What are we seeing in the extreme and unfathomable crimes and potential crimes of today? [An Email sent to the Daily Beast, Wednesday, 17th November 2010]
I've only been reading the Daily Beast since the Newsweek merger was announced and have found it most interesting because of the few articles that strike my interest.
1. One of them was the murder of Ronnie Chasen
2. Another the serial killings of three women separated by 20 years
3. A third a 13-year-old girl found alive after four days of captivity
The common thread of these revolves around psychopathic behaviour, the solutions to these crimes using forensics and the technology of today which can facilitate the sadistically disposed to commit them.
I come to these from a recent background of just over 12 years where I've been subjected to continuous surveillance technology captivity, torture, medical experimentation, surveillance R&D and the likelihood of murder to hide the truth at some point.
Thus, the psychological characteristics of those who commit these crimes are of great interest to me as is solving them.
But, for me the worst aspect is the fact that these are being carried out from inside the government by those who can con others into believing their false allegations and false negative characteristics to create a false threat and danger which enables them to use the surveillance technology indefinitely against a given target like myself to milk the system for all they can get out of it.
The stories above have ancillary characteristics with other recent stories about Randy Quaid, the Canadian Air Force Colonel serial killer and even the US Defence Department's budget as it relates to intelligence spending and TSA [Top Secret America] about which the Washington Post has most fortunately made us aware.
My point is not to go into my experience but to stimulate in you an additional curiosity along lines where the criminal deviant is gaining access to the most sophisticated surveillance technology ever known and using it for extreme criminal purposes which in my case are made to look legitimate when they are not.
Authority cannot be assumed to be trusted as in the case of the Canadian Air Force Colonel and base commander who had access to information which he used to facilitate his perverted crimes.
Randy and Evi Quaid cannot be immediately dismissed as paranoid or in some manner mentally ill and in need of therapy. What they report about their electronic devices being hacked and monitored is a simple fact of life today. Toxic Surveillance goes way beyond but is based upon the same Tempest principle. Their sense of being on a "hit list" should be taken seriously and not dismissed.
There is a whole undercurrent of malevolent or would-be malevolent people in the world who want to gain by crime because they do not have the ability to gain legitimately. At the same time there is a complex of motivations which also involve the perverse psychological rewards derived from crime.
Since I know my situation completely and have kept extensive documentation on it for over 12 years 24/7/365 as it progressed, I look for similarities in other situations which might add to my understanding and provide me with indications of how widespread and deep this abuse exists.
Keep in mind while you pursue these kinds of aberrations in the world at large that there could be a new element at work derived from intelligence development that has come out of TSA [Top Secret America] during the past decade founded on little known principles, i.e., Tempest, developed since the 1950s.
This enables the twisted and perverted involved in the huge TSA monolith to gain materially and psychologically (psycho pathologically) by acting out perversions with the surveillance technology and other more normal methods of extreme criminal activity.
I can see a scenario where organised crime might want to obtain this surveillance technology, or those who are part of TSA and sadistically disposed along with being "no-hopers" using it in much the same manner as if they were organised crime itself.
I see the latter as becoming serial criminals moving from victim to victim but being undetected and not suspected, an "Unsub" (Unidentifed Subject), as the criminal agents.
We've got to start thinking in completely different ways about all the events we see around us, and we must rely more and more on forensics which means databases like DNA.
People given surveillance technology and the ability to totally invade the privacy of others will find an absolute power that brings out in them the worst aspects of the human character as experiments at Yale and Stamford have shown 50 and 40 years ago respectively.
