From: "Gary D Chance"
To: "BBC News Channel"
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 8:29 PM
Subject: Child deaths decline from abuse (murder + indeterminant) info cannot be taken as meaningful against background of surveillance given to child abusers for past 11.5 years in my direct experience.
"Child killing rate 'drops by 40%' in England and Wales"
One of your interviewees pointed out that the number of children killed while under the scrutiny of social services has been increasing of late since the end of the study cited in 2006.
I want to see each year's info to see how the distributions of deaths occur from year to year during the past 40 years at least.
I also want to point out that the information is never made available publicly as has happened in the Baby P case and in another more recently where there have been demands that the info about child abuse behind the two boys who tortured two others for 90 minutes be made public.
Focussing just on deaths of children does not reveal the magnitude of the violent abuse which might be occurring that is deflected and/or covered up. Also, the actual number of children deaths can easily be misleading.
I cannot accept that the police, NHS, social services, etc are working together more closely and more effectively when I've been the direct victim of surveillance technology torture and attempted murder by the child abusers I reported in May 1998 for 11.5 years 24/7/365 which has included the participation of all these government departments, elected officials and general public.
Here is a glaring incident where there is a massive cover up of the abuse problem where the abusers are given surveillance to hide it and do so by attacking the person who reported the abuse in the first place. It demonstrates the collusion present to hide child abuse.
This reveals that the range of people being abused is extended by both enlarging the number of children abused as continued with the children I reported plus including myself with a continuous effort to murder me with surveillance torture.
Also, there is the expanded abuse that takes place against other children in the environment who are subjected to the surveillance technologies abuse fallout which creates antisocial and criminal behaviour as standards that impact them directly.
What has been happening for the past 11.5 years is that violent abuse including the right to murder someone has become the standard in the environment which has led to a wider abuse activity of other children, children against children and adult against adult.
Given the manipulative character of the child abusers which I have directly witnessed and experienced for the past 11.5 years 24/7/365, I cannot accept the validity of these numbers.
Child abusers and those in social services, NHS, police, etc all seek to make every effort to move child abuse out of the conclusion for any death of a child.
There is a general tacit collusion underway to understate the numbers of child abuse deaths which is supported by not making the reports public or by giving child abusers surveillance to cover up everything on an ongoing basis.
When I first moved into these premises in 1996, I recall a young lad about six who was found dead (not in this area but in the news), but the cause of death could not be determined. No one could explain what appeared to be a death without any cause.
However, the neighbours began talking with the media after his body was found, and all this information began to become public about how he was neglected by his mother who had tried to give him up to the social services because she could not take care of him.
They did not take him, and I believe that he died because he was completely denied any attention whatsoever being abused and rejected by his mother and refused by the social services which made him stay in the terrible environment which did not kill him overtly but led to his death by extreme neglect.
What I see is a massive cover up by everyone involved to create the illusion that there is no child abuse when it is actually increasing with the number of abused and neglected children growing to such an extent that they will mushroom in the future into self destructive or outwardly destructive adults who abuse children.
This incredible and unbelievable abuse of the system by giving the child abuser surveillance has created an image that all is better because those using the surveillance fake it and get everyone else to go along out of fear.
But, under the surface there is a growing rot of abused people who are growing into adulthood with the disposition to be violent. It is the state which is creating this because of the extreme need of those in elected office and the civil service bureaucracies to look good.
The result will be much like Enron with a collapse into much larger violence against children.
The whole problem of violence has to be examined entirely as I've always said all along. The dramatic deaths are not what is most important as tragic as they are.
It's the number of children below these death pinnacles whose lives are ruined as I've witnessed here that is important. How big are these mountains under the pinnacles of these children's deaths?
I also believe that there are many more mountains that do not have such pinnacles such as Kensington & Chelsea where they are top rated which is based upon massive fraud.
When Baby P's trial was finished for those who killed him, and all of this became public, don't you recall that the actual number of children who died as a result of child abuse/neglect turned out to be much larger that was being reported?
Hiding child abuse violence/neglect by letting violent abusers act out their violence with surveillance is a no brainer as regards to increasing violence in the future.
This same effort I believe is also reflected in the need to hide the real number of children killed by abuse from the time of Victoria Climbie's death in early 2000 for the past ten years since the time the hearing was in progress.
The greatest problem of all is that the media is not reporting this terrible situation where child abusers have been given surveillance to cover up their abuse and all other problems for the past 11.5 years.
Gary
To: "BBC News Channel"
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 8:29 PM
Subject: Child deaths decline from abuse (murder + indeterminant) info cannot be taken as meaningful against background of surveillance given to child abusers for past 11.5 years in my direct experience.
"Child killing rate 'drops by 40%' in England and Wales"
One of your interviewees pointed out that the number of children killed while under the scrutiny of social services has been increasing of late since the end of the study cited in 2006.
I want to see each year's info to see how the distributions of deaths occur from year to year during the past 40 years at least.
I also want to point out that the information is never made available publicly as has happened in the Baby P case and in another more recently where there have been demands that the info about child abuse behind the two boys who tortured two others for 90 minutes be made public.
Focussing just on deaths of children does not reveal the magnitude of the violent abuse which might be occurring that is deflected and/or covered up. Also, the actual number of children deaths can easily be misleading.
I cannot accept that the police, NHS, social services, etc are working together more closely and more effectively when I've been the direct victim of surveillance technology torture and attempted murder by the child abusers I reported in May 1998 for 11.5 years 24/7/365 which has included the participation of all these government departments, elected officials and general public.
Here is a glaring incident where there is a massive cover up of the abuse problem where the abusers are given surveillance to hide it and do so by attacking the person who reported the abuse in the first place. It demonstrates the collusion present to hide child abuse.
This reveals that the range of people being abused is extended by both enlarging the number of children abused as continued with the children I reported plus including myself with a continuous effort to murder me with surveillance torture.
Also, there is the expanded abuse that takes place against other children in the environment who are subjected to the surveillance technologies abuse fallout which creates antisocial and criminal behaviour as standards that impact them directly.
What has been happening for the past 11.5 years is that violent abuse including the right to murder someone has become the standard in the environment which has led to a wider abuse activity of other children, children against children and adult against adult.
Given the manipulative character of the child abusers which I have directly witnessed and experienced for the past 11.5 years 24/7/365, I cannot accept the validity of these numbers.
Child abusers and those in social services, NHS, police, etc all seek to make every effort to move child abuse out of the conclusion for any death of a child.
There is a general tacit collusion underway to understate the numbers of child abuse deaths which is supported by not making the reports public or by giving child abusers surveillance to cover up everything on an ongoing basis.
When I first moved into these premises in 1996, I recall a young lad about six who was found dead (not in this area but in the news), but the cause of death could not be determined. No one could explain what appeared to be a death without any cause.
However, the neighbours began talking with the media after his body was found, and all this information began to become public about how he was neglected by his mother who had tried to give him up to the social services because she could not take care of him.
They did not take him, and I believe that he died because he was completely denied any attention whatsoever being abused and rejected by his mother and refused by the social services which made him stay in the terrible environment which did not kill him overtly but led to his death by extreme neglect.
What I see is a massive cover up by everyone involved to create the illusion that there is no child abuse when it is actually increasing with the number of abused and neglected children growing to such an extent that they will mushroom in the future into self destructive or outwardly destructive adults who abuse children.
This incredible and unbelievable abuse of the system by giving the child abuser surveillance has created an image that all is better because those using the surveillance fake it and get everyone else to go along out of fear.
But, under the surface there is a growing rot of abused people who are growing into adulthood with the disposition to be violent. It is the state which is creating this because of the extreme need of those in elected office and the civil service bureaucracies to look good.
The result will be much like Enron with a collapse into much larger violence against children.
The whole problem of violence has to be examined entirely as I've always said all along. The dramatic deaths are not what is most important as tragic as they are.
It's the number of children below these death pinnacles whose lives are ruined as I've witnessed here that is important. How big are these mountains under the pinnacles of these children's deaths?
I also believe that there are many more mountains that do not have such pinnacles such as Kensington & Chelsea where they are top rated which is based upon massive fraud.
When Baby P's trial was finished for those who killed him, and all of this became public, don't you recall that the actual number of children who died as a result of child abuse/neglect turned out to be much larger that was being reported?
Hiding child abuse violence/neglect by letting violent abusers act out their violence with surveillance is a no brainer as regards to increasing violence in the future.
This same effort I believe is also reflected in the need to hide the real number of children killed by abuse from the time of Victoria Climbie's death in early 2000 for the past ten years since the time the hearing was in progress.
The greatest problem of all is that the media is not reporting this terrible situation where child abusers have been given surveillance to cover up their abuse and all other problems for the past 11.5 years.
Gary
