From: "Gary D Chance"
To: "BBC News Channel"; Prof A C Grayling; Archbishop Vincent Nichols
Sent: Saturday, February 13, 2010 5:31 PM
Subject: Dehumanisation has taken a quite nasty turn in the past decade including NHS activity which needs to be fully understood and made public for a more common ground to solving this problem.
Archbishop Vincent Nichols
Professor Anthony Grayling
BBC News Channel
Mesdames et Messrs
Archbishop Vincent Nichols attacks NHS over compassion
I was quite intrigued by the comments offered today regarding the dehumanisation of attitude and care toward all of us about which a focus of attention has developed with respect to assisted suicide and general NHS care for an aging population.
I think that there is a common ground for all of us to agree upon which is not obvious to everyone at present because there is not a general awareness of the experience to which I've been subjected for the past 11.5 years from ages 55 to 67.
I want to back away from the present visible problem for the moment regarding assisted suicide and attitudes which relate to the practise of medicine in the NHS that have surfaced today.
I believe that the Archbishop is correct when he describes areas of the NHS which are more concerned with medical problems rather than the human beings who have these problems. Further, he made note of problems that arise out of perceived nuisances, etc from older people.
I am not a Catholic and would have profound disagreements with its dogma and creed, but that does not prevent me from agreeing in an area which I would call humanistic values.
My actual background leads more to that of Prof Grayling since I studied philosophy and French as an undergraduate at Columbia, and I would be more disposed to the secular part of society for an ethical development.
However, the religious character of the human being cannot be negated which would be a mistake as was so eloquently and masterfully described and analysed by Carl Jung in his 1938 Terry Lectures at Yale University which are published as "Psychology and Religion."
At some point we all will reach a common ground in the future in these matters, but in the meantime we have to deal with the present.
I have experienced the sharp edge of the this dehumanisation for the past 11.5 years carried out by the NHS, police, government and general public from the abuse of surveillance technology 24/7/365 under the operational control of abusive personalities.
This surveillance technology is based upon neuroscience and related to what is called Tempest that picks up the smallest electromagnetic radiation emission from any such device and is used for monitoring computer and other similar technology. Tempest has been in use for at least five decades.
The human brain is no different from a computer with its electricity generated from chemical interaction that produces an electromagnetic radiation emission halo around the head that can be monitored and decoded.
Thoughts (words and images) can be read as mine have been for the past nine years 24/7/365. Eyesight and hearing can similarly be seen and heard remotely by others as well.
Sound can be induced by electromagnetic radiation so that I hear what those operating the surveillance technology say including those with whom they speak.
This goes further so that muscle movement and feelings can be monitored and fed back as well including pain. Words and images can be induced too as part of a memory probing process that creates dreams while asleep.
And, medication can be surreptitiously administered which in my experience has been used to incapacitate and debilitate as part of a general effort to control and discredit whatever I communicate about this surveillance technology.
There is a massive effort to create illness both physically and mentally to achieve medical intervention and interference along the lines of Munchausen's By Proxy Syndrome which we've recently seen emerge once again from what Lisa Hadley-Johnson did to her son for six years from ages two to six claiming him to be "the sickest child in Britain."
Here the NHS performed miserably because they should have suspected that something was wrong which was not being communicated to them as the mental illness called Munchausen's By Proxy Syndrome.
In my situation I can tell the NHS as I've been doing for over a decade that what they are getting from those using the surveillance technology is faked without any success in stopping the ongoing abuse.
In the so-called interest of science they (NHS and numerous others) continue to carry out extensive medical experimentation and social control activities by remote access in the community through the abuse of this surveillance technology which is being developed by using a non-consenting human guinea pig. One medical student refused to participate on the grounds of ethics and departed a year or two ago.
This is the malevolent use of neuroscience to bring about social control, debility and eventual death by this means with surveillance technology in the hands of those with viciously violent personality disorders whom I reported for child abuse three months before they were given surveillance technology to use against me that continues as of this writing by the same people.
I want to increase your awareness of this misdirected medical science coming from the NHS that is based upon false allegations made by those whom I reported for abuse and others who join in for their own sadistic reasons.
I am not just talking about the freedom of choice about whether or not to end one's life facing a terminal illness but about the deliberate decision to destroy human activity and life itself by those who make false allegations so that others in authority, e.g., the NHS, can carry out with them the ending of life itself preceded by a long period of torture abuse from the R&D for this surveillance technology.
I want to change all of this to the benevolent use of this neuroscience by its full public exposure so that it can make a contribution to the overall problem of medical practise as it relates to human beings including those who are faced in the last years of their life with medical conditions that are terminal at some point. [This does not apply to me.]
Recently, there was publicity about being able to communicate with someone in a vegetative state using an MRI to watch brain activity while the comatose person thought about contrasting sports activities. However significant this might seem, it is nothing compared with the neuroscience used against me for the past nine years.
Consider the ability to completely read someone's thoughts including words and images. Also, consider the ability to communicate with that person either by electromagnetic radiation induced sound or even feed back directly to the brain words and images which has been done to me extensively including videos.
Imagine carrying out eye examinations of people by being able to look through their eyes. Eye movement for those with diplopia (double vision) can be measured quickly and precisely to determine the degree to which the images disassociate.
There is so much that can be done that it becomes quite mind boggling to contemplate the advantages of making this state-of-the-art neuroscience available generally to the medical profession instead of keeping it held in deep, dark secret for destructive purposes.
This creates a whole new dimension to approaching the problem of life and death in those with terminal illnesses and even more important with respect to treating those who are in advanced stages to understand what they are experiencing and what can be done to help because this provides a whole new world of communication.
So the positions today with respect to the arguments and disposition regarding humanism, right to and sanctity of life and how people are being treated can be changed radically to open a whole new approach to people by communicating with them through neuroscience.
I believe that we must back up for awhile to get this neuroscience out in the open and the world on a level playing field so that the discussions can then go forward on a more common ground with a better understanding of what people are experiencing and what they want.
Obviously, we all deplore the idea of the state taking over and determining life and death of an individual, but this is exactly what has been happening to me for the past 11.5 years. It must be exposed and addressed fully in a democratic society before anyone can move forward on a meaningful basis.
The great problem is that the expanded control from such surveillance technology will render mute any discussion like this that is taking place today because a few people can carry out this activity without restraint as my experience has proven for the past 11.5 years.
Anyone with a reasonable set of standards and decent disposition toward human rights would look at horror at what has been done to me for the past 11.5 years. Most likely they would not believe that it is true which is why this goes on and why no one stops it.
"Doesn't make any difference," said a surveillance male as I concluded this letter having monitored its writing completely and communicated their abuse to me verbally. That is their general attitude and why this goes on whether you believe it or not. Sooner or later you will.
The "Problem of Other Minds" has been solved. Now you can know what someone else is thinking and feeling.
Sincerely yours
Gary D Chance
