The Long War Journal 04.08.2010 2 Gitmos at top
It's the British who are being duped again because they want so much to believe something is true. Then when they are about to be exposed as gullible, they try to cover up with violence. Here the British brought a Pakistani shopkeeper to Kabul as Taliban high command for peace talks with President Karzai only to learn the worst after paying him hundreds of thousands. It was a complete hoax apparently even unknown to the Taliban.
In my direct experience for 12+ years it's been a viciously violent child abuser whom I reported for child abuse and products of Top Secret America's global abuse agent/contractor gang that have been tweaking the British for a dozen years feeding them with what they want to believe, and the British have been sucking it up and paying out.
I've been subjected to Toxic Surveillance imprisonment, torture interrogation, medical experimentation, surveillance R&D and attempted murder for a dozen years. No one pays any attention to the evidence. When the British want to believe something, nothing will stand in the way of that belief.
The result here in London has been the collapse of local housing management and local government with the fakery eating up resources so that the London bombers of 7/7 and 21/7/2005 as well as the Detroit Xmas bomber (the risk of which I predicted five months in advance and notified President Obama and Prime Minister Brown) were picked up and dropped leaving them to their terrorism while they chased the hoax manufactured against me. The massive hoax surveillance continues against me. What will be the next catastrophe as a result?
I am very sorry to say that the Taliban as quoted above are right. NATO will not be able to defeat them because of these character flaws, and as my experience attests, terrorists will succeed too. The real nut jobs inside the US/UK and NATO effort are not being removed despite huge correspondence from me in this one instance to identify them and stop their abuse. I shudder to think how pervasive this might be.
Karzai's aide: UK 'to blame' for Taliban impostor - AP Fri 26.11.2010 It was the Brits what done it. Gullible ain't they?
Taliban Leader in Peace Talks Was an Impostor - NYT Mon 22.11.2010 You've been had by gad.
Taliban Elite, Aided by NATO, Join Talks for Afghan Peace - NYT 19.10.2010 Oh, what a lovely hoax!
Former Gitmo detainee turned Taliban leader threatens Afghan elders - The Long War Journal 04.08.2010 2 Gitmos at top
It's the British who are being duped again because they want so much to believe something is true. Then when they are about to be exposed as gullible, they try to cover up with violence. Here the British brought a Pakistani shopkeeper to Kabul as Taliban high command for peace talks with President Karzai only to learn the worst after paying him hundreds of thousands. It was a complete hoax apparently even unknown to the Taliban.
In my direct experience for 12+ years it's been a viciously violent child abuser whom I reported for child abuse and products of Top Secret America's global abuse agent/contractor gang that have been tweaking the British for a dozen years feeding them with what they want to believe, and the British have been sucking it up and paying out.
I've been subjected to Toxic Surveillance imprisonment, torture interrogation, medical experimentation, surveillance R&D and attempted murder for a dozen years. No one pays any attention to the evidence. When the British want to believe something, nothing will stand in the way of that belief.
The result here in London has been the collapse of local housing management and local government with the fakery eating up resources so that the London bombers of 7/7 and 21/7/2005 as well as the Detroit Xmas bomber (the risk of which I predicted five months in advance and notified President Obama and Prime Minister Brown) were picked up and dropped leaving them to their terrorism while they chased the hoax manufactured against me. The massive hoax surveillance continues against me. What will be the next catastrophe as a result?
I am very sorry to say that the Taliban as quoted above are right. NATO will not be able to defeat them because of these character flaws, and as my experience attests, terrorists will succeed too. The real nut jobs inside the US/UK and NATO effort are not being removed despite huge correspondence from me in this one instance to identify them and stop their abuse. I shudder to think how pervasive this might be.
Friday, 26 November 2010
Toxic Surveillance Will Subvert All Until Democratically Controlled
26/11/10 12:03:51 "How Promoting Entrepreneurship Can Grow Our Way Out of Deficits" - The Daily Beast Toxic Surveillance will subvert it.
I hate to be pessimistic, but growth is dead. It's been killed in the last four decades and finally wiped out by Toxic Debt. There has been every opportunity at every economic downturn to make the necessary strategic changes to ensure that economic well being continues. This has not happened. There was a warning called "The Limits to Growth" based upon Jay Forester's "World Economics" published almost 40 years ago to which no one paid any meaningful heed on a broad basis.
If the US wants to get out of the current hole, it could develop the vast oil shale resources which the US government owns within a 50-mile radius of the juncture of Colorado, Wyoming and Utah. But, no one now wants more hydrocarbon fuel development for ecological reasons although this is a phenomenal source of domestic US energy which could help preserve world energy.
Growth in the traditional manner is not a viable option. More important today is sustaining income levels all around. Wealth creation by growth is finished. A way to look at it is the growth stock mania that hit Wall Street in the early 70s and collapsed in 1973/4. Remember the Nifty-Fifty? This is also when "The Limits to Growth" appeared and deception began to emerge as fraud took over to steal existing wealth rather than create and earn it honestly. This evolved into Toxic Debt.
There has to be an acceptance that wealth creation in the future will not be what it has been in the past overall. More and more resource based enterprises will not provide anything other than an ultimate collapse. The entrepreneur and small business of the future will have a tough slog until there is a fundamental shift to a cheap source of energy on a large scale that is renewable and sustainable without polluting.
We are looking at a shift which will take decades and will be the equivalent of the industrial revolution where the horse and buggy and sail gave way to the internal combustion and steam engine. That shift, however, will entail an espionage revolution that we are only just beginning to glimpse. As fast as electronic devices are developed, there will be the ability to monitor and control them by other surreptitious electronic espionage devices. Toxic Debt is turning into Toxic Surveillance as the means to gain wealth by deceit.
There is nothing about this in the above because it is all secret or as the Washington Post has called it: Top Secret America. Toxic Surveillance will do far worse to human economic activity than Toxic Debt ever could. Already there is a massive espionage structure spreading out in the US and world about which we all must learn as much as possible that must be brought under democratic control. At present there is no general knowledge of it since it is secret.
It is not just all the electronic gadgets and devices which are being produced that are subject to this Tempest interception, decoding and control, but it's the human being with his/her electronic brain and neurological system that is also vulnerable. This espionage technology has been developed and has been in use for at least the past decade in my direct experience against the human being, but no one wants to admit its existence.
There will not be a future that resembles in anyway the past unless this problem is addressed democratically. All planning and commentary along with all efforts to get human economic activity on a beneficial footing for all will be subverted and destroyed by this Tempest based espionage technology unless it is dealt with properly. Top Secret America cannot be allowed to become the real government by the few in the US and world.
I hate to be pessimistic, but growth is dead. It's been killed in the last four decades and finally wiped out by Toxic Debt. There has been every opportunity at every economic downturn to make the necessary strategic changes to ensure that economic well being continues. This has not happened. There was a warning called "The Limits to Growth" based upon Jay Forester's "World Economics" published almost 40 years ago to which no one paid any meaningful heed on a broad basis.
If the US wants to get out of the current hole, it could develop the vast oil shale resources which the US government owns within a 50-mile radius of the juncture of Colorado, Wyoming and Utah. But, no one now wants more hydrocarbon fuel development for ecological reasons although this is a phenomenal source of domestic US energy which could help preserve world energy.
Growth in the traditional manner is not a viable option. More important today is sustaining income levels all around. Wealth creation by growth is finished. A way to look at it is the growth stock mania that hit Wall Street in the early 70s and collapsed in 1973/4. Remember the Nifty-Fifty? This is also when "The Limits to Growth" appeared and deception began to emerge as fraud took over to steal existing wealth rather than create and earn it honestly. This evolved into Toxic Debt.
There has to be an acceptance that wealth creation in the future will not be what it has been in the past overall. More and more resource based enterprises will not provide anything other than an ultimate collapse. The entrepreneur and small business of the future will have a tough slog until there is a fundamental shift to a cheap source of energy on a large scale that is renewable and sustainable without polluting.
We are looking at a shift which will take decades and will be the equivalent of the industrial revolution where the horse and buggy and sail gave way to the internal combustion and steam engine. That shift, however, will entail an espionage revolution that we are only just beginning to glimpse. As fast as electronic devices are developed, there will be the ability to monitor and control them by other surreptitious electronic espionage devices. Toxic Debt is turning into Toxic Surveillance as the means to gain wealth by deceit.
There is nothing about this in the above because it is all secret or as the Washington Post has called it: Top Secret America. Toxic Surveillance will do far worse to human economic activity than Toxic Debt ever could. Already there is a massive espionage structure spreading out in the US and world about which we all must learn as much as possible that must be brought under democratic control. At present there is no general knowledge of it since it is secret.
It is not just all the electronic gadgets and devices which are being produced that are subject to this Tempest interception, decoding and control, but it's the human being with his/her electronic brain and neurological system that is also vulnerable. This espionage technology has been developed and has been in use for at least the past decade in my direct experience against the human being, but no one wants to admit its existence.
There will not be a future that resembles in anyway the past unless this problem is addressed democratically. All planning and commentary along with all efforts to get human economic activity on a beneficial footing for all will be subverted and destroyed by this Tempest based espionage technology unless it is dealt with properly. Top Secret America cannot be allowed to become the real government by the few in the US and world.
Thursday, 25 November 2010
Discrimination Against Gays & Lesbians' National Security Disaster
"US appeals ruling on gay Air Force officer but does not seek to bar reinstatement" Major Witt can return to active duty
A USAF flight nurse appears set to return to active duty after her dismissal appeal procedures go through the courts since the government did not ask for a stay when it lost a decision. She has to pass professional and physical qualification tests for reinstatement that will be no problem.
I'm glad to see this happening with the administration seeking to end DADT and Congress looking at the necessary legal means. DADT has been set aside by a federal judge recently.
NSA has had a gay and lesbian club for some time. When James Bamford went to NSA almost a decade ago for a book signing when his "Body of Secrets" came out, the news article I read described the existence of this organisation. If NSA can do this, anyone can.
Not generally known Martin & Mitchell defected to the USSR in September 1960 causing huge damage to the US intelligence effort. http://bit.ly/ia3kN1 They had been in the US Navy's Naval Security Group (NSG) serving together in Japan 1951-4 and joined NSA at the same time in 1957.
Open acceptance of gay and lesbian oriented people might have saved US national security at an especially critical time during the Cold War.
"A secret 1963 NSA study said that "Beyond any doubt, no other event has had, or is likely to have in the future, a greater impact on the Agency's security program." ever."
I served as an analyst in the USAF Security Service from 1961 to 1964 from the time the Berlin Wall went up through the Cuban Missile crisis and JFK's assassination to the election of LBJ as president. My work had been directly effected by the defection of Martin and Mitchell.
A USAF flight nurse appears set to return to active duty after her dismissal appeal procedures go through the courts since the government did not ask for a stay when it lost a decision. She has to pass professional and physical qualification tests for reinstatement that will be no problem.
I'm glad to see this happening with the administration seeking to end DADT and Congress looking at the necessary legal means. DADT has been set aside by a federal judge recently.
NSA has had a gay and lesbian club for some time. When James Bamford went to NSA almost a decade ago for a book signing when his "Body of Secrets" came out, the news article I read described the existence of this organisation. If NSA can do this, anyone can.
Not generally known Martin & Mitchell defected to the USSR in September 1960 causing huge damage to the US intelligence effort. http://bit.ly/ia3kN1 They had been in the US Navy's Naval Security Group (NSG) serving together in Japan 1951-4 and joined NSA at the same time in 1957.
Open acceptance of gay and lesbian oriented people might have saved US national security at an especially critical time during the Cold War.
"A secret 1963 NSA study said that "Beyond any doubt, no other event has had, or is likely to have in the future, a greater impact on the Agency's security program." ever."
I served as an analyst in the USAF Security Service from 1961 to 1964 from the time the Berlin Wall went up through the Cuban Missile crisis and JFK's assassination to the election of LBJ as president. My work had been directly effected by the defection of Martin and Mitchell.
Friday, 19 November 2010
Common Thread of Violence Acceptability & Authority's Failures
[Second Email to The Daily Beast with some bits added]
I want to expand on earlier comments yesterday after reading further this morning about:
1. From Top Chef Just Desserts to Real Housewives, Reality TV Gets Violent - The Daily Beast
Does Reality TV reflect the violence in society or contribute to it by providing a means to pander to violent voyeurism encouraging those who appear to partake in conflicts which verge on and sometimes roll over into violence? Does Reality TV encourage the public to participate in Toxic Surveillance because it is seen to be acceptable on television?
2. The Kensington Avenue Strangler: Philadelphia's Prostitute Hell - The Daily Beast
It's a terrible thing that those in the society who are supposed to protect everyone do not as the complaints against the police here reveal. These are all too common and can be found across economic and social class with failures that are amazing.
This is an excellent article about society's attitude to those who are entrapped by this life, use drugs to escape reality and then cannot escape its violence because of the drugs. It is ripe for a serial killer to come along, and I wonder just how much the police will actually do?
I'm reminded about the "Criminal Minds" episode involving a "cleaner" where scores of people had disappeared from such an environment. Although a fictional rendition, this drama revealed the failure of the local police to even want to recognise that there was a problem, so the "cleaner" went on until the BAU intervened.
This is the kind of article that is needed to get this into the nation's consciousness and keep it there so that these problems can be address. The great tragedy today is that those in authority create problems to keep from solving the real ones thus creating an illusion that they are doing something. That's one which needs to be addressed as well.
3. Hollywood Publicist Ronni Chasen's Murder Sparks Police Hunt - The Daily Beast
I do not begrudge the dedicated efforts and number of officers assigned to the Ronni Chasen murder in Beverly Hills. I would just like to see the same response to the serial killings on Kensington Avenue in Philadelphia among the prostitutes. We need to hold all human life sacrosanct and protect the public with the same diligence everywhere. Any murderer or violent criminal allowed to stay free has the potential to commit his/her crimes anywhere against anyone. All deserve the same police response and protection everywhere. There are no tourist buses going to Kensington Avenue in Philly. One sees this aberration in Beverly Hills as some kind of additional voyeuristic entertainment spectacle of the most macabre kind.
4. The Death of Mitrice Richardson: A Malibu Murder Mystery - The Daily Beast
This bizarre case has police (sheriff) bungles all along. Was this young women troubled and behaving erratic which the sheriff's office ignored when processing her for not paying for a meal then turned her loose with nothing? Her remains were found a year later six miles from the sheriff's office in a remote location where the evidence was rendered useless by the sheriff's office botched recovery. What really happened here from the beginning to the end? After reading this, I wonder if anyone is telling the truth?
******
Once again these all blend together when considered against the background of my direct experience as a target of what I call Toxic Surveillance to which I've been subjected for a total of 12 years and three months 24/7/365 since mid-August 1998.
In human society worldwide but most especially in the West there is a regression toward accepting an increase in violence as part of the human condition and as an essential ingredient for reality TV as well as torture to extract information from suspects given terrorism looming in the background.
As a result, there is a disposition to accept and exploit violence in the worst area of Philadelphia while a violent murder becomes the object of tourist bus curiosity and voyeurism in Beverly Hills.
A common thread I see running through all of these where violence is accepted or becoming acceptable is the accumulation or simply the acquisition of wealth which might be very small indeed. People lay their lives on the line for the smallest of gains or commit extreme crimes often for no gain other then a perverted psychological reward.
Elements of society are seen as exploitable with respect to violence from Philly's Kensington Avenue where both prostitutes' customers and the police treat them as objects of violent abuse up to and including rape and murder to tourist buses in Beverly Hills viewing a murder scene of an entertainment publicist and Reality TV where conflict on the threshold of violence is sought as entertainment by depicting the human condition in some way.
All of these elements are contained in the abuse of Toxic Surveillance against me during all of these yeas of torture 24/7/365. All those involved who number in the 100s by now have structured their lives around violence as a means of existence and used me as a scapegoat to create that violence upon whom they project their own violence in an effort to deny or escape it in themselves.
But, this is perpetual. It goes on indefinitely never stopping 24/7/356 driven by the same people for as long as possible while they use the Toxic Surveillance as long as they think that their sadistic behaviour can continue without their getting exposed and caught for what they are actually doing. They will kill before that happens unless the Toxic Surveillance does first.
Society has become inverted. The standards are now reversed in my direct experience for over 12+ years as a result of surveillance technology being placed at the disposal of viciously violent personalties. Initially, this included those whom I reported for child abuse in May 1998 along with those whom I reported for antisocial and earlier crimes including an apparent rape and attempted murder.
This initial 2.5-year period was escalated in February 2001 by the arrival of Colonel Vine USMC Ret, Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret and others with their most sophisticated surveillance technology to be used against any electronic device and the human being as well. They arrived just after George Bush was first inaugurated as president and made many verbal representations about their authority coming from the top of the governments in the US and UK. This was seven months before 9/11.
These two activities merged with the child abusers going on to work closely with them especially Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret. He and the abused children's mother are always present to "cook the books." The whole process is founded upon a multitude of false allegations made against me along with numerous false negative characterisations all of which are used to keep the Toxic Surveillance in operation while denying the accuracy of what I report.
This surveillance technology reflects an enormous advancement in law enforcement, security, intelligence and medicine but is being used in a completely malicious manner by criminals to sustain their criminally corrupt activity at the expense of those who are honest and decent. Toward this end they have used the NHS (National Health Service), police, social services, local and central government departments, elected officials, tenants and residents of this environment and the general public as direct participants in the Toxic Surveillance torture abuse revealing the disposition to sadistic violence as a fundamental human problem.
So far the tenant management organisations in London's Kensington & Chelsea have failed as has the Council itself. In 2008 the overall TMO collapsed followed by the local EMB in 2009. These were tenant management organisations. While they have been regenerated, their futures are shaky at best. Finally, this year the Kensington & Chelsea local council has announced recently that it is seeking to merge back office activities with the two adjacent councils of Westminster and Hammersmith & Fulham.
Family, Adult and Corporate Services are those which are being emphasised for such a consolidation. These are directly related to the extensive Toxic Surveillance abuse that has occurred for the past 12+ years under the operational control of child and adult abusers who have institutionalised abuse in the Royal Borough all these years and seek to cover up what has happened with further abuse. This will only lead to a further demise in government.
The surveillance technology which could solve crimes and bring about a revolution in medicine is being used in the old ways of the police to abuse by faking allegations in order to destroy those whom they do not like while creating an appearance that they are doing something meaningful. One step forward two steps back.
I bring this up in the context of these three articles [I added the fourth above later] because they show a disposition to cultivating violence and a vast gap between solving real crimes both in terms of areas and in terms of the knowledge about the crimes.
Reality TV shows the disposition toward conflict and violence as entertainment value as do the tourist buses in Beverly Hills. All those watching me inside my home 24/7/365 think that it's great entertainment. "It's better than TV," one said. Or, they use words like "interesting" or "fascinating." They think it's "fun." Most of all they are addicted to it as if it were a drug which involves hundreds of people over these 12+ years. No one will stop it. Try to drag the mother of the abused children away form it, and hysteria will occur of a most extreme kind.
While the crimes on Kensington Avenue are understood with a great deal of potential evidence, the crime in Beverly Hills is a mystery so far to the police (or they don't want to say anything). There is an apparent lack of motivation in the police in Philly, but there is tremendous motivation by the police in Beverly Hills to solve the crime. This surveillance technology could assist both these local lpolice forces, I believe, to enhance their efforts to solve these crimes, yet it is generally unknown to the world.
There is a disposition of the Philly police to engage in crimes with those whom they think are underclass, hence police work is not accomplished. This disposition to be onlookers is shared by the public who in some way contribute to borderline criminal activity by creating the audience which enables producers, etc to pander to violence.
While I think it is important to report real crime so that the public can better protect itself and ensure that those who are paid by the taxpayer to protect the public do so, I see the gratuitous creation of violence as unacceptable and feeding the notion that it is OK to watch. Tour buses and Reality TV contribute to the Toxic Surveillance Society where the criminals use it to fake allegations and negative characteristics to get the all-too-willing people in authority to come look at what does not exist which they find "fascinating" and will not stop an obvious hoax being perpetuated.
This is why I see your reporting of these crimes as being very important and worthy of national level journalistic attention, and why I want to bring to your attention Toxic Surveillance so that you can be aware of its existence to keep your antennae tuned to picking it up. Toxic Surveillance comes from the US. I believe that it comes from Top Secret America. And, I believe that it poses a serious risk to everyone just as I've experienced it for the past 12+ years.
I want to expand on earlier comments yesterday after reading further this morning about:
1. From Top Chef Just Desserts to Real Housewives, Reality TV Gets Violent - The Daily Beast
Does Reality TV reflect the violence in society or contribute to it by providing a means to pander to violent voyeurism encouraging those who appear to partake in conflicts which verge on and sometimes roll over into violence? Does Reality TV encourage the public to participate in Toxic Surveillance because it is seen to be acceptable on television?
2. The Kensington Avenue Strangler: Philadelphia's Prostitute Hell - The Daily Beast
It's a terrible thing that those in the society who are supposed to protect everyone do not as the complaints against the police here reveal. These are all too common and can be found across economic and social class with failures that are amazing.
This is an excellent article about society's attitude to those who are entrapped by this life, use drugs to escape reality and then cannot escape its violence because of the drugs. It is ripe for a serial killer to come along, and I wonder just how much the police will actually do?
I'm reminded about the "Criminal Minds" episode involving a "cleaner" where scores of people had disappeared from such an environment. Although a fictional rendition, this drama revealed the failure of the local police to even want to recognise that there was a problem, so the "cleaner" went on until the BAU intervened.
This is the kind of article that is needed to get this into the nation's consciousness and keep it there so that these problems can be address. The great tragedy today is that those in authority create problems to keep from solving the real ones thus creating an illusion that they are doing something. That's one which needs to be addressed as well.
3. Hollywood Publicist Ronni Chasen's Murder Sparks Police Hunt - The Daily Beast
I do not begrudge the dedicated efforts and number of officers assigned to the Ronni Chasen murder in Beverly Hills. I would just like to see the same response to the serial killings on Kensington Avenue in Philadelphia among the prostitutes. We need to hold all human life sacrosanct and protect the public with the same diligence everywhere. Any murderer or violent criminal allowed to stay free has the potential to commit his/her crimes anywhere against anyone. All deserve the same police response and protection everywhere. There are no tourist buses going to Kensington Avenue in Philly. One sees this aberration in Beverly Hills as some kind of additional voyeuristic entertainment spectacle of the most macabre kind.
4. The Death of Mitrice Richardson: A Malibu Murder Mystery - The Daily Beast
This bizarre case has police (sheriff) bungles all along. Was this young women troubled and behaving erratic which the sheriff's office ignored when processing her for not paying for a meal then turned her loose with nothing? Her remains were found a year later six miles from the sheriff's office in a remote location where the evidence was rendered useless by the sheriff's office botched recovery. What really happened here from the beginning to the end? After reading this, I wonder if anyone is telling the truth?
******
Once again these all blend together when considered against the background of my direct experience as a target of what I call Toxic Surveillance to which I've been subjected for a total of 12 years and three months 24/7/365 since mid-August 1998.
In human society worldwide but most especially in the West there is a regression toward accepting an increase in violence as part of the human condition and as an essential ingredient for reality TV as well as torture to extract information from suspects given terrorism looming in the background.
As a result, there is a disposition to accept and exploit violence in the worst area of Philadelphia while a violent murder becomes the object of tourist bus curiosity and voyeurism in Beverly Hills.
A common thread I see running through all of these where violence is accepted or becoming acceptable is the accumulation or simply the acquisition of wealth which might be very small indeed. People lay their lives on the line for the smallest of gains or commit extreme crimes often for no gain other then a perverted psychological reward.
Elements of society are seen as exploitable with respect to violence from Philly's Kensington Avenue where both prostitutes' customers and the police treat them as objects of violent abuse up to and including rape and murder to tourist buses in Beverly Hills viewing a murder scene of an entertainment publicist and Reality TV where conflict on the threshold of violence is sought as entertainment by depicting the human condition in some way.
All of these elements are contained in the abuse of Toxic Surveillance against me during all of these yeas of torture 24/7/365. All those involved who number in the 100s by now have structured their lives around violence as a means of existence and used me as a scapegoat to create that violence upon whom they project their own violence in an effort to deny or escape it in themselves.
But, this is perpetual. It goes on indefinitely never stopping 24/7/356 driven by the same people for as long as possible while they use the Toxic Surveillance as long as they think that their sadistic behaviour can continue without their getting exposed and caught for what they are actually doing. They will kill before that happens unless the Toxic Surveillance does first.
Society has become inverted. The standards are now reversed in my direct experience for over 12+ years as a result of surveillance technology being placed at the disposal of viciously violent personalties. Initially, this included those whom I reported for child abuse in May 1998 along with those whom I reported for antisocial and earlier crimes including an apparent rape and attempted murder.
This initial 2.5-year period was escalated in February 2001 by the arrival of Colonel Vine USMC Ret, Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret and others with their most sophisticated surveillance technology to be used against any electronic device and the human being as well. They arrived just after George Bush was first inaugurated as president and made many verbal representations about their authority coming from the top of the governments in the US and UK. This was seven months before 9/11.
These two activities merged with the child abusers going on to work closely with them especially Lt Harry Bird USMC Ret. He and the abused children's mother are always present to "cook the books." The whole process is founded upon a multitude of false allegations made against me along with numerous false negative characterisations all of which are used to keep the Toxic Surveillance in operation while denying the accuracy of what I report.
This surveillance technology reflects an enormous advancement in law enforcement, security, intelligence and medicine but is being used in a completely malicious manner by criminals to sustain their criminally corrupt activity at the expense of those who are honest and decent. Toward this end they have used the NHS (National Health Service), police, social services, local and central government departments, elected officials, tenants and residents of this environment and the general public as direct participants in the Toxic Surveillance torture abuse revealing the disposition to sadistic violence as a fundamental human problem.
So far the tenant management organisations in London's Kensington & Chelsea have failed as has the Council itself. In 2008 the overall TMO collapsed followed by the local EMB in 2009. These were tenant management organisations. While they have been regenerated, their futures are shaky at best. Finally, this year the Kensington & Chelsea local council has announced recently that it is seeking to merge back office activities with the two adjacent councils of Westminster and Hammersmith & Fulham.
Family, Adult and Corporate Services are those which are being emphasised for such a consolidation. These are directly related to the extensive Toxic Surveillance abuse that has occurred for the past 12+ years under the operational control of child and adult abusers who have institutionalised abuse in the Royal Borough all these years and seek to cover up what has happened with further abuse. This will only lead to a further demise in government.
The surveillance technology which could solve crimes and bring about a revolution in medicine is being used in the old ways of the police to abuse by faking allegations in order to destroy those whom they do not like while creating an appearance that they are doing something meaningful. One step forward two steps back.
I bring this up in the context of these three articles [I added the fourth above later] because they show a disposition to cultivating violence and a vast gap between solving real crimes both in terms of areas and in terms of the knowledge about the crimes.
Reality TV shows the disposition toward conflict and violence as entertainment value as do the tourist buses in Beverly Hills. All those watching me inside my home 24/7/365 think that it's great entertainment. "It's better than TV," one said. Or, they use words like "interesting" or "fascinating." They think it's "fun." Most of all they are addicted to it as if it were a drug which involves hundreds of people over these 12+ years. No one will stop it. Try to drag the mother of the abused children away form it, and hysteria will occur of a most extreme kind.
While the crimes on Kensington Avenue are understood with a great deal of potential evidence, the crime in Beverly Hills is a mystery so far to the police (or they don't want to say anything). There is an apparent lack of motivation in the police in Philly, but there is tremendous motivation by the police in Beverly Hills to solve the crime. This surveillance technology could assist both these local lpolice forces, I believe, to enhance their efforts to solve these crimes, yet it is generally unknown to the world.
There is a disposition of the Philly police to engage in crimes with those whom they think are underclass, hence police work is not accomplished. This disposition to be onlookers is shared by the public who in some way contribute to borderline criminal activity by creating the audience which enables producers, etc to pander to violence.
While I think it is important to report real crime so that the public can better protect itself and ensure that those who are paid by the taxpayer to protect the public do so, I see the gratuitous creation of violence as unacceptable and feeding the notion that it is OK to watch. Tour buses and Reality TV contribute to the Toxic Surveillance Society where the criminals use it to fake allegations and negative characteristics to get the all-too-willing people in authority to come look at what does not exist which they find "fascinating" and will not stop an obvious hoax being perpetuated.
This is why I see your reporting of these crimes as being very important and worthy of national level journalistic attention, and why I want to bring to your attention Toxic Surveillance so that you can be aware of its existence to keep your antennae tuned to picking it up. Toxic Surveillance comes from the US. I believe that it comes from Top Secret America. And, I believe that it poses a serious risk to everyone just as I've experienced it for the past 12+ years.
Thursday, 18 November 2010
Extreme & Unfathomable Crimes' Message
What are we seeing in the extreme and unfathomable crimes and potential crimes of today? [An Email sent to the Daily Beast, Wednesday, 17th November 2010]
I've only been reading the Daily Beast since the Newsweek merger was announced and have found it most interesting because of the few articles that strike my interest.
1. One of them was the murder of Ronnie Chasen
2. Another the serial killings of three women separated by 20 years
3. A third a 13-year-old girl found alive after four days of captivity
The common thread of these revolves around psychopathic behaviour, the solutions to these crimes using forensics and the technology of today which can facilitate the sadistically disposed to commit them.
I come to these from a recent background of just over 12 years where I've been subjected to continuous surveillance technology captivity, torture, medical experimentation, surveillance R&D and the likelihood of murder to hide the truth at some point.
Thus, the psychological characteristics of those who commit these crimes are of great interest to me as is solving them.
But, for me the worst aspect is the fact that these are being carried out from inside the government by those who can con others into believing their false allegations and false negative characteristics to create a false threat and danger which enables them to use the surveillance technology indefinitely against a given target like myself to milk the system for all they can get out of it.
The stories above have ancillary characteristics with other recent stories about Randy Quaid, the Canadian Air Force Colonel serial killer and even the US Defence Department's budget as it relates to intelligence spending and TSA [Top Secret America] about which the Washington Post has most fortunately made us aware.
My point is not to go into my experience but to stimulate in you an additional curiosity along lines where the criminal deviant is gaining access to the most sophisticated surveillance technology ever known and using it for extreme criminal purposes which in my case are made to look legitimate when they are not.
Authority cannot be assumed to be trusted as in the case of the Canadian Air Force Colonel and base commander who had access to information which he used to facilitate his perverted crimes.
Randy and Evi Quaid cannot be immediately dismissed as paranoid or in some manner mentally ill and in need of therapy. What they report about their electronic devices being hacked and monitored is a simple fact of life today. Toxic Surveillance goes way beyond but is based upon the same Tempest principle. Their sense of being on a "hit list" should be taken seriously and not dismissed.
There is a whole undercurrent of malevolent or would-be malevolent people in the world who want to gain by crime because they do not have the ability to gain legitimately. At the same time there is a complex of motivations which also involve the perverse psychological rewards derived from crime.
Since I know my situation completely and have kept extensive documentation on it for over 12 years 24/7/365 as it progressed, I look for similarities in other situations which might add to my understanding and provide me with indications of how widespread and deep this abuse exists.
Keep in mind while you pursue these kinds of aberrations in the world at large that there could be a new element at work derived from intelligence development that has come out of TSA [Top Secret America] during the past decade founded on little known principles, i.e., Tempest, developed since the 1950s.
This enables the twisted and perverted involved in the huge TSA monolith to gain materially and psychologically (psycho pathologically) by acting out perversions with the surveillance technology and other more normal methods of extreme criminal activity.
I can see a scenario where organised crime might want to obtain this surveillance technology, or those who are part of TSA and sadistically disposed along with being "no-hopers" using it in much the same manner as if they were organised crime itself.
I see the latter as becoming serial criminals moving from victim to victim but being undetected and not suspected, an "Unsub" (Unidentifed Subject), as the criminal agents.
We've got to start thinking in completely different ways about all the events we see around us, and we must rely more and more on forensics which means databases like DNA.
People given surveillance technology and the ability to totally invade the privacy of others will find an absolute power that brings out in them the worst aspects of the human character as experiments at Yale and Stamford have shown 50 and 40 years ago respectively.
I've only been reading the Daily Beast since the Newsweek merger was announced and have found it most interesting because of the few articles that strike my interest.
1. One of them was the murder of Ronnie Chasen
2. Another the serial killings of three women separated by 20 years
3. A third a 13-year-old girl found alive after four days of captivity
The common thread of these revolves around psychopathic behaviour, the solutions to these crimes using forensics and the technology of today which can facilitate the sadistically disposed to commit them.
I come to these from a recent background of just over 12 years where I've been subjected to continuous surveillance technology captivity, torture, medical experimentation, surveillance R&D and the likelihood of murder to hide the truth at some point.
Thus, the psychological characteristics of those who commit these crimes are of great interest to me as is solving them.
But, for me the worst aspect is the fact that these are being carried out from inside the government by those who can con others into believing their false allegations and false negative characteristics to create a false threat and danger which enables them to use the surveillance technology indefinitely against a given target like myself to milk the system for all they can get out of it.
The stories above have ancillary characteristics with other recent stories about Randy Quaid, the Canadian Air Force Colonel serial killer and even the US Defence Department's budget as it relates to intelligence spending and TSA [Top Secret America] about which the Washington Post has most fortunately made us aware.
My point is not to go into my experience but to stimulate in you an additional curiosity along lines where the criminal deviant is gaining access to the most sophisticated surveillance technology ever known and using it for extreme criminal purposes which in my case are made to look legitimate when they are not.
Authority cannot be assumed to be trusted as in the case of the Canadian Air Force Colonel and base commander who had access to information which he used to facilitate his perverted crimes.
Randy and Evi Quaid cannot be immediately dismissed as paranoid or in some manner mentally ill and in need of therapy. What they report about their electronic devices being hacked and monitored is a simple fact of life today. Toxic Surveillance goes way beyond but is based upon the same Tempest principle. Their sense of being on a "hit list" should be taken seriously and not dismissed.
There is a whole undercurrent of malevolent or would-be malevolent people in the world who want to gain by crime because they do not have the ability to gain legitimately. At the same time there is a complex of motivations which also involve the perverse psychological rewards derived from crime.
Since I know my situation completely and have kept extensive documentation on it for over 12 years 24/7/365 as it progressed, I look for similarities in other situations which might add to my understanding and provide me with indications of how widespread and deep this abuse exists.
Keep in mind while you pursue these kinds of aberrations in the world at large that there could be a new element at work derived from intelligence development that has come out of TSA [Top Secret America] during the past decade founded on little known principles, i.e., Tempest, developed since the 1950s.
This enables the twisted and perverted involved in the huge TSA monolith to gain materially and psychologically (psycho pathologically) by acting out perversions with the surveillance technology and other more normal methods of extreme criminal activity.
I can see a scenario where organised crime might want to obtain this surveillance technology, or those who are part of TSA and sadistically disposed along with being "no-hopers" using it in much the same manner as if they were organised crime itself.
I see the latter as becoming serial criminals moving from victim to victim but being undetected and not suspected, an "Unsub" (Unidentifed Subject), as the criminal agents.
We've got to start thinking in completely different ways about all the events we see around us, and we must rely more and more on forensics which means databases like DNA.
People given surveillance technology and the ability to totally invade the privacy of others will find an absolute power that brings out in them the worst aspects of the human character as experiments at Yale and Stamford have shown 50 and 40 years ago respectively.
Saturday, 13 November 2010
US Monetary Policy Today & Rest of the World
Five myths about the Federal Reserve
Here are my rebuttals to each of these five statements:
1. What monetarists have maintained is that money supply increases in excess of the real growth in the economy will result in price increases and not real growth increases. The Fed buys gov LTD from money centre banks crediting its current accounts with them. This money will "leak" by lending into the capital markets if businesses and consumers cannot borrow as expected. That money will inflate prices of whatever investments are attractive from gold to services.
2. Interest rate arbitrage AND expectations of further inflation push down the price of the dollar making goods and services for the importing US consumer immediately more expensive from overseas causing US inflation and/or business contraction. Buying/selling dollars is totally irrelevant. A weaker dollar is not welcome as the global protests have shown. Beggar-thy-neighbour policies depressed economic activity in the 1930s.
3. Fed purchases of gov LTD monetise the deficit pure and simple and takes pressure off squeezing the private sector financing which has to be impacted by the huge, ongoing US deficit. There is a shortage of financing for US gov deficit if no one wants to buy US gov debt because there are expectations that it will continuous to balloon. The Fed and Treasury have to work together now like at no other time in history.
4. When it comes to monetary policy integrity of the US, the Fed will be independent of the gov. Witness Paul Volcker's "Saturday Night Special" in October 1979 when he decontrolled the price of money and set money supply growth targets on steady instead of price targets. That was one year before the 1980 national elections. I wonder what Jimmy Carter thought about appointing Paul Volcker in 1979 when short term interest rates soared into an inverted yield curve? Incidentally, Paul Volcker saved the Western world's monetary system by doing so.
5. Ben Bernanke had no choice but to do what was needed to prevent a collapse. He (the Fed) poured in $1.7b of liquidity into the system and did whatever else was necessary. He would have to set it right later, but there are still serious problems that now need $600b in LTD purchases for stability. Alan Greenspan was not the man for the job and "fed" the bankers what they wanted. I suspect there are many who understood what was happening but could do nothing.
I want to hear what Paul Volcker really thinks, and I would like to hear the same from Rupert Pennant-Rea the former Economics Editor and Editor of the Economist before becoming a deputy governor of the Bank of England a job he lost ingloriously after being caught out working too hard and mixing business with pleasure at the Old Lady on Threadneedle Street.
Here are my rebuttals to each of these five statements:
1. What monetarists have maintained is that money supply increases in excess of the real growth in the economy will result in price increases and not real growth increases. The Fed buys gov LTD from money centre banks crediting its current accounts with them. This money will "leak" by lending into the capital markets if businesses and consumers cannot borrow as expected. That money will inflate prices of whatever investments are attractive from gold to services.
2. Interest rate arbitrage AND expectations of further inflation push down the price of the dollar making goods and services for the importing US consumer immediately more expensive from overseas causing US inflation and/or business contraction. Buying/selling dollars is totally irrelevant. A weaker dollar is not welcome as the global protests have shown. Beggar-thy-neighbour policies depressed economic activity in the 1930s.
3. Fed purchases of gov LTD monetise the deficit pure and simple and takes pressure off squeezing the private sector financing which has to be impacted by the huge, ongoing US deficit. There is a shortage of financing for US gov deficit if no one wants to buy US gov debt because there are expectations that it will continuous to balloon. The Fed and Treasury have to work together now like at no other time in history.
4. When it comes to monetary policy integrity of the US, the Fed will be independent of the gov. Witness Paul Volcker's "Saturday Night Special" in October 1979 when he decontrolled the price of money and set money supply growth targets on steady instead of price targets. That was one year before the 1980 national elections. I wonder what Jimmy Carter thought about appointing Paul Volcker in 1979 when short term interest rates soared into an inverted yield curve? Incidentally, Paul Volcker saved the Western world's monetary system by doing so.
5. Ben Bernanke had no choice but to do what was needed to prevent a collapse. He (the Fed) poured in $1.7b of liquidity into the system and did whatever else was necessary. He would have to set it right later, but there are still serious problems that now need $600b in LTD purchases for stability. Alan Greenspan was not the man for the job and "fed" the bankers what they wanted. I suspect there are many who understood what was happening but could do nothing.
I want to hear what Paul Volcker really thinks, and I would like to hear the same from Rupert Pennant-Rea the former Economics Editor and Editor of the Economist before becoming a deputy governor of the Bank of England a job he lost ingloriously after being caught out working too hard and mixing business with pleasure at the Old Lady on Threadneedle Street.
China, Spartacus and Toxic Surveillance
I. China
13/11/10 12:30:17 "Only Britain can beg for scraps from China and tell them how to behave" | Simon Jenkins | Comment is free | The Guardian
13/11/10 12:34:18 David Cameron says he will drum up China trade & tackle human rights. "It is an exercise in bluff concealing hypocrisy"
13/11/10 13:09:55 But, Mr Jenkins, why is it that nary a word has emerged from people like yourself in the media concerning Toxic Surveillance used in London for 12+ years to imprison, torture, carry out medical experiments, surveillance R&D and attempt to execute 24/7/365 during all these years? You could add that to your list here:
"One day perhaps China will have enough of this posturing and send a return delegation to London. Before discussing British lingerie exports, the Chinese will profess a "deep concern" at Britain's prison overcrowding, control orders, housing benefit reform and cap on student fees. They will "raise awareness" of Abu Hamza's detention, the persecution of asylum-seeking children and house flipping by MPs."
"Finally the delegation might beg advice on democracy. How can they arrange for seats in the houses of parliament to be sold to wealthy businessmen, or handed down from father to son? How could an election be fixed so the party that comes third finds itself in power? And perhaps Cameron could lend Beijing his admirable Mr Gove, to advise on the dictatorial centralisation of the Tibetan education service."
II. Spartacus
13/11/10 12:25:00 I am not nor ever will be Spartacus. I think the judge made the correct decision. Now, we have Yasmin Alibhai-Brown targeted with a "joke" threat to stone her to death
13/11/10 13:48:00 "Spartacus:" universal values are freedom, love, hope, & finally life itself. Oppression & slavery strip these away
13/11/10 13:53:27 In the winter of 1959 when I had just turned 16, I read Howard Fast's 1951 novel "Spartacus." At at that time I was studying Roman history and wrote a paper about it for my Roman humanities class. It was not part of the curriculum. I just read this on my own and submitted this paper when one was due. This occurred in the deep south some 35 miles east of Atlanta, Georgia at the original campus of Emory University which had by then moved to Atlanta. The essence of Spartacus was slavery and freedom which was very much a suppressed issue at that time in the deep south of the US. The following year I saw the film when it first came out.
Slavery takes on different forms, and I view this use of the phrase "I am Spartacus" to violate the essence of what Spartacus has come to symbolise. No one can make extreme threatening comments publicly as was done in this instance or more recently against Yasmin Alibhai-Brown without being held accountable and responsible. The judge has made the correct decision in this case. Those who have opposed this decision have enslaved themselves as part of a tyrannical mob who approves jokes about bombing when Spartacus represents the essence of opposition to such tyranny that was engendered in the "joke" Tweet.
http://bit.ly/ciIVV7 "Spartacus' " "central theme is that man's most basic universal values are freedom, love, hope, and finally life itself. Oppression and slavery strip these away from man. . ."
III. Toxic Surveillance
13/11/10 15:04:12 JRN 320 - Promise and Perils of Online Journalism: WaPost Exec Editor Marcus Brauchli and "Top Secret America"
13/11/10 11:22:29 I'm glad to see this particular example of today's journalism being brought to journalism schools giving students an opportunity to hear directly from Marcus Brauchli about what I consider to be the most profound problem in the world today that is comprehensively presented to Washington Post readers by the use of technology and the Internet. The importance of what the Post has done in terms of content and method (form?) will take a considerable amount of time to sink in fully, but such an appreciation will inevitably occur precisely because of the technology used to communicate and the interaction it makes possible.
One of the key reasons that Top Secret America is so important has to do with his statement: “The most powerful officials have virtually no power to compel a news organization not to publish something.” If what those in power want suppressed cannot be achieved by legal means, the essence of Top Secret America that has yet to be exposed will cause to happen by its dirty tricks based upon technology that is far beyond the willingness of most to accept although it is known and described, and I don't mean simple hacking.
What the Washington Post has been able to do at this point in time will be seen, I believe, as the pivotal point between the old world of struggling to publish the truth against a recalcitrant power and a new world where that struggle will encounter the ability to know ("intelligence") turned against a domestic population in advance and in order to sabotage in such a manner that censorship is achieved. Any effort to try to describe what is happening will be ridiculed especially by those carrying out the dirty tricks.
Why I like to see this being brought to the journalism schools as here means that today's students have a choice about how they want to pursue their careers in the future in light of what Top Secret America represents in both content and method of communication. It will take a lot of study to grasp the meaning of this fully, but then that is the job of the students. I just hope that this can be brought to as many schools as possible if Mr Brauchli has the time which I'm sure he doesn't. Well, there is the technology and Top Secret American at the Post with its searchable database.
I'm just wondering when Marcus Brauchli will start chipping away at the essence of Toxic Surveillance (a product of Top Secret America) to stop its abuse by publishing it?
13/11/10 12:30:17 "Only Britain can beg for scraps from China and tell them how to behave" | Simon Jenkins | Comment is free | The Guardian
13/11/10 12:34:18 David Cameron says he will drum up China trade & tackle human rights. "It is an exercise in bluff concealing hypocrisy"
13/11/10 13:09:55 But, Mr Jenkins, why is it that nary a word has emerged from people like yourself in the media concerning Toxic Surveillance used in London for 12+ years to imprison, torture, carry out medical experiments, surveillance R&D and attempt to execute 24/7/365 during all these years? You could add that to your list here:
"One day perhaps China will have enough of this posturing and send a return delegation to London. Before discussing British lingerie exports, the Chinese will profess a "deep concern" at Britain's prison overcrowding, control orders, housing benefit reform and cap on student fees. They will "raise awareness" of Abu Hamza's detention, the persecution of asylum-seeking children and house flipping by MPs."
"Finally the delegation might beg advice on democracy. How can they arrange for seats in the houses of parliament to be sold to wealthy businessmen, or handed down from father to son? How could an election be fixed so the party that comes third finds itself in power? And perhaps Cameron could lend Beijing his admirable Mr Gove, to advise on the dictatorial centralisation of the Tibetan education service."
II. Spartacus
13/11/10 12:25:00 I am not nor ever will be Spartacus. I think the judge made the correct decision. Now, we have Yasmin Alibhai-Brown targeted with a "joke" threat to stone her to death
13/11/10 13:48:00 "Spartacus:" universal values are freedom, love, hope, & finally life itself. Oppression & slavery strip these away
13/11/10 13:53:27 In the winter of 1959 when I had just turned 16, I read Howard Fast's 1951 novel "Spartacus." At at that time I was studying Roman history and wrote a paper about it for my Roman humanities class. It was not part of the curriculum. I just read this on my own and submitted this paper when one was due. This occurred in the deep south some 35 miles east of Atlanta, Georgia at the original campus of Emory University which had by then moved to Atlanta. The essence of Spartacus was slavery and freedom which was very much a suppressed issue at that time in the deep south of the US. The following year I saw the film when it first came out.
Slavery takes on different forms, and I view this use of the phrase "I am Spartacus" to violate the essence of what Spartacus has come to symbolise. No one can make extreme threatening comments publicly as was done in this instance or more recently against Yasmin Alibhai-Brown without being held accountable and responsible. The judge has made the correct decision in this case. Those who have opposed this decision have enslaved themselves as part of a tyrannical mob who approves jokes about bombing when Spartacus represents the essence of opposition to such tyranny that was engendered in the "joke" Tweet.
http://bit.ly/ciIVV7 "Spartacus' " "central theme is that man's most basic universal values are freedom, love, hope, and finally life itself. Oppression and slavery strip these away from man. . ."
III. Toxic Surveillance
13/11/10 15:04:12 JRN 320 - Promise and Perils of Online Journalism: WaPost Exec Editor Marcus Brauchli and "Top Secret America"
13/11/10 11:22:29 I'm glad to see this particular example of today's journalism being brought to journalism schools giving students an opportunity to hear directly from Marcus Brauchli about what I consider to be the most profound problem in the world today that is comprehensively presented to Washington Post readers by the use of technology and the Internet. The importance of what the Post has done in terms of content and method (form?) will take a considerable amount of time to sink in fully, but such an appreciation will inevitably occur precisely because of the technology used to communicate and the interaction it makes possible.
One of the key reasons that Top Secret America is so important has to do with his statement: “The most powerful officials have virtually no power to compel a news organization not to publish something.” If what those in power want suppressed cannot be achieved by legal means, the essence of Top Secret America that has yet to be exposed will cause to happen by its dirty tricks based upon technology that is far beyond the willingness of most to accept although it is known and described, and I don't mean simple hacking.
What the Washington Post has been able to do at this point in time will be seen, I believe, as the pivotal point between the old world of struggling to publish the truth against a recalcitrant power and a new world where that struggle will encounter the ability to know ("intelligence") turned against a domestic population in advance and in order to sabotage in such a manner that censorship is achieved. Any effort to try to describe what is happening will be ridiculed especially by those carrying out the dirty tricks.
Why I like to see this being brought to the journalism schools as here means that today's students have a choice about how they want to pursue their careers in the future in light of what Top Secret America represents in both content and method of communication. It will take a lot of study to grasp the meaning of this fully, but then that is the job of the students. I just hope that this can be brought to as many schools as possible if Mr Brauchli has the time which I'm sure he doesn't. Well, there is the technology and Top Secret American at the Post with its searchable database.
I'm just wondering when Marcus Brauchli will start chipping away at the essence of Toxic Surveillance (a product of Top Secret America) to stop its abuse by publishing it?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)