Storms 14 Years Apart Connected By Torture Abuse

@BBCNews Storms on Xmas Eve remind me of 1999 after a day of rain, a high wind & rain storm blew thru at night & into France causing damage. [Twitter]

What ties these two storm periods together for me is the surveillance technology imprisonment and apparent efforts to remove me from my home.

On Xmas Eve Eve of 1999 which was on a Thursday, I was subjected to a police siege all night long that included people outside talking loudly about removing me from my home. A female was waiting for me to turn off my light as evidence of my presence so they could raid the place. I finally went to bed about 0300 leaving the light on near a wall in the living room then at the base of which there were what I called sound detection boxes installed at the base of my wall from below about two feet from where I slept. I could hear voices of those with their heads stuck inside the sound detection boxes talking and waiting for me to move. When I did, they would run outside with the sound recording to see if it was adequate enough to stage the raid. It never was. This was torture.

The storm in 1999 arrived on Xmas Eve after a day of dull darkness and light rain. When I went out early that morning, a woman shouted asking if they had gotten me out, and the reply came that they had not. I returned home that Xmas Eve Friday night about 1800 and went to bed without turning on the light since the whole operation was in place and continued all night as the storm swept through into the early morning hours of Xmas Day reaching its worse about 0400. I continued to listen to all their activity and tried to sleep to make up for the lost sleep from the night before while I sought to make as little noise as possible listening to the chatter from the sound detection box a couple feet from me.

The storms of 2013 some 14 years later after spending all these Xmas holidays subjected to this same kind of abuse have been rolling through so far in numbers a day early with a storm during Xmas Eve Eve and another due to be at its worst early on Xmas Eve. By this time they have distributed surveillance technology of the most sophisticated kind with neighbours operating it. There are fundamental Muslim Islamists who advocate Sharia law next to the head of the bed wall in the bedroom so I get their abuse some two feet away from my head as they disturb me with false allegations and hitting the wall to wake me and create abuse by using the surveillance technology. The same is true when I go into my bathroom or am in my living room with voices and abuse coming from the kitchen next door to my bathroom wall and voices from the public Walkway, outside or the surveillance technology electronic transmission of sound.

Now, that's real progress, isn't it, for the UK? Indefinite surveillance technology moving from a police seige that lasted a month 14 years ago during the Xmas holidays to one this year where the neighbours and others are involved with the same people at the surveillance technology core whom I reported for child abuse in 1998. They mounted the police seige in 1999 after I sent the Prime Minister a letter about the surveillance technology abuse that started in mid-August 1998. They also began to immediately reinforce the surveillance technology after I sent the letter by adding more radar imaging devices in the flat above which helped destroy my eyes quicker.

I've really learned a lot about the British and their standards of value, the democratic rule of law and human rights as it is really practised by the government in the UK. This evening the same kind of seige is being mounted as the storm winds can heard outside that are anticipated to get much worse by 0400 at their estimated peak. It doesn't take much expertise or ability to mount this kind of torture abuse, and it appears that this is the standard for behaviour in the UK as far as my experience reveals. Xmas doesn't mean very much here, and peace on earth, good will to men is a grand slogan only used to create an image for the rest of the world while hiding the reality of what actually happens in the UK.

They seek to cover up by any means what I can report so they can get on with abuse against and theft from others. This is a society of predators and is not much different from Syria where a British doctor was just murdered as the BBC News Channel reported this evening with an interview with his sister describing what his mother was told. Even Russia has released political prisoners before this Xmas. But, the British government still holds me imprisoned by surveillance technology inside my home subjected to torture abuse, medical experimentation, surveillance technology R&D and its lethal use waiting for death to occur while they threaten to remove me minute-by-minute to accelerate death by natural causes.

NHS Mental Health Services at Breaking Point

Funds cut for England mental health trusts where community care gone & only crisis help available with teams swamped.

The great problem I have experienced with the NHS mental health providers since 1999 has been Munchhausen By Proxy used by those I reported for child abuse in May 1998 who were then given surveillance technology to use against me from August 1998. They used this to protect themselves from my reporting while expanding their abuse to adults, namely me, who are made totally defenceless in much the same manner children are defenceless against adult abuse.

They then brought the NHS into the process in a significant manner in 1999 by continuing to make false allegations against me using the surveillance technology in which the NHS mental health professionals participated. No amount of reporting with evidence to the NHS mental health institutions from early 2000 until now has been effective in stopping this abuse of the system including the NHS.

The NHS mental health professionals were unable to recognised and properly address the mental health problems of those abusing the surveillance technology against me including psychopathy, necrophilia and sadism. Munchhausen By Proxy is a mental illness in and of itself.

There was a huge and continuous waste of resources all around including the NHS as a result of this failure that accumulated exponentially. The NHS professionals did not and still do not listen to me when I explain exactly what is happening, that they are harassing me and that they are wasting resources as continued this year up through the end of November 2013. They prefer like abusers to blame the victim.

It is a great tragedy that the NHS mental health professionals and institutions are so grossly incompetent in terms of professional expertise and managementy that what is described in this article has come to be as a result. I believe that their assessment tests are inadequate, and they rely on medication to bring symptomatic relief while the underlying problem continues unabated. The mother of the abused children has used the surveillance without stopping all these years and is medicated by the NHS while she also engages in substance abuse, i.e., alcohol, and perhaps Class B and A drugs as well.

These people use the surveillance technology to try to create a mental health problem and get me sectioned. When none exits, they make it up anyway and try to ram through their false allegations with extreme emotional hysterical behaviour to incite those in the NHS to act on their Munchhausen By Proxy false allegations. They are using mental illness in the community as a weapon to attack those they do not like and seek to use the NHS as a false prison for punishment based on their manufactured allegations. It's no wonder NHS mental health services are suffering from being overwhelmed by users given this situation. I wouldn't go near an NHS mental health professional after my experience.



1.  Breaking Point

a.  Referrals Up

"The Royal College of Psychiatrists is warning that mental health services are near breaking point.

"Separate data for the same period shows referrals to crisis and community mental health teams have risen by 16%.

b.  Mental Health Services Unsafe

"The revelations come just weeks after one of the country's leading psychiatrists told BBC News that mental health services are unsafe and in crisis.

c.  Butterfly Effrect From Small Cuts

"Prof Sue Bailey, President of the Royal College of Psychiatrists, said: "Even small cuts at this time can have a disproportionately large effect on the welfare of our patients.

" "The services are stretched to their limit and if they stretch any further, the elastic band is going to snap."

2.  People Who Need Services Denied

a.  Help For Crisis Only

"That is certainly the experience of Emma Bardney, who has a complex post traumatic stress disorder, but says she's been failed by her mental health trust.

" "Its been really tough... fighting for the right to get better," said the 42 year old paramedic.

" "There's been no community mental health support available to me. So my care plan has been sporadic out-patients with a consultant or crisis support and nothing in-between and the only way you can access support is when you are in crisis.

" "So you have to get to a very low point before you get any type of support or help.

b.  Community Health Care Gone & Crisis Teams Swamped

" "Mind hears all the time from people who have lost the community health care that was helping them to cope and who now find themselves unable to get through to their local crisis team," said Paul Farmer.

" "They feel 'fobbed off' when they do, because there simply aren't enough staff to cope with the numbers of people in desperate need of help." "

Full Truth of JFK's Assassination Needs Light of Day

Review: JFK's Last Hundred Days: The Transformation of a Man and the Emergence of a Great President By Thurston Clarke

Mon 11.11.2013: JFK's political side probably brought down the wrath of Pentagon extremists after the private, secret deal he did with Khrushchev to pull US Jupiter missiles out of Turkey as a quid pro quo over Cuba

Date: 11-11-2013 16:24

William B Shavelson
Editor in Chief
Columbia Magazine

Dear Mr Shavelson

I agree with Thurston Clarke's assessment of JFK as reviewed by William Keylor about his book in "Autumn of the President." The world would be completely different today had he lived. I served in the USAF Security Service from 1961 to 1964 while JFK was in office until his tragic assassination 50 years ago. I served from the Berlin Wall's building to the election of LBJ and spent 18 months at its HQ in San Antonio during which the Cuban Missile Crisis occurred.

I had been just three weeks into my one-year tour in Trabzon, Turkey, on the Black Sea 90 miles from the Soviet border at Hopa, Georgia, when he was assassinated. I am surprised, however, by this time that the myth he "stared down" Khrushchev over Cuba is not fully recognised for what really happened. He bargained on his own with the Soviet leader and agreed to swap out the aging US Jupiter missiles from Turkey for the withdrawal of Soviet missiles from Cuba. Nobody knew about this except a few people [See James Bamford's Body of Secrets]. He kept it a secret from the American public with mid-term elections pending in early November 1962. [See Seymour Hersh, The Dark Side of Camelot, chapter 20: Missile Crisis]

This did not become public in the US for over 20 years. While I was stationed at Trabzon, I met several employees of Hawker-Siddely (diesel engines) and Marconi (electronics) who were working under NATO contract to retrain Turkish missile men into radar at Rize which was on the Black Sea half way to the Soviet border from Trabzon. They were from England, Scotland, Ireland and France. This was not classified information and was openly known. Still, I never said anything about it and never heard anything for decades until the 1980s. I worked in an area that did not officially exist and was completely unkown. I Never Said Anything for decades.

I think the secrecy was a huge mistake, and in a democracy such as the US the public should have been told. He created a political image, but his actions were different from that image which left him open to blackmail by the Soviet Union for making a secret deal with Khrushchev. This had to send some of the ultra right-wing generals at the Pentagon into the stratosphere for they surely learned about it. After all, NATO was involved.

Also, JFK wouldn't accept the Army's lie as described by Neil Sheehan in his "Bright and Shining Lie" from the beginning of 1963 when the South Vietnamese Army were not willing or able to undertake the fighting against the Viet Cong. He wanted to withdraw from South Vietnam as described, but the president of South Vietnam was assassinated just three weeks before JFK. The CIA was on the move, and Mongoose might very well have been out of control and operating beyond JFK's knowledge. I believe that the full information about his assassination has still to see the light of day.

Sincerely yours

Gary D Chance, '69 GS, '73 GSB

Virtually no military alert was made when JFK assassinated except by CINCPAC, documents altered & code books missing. [Twitter]

Columbia Professors Discuss the Legacy of President John F. Kennedy including the Peace Corps

Surveillance Violence Creates Captivity & Enslavement

These two news articles today when put together explain how it is possible to imprison and enslave someone indefinitely by surveillance technology while carrying out a long drawn out assassination.

1. British Soldiers in Belfast 40 years ago terrorise just as the US Marines have been terrorising London since mid-February 2001

Undercover soldiers 'killed unarmed civilians in Belfast' 40 years ago

1136
See BBC One's Panorama tonight at 2100 for Britain's Secret Terror Force. These British soldiers acted out of uniform to carry out surveillance from the gutter vantage point as dustmen and similar workers.

Today the same goes on in London's North Kensington against me with US Marines using the most sophisticated surveillance technology ever known that they introduced with their arrival in February 2001. They and others with them threaten to kill continuously as part of their torture abuse. They are actually killing, however, with electronic weapons at the same time while causing as much damage as possible hoping to discredit what I report by blaming their innocent victim (me). They do not wear uniforms and participate in the community with those I reported for child abuse as far back as 1998.

They have expanded this operation by distributing the surveillance technology to neighbours apparently at a price for profit and have also used me as an additional non-consenting marketing guinea pig to attempt to sell the surveillance technology on a wider basis. At the same time they are trying to take over all my property and my home by eliminating me. This totally invasive surveillance technology violence has become a standard of my daily life 24/7/365 since mid-August 1998.

Will it be 40 years before this is revealed too?

Are the US Marines an occupying force in the United Kingdom as the British were in Northern Ireland?

2. Three women enslaved for 30 years in London's Lambeth


The police say:

1. The women had a controlled existence with some degree of freedom; and

2. The police have never seen anything on this scale before (length of time).

The police have been knowing participants in my enslavement and captivity with torture by surveillance technology for over 15 years 24/7/365 since mid-August 1998, and they are making every effort to wipe me out now to cover up this horrendous crime in which they are directly involved.

1546
3 women 'held as slaves for 30 years' in S London aged 69 (Malaysan), 57 (Irish) & 30 (British). A male & female aged 67 are being held by police. A television programme on forced marriages brought one of them to contact a charity who then informed police. I am not surprised by this at all and wait to see the full information disclosed.

One wonders about slavery in the UK where the right to life is allowed to be denied for decades even while everyone knows about it as has occurred in my direct experience for over 15 years by those using surveillance technology against me whom I initially reported for child abuse in May 1998.

They keep me enslaved by surveillance technology stealing all that I do and using it in an inverted fashion as their own work against me although it is about them. They maintain false allegations against me to discredit the truth about what I report which has just happened again with an hysterical vigilante mob running around outside making these false allegations.

They seek to destroy, blame me for what they are doing and take over everything for themselves by using the police and NHS through their non-stop false allegations which can be seen to be false. The government has been so duped and misled that it has been trapped in this web of image deception that those involved want to perpetuate it goes beyond identity theft constituting the theft of life itself which is the new crime based upon surveillance technology abuse 24/7/365 by the same people indefinitely until they succeed. [Facebook]

@BBCNews Home Secy shocked by appalling 3 decades of enslavement needs to be asked why she ignored my continuous Emails & had them spiked. [Twitter]

Abusive Management Creates Child Protection Workers' Pressure

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-24999826

77% said the increased thresholds were due to increased referrals.

"One respondent told the survey: "We were told if you have a teenager on your case who is 14 to 16 years old then they cannot have child protection plans anymore because they are either deemed 'capable of voting with their feet' or 'able to self-protect'." "

Oh, good, a 14-year-old gets to run away from home and be subjected to the street predators instead but deemed capable of self protection. The abusers are managing the system.

In a world of phenomenal technological advances, why is it that the most sophisticated surveillance technology ever known has been given to those whom I reported for child abuse along with others reported for antisocial behaviour and crimes?

This has been going on indefinitely 24/7/365 since 1998 and continues as of this writing. The abusers have come to dominate and control government.

Family and Children Services in Kensington & Chelsea merged into Westminster and Hammersmith & Fulham councils at the end of 2010. Obviously, the budget whatever it was could not possibly handle child abusers who were using the most sophisticated surveillance technology ever known. That must have been quite expensive as child abuse flourished and grew.

When I tried to report this at the end of 1999 to the Prime Minister, I was summoned before a couple psychiatrists at the nearby St Charles Hospital where my letter to the Prime Minister was displayed to me in a folder bearing my name. I had described the ongoing child abuse that summer where the abused child was acting out violence against other children as he continued to receive abuse.

I was the one who was then subjected to extreme abuse by these psychiatrists and a psychiatric nurse who joined in the surveillance technology abuse against me. When I met with them in early 2000, it was the time when Victoria Climbie was being tortured to death. They paid no attention to the fact that I was reporting child abuse and reiterating it to them. They did not listen to me and embarked on an abuse campaign against me instead.

This year I was once again summoned to attend a meeting with one of these psychiatrists with whom I would have nothing to do and filed a complaint. My third major complaint over these years. Part of the complaint resolution was an invitation to make an appointment with them. Yesterday Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt said he had never met a doctor who did not want to help patients. There are many Dr Shipmans in the NHS and many doctors who mis-prescribe medications for the wrong reasons such as powerful antipsychotics as calmatives that have serious side effects. These doctors are helping themselves not the patients.

The police have been the same. Try to file a complaint against the police with the IPCC as I have done this year and see what happens. Those charged with protecting children not only fail to do so but set up a process so that child abuse can continue which is covered up by all those involved who seek to blame and eradicate the person who reports the child abuse. Jimmy Savile flourished in the NHS, and the police did not act properly when complaints were made in numerous locations around the country. This goes on today as of this writing still.

The problem is far from solved, and those charged with child protection fail miserably bringing about all the pressure on themselves about which they complain. No one wants to get involved with people like these so high vacancy rates develop. Then along comes Jeremy Hunt who pretends these kinds of violently destructive problems are so rare that he's never met a psychopathic doctor when 1% of the population is psychopathic. How many people are employed by the NHS? How many psychopathic personalities become involved in child protection who happen to be child abusers and set up a structure of institutionalised child abuse?

1117
@BBCNews Child protection workers under terrific pressure? Are they being screamed at and beaten? Think about pressure abused children suffer. [Twitter]

" "A child disclosed he'd been hit by his father; there were significant injuries to substantiate. The child then confirmed regular abuse - the first time social care became aware of it.

" "A decision was made by higher management to allow the child to stay home, therefore reducing child protection numbers." "

1130
@BBCNews Child protection workers do not get sympathy from me when abusers I reported in 1998 given surveillance & still using it to abuse. [Twitter] 

UK Human Rights Abuses While David Cameron in Sri Lanka & Charles Clarke at Phone Hacking Trial

 I.  Prime Minister David Cameron in Sri Lanka with Human Rights Issues
 
1047
@BBCNews Mr Cameron ignores London human rights violations by Colonel Vine USMC (Res/Ret) who went to Sri Lanka fm here just after tsunami. [Twitter]

Sri Lankan 'war crimes' warning for UK PM Cameron  who proposes to raise human rights issues re 2009 Tamil bombings.

Colonel Vine USMC (Ret/Res) who set up surveillance technology abuse against me in February 2001 with Lt Harry Bird USMC (Ret/Res) went to Sri Lanka just after the tsunami on Boxing Day 2004. He had gone to Kabul at the end of 2001 just after the successful invasion of that country. He's an apparent frequent traveler to trouble spots like these at critical times which I believe are connected with bringing his extreme suppressive activities to areas of insurgency throughout the world.

So far this surveillance technology operation against me in London's North Kensington continues 24/7/365 consisting of imprisonment, torture interrogation under threat of death, medical experimentation and surveillance technology R&D. While the Tamil Tigers were blocked from escape and bombed, those using the surveillance technology against me in effect do the same thing only with electronic weapons on a continuous experimental basis.

David Cameron has received extensive information from me about this for many years. His proposed critical words in Sri Lanka to shine a light on the problem there reflects extreme hypocrisy since he does not address a similar problem in London about which he is fully aware. The activity being carried out against me is lethal and appears to be exported elsewhere.

"Asked about the comments, Mr Cameron maintained he was right to raise questions, adding: "That's exactly what I'll be doing."

"The UN estimates that 40,000 civilians were killed in the last five months of the 26-year conflict but the Sri Lankan authorities deny responsibility.

"British media in Sri Lanka who have been asking questions about the government's human rights record have struggled to get answers.

"A Channel 4 documentary team was forced to give up on reaching the north of the south Asian state after being stopped by pro-government demonstrators.

"Many critical Sri Lankan journalists have been murdered, the BBC's diplomatic correspondent James Robbins says." [Facebook]

1219
@BBCNews @David_Cameron Would you kindly shine a light on 15+ years 24/7/365 surveillance human rights abuses in London's N Kensington plse? [Twitter]



II.  Former Home Secretary Charles Clarke (Dec 2004 to June 2006) Testifies at the News of the World (NoW) Phone Hacking Trial

1603
Charles Clarke adviser Hannah Pawlby 'was hacked by NoW'  along with family & a senior MI6 agent family friend in 2005.

BBC News Channel broadcast noted that Andy Coulson called her in June 2005. Here there are reported two phone messages left for her regarding an important story apparently involving the false allegations against her and Mr Clarke. She and others were hacked at least 12 times noted by evidence found by the police. The great tragedy is that this was just before the 7/7 deadly London terror attack. It is outrageous that the NoW was hacking the Home Secretary's personal adviser and a senior MI6 agent at this time about false sewer allegations.

Even worse, however, was the fact that the Home Office was involved in a far worse surveillance operation against me and had been for years since 1998 at this time in 2005. I received the first of two abusive letters from the Home Office's Simon Watkin dated 3rd March 2005 (link to this letter posted here a couple days ago) concerning my correspondence to the Home Secretary who was Charles Clarke at this time having just taken over from David Blunkett in Dec 2004.

I was subjected to continuous 24/7/365 false allegations of the most destructive kind straight out of the sewer in an effort to "shut him down" in order to "break him down." I was then falsely accused by the Home Office of being mentally ill in order to deny my complaint by blaming me the victim.

I note here at this same time Charles Clarke was not deemed mentally ill and is testifying in court today on behalf of the prosecution against the NoW defendants when he was in charge of running a far worse abusive operation. [Facebook]


III.  Blocked from the Internet While in the Middle of the Above News and Postings

1251
@BBCNews Home Secy Charles Clarke phone hacked 2005 re non-existent affair, yet I received Home Ofc abusive letter re surveillance complaint [Twitter Posted But Internet Connection Blocked]

1357
@BBCNews Just like China here. I'm blocked from BBC News online by those surveillance hackers when PM in Sri Lanka & Charles Clarke at Court [Twitter apparently went through OK but could not be retrieved for my viewing]

1412
Android Tablet blocked from Internet completely now having sent the above Tweet when blocked from the BBC. This has been going on for over an hour since just before 1300 when I posted that Tweet about Charles Clarke above. Now the mother of the abused children and Lt Harry Bird USMC (Ret/Res) are making up a false allegation of the sewage kind to justify this blockage.

1434
Rebooted Android Tablet with no change after resetting router with WiFi connecting but no Google connection. Now, there is no WiFi connection.

1438
Reset router and WiFi with no connection from Google afterwards. Grey systray WiFi icon.

1441
@BBCNews Charles Clarke destroys NoW criminal prosecution since he did worse as Home Secretary setting this hacking standard and cover up. [Twitter Failed to retrieve]

1523
1. Prime Minister David Cameron is in Sri Lanka talking about human rights.
2. Former Home Secretary Charles Clarke is testifying at the NoW phone hacking trial.
3. I'm denied Internet access by surveillance hackers to suppress the truth about these.

1540
Connected to the Internet once again after resetting router and bringing Android Tablet back from sleep mode with blue systray icon appearing.

David Blunket Screams at Phone Hacking But Did Far Worse as Home Secretary

1533
@BBCNews David Blunkett complains about phone hacking? As Home Secretary, he continued totally invasive surveillance imprisonment torture [Twitter]

1622
Hacking jury hears David Blunkett voicemails

10 in 2005 while DWP Secy. Home Secy 06.2001 - 12.2004 & targeting me. [Twitter]

"In one message, [David Blunkett] said: "Someone very, very close has done a really phenomenal piece of work on destroying both our lives at this moment in time and it's vile.

" "Whoever it is I hope they rot in hell."

"He said: "I do think that someone has done a pretty good stitch-up job, chapter and verse, times, places, everything. That's pretty sophisticated to say the least."

"In another message, Mr Blunkett said: "The hyenas are still trying to get me but when I'm back I will shed a little light and they will all run back into the jungle again."

"The court then heard from Mr Blunkett's former special adviser, Huw Evans, who said he frequently spoke to the then home secretary on mobile phones and used voicemails, but knew calls could be intercepted.

" "We were very careful if we were having a conversation on a mobile to stick to a general subject or use coded language," he said."

After Mr Blunkett was DWP Secretary, he made a statement about which I made a comment in an Email to him at the time when he was a back bencher. He sent me a letter reply in which he noted that I was still suffering from a mental illness since I continued to describe quite accurately and objectively the non-stop, 24/7/365 surveillance technology abuse to which I was subjected.

This was the third letter I had received from those connectged with the Home Office when David Blunkett, Charles Clarke and John Reid were Home Secretaries. The first two described and provided by link below came from a Simon Watkin who persisted in this abuse by blaming the victim calling me mentally ill in each letter which was sent within the first few months of the tenure of Charles Clarke and John Reid.

I did not receive a reply while David Blunkett was Home Secretary, but I did get the same abusive content about mental illness from him personnally after he was a back bencher referring to the period of time when he was Home Secretary.

1633
Mr Blunkett has two standards: one for himself and another for other people whom he abused while Home Secretary continuing with totally invasive surveillance technology imprisonment and torture.

In the first Labour government (1997 - 2001) David Blunkett was Education and Employment Secretary. I directed correspondence to him because of the serious problems I encountered. He was made aware of the surveillance technology abuse against me at this time.

In the second Labour government (2001 - 2005) David Blunkett was Home Secretary until forced to resign in December 2004 over the Kimberly Quin affair. I sent him extensive correspondence about the ongoing surveillance abuse against me.

In the third Labour government David Blunkett was DWP Secretary until Nov 2005 for only six months. This is when these phone hacked voicemails occurred which were played in court today as described in this article. His condemnation of them is extreme, but the surveillance technology abuse against me goes on as of this writing 15+ years after it began revealing the legacy of his real character.

Why is Mr Blunkett not on trial for this? [Facebook]

1702
02.03.2005 Simon Watkin Home Office abuse reply letter to my Home Secy Emails to Charles Clarke after David Blunkett

Following extensive correspondence to Home Secretary David Blunkett, I provided further information to his successor, Charles Clarke, who assumed this position in December 2004 until he departed in May 2006.

By attacking me as being mentally ill for reporting the surveillance technology abuses to which I was subjected and having kept meticulously documented diary/logs of which some 60 of these were sent to the Home Secretary David Blunkett on a daily basis in July and August 2001 before 9/11, I took this letter as an attempt to cover up what had been done to me.

Four months after this letter and my extensive previous correspondence, London was subjected to a terrorist attack on 7th July 2005 with 52 killed and over 700 injured followed by a similar attempted attack on 21st July 2005 when the rucksack bombs failed to detonate properly. These two groups of terrorists have been linked with some of them living and operating not far away. Simon Watkin had worked in David Blunkett's private office and was involved with developing technology in the community. [Facebook]

1740
08.08.2006 2nd Simon Watkin Home Office abuse reply letter to my Home Secretary Emails to John Reid after Charles Clarke and David Blunkett

During this second Labour government. John Reid had just taken on this position in May 2006 after Mr Clarke's departure following an immigration records debacle and prisoner release fiasco.

John Reid went on to characterise the Home Office as "dysfunctional" and "unfit for purpose" which led to its being separated into two different departments with the Justice Department created for the courts and prison systems. 

Simon Watkin gets more abusive in this reply letter which I again took as an effort to hide what was actually going on and stop my correspondence about this extreme abuse of power which was continuing. Dr Reid was most certainly right, and Simon Watkin's correspondence to me reflected this problem where key issues were swept under the carpet by blaming the victim rather than addressing the problem. [Facebook]

Royal Marine's Murder Conviction Reflects Philip Zimbardo's Lucifer Effect, i.e., the Rotten Barrel

Marine guilty of Afghanistan murder of wounded insurgent

Other 2 cleared. Given what was said why were they cleared? I don't understand why they were not convicted as accessories to murder at the very least.

One of the others offered to shoot him in the head which was deemed too obvious by another.

They all refused to treat him before he was shot dead in the chest.

None of them reported what had happened, and there was a silence statement made with reference to the Geneva convention.

It was inadvertently filmed and recorded by a helmet camera which only accidentally became available when discovered on a notebook computer.

How can the other two go back to active duty?

The barrel is rotten here and needs very close examination including the legal procedures and foundation.

Is British military law capable of coping with serious incidents? [Facebook]

@BBCNews Phenomenally good interview with Robert Fox, Defence Editor, Evening Standard, re Royal Marine's execution conviction of Taliban. [Twitter]

Well, finally, the whole process of why these extreme abuses occur is emerging on the BBC News Channel. Robert Fox brought in the scope of the understanding which originated with Philip Zimbardo at Stanford in his 1971 prison experiment. He was a 1950s classmate in the Bronx with Sidney Milgram who did his famous experiment at Yale in the early 1960s where he found that 60% of the population was disposed to sadistic behaviour to the point of administering electronic shocks which could be lethal. Actually, they were both in the same graduating class in their Bronx high school.

Essentially, in the Zimbardo experiment and at Abu Ghraib, the fault was lack of supervision. The other problem that Zimbardo discovered which impacted himself was that those involved became indentified themselves with the institutional objectives and lapsed on human grounds. This is what Milgram brought out in his experiment where the 60% number results from people believing that they are participating in a sanctioned activity. Actually, Michael Portillo redid his experiment on the BBC during the past decade and came up with the same 60% number.

Matthew A's questions were superb as always, but it is not valid to say that so many behave properly: only 35% or sightly more do so. Only a very few will actually report what has happened. None did so in this instance. Others stand around and do nothing for the most part which is what actually happened in the Zimbardo experiment until a woman psychologist visited the faked prison with its inmates and guards, saw the cruelty and reacted vehemently against it telling Zimbardo he had to close it down which he did the following day.

Exactly the same thing has been happening in North Kensingon for over 15 years against me with surveillance technology that has been unsupervised so that it has run sadistically berserk with intense torture abuse 24/7/365. I have been imprisoned and tortured, subjected to medical experimentation and surveillance technology R&D by large groups of people at whose core is the mother of the children whom I reported for child abuse in May 1998 three months before the surveillance technology was given to her family group to use against me.

They were thus sanctioned by authority to use surveillance technology against me to cover up their abuse as they went on to increase it on a widespread basis. They were joined after 2.5 years of this torture by US Marines (Res/Ret) in February 2001 with their most sophisticated surveillance technology. This included a Colonel Vine, Lt Harry Bird and others with them operating under the auspices of what I believed to be the Metropolitan Police's Special Branch. These were "Paul Winston" and "Mike" the latter of whom has clearly re-emerged in this environment recently.

This is a perfect example of this kind of a situation run amok due to lack of supervision because no one can know what these people are doing with the surveillance technology, and as a group, they behave exactly like those guards at the Stanford experiment and at Abu Ghraib only they keep getting away with it because no one stops them while they abuse me in the extreme to discredit what I am accurately reporting continuously.

Since this has a military aspect from control of the environment by US Marines, I would like to see Robert Fox apply his psychological expertise to this situation which has run amok for so many years with Lt Harry Bird USMC Res/Ret declaring that he has a beachhead and war office as he denotes me as the enemy and supplies the directed energy weapon, i.e., surveillance technology, on a distributed basis to the recruits in this environment. Someone needs to publicise this abuse to stop it so that it can all be brought to light before it gets worse by spreading. After all this is social housing not a concentration camp.

Zimbardo calls these situations ones where the barrel is rotten that then creates the bad apples. That's the answer to Matthew A's all important question. It's a failure of management and supervision which often times occurs in fast moving military situations where soldiers are left on their own, e.g., Casualties of War, from the Vietnam War or My Lai. The exact same thing is happening right here in North Kensington, and Robert Fox is not very far away just on the other side of Kensington High Street. Maybe he can get it right for the British public.

Baloney Served as ISC Meets UK Intel Chiefs Where Lords & Knights of the Realm Gather

UK intelligence work defends freedom, say spy chiefs Baloney I say after 15+ years surveillance imprisonment torture

@BBCNews ISC hearings: my direct experience at ground level revealed an alarming disassociation between it and the top of MI5, MI6 and GCHQ.

There is clearly a need for a very strong and robust ISC to bring together the public, its information and its questions with respect to those at the top of the intelligence services.

The problem as I see it involves management which appears to be absent in a meaningful sense with respect to intelligence, i.e., despite having surveillance powers, they cannot get it right. As a result, there is a huge risk being ignored.

Here are a few examples:

Let's just consider the first three years of my 15+ years being subjected to 24/7/365 surveillance technology abuse from mid-August 1998 to mid-September 2001. The level of UK surveillance technology was tops for that period but misapplied based upoon emotional nonsense, those who sought easy career advancement and the utilisation of people who were hopelessly substandard and criminal in their intent and actions. This persists as of this writing making it relevant and extraordinarily damaging for today as it was in the past putting this country at grave risk.

Tempest

Surveillance technology was given to those whom I reported for child abuse in May1998. During following year or so, I placed a colour transparency on the computer notebook screen which resulted in changing the frequency of the electromagnetic radiation emission. Those using Tempest intercept technology in the flat below who were the child abusers began screaming that something was wrong with the surveillance technology because they could no longer see the computer screen. They began making false and irrelevant allegations as they called the technician to come service it. After he arrived and reviewed the situation, he saw what I had done and instructed them on how to tune in the new frequency. This revealed the fact that they were using Tempest at that time c 1999/2000.

In February 2001 US government agents/contractors Colonel Vine and Lt Harry Bird, each USMC Res/Ret, arrived with there totally enhanced Tempest surveillance technology to be used against any electronic device including the computer and human brain. This surveillance technology had the ability to detect the electromagnetic radiation emissions from each component of the computer and feedback to it commands which enabled the computer to be controlled remotely quite independent of any communication or Internet connection. This surveillance software was loaded at boot including a keyboard map.

During the summer of 2001 while I was working in the easyEverything Internet shop on Kensington High Street, I could not use the notebook computer. I could not enter the password required at the BIOS boot to continue. Lt Harry Bird USMC Res/Ret had not brought along with him the keyboard map software that he loaded right at the initial BIOS boot which stopped me from tying in any characters. This was all revealed by an explanation and apology he made to"Paul Winston" whom I believed to be Metropolitan Police Special Branch at that time supervising his activity. They were using Voice-to-Skull (V2K) as part of the human brain surveillance technology, so I could hear all they said.

Rendition

During May/June 2001 again while working at the easyEverything Internet shop on Kensington High Street, Colonel Vine strongly advocated and argued for kidnapping me to which "Paul Winston" objected completely and made him promise that he would not kidnap me. Colonel Vine went so far to cite as an example of their kidnapping success incident where he claimed that they had picked up someone following a Royal Festival Hall concert without anyone ever knowing anything about it.

Torture

During July and August 2001, I sent 60 separate daily Emails to a distribution list including cabinet members, the Home Secretary, the Chancellor and Prime Minister which included the 24/7 diary/log of the extreme torture sleep deprivation to which I was being subjected. Each of these Emails were 15 to 20 pages long and contained a completely detailed account of all that happened along with a meticulous sleep log revealing about four hours of sleep on average per night in multiples of about six to eight segments during an extended attempt to get some sleep.

Terrorism

All of this occurred before 9/11 and started when these resources were being expended in 1998 while Abu Hamza recruited, trained and sent to Yemen eight terrorists to bomb during the Christmas of 1998 including his son and son-in-law. They were not tracked.  I was. And, such continued to be the case missing opportunities to pick up 9/11 terrorists and others as they passed through the Finsbury Park mosque. The surveillance technology was the best it could be at that time but was not being used properly. To quote William Sullivan US the ambassador to Iran in 1979 in a slightly different way: there was no lack of "Intelligence," but there was a lack of "intelligence." Intelligence was faked against me while the real terrorists flourished and went undetected.

Management

Jack Straw was Home Secretary from 1997 to 2001 and moved to Foreign Secretary after the May 2001 election. David Blunkett moved to Home Secretary at that time. The UK had imported surveillance thugs in the quise of Vine and Bird in February 2001 who then implemented an escalation of torture and interference that continues as of this writing. When Dana Priest of the Washington Post revealed rendition, I learned what the kidnapping proposal was all about. Then the Abu Ghraib abuses were revealed in 2004. When both of these became public, I thought that surely the talk of kidnapping me and the torture would cease. This has not happened. If anything, the talk of kidnapping me and the torture go on at accelerated levels.

What was said today by the heads of MI5, MI6 and GCHQ can only be characterised by me as so much baloney. They haven't a clue about what actually happens at ground level while they use glossy words to paint a rosy, but faked, picture. This reminds me of the period of time when Frank Serpico was part of the NYPD in the late 1960s, and corruption permeated New York City's police officers. The change that occurred following the Knapp Commission Report was that senior officers were responsible for what those on the ground did as if they had done it themselves. Ignorance was no excuse. Senior police officers then started crawling around on rooftops in the middle of the night so that they could see what their men were doing. Top ranks of the NYPD were also changed.

Surely this cannot be the Intelligence services of the UK for they don't even know what is happening in their own ranks and inside the UK that has been present for 15+ years. Maybe each of them should have a publicly available Email address to get the facts straight from the public. Naturally, this would be subjected to interception by each other and NSA, etc.

1859
@BBCNews Lord Reid: if GCHQ or whoever wants to read the content of a message, it has to apply to a minister for a warrant. Political! [Twitter]

Did the UK award a medal to a US Marine for surveillance torture medical research?

Modern Medicine: Poison. How scientists went from finding antidotes to poisons to applying poisons as a cure Available until 11:29pm 29th October 2013 on the BBC iPlayer.

There is a stunning example of the proper functioning for approving drugs by the US when a woman at the FDA refused to grant approval for Thalidomide while it was being sold globally with tragic consequences that were eventually discovered. JFK gave her a medal for maintaining proper standards that protected women in the US from the horrible side effects of this morning sickness drug that destroyed their offspring the consequences with which the world is still grappling today.

Enclosed below is information from an Email from the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues with respect to its educational material which is linked there. I urge you to look at this educational material with respect to consent as presented by the Commission involving its investigative work and other aspects of research carried out in the community.

I have been subjected to such medical research by those who introduced neurological surveillance technology against me in February 2001 namely, Colonel Vine and Lt Harry Bird, both of the USMC (Res/Ret). This medical research as well as general surveillance technology R&D has been carried out in conjunction with the NHS and their own laboratories which I presume are located in the US.

I have brought this subject up continuously during the past 12+ years since February 2001 in connection with its being conducted outside a hospital environment without my consent let alone my having been informed except by its torture abuse and continuous side effects. Such medical experimentation formed a part of my recent Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) complaint on 1st April 2013.

In contrast to the woman from the US FDA who was awarded a medal by JFK for not allowing sub-standard drug development research to form the foundation for licensing Thalidomide in the US, Lt Harry Bird USMC (Res/Ret) was recently apparently given a medal for his activities in North Kensington, London, against me since February 2001 which have included medical research some of which involved incapacitants and/or debilitants. He was described as being in uniform on the day he was purportedly to receive this medal which has been often referenced since including during the past couple days.

The US Marine Corps is in charge of the Joint Non-Lethal Weapons Directorate (JNLWD) for all the US military at the Department of Defense. I believe that his connection with the US Marines which he flouts continuously, the US embassy and his activity including the purported receipt of a medal should be investigated throughly. There was a medical student present nightly a few years ago who refused to continue his participation on ethical grounds.

Every effort is currently being made to cover up this criminal activity as I continuously report.

Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues


Re-Introducing New Materials for Bioethics Education

You may have missed the original announcement as it went out just prior to the recent federal government shutdown. The Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues is back and we're pleased to share our new materials for bioethics education.

Don't forget to follow us on Twitter @bioethicsgov for news updates like this

Providing easily accessible and free materials based on the Bioethics Commission’s own analysis is an effort to help meet the repeated recommendations the advisors have made that bioethics education should be available to a wider variety of disciplines at the undergraduate, graduate, and professional levels. The new materials integrate content across the Bioethics Commission’s reports and are designed to support teaching of bioethics ideas, principles, and theories.

“Establishing the appropriate ethical foundation early in education and reinforcing it throughout a career allows professionals across disciplines to build rigorous ethics into their daily work and to anticipate problems, helping prevent ethical surprises and obstacles down the road,” explains Executive Director Lisa M. Lee, Ph.D., M.S., in a just-published Hastings Center Report essay about the new materials.

    Read the Hastings Center Report essay
    Download the education materials, including modules on informed consent and community engagement
    Watch a video featuring commission representatives to learn more about the Bioethics Commission’s commitment to supporting bioethics education
    Read more on our blog
    Check out the Hastings Center Report call for papers for a special issue on teaching bioethics
    View our webinar from September 19th where Bioethics Commission staff reviewed the materials and discussed their potential application in both traditional and nontraditional educational settings

The Bioethics Commission is committed to ensuring that future scientists, public health professionals, and health care providers are able to identify ethically challenging situations, to make morally sound decisions in response to these situations, and to seek and receive the support they need to do so.

The Rabbit Never Escapes

US ambassador in Germany summoned in Merkel mobile row re NSA's monitoring her calls.

An untrustworthy ally? Chancellor Angela Merkel hails from East Germany that was the GDR until the Berlin Wall came down in 1989 just 24 years ago where the Stasi ran the state from its huge bureaucracy staffed by 15,000 on Normannenstrasse for overseas and domestic surveillance. Anna Funder goes on to describe in her book "Stasiland" how the public stormed the Stasi HQ. On page 57 she describes how the German media called the GDR "the most perfected surveillance state of all time."

She writes that the Stasi had 97,000 employees in a country of 17 million and goes on to describe that there was "one Gestapo agent for every 2,000 citizens" in Nazi Germany, and there was "one KGB agent for every 5,830 people" in the USSR. However, the Stasi had 173,000 informers in addition to its employees, and Anna Funder writes that when part time informers were added there were one for each 6.5 citizens in the GDR. Her book describes how this surveillance state controlled the lives and relationships of everyone. The West cannot allow anything like this to ever take a foothold, and Ms Merkel is doing exactly what needs to be done. Everyone else should follow her example. She knows what she is doing. [Facebook]

Frank Gardner commenting on the BBC News Channel said he would be surprised if allies were not spying on each other citing as an example the competition to sell arms thus making economic competition by nations subjected to spying for information in order to gain an advantage.  His reporting is descriptive, as I took it, that does not reflect his or the BBC's point of view.

Such an attitude by nation states reflects the acceptance of spying that trickles down into a society where we have seen phone hacking in journalism taken on as acceptable if one could get away with it for competitive reasons. Of course, when the truth about the extent of this spying for gain became known, it turned into a national scandal with the Leveson Inquiry alongside an ongoing police investigation. Currently, there is a struggle taking place with respect to media guidelines as a result.

I hope everyone saw Ambassadors on BBC Two last night for it featured a satire about the diplomatic corps in a fictional country where the UK government was trying to compete against the French for a two billion pound sale of helicopters to this country while a British citizen was in prison facing faked murder charges and possible execution. I'll not say more that would ruin it for anyone who has not seen it yet that is available on the BBC iPlayer at:

Ambassadors: The Rabbit Never Escapes. Human rights cause trouble for a lucrative arms deal between the UK and Tazbekistan. Available until 8:59pm 13th November 2013

What I will say is that in North Kensington the same absurd false allegations have been made against me since 2001 as part of a totally invasive surveillance technology operation involving a vigilante mob surrounding my home who have distributed surveillance technology. These false allegations are intended to incite a violent mob hysterically for an emotional response to generate fear and hatred and keep the surveillance technology in place citing "He has to be monitored." As a result, there is a complete abrogation of human rights and the democratic rule of law reflecting the absence of any acceptable standards. If you can get away with it, then it's acceptable.

Naturally, Frank Gardner was describing the reality of international economic competition where nations have the power to carry out clandestine spying, but that standard exists now in the community as I've experienced directly 24/7/365 since 1998 which has contributed to terrorism, serious and organised crime and failures in government. This is called "reality" by these people here with their surveillance technology. Once the government itself starts down the slippery slope, where does it end?

A characteristic of psychopathy is competition where those engaged in this surveillance technology abuse against me are obsessed with winning or losing. They will do anything to win. The title of this Ambassadors' episode, The Rabbit Never Escapes, could very well apply to a surveillance target when psychopathic behaviour reflecting a competition for arms sales or surveillance technology power over others where those involved will do or say anything to win for their own personal gain which can be seen portrayed in this satire on BBC Two.

Commercialised Hatred & Fear By Surveillance Power & Control Abuse

A witch hunt at Big Brother House appears to be an appropriate tribute to the cultural heritage of the UK

With Halloween approaching on 31st October enterprising commercial interests produced mental patients' costumes flogged by the likes of Asda, Tesco, eBay and Amazon until complaints and a national outcry brought this to an end. These costumes presented the mental health patient fear factor with meat cleavers, machetes, face masks like that used on Hannibal Lecteur who consumed human flesh directly and bloody designer clothing or a psycho ward labeled orange jump suit. This fit right in with the other commercial aspects of witches, goblins, ghosts and terrifying mystical creatues that are brought forth on Halloween as objects to inspire fear.

This environment has been right in step with this cultural foundation in the UK by carrying out a witch hunt against me for over 15 years 24/7/365 using surveillance technology as a weapon to do so. Creating fear by using mental health characterisations from the beginning in 1998 has also been the foundation of this effort to subvert the government's legitimate efforts to deal with problems by creating  a massive hoax aka Munchausen By Proxy Syndrome. They have brought this to the extreme in a Big Brother cultural society by distributing surveillance technology among neighbouring flats and attempting to sell  surveillance widely on the basis of an apparent pilot project ordained and sustained by a government preferring hoax rather than reality.
Nobody objects sufficiently enough to this commercialisation of the destruction of human life to stop it. These are definitely the Killing Fields I've called them in the past, and they are making a snuff film and recordings out of it. What I hear sounds like the endlessly repeated performance that has gone on day and night alll these years to give these people who have nothing to do the appearance of doing something. A five-year management review study has resulted in keeping this effort in place while trying to engineer another election that is nothing more that what was done in 2009 that failed as can be see here.

What is most amazing at the same time is reflected by the commercialisation of mental health patients' Halloween costumes that was quickly scuppered nationally by a huge outcry covered extensively in the media. Quite the contrary here, however, is the fact that what actually exists in real terms is the abuse of the fear generated from false allegations about mental health illness that has been exploited throughout all these years without anybody stopping it. What kind of five-year investigation was actually conducted, and why is this environment so out of step with the rest of the nation when it comes to scare mongering by using a mental health illness hoax?

These people are ferociously continuing this during the so-called election process by faking everything without a murmur from anyone about this reality. The extreme abuse against me continues unabated 24/7/365 driven by those whom I reported for child abuse in 1998 and joined in February 2001 by Colonel Vine USMC Res/Res and Lt Harry Bird USMC Res/Ret with surveillance technology that is now being commercialised under under what has more recently been apparently called a pilot project scheme (someone said 15 units and 15 cases recently) which the government is funding that has been distributed to create a vigilante mob of Big Brother House surveillance technology abusers.


1. Mental Health Patients' Halloween Costumes




Asda and Tesco withdraw Halloween mental patients' costumes featuring violence fear factor from cleaver and machete.

"The £20 Asda outfit included ragged clothing, fake blood, a mask and a fake meat cleaver while Tesco's [Psycho Ward] orange boiler suit came with a plastic jaw restraint and offered to "complete the look" with a machete.

"Online retailer Amazon had also advertised the "psycho ward" outfit, but later said the costume was "not available"."

What actually happens in the community reflects this costume design. There are those who use mental illness like this as a weapon against the healthy because they do not like someone and seek to create hatred and fear based upon false allegations. Those whom I reported for child abuse are doing this to me and have been for over 15 years 24/7/365 by using surveillance technology indefinitely in order to discredit what I report. They are thus abusing the community in this manner, and if their target in this instance me were actually mentally ill, they could spark a psychotic break. As it is, they are making every effort to be as provocative as possible. The new abuse word is to call someone "potty" which actually reflects a necrophilic personality by this use of language.

The great problem in all of this is that the UK government is behind this activity by supporting this abuse without stopping it which involves the police, NHS, justice (legal profession and magistrates) along with the local and central governments. The result has been a destroyed government, yet the more they do the less inclined they are to admit their error and seek to cover up everything by accelerating the abuse against me. The greatest tragedy in all of this is that the NHS mental health professionals cannot deduce that those carrying out the abuse have a mental health problem acted out right in front of their faces which is the essence of Munchausen By Proxy Syndrome. Those using surveillance technology to fake allegations to get the police and NHS mental health professionals to intervene are the one's who are actually mentally ill which they are trying to hide. Munchausen By Proxy Syndrome is a mental illness symptom.

This is like terrorism. They are using false mental health allegations to carry out violence themselves, and all involved ignore what is actually happening while allowing it to grow. No wonder these costumes appear at Halloween. It's part of the actual culture  in the UK that is not going away but getting worse.

2. Big Brother House on Display

The National Trust is conducting public tours on Friday and Saturday (27th & 28th September) of the Big Brother House as a cultural heritage ignoring its reality. I find this quite fitting that the National Trust should now associate the Big Brother House with the hundreds of years of British cultural heritage considering its influence on the UK culture as I've experienced directly.

I've been subjected to totally invasive surveillance technology abuse 24/7/365 for over 15 years since mid-August 1998 which goes on as of this writing. This is like the nation watching me in everything that I do regardless of what it is while behaving provocatively to entertain itself with bullying sadistic violent abuse that seeks to watch the impact and results.

Hundreds if not thousands of people have actually been directly involved in this surveillance technology abuse including the police, NHS, justice system and local and central government who support and sustain this activity indefinitely. Phrases used to sustain it include "He has to be monitored," "He is a study'' and "He might harm himself" which is something those using the surveillance technology seek to do. In fact, they are actually Angels of Death. It's like a narcotic for these people. They refuse to give it up. "I want to see," said one of them recently.

Let's congratulate the National Trust on keeping abreast with the cultural times by providing the public with an inside look at a house totally connected to surveillance. Perhaps it would like to investigate my home, adjacent flats and others in the environment where what they call "television" is installed so that whole families including children can watch all that I do inside my home 24/7/365, make up false allegations and gain sadistic pleasure from continuous torture abuse. Is this progressive or regressive? Whatever you might think it's the very essence of the UK as portrayed by George Orwell in 1984 that has gone far beyond even his imagination. Clever bunch that National Trust lot. Hail Britannia! Britannia rules the air waves

Navy Yard Gunman Complained About Linen Closet Noises

ABC News 20th September2013 Navy Yard Gunman Kicked Out of Quarters for Noise Complaint

Saturday, 21st September 2013

For almost 20 years I had a knowledge that was generally unknown to the world, but even that knowledge was limited until I read The Puzzle Palace and had something to direct others to read. For the past 15 years and especially since February 2001 I've acquired another special knowledge as a surveillance target that was and is generally unknown. No one wants to accept the reality of the surveillance technology based upon Tempest used against computer technology and humans that is beyond anything ever known. We all have a weakness about what is known to us personally and our inability to accept what is not generally known. Every effort is made to censor and stop my collection of evidence, its processing and reporting inluding my comments about current events especially related to the abuse I witness continuously.

Saturday afternoon, a male using this surveillance technology said outside under my front window "I'm going to section you for what you wrote on Facebook." In the UK section means to detain involuntarily for 28 days in hospital under the Mental Health Act because someone is either threat to him/herself or others or both. This was an attempt to suppress by intimidation using mental illness as a weapon. This was the threat used at the end of The Whistle Blower against Michael Caine's character to keep him silent. What I have written is not a threat to anyone but quite the opposite. However, every effort is made to provoke something that can be used against me, i.e., the familiar dirty tricks campaign.

All during this Saturday afternoon, I could not access the Internet with the tablet I'm using because those with the surveillance technology were deliberately blocking me as they do frequently in their efforts to censor and stop what I am doing. They were blocking/stalling quite important evidence from the previous night's continuous abuse. I use Facebook to document on a broad basis with general comments sometimes specifically related to this activity as it coincides with world activity.

In the past I've blocked comments to avoid abuse since those locally using the surveillance technology would comment under pseudonyms to be abusive. They want to control and dominate everything and make distorted complaints to Facebook about what I write and note which has lead to restrictions on my Facebook account in the past. There is nothing I can do about this since Facebook is too huge, and no redress of grievance contact point was available as far as I could find. Since they know all my logon details, they can access my Facebook account to make minor changes which has happened.

I made the following Disqus comment after an ABC News article concerning Aaron Alexis and some more mental illness problems: "He could have been harassed by surveillance technology that included the electronic transmission of sound, Voice-to-Skull (V2N), and ultrasound to make the noises in the linen closet. These could have been done to drive him out and/or create a mental health problem. Doing this to someone who is unstable could result in a psychotic break with tragic results as occurred." Someone asked the following question: "And this nobody would be targeted in such a way why?" with two others repeating "Why?"

It's a very good question. That's how these people operate among many reasons by going after the vulnerable maliciously and sadistically. It's the same kind of question that has been raised about targeting people with nothing to fear. It's arbitrary and capricious or for revenge and retaliation by those with this surveillance technology. The worst case scenario is that it's done intentionally to create a violent incident to sustain fear, funding and power. The problem is that neither ABC News or any other large news agency will explore this as a legitimate investigation because the implications are too problematic. To me that's apathy. It's better for them to ignore it which means that this surveillance technology activity gets sanctioned and continues to grow whether or not it exists in this instance.

What are we left with? The social media including Facebook. This is certainly far better than it was before even with all the cake baking and similar interaction. I'm against the direct interference that I receive which actually pushes the likes of Facebook into cooking and pets as the lowest common denominator that is innoffensive and irrelevant on a higher social level of human interaction in the world. Apathy is getting more and more pervasive in human life and has led to extreme failures. All one has to do is read the news, but then what I have to say never gets into any news media despite years of media correspondence or into the political process despite the same.

How did Jeremiah Duggan die?

19:47
Jeremiah Duggan dies in Weisbaden in March 2003 while at Lyndon LaRouche's Schiller Institute for anti war conference

BBC2 Newsnight report: Jeremiah Duggan, Wiesbaden's Schiller Institute and Lyndon Larouche. Why did this British student in Paris die in Weisbaden? After being recruited from Paris to Weisbaden with anti war inclinations in the background to attend a conference, he ran out out at 0515 for four or five kilometres before being struck and killed on the autobahn about 0600. He was in a state of terror the British inquest stated refusing to recognise Weisbaden's conclusion that he committed suicide. Weisbaden would not investigate and closed the case. This video report reveals what was happening around this incident including comments by a former member of the Schiller Institute. It appears that he might have been subjected to mind control experimentation from an unknown source that he called computer experiments.

20:15
Erica Duggan talks about her son eight years after his death in Wiesbaden

Erica Duggan ignored by the prosecutor in Wiesbaden in March 2011 says "They [LaRouche organisation's Schiller Institute] saw him as the enemy and hounded him to death." She has evidence the Wiesbaden prosecutor will not consider that her son, Jeremiah Duggan, was not where he was described but at the LaRouche building near where he died hit by an auto in the busy autobahn about 0600 in March 2003. Did he run the four to five kilometres to this point from the house where he was claimed to have been?

Blame the Victim Society

Russian MP Adrei Lugovoi has a point in mocking UK police and justice (1) but perhaps not exactly in the way he intended.  The police would not believe Alexander Litvinenko until days before his death when confirmation of his radiation poisoning could be made or so it was described in the media.  The victim was ignored when he knew what was happening. 

The Home Secretary commissioned a report (2) about the police handling of the various incidents concerning Jimmy Savile that came to their attention which was just released.  The victims were not only ignored but one was told not to report the crime and another that he could be subjected to arrest for doing so. 

Victims were ignored and felt they could not report the abuse successfully and did not.  They were intimidated from the outset which enabled Jimmy Savile to flourish.

There were other very important factors, e.g., database linkage nationally, that were involved, but what stands out is the fact that victims were not respected and heard to the extent that they were disregarded, considered a nuisance with respect to the estimable Jimmy Savile and could be criminalised themselves for making such reports. 

Sir Peter Fahy, chief constable of Greater Manchester Police, makes a valid point (3) when he notes the complexity of such cases and the need to address the underlying issues.

Jimmy Savile was a sexual predator, but the essence of what he did involved power in that he could have power over vulnerable young people for his exploitation.  This is a violent abuse that  is sexual in character.  However, the same fundamental abuse can be violent in a sexually sadistic character and have the same foundation but not be the same precise predatory nature.

We can go a bit further and note that serial killers murder their victims for the power that this gives them over life and death of their victims at the instant of death as the “Green River” killer has described who confessed to killing some 49 women over three decades.  (See Ann Rule’s book “Green River Running Red.”) 

The underlying issue here involve the psychopathic character with ancillary elements of paranoia, sadism and necrophilia as I’ve been witnessing, describing and reporting for 14.5+ years since 1998.  The abuse has been perpetuated against me by those whom I reported for child abuse in 1998 who use surveillance technology during all these years without anyone getting anything right. 

Not only can a Jimmy Savile-like situation happen again it is and has been for the past 14.5+ year 24/7/365 in my direct experience.  If the sadistic abuser can latch onto one victim by using surveillance technology indefinitely, s/he they will never stop. 

If s/he they can also use the trappings of a charity management organisation, volunteer status and creating both vulnerability in the targeted victim as well as the problems that are then blamed on the victim, this will flourish indefinitely just as Jimmy Savile did and as I’ve experienced as a victim since 1998 after I reported child abuse in 1998. 

It was the child abusers and generally abusive personalities who then perpetuated this abuse against me and have been to this very day continuously abusing others in the process as they have done so.  The underlying issue which has not been grasped and understood properly is the essence and behaviour of the psychopathic personality that forms the core of the surveillance technology abuse in this instance. 

Psychopathy is extraordinarily important because it effects some 1% of the population (600,000 is a huge number in the UK) and manifests itself in varying types and degrees of antisocial and criminal behaviour.  As I’ve noted previously according to Robert Hare’s research, 25% of those in prison are psychopaths who have committed 50% of the crimes.  This number keeps turning up in those who were involved in the 2011 UK riots and those who fail to perform community orders. 

This is important for the police, health, justice and prison systems professionals to fully understand which has not even begun to start happening yet because:

1)  the police overlook the psycopathic factor and its behaviour characteristics,

2)  the health professionals cannot diagnose it due to its unique mental illness character,

3)  the justice system is frustrated because judges cannot understand why a large number of offenders are recidivists, and

4)  prison reform will just not work until the psychopaths are identified and handled separately and differently. 

This is why when I send out correspondence, they go to these various ministers of state, the Chancellor and the Mayor since the underlying issue forming the foundation of my experience is psychopathy that has impacted all of them in terms of their responsibilities, yet the problems are still occurring, and there is no visible dealing accurately with the essence of the problem to stop it here and to bring about policy changes to create an interdisciplinary government to make it effective across the nation.

The health professionals have to come to grips with psychopathy in such a way that they can educate the police in its characteristics especially the younger officers who do not have experience.  This then has to feed into the justice and prison systems and back out again into the worlds of the police and health professionals so that an emerging database of characteristics underpinning criminal behaviour with this common denominator emerges. 

The serial criminal of whatever kind who repeats these offences over and over needs to be understood completely by all these professionals so that an effective database can be created, and those who repeat the same crime over and over against one or just a few victims as I am experiencing must be understood in the same way. 

When you add surveillance technology to the methods used by psychopaths to carry out serial crimes as I have experienced directly by its indefinite usage against me since 1998 24/7/365, a huge problem emerges that is far more difficult to detect, solve and ultimately results in the protection of the public. 

This serial psychopathic criminal can hide behind surveillance technology while using it for crimes that can be virtually undetectable, and no one is going to pay any attention to the victim which will allow theses criminals free reign to blame the victim.

These are the news reports that inspired my comments about the issues mentioned above:

(1) Wed, 13 Mar 2013 - 17:09:55:    BBC News-Litvinenko suspect rules himself out of attending inquest. Russian MP Andrei Lugovoi mocks UK police/justice

(2) Wed, 13 Mar 2013 - 17:41:00:    BBC News-Jimmy Savile: Police watchdog criticises 'failures': need "professionals of all kinds to report child abuse"

“[HM Inspector of Constabulary Drusilla Sharpling] told the BBC that it must become an obligation on professionals of all kinds to report child abuse, and the use of the police database had to be "slicker" and "more comprehensive".

“Home Secretary Theresa May, who commissioned the report, said it had brought into "sharp focus police failings that allowed Savile to act with impunity over five decades"

“ "The public rightly want answers to how victims' voices were ignored for so long. While we can never right this wrong, we must learn the lessons to prevent the same from ever happening again."

(3) Wed, 13 Mar 2013 - 17:44:15:    BBC News - Savile failings 'could happen again'. They are right now and have been for 14.5+ years in my experience.

“The Home Office is to review its policies regarding child protection.

“Sir Peter said the many reports on Savile and other cases of serial sexual offenders were not addressing the underlying issues.

“"We can continue to criticise individual members of staff for individual failings but this ignores the complexity of these issues and the way our system of criminal justice affects the victims of sexual offences," he said.”